Judd v Obama final draft 11
Posted on | September 11, 2012 | 2 Comments
Category:
Comments
2 Responses to “Judd v Obama final draft 11”
Leave a Reply
-
EVIDENCE AGAINST OBAMA — YouTube Indiana Trial of Obama !
EVIDENCE AGAINST OBAMA — Indiana Trial of Obama, 2nd Copy
Evidence on Barack Obama
Obama File with Exhibits
Affidavit of Paul Irey
Obama file Exhibits 1 - 7
Obama file Exhibit 8 - Part 1
Obama file Exhibit 8 - Part 2
Obama file Exhibits 9-13
Obama file Exhibits 14-21
Request for Docs under FOIA and Emergency Motion for Reconsideration
Exhibits sent to Inspector Generals and CongressPetition the White House to institute Edward Snowden, National Whistleblower – Patriots against Government Corruption Day
URGENT! PLEASE SIGN PETITION TO CONGRESS
OrlyTaitzEsq.com
TAITZ REPORT
Subscribe today to stay in touch with our progress. Send this channel out to your email lists. Thank you for your support. CHANNEL (Google Plus) SUBSCRIBE TO YOUTUBE Official Facebook
Recent Posts
IMPORTANT NOTICES – PLEASE READ!
Historic DVD Now Available! DVD of the historic trial in GA and DVD of a historic testimony in NH, where evidence was provided showing Obama using a forged birth certificate and a stolen social security number. The DVDs are in a beautiful commemorative case with personal autographs from attorney Dr. Orly Taitz $22.50 each +$2.50 for shipping and handling. --------- To order these DVDs, donate $25.00 by credit card on the website RunOrlyRun.com and email orly.taitz@gmail.com with you name and address. Or send a $25.00 check with your name and address to: Orly Taitz for US Senate 2012, 29839 Santa Margarita ste 100, RSM, CA 92688.Advertisement / Sponsors
29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy,
Ste 100
Rancho Sta Margarita, CA 92688
orly.taitz @gmail. com
(949) 766-7687
--------------------------------------
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld
--------------------------------------
Bumper Sticker
$9.99 thru PayPal--------------------------------------
--------------------------------------Orly Taitz Photo Collections
Pages
- #409755 (no title)
- …Defendant Obama defaulted in Grinols et al v Obama et al
- …Grinols Subpoenas
- ..Grinols Order, Summons, TRO, Complaint
- .Affidavit of Mike Zullo
- 1. Judd v Obama
- 2. Farrar v Obama
- 3. Taitz v Sebelius
- 4. Taitz v Indiana, IN Judge Orders Trial
- 5. Taitz v Astrue
- 6. Mississippi Filed Complaint Update
- 7. Taitz Walters v Sec of State Kansas
- Videos
- Video: Orly before NH Election Committee
September 11th, 2012 @ 7:59 pm
There is no mention of Mr. Obama’s father not being a U.S. citizen. Being born of a citizen father is absolutely central to the concept of a “natural born Citizen.” In fact, for 110 years after the U.S. Constitution was ratified, the ONLY way U.S. citizenship was conferred, IF a father was identified, was from the father to his child. Only if there was no identified father of record did the mother confer her citizenship to her child. Only if the child was a foundling did birth upon U.S. soil confer citizenship. The father’s citizenship is the most basic means of gaining citizenship at birth, naturally, without naturalization.
The whole world knows that Barack Obama’s father was a Kenyan (a British Protected Citizen) and not a U.S. citizen. That by itself – never mind the computer-fabricated Certification and Certificate of Live Birth – makes Barack Obama II constitutionally ineligible for the Office of President, not being
a natural born citizen:
one born in the country
of parents who are citizens.
The U.S. Supreme Court stated this standard interpretation in Minor v. Happersett (1875) 88 US 167, and repeated it verbatim in Wong Kim Ark (1898) 169 US 655, 679-680, 708 ff., in both the opinion and the dissent. The Court mentioned nbC similarly in The Venus (1814), Shanks v. DuPont (1830), and Perkins v. Elg (1939). The U.S. Senate affirmed the above Supreme Court interpretation in 2008, by voting 99-0 for S.R. 511, that both of John McCain’s parents were U.S. citizens when he was born, as required by the “natural born citizen” clause of the U.S. Constitution, Art. ii, § 1, ¶ 5.
Citizenship conferred from the father to his child is at the very heart of being a natural born Citizen.
September 12th, 2012 @ 1:50 am
I noticed that when we argue two prent theory, they respond only to this and ignore forgery. It is easy for them to argue theory and ignore forgery and SSN fraud, I am going with the most damning evidence and not giving them a way out