11 Responses to “Web commentary by award winning journalist Sher Zieve”

1. Bloodless Coup
   January 29th, 2012 @ 12:14 pm

   I would like to have some more specific information on which judges have been threatened by Obama’s thugocracy.

   To be fair, Shere Zieve actually writes that they “appear” to have been threatened, (or bribed) and I agree.

   There has be some plausible explanation for these judges twisted legal reasoning and the outlandish claim that American Citizens lack the legal standing needed to challenge a sitting President’s eligibility.

   I think this claim is absurd, appalling, and simply defies commonsense!

2. ERIC MILLER
   January 29th, 2012 @ 12:22 pm

   First, Thank you for the update on this historic event.
   Orly Taitz is the best example that I have seen of what it means to be steadfast and unmovable. I yield to her all of my thanks and admiration.
   What comes next will no doubt amaze you and the whole world.
   A military coup will remove the usurper Obama , and he will slip out of history without a fight or harm.
   As this drama unfolds, an even greater drama will be revealed.
   After Obama is removed by force, he will be replaced with a pro-tem President. His name is Ronald Wilson Reagan. Although his death was proclaimed and viewed, it was all staged and faked. Reagan has been cured of Alzh and never was dead. The world will be in wonder and amazement over this revelation. Even if you do not post this, I wanted you to know were we are headed. This is not a prank, or to be taken lightly. Reagan will regain the full powers of office and become the next President. All of the “New World Order” people will be put on hold, not allowed to proceed.
   I could explain much more, but for now I will only say this.
   Thank you,
   Eric Miller

3. West Coast Carl
   January 29th, 2012 @ 2:53 pm

   Israeli media recognizes the significance of January 26th even if the American MSM does not.

   https://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/152218#.TyXCylJUHjg

   Orly, if Judge Malihi rules in your (and America’s) favor, will you be able to move to void the punitive $20,000 fine that was levied against you claiming your cases are ‘frivolous’?

4. orly taitz
   January 29th, 2012 @ 4:05 pm

   it will take some time, it is not that simple

5. pi314
   January 29th, 2012 @ 4:54 pm

   What “award” has she won??

6. Veritas
   January 29th, 2012 @ 5:50 pm

   Gulagbound website, running thepostemail articles while site is upgraded, reports:
   ———-

   The White House has been posting Obama’s activities day by day this week, and the schedule now reflects that

   his schedule was open on Thursday morning.

   However, The Post & Email has been told by a source that

   Obama watched the entire hearing remotely.

   Is that why his morning schedule was open?

7. Starla
   January 29th, 2012 @ 9:10 pm

   “ORLY TAITZ BRIEFS THE POST & EMAIL ON BALLOT CHALLENGE HEARING”

   Sharon Rondeau
   The Post & Email
   January 27, 2012, 9:00 am

   Excerpt:

   “[…] Neither Obama nor his attorney, Michael Jablonski of Atlanta, attended the hearing. In a last-minute attempt to have the hearing canceled, Jablonski had written a letter to Georgia Secretary of State Brian Kemp claiming that Malihi had mishandled the complaints and that Obama’s eligibility was a settled matter.

   […]

   “Taitz had been given two hours for testimony and closing argument. Her case was based not only on the question of Obama’s “natural born” status, but also on the premise that he has committed identity fraud and forgery. Six witnesses traveled to Atlanta, some from the West Coast, to testify.

   Taitz contends that Obama is using a social security number which was not issued to him, which Private Investigator Susan Daniels alleged in her testimony. Daniels stated that the number, beginning in “042,” was issued from the state of Connecticut, where Obama neither worked nor resided. Witness John Sampson stated that Obama’s status as a U.S. citizen or possible illegal alien should be checked because of that and other inconsistencies.

   Taitz asked questions of witnesses John Sampson and Chito Papa regarding the alleged forgery of Obama’s long-form birth certificate released on April 27, 2011. She became a witness herself before presenting her closing argument.”

   See The Entire Article Here:

   https://gulagbound.com/25514/orly-taitz-briefs-the-post-email-on-ballot-challenge-hearing-pe/

   * * * *

   “OBAMA AND HIS SYNDICATE: SOME GOOD (OBAMA ELIGIBILITY HEARING) AND SOME CHILLINGLY BAD NEWS”

   By Sher Zieve
   January 27, 2012, 9:39 am

   Read The Entire Article Here:

   https://gulagbound.com/25516/obama-and-his-syndicate-some-good-obama-eligibility-hearing-and-some-chillingly-bad-news/

   Be certain to read this article with all of the comments!

