OrlyTaitzEsq.com

TaitzReport.com

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation (DOFF)
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz


If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.





The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.
-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.  -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.  -- Mahatma Gandhi

Posted on | October 11, 2009 | 2 Comments

Taitz makes a move to nail the Standing Issue

Sunday, October 11, 2009 6:32 PM
From:
“William M Lolli”

View contact details

To:
wlolli@techassistinc.com
Message contains attachments
1 File (270KB)
Friends,

As I had indicated in some previous emails, it is taking some time for
me to condense my thoughts on the October 5th hearing.

Part of my concerns has been the manner in which Carter repeatedly
returned to his hypothetical arguments and requesting more specifics
regarding the issue of standing and specific harm, from Taitz and Kreep.

Attached is an outstanding filing by Taitz asserting more substance
behind the specific harm requirements. I hope this filing makes the
issues more clear to Judge Carter and adds more weight to the
Taitz/Kreep arguments against the government’s Motion to Dismiss.

Basically Taitz is citing law that public sector fraud is sufficient
grounds to fulfill the standing and harm requirements– even further,
that the specifics of individual damages are not required under statute.

Carter will no doubt allow the government to respond, and I wonder what
their response will be. Will the government actually argue that it is
okay to commit crimes so long as they are committed by those in high
office? Stranger things have happened.

Outstanding work on the part of Taitz.

See attached PDF.

Category: Uncategorized

Comments

2 Responses to “”

  1. DJ
    October 12th, 2009 @ 11:07 pm

    Re: “STANDING ISSUE”? Could this be why they say we have No “STANDING” ? There are “The Two United States and the Law” Please read.

    Dear Orly,

    Did you get this? Is it the stumbling block to standing? Is it because the judges and congress are saying Obama is under another set of rules(jurisdiction) and another system(The Federal USA not the Continental USA) that they claim isolates them from the citizens and therefore we have no cause of action against him? Please read about Continental vs Federal USA @ the following link.

    https://www.supremelaw.org/authors/freeman/freeman4.htm

    You represent the values America was built upon. Thank You!

    God Bless & Protect you and all those who stand with you!

    DJ

    From: Don
    Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2009 10:57 PM
    To: dr_taitz@yahoo.com

    Subject: FW: “STANDING ISSUE”? Could this be why they say we have No “STANDING” ? There are “The Two United States and the Law” Please read.

    Dr. Taitz, a friend sent this link to me and said this is why we will never have standing. I hope it is worthy of your time.

    https://www.supremelaw.org/authors/freeman/freeman4.htm

    DJ

    From: David
    Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2009 7:58 PM
    To: undisclosed recipients:
    Subject: “The Two United States and the Law”

    https://www.supremelaw.org/authors/freeman/freeman4.htm

  2. DJ
    October 12th, 2009 @ 11:09 pm

    FW: “STANDING ISSUE”? Could this be why they say we have No “STANDING” ? There are “The Two United States and the Law” Please read.

    Dear Orly,

    Did you get this? Is it the stumbling block to standing? Is it because the judges and congress are saying Obama is under another set of rules(jurisdiction) and another system(The Federal USA not the Continental USA) that they claim isolates them from the citizens and therefore we have no cause of action against him? Please read about Continental vs Federal USA @ the following link.

    https://www.supremelaw.org/authors/freeman/freeman4.htm

    You represent the values America was built upon. Thank You!

    God Bless & Protect you and all those who stand with you!

    DJ

    From: DJ
    Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2009 10:57 PM
    To: dr_taitz@yahoo.com

    Subject: FW: “STANDING ISSUE”? Could this be why they say we have No “STANDING” ? There are “The Two United States and the Law” Please read.

    Dr. Taitz, a friend sent this link to me and said this is why we will never have standing. I hope it is worthy of your time.

    https://www.supremelaw.org/authors/freeman/freeman4.htm

    DJ

    From: David
    Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2009 7:58 PM
    To: undisclosed recipients:
    Subject: “The Two United States and the Law”

    https://www.supremelaw.org/authors/freeman/freeman4.htm