Whose side is our military on?
Posted on | November 29, 2009 | 3 Comments
Yephora |
Submitted on 2009/11/29 at 7:41pm
A few years ago when our fighting men had Muktada al Sadr cornered in a Moslem graveyard in Fallujah ready to blow his brains out _the military brass_ negotiated with the terrorists and issued the order to let him go. Allowing him to live resulted in hundreds of our soldiers dying by Sadr’s IED’s in the subsequent years. Violent jihadist Hasan, the Ft. Hood terrorist, killed 13 American soldiers because _the military brass_ ignored all the warning signals about that traitor. Had they done their due diligence Hasan would have been long gone and American soldiers would still be alive. Now we learn our soldiers could have captured or killed Osama bin Laden, but _the military brass_ gave the order to … you guessed it, let him go. Can someone tell me: WHOSE SIDE IS OUR MILITARY BRASS ON??????!!! |
From reader Kelli Cook 0 # |
Comments
3 Responses to “Whose side is our military on?”
November 30th, 2009 @ 1:49 am
Tennessee Grand Jury -December 1, 2009 8 a.m.
November 30th, 2009 @ 11:10 am
What are the facts behind the Bin Laden comment?
December 1st, 2009 @ 11:26 pm
I can sum the situation in parallel comment: A live Castro has been worth more to the Military-Industrial Complex than a dead one.
If ever… and a derisive and doubtful when… Osama is bagged before his full usefulness to us is come, it will be a tactical error for the Complex. At that point the wars being waged in the Middle East by us will have to be rolled up. ‘Time to come home, boys’, will be the cry from here, ‘no more reason to fight’.
This fits in with our treatment of the information on Osama’s probably being dead from a failed liver. Report is that he had serious need of liver dialysis… very jaundiced… something almost impossible to receive treatment for on the run. He’s a goner. Our treatment of the info? We ignored it… the information never happened. That way the wars keep going.
“Nem ne geldt… Get the gold”.