   * * * *

8. Veritas
   January 30th, 2012 @ 3:57 am

   Given that Obama watched the ENTIRE proceedings, he was not telling the truth when he many times joked burlesquely that the whole matter was poppycock and nothing more than a farce. That is how people react when they are shaken to their core. Orly, you are under his skin and he will capitulate to truth and justice…not for the sake of the Nation but for his own well-being.

9. Abgespacktes Feld
   January 30th, 2012 @ 4:30 am

   > However, The Post & Email has been told by a source that
   Obama watched the entire hearing remotely.
   Is that why his morning schedule was open?

   Well, if he actually wanted to spend the time watching the hearing, don’t you think he’d block his schedule?

10. Starla
    January 30th, 2012 @ 6:14 am

    “IS THE JUDICIAL BRANCH DEAD?”

    January 27, 2012

    “One of my earliest childhood memories is of my parents talking about Nixon and the Watergate scandal. I remember the newspaper headline: “Nixon Resigns!” President Nixon’s fight against court subpoenas made international news. Yesterday President Obama completely ignored a court subpoena, and the world shrugged.

    Obama’s behavior yesterday is even more disturbing than Nixon’s. Nixon at least respected the judicial branch enough to have his attorney’s show up in court and follow procedure. Nixon’s fight in the courts followed existing law. Nixon acknowledged the authority of the judicial branch even while he fought it. Obama, on the other hand, essentially said yesterday that the judicial branch has no power over him. He ordered his attorneys to stay away from the hearing. He didn’t petition a higher court in a legitimate attempt to stay the hearing. Instead he showed complete contempt for the entire judicial branch and for the rule of law. Rather than respecting the legal process, Obama went around the courts and tried to put political pressure directly on the Georgia Secretary of State. When that failed, he simply ignored the judicial branch completely.

    The rule of law, and our three-branch system of government, now hang in the balance. If the Georgia court issues a ruling on the merits and an order finding Obama in contempt of court, and if that contempt order actually results in real punishment of some kind, then we will still have a Constitutional Republic. If this doesn’t happen, then Obama will have been rewarded for showing complete contempt for the judicial branch.

    Understand that the goal of the Georgia ballot challenge was to have a court rule on the merits of the Constitutional question: Does the term “natural born citizen” in Article II of the Constitution require a Presidential candidate to have two parents that were U.S. citizens at the time the candidate was born? Obama wants to avoid having a court rule on this question. That is why he didn’t show up and ordered his attorneys to not show up. Obama was hoping that the Georgia court would enter a default judgment rather than rule on the merits. If the court enters a default judgment, Obama will have succeeded in avoiding the Constitutional eligibility question. He will then appeal the default judgment, get the appellate court to suspend the default judgment pending appeal, and then delay the appeal until after the primary. This is undoubtedly Obama’s plan.

    If the Georgia Court rules that Supreme Court precedent must be followed and therefore Obama simply does not meet the minimum Constitutional requirements to hold the office of President, then we will at least have succeeded in finding one court in the nation willing to do its job. If that court finds Obama in contempt of court, then we still have three viable branches of government. The Georgia court has the authority to do both of these things. The world should be holding its breath.

    Unfortunately the world is apparently unaware that our great Republic is on life support. The Roman Empire died a slow death. It’s death was so gradual that few people living at that time probably noticed the individual events that marked the death throes of that great empire. Apparently the same is true of America. Yesterday marked a stunning turn of events in the constant power struggle between the three branches of our government. Our President openly showed that he believes he is completely above the law. I wonder if the court even noticed its own death certificate. We will see in a few days.

    I will certainly try to explain this to the court in our proposed findings of fact and law that the court requested we file before February 5th. Please pray with me that Judge Malihi rules on the merits of our case.

    All of your encouragement and prayers have been greatly appreciated. They are needed even more over the next few weeks. This battle is FAR from over. And it has taken on importance beyond what we predicted (which is truly astounding). Please tell everyone you know about Obama’s contempt of the judicial branch. Please explain to them what it really means. Even those that agree with Obama politically and disagree with our ballot challenge should be shocked, appalled, and scared of Obama’s contempt for the judicial system.”

    Read More Here:

    https://libertylegalfoundation.org/1665/is-the-judicial-branch-dead/

    * * * *

    “OBAMA DENIED AGAIN!”

    https://libertylegalfoundation.org/1640/obama-denied-again/

    * * * *

11. Ron (Dallas)
    January 30th, 2012 @ 7:11 pm

    The “Rule of Law” went out the window when the country let Bill Clinton lie under oath, regardless of what it was about!

Leave a Reply