OrlyTaitzESQ.com

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz


If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.





The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.

-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.
 -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.
 -- Mahatma Gandhi



William Windsor from Lawless America.com described the same problem with missing documents and the same employees: Clerk William Sutter, employees Jeffrey Atkins, Erik Fossum. Attorney Leo Denofrio had the same problems with with the clerk Danny Bickel. We no longer have a rule of law.

Posted on | December 8, 2012 | 3 Comments

MichaelN 153 approved

More on clerks and staff of the SCOTUS

http://secretjustice.com/Supreme%20Court%2010-7-2011.pdf

Obstruction of Justice at The Supreme Court

Thursday, 10 February 2011 00:00
William M. Windsor
  • E-mail
  • Print
  • PDF
people-man-3500000-070113s0297-cropped-300w

Â

The Clerk’s Office of The United States Supreme Court is committing obstruction of justice and violating Constitutional and legal rights.

I have written to the Clerk of the Court, William K. Suter, to request an appointment.

I have called asking to speak to him, but they refuse to put my calls through to him or his assistant or anyone else.

I am now collecting evidence of illegal practices of the Clerk’s Office and the United States Supreme Court….

Failure to file Valid Motions

I have repeatedly had motions held for as long as a month and never filed.  My petitions are not filed on a timely basis.  Court personnel claim the rules provide something other than what they clearly provide.

On February 10, 2011, I received a 6-inch thick box with motions sent to The United States Supreme Court by Federal Express on January 5, 2011.  The postmark is February 2, 2011.  So, The Supreme Court held my motions for 28 days before returning them.  During those 28 days, my petitions were denied.  So, when the motions were returned to me, they were invalid because you can’t file a motion in a closed case.  I believe this is absolutely intentional, because this has happened to me on everything that I have filed with The Supreme Court.  I will scan all of this proof and link it here for those who like to see the real stuff.

On February 10, 2011, I also received a letter from Jeffrey Atkins CLAIMING that my Petitions for Rehearing were not being filed because I failed to submit a  certificate stating that the petitions comply with the word limitation.  This is absolutely false as the required certificate was sent by Federal Express for delivery on the same date, and I have a Fed Ex Confirmation and a signature showing it was received.  Jeffrey Atkins’ letter to me also claims The Supreme Court received my documents on February 8, but that is false.  The Fed Ex delivery documents clearly show receipt was February 7.

My Efforts on February 10, 2011

On Monday, February 7, 2011, The Supreme Court received three petitions and several motions from me.  Additional motions were received on February 8 and February 10.  I send everything by Federal Express and require a signature for delivery, so I have proof of everything.  I have checked The Supreme Court Docket each day to see if my documents have been filed.  NOTHING has been filed.  This is consistent with my experience with the Court Clerk’s office.  My motions and petitions are held for long periods of time without filing.  Each time, I have had to call and voice extreme displeasure before anything is done.  I hear all kinds of bogus excuses.  I am printing the Supreme Court Dockets for my cases each day to prove this.  These are linked at the bottom of this story for your reference.

Let me illustrate the impact of this for you.  My Petition for Rehearing in Docket #10-411 is scheduled to be considered and voted on by SCOTUS on February 18, 2011.  If the Application that I presented for filing in this case is not filed and presented to Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg ASAP, she will not be able to consider it before the justices vote on my Petition.  The Application then becomes moot, and I lose the opportunity for Justice Ginsburg to take action.

I have called the Clerk’s Office every day this week.  My calls have not been returned by anyone — specifically, Jeffrey Atkins, Erik Fossum, and William Suter.

I called February 10 at 12:10 pm.  Ryan Nelson answered the phone.  He told me he cannot put my call through to the Clerk of the Court, Mr. William K. Suter, or his assistant or anyone acting on his behalf.  I gave him my number and told him I expect him to get a message to Mr. Suter to call me.

Ryan Nelson told me that he could connect me with a case analyst who could answer some of my questions.  I advised him that Erik Fossum and Jeffrey Atkins are extremely rude, have failed to return my calls, and claim the rules provide for something other than what they clearly provide.  He said he would connect me with another analyst who would help me.

I spoke briefly with case analyst Ruth Jones at 12:15 pm.  She asked my name.  She then said she couldn’t help me “because you are outside my alphabet.”  I explained to her that I cannot deal with Erik Fossum, who seems to have W in his alphabet.  She hung up on me.

I called back and James answered the phone.  I asked to speak to Ryan Nelson.  He didn’t seem to know who that was, so I suspect “Ryan Nelson” was a fake name.  He transferred the call, and then it sounded like the phone was picked up and immediately put on hold.  I called back several times, and this happened every time.

My calls will continue, and I will document every call.

Missing Court Records

This is serious business!

The actions of the Clerk’s Office clearly constitutes obstruction of justice, a criminal violation.  From speaking with others, I understand that this is not an isolated situation.

The United Nations conference on judicial corruption worldwide says one of the cardinal signs of judicial corruption is  missing court records.  See Strengthening Judicial Integrity Against Corruption – UN International Crime Prevention Center

Statutes provide the essential elements for a valid court order, and I believe The Supreme Court has issued thousands, perhaps tens of thousands, of invalid orders.  I know that, based upon the statutes, the so-called orders that have been issued in my cases at The Supreme Court include many invalid orders.  The so-called orders are nothing but two or three sentence letters, and they are not signed by anyone in authority.

I will be making a visit to Washington, DC to The Supreme Court .  I will be asking permission to inspect and to copy the records of my court actions that SCOTUS considers the valid records of the denial of my applications, motions, and petitions.  This is a right guaranteed by Article I of the Bill of Rights.

We Must Do Something

Every aspect of our federal judicial system is corrupt.  We must all figure out how we can regain control of our government.

Comments

3 Responses to “William Windsor from Lawless America.com described the same problem with missing documents and the same employees: Clerk William Sutter, employees Jeffrey Atkins, Erik Fossum. Attorney Leo Denofrio had the same problems with with the clerk Danny Bickel. We no longer have a rule of law.”

  1. Elizabeth
    December 8th, 2012 @ 5:59 pm

    I cut and pasted this situation
    and emailed it to the senator in
    my state.

    I also emailed him a second
    epistle, with a lengthy
    tirade on why voters need to
    show ID’s, and sent him an
    example of one county’s
    legal requirement for ID’s.

    This senator was also informed in
    succinct detail, about Obama’s sketchy background, actions since in office,
    and his agenda for America.

    He does acknowledge correspondence,
    since he did reply to my earlier one
    about voter ID.

  2. Hunk
    December 9th, 2012 @ 6:26 am

    I’m not sure who once opined that…”It is no longer the justice system, it is the Just us system.” I think that sums things up.

  3. Yoel
    December 9th, 2012 @ 6:50 pm

    All three branches of “our” government are now controlled by despots who, believing themselves untouchable, have become emboldened beyond redemption, thus there remains but one viable method of redress available to “We the People.” A large dose of the bitter, yet historically proven effective, medicine known as “direct action” is our nation’s only hope for survival and renewal…To foolishly believe this nation’s woes shall be healed by the same despots who intentionally created those woes is to believe in unicorns and fairy dust…The propaganda claims of America having a balanced “two party system” are a cruel hoax. Both parties in Washington work hand in hand against the best interests of “We the People.” Politicians protect each other while they illegally enrich themselves at our expense. Those who make bold campaign promises to “reform government” do nothing of the sort, it’s just sales talk. Too many Americans are dumb suckers!…..ENOUGH!

Leave a Reply