OrlyTaitzEsq.com

TaitzReport.com

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation (DOFF)
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz


If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.





The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.
-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.  -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.  -- Mahatma Gandhi

why did Tepper ask for verification instead of certified copy? Is it because there is nothing there to copy?

Posted on | November 7, 2012 | 6 Comments

charade 2 approved

After reading Teppers letter to Fuddy it is a strange request to seek a VERIFICATION instead of a CERTIFIED COPY to be provided by Fuddy to Tepper. If a STRONG legal position is to be maintained, why would anyone request a VERIFICATION instead of a CERTIFIED COPY which the requestor [Tepper] said that he was entitled to under Hawaii law, according to [Tepper’s] quote of the Hawaii law.

Maybe someone has the answer to the question of seeking a VERIFICATION vice a CERTIFIED COPY, where a CERTIFIED COPY would be the stronger evidentiary procedure to adhere to.
Category: Uncategorized

Comments

6 Responses to “why did Tepper ask for verification instead of certified copy? Is it because there is nothing there to copy?”

  1. Howie Koplitz
    November 7th, 2012 @ 7:29 pm

    Orly

    I think you are on to something very big. I think you should bring this up at the hearing and in a motion. Why in the world would Tepper ask for a verification instead of a certified copy of the BC? I find that really strange. This might be the key that unlocks the secret door.

  2. Eponymous
    November 7th, 2012 @ 7:32 pm

    Tepper has no legal right under HI privacy laws to be granted a certified copy of the BC. It’s the same issue that Dr. Taitz had when she went to HI to try to get one.

  3. The Right Thing
    November 8th, 2012 @ 11:03 pm

    Because they both know that there AIN’T no valid document so they are both playing games like a couple of DUMB FOOLS.

    Verified or Certified it’s still a cheap poorly done piece of garbage that they are playing with.

  4. turnright
    November 8th, 2012 @ 11:36 pm

    Well Epo…

    What does this mean? :

    “… CERTIFIED COPY which the requestor [Tepper] said that he was entitled to under Hawaii law, according to [Tepper’s] quote of the Hawaii law.”

  5. Tate S. Buthertz
    November 9th, 2012 @ 7:26 pm

    TUPPER IS GOING TO BRING OUT A LOT OF STUFF TO TRY TO SRUPRISE YOU AT TEH TRIAL ON THE 16. THATS HOW HEW ORKS – THERES ALWAYS SOMETHING HE HAS TO BRING UP TO THE COURT AND YOIU KNOW HE MUST BE WORKING FOR OBAMA AND THAT .

  6. Dr. Conspiracy
    November 10th, 2012 @ 9:09 pm

    Tate, I don’t think you will see any surprises on the 16th.

    The motions to dismiss that will be the subject of that hearing have already been fully briefed.

Leave a Reply