Defend Our Freedoms Foundation (DOFF)
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz

If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.

The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.

-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.
 -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.
 -- Mahatma Gandhi

We are proceeding with the demand for the hearing in the Judiciary committee: 5 justices never received the applications, none received the supplemental brief, no signatures anywhere

Posted on | February 19, 2013 | 82 Comments

Press release

Law offices of Orly Taitz

Attorney Orly Taitz continues with the demand for the Judiciary Committee to investigate the fact that 5 out 9 Justices of the Supreme Court never saw the casesupposedly heard in conference by the Supreme Court and all 9 never saw the supplemental brief filed with SCOTUS, as 5 original sets of briefs were sent  back and all supplemental briefs were sent back and never docketed.

An order by the Supreme Court shows a notation after case 12A712 applications denied, which appear to relate to case 12A606, however evidence shows that the case was not heard at all as 5 out of 9 Justices never even got a packet with pleadings. 

There are 7 other cases that are proceeding in other courts.

While a part of those cases might be considered moot, such as stays of certifications, the bulk of the cases is  not moot, such as Declaratory Relief and RICO (racketeering) cases.

Overwhelming and never refuted evidence shows Barack Obama using a Connecticut Social Security number 042-68-4425, which was never assigned to him according to E-Verify and SSNVS. Sworn affidavit of Chief investigator of special Investigations unit of the U.S. Coast Guard shows Obama using a forged Selective Service Certificate and multiple experts showed the alleged copy of Obama’s birth certificate to be a forgery. In a case in MS, which included the RICO charges, Obama’s personal attorneys submitted a new copy of the birth certificate, which according to experts represents a forgery of a forgery, which was made to minimize the white halo   effect around the letters. This white halo effect created by computer manipulation made the initial forgery released on April 27, 2011 a complete joke.

For four and a half years now in spite of multiple legal actions, not one single judge or jury ever saw an original 1961 birth certificate for Obama, original selective service certificate or original SS-5 application for the Social Security number 042-68-4425, which Obama claims to be assigned to him.

Due to lack of any original documents and a mountain of evidence showing the alleged copies to be crude forgeries,  it is safe to assume “original documents” never existed.

Please, keep in mind: if  a criminal and his accomplices in high places could steal the U.S. Presidency, the White House, they can steal your house, they can steal anything.

Current policies and proposals by Obama devalued the U.S. dollar by incurring 6.5 trillion  debt in 4 years, this devalues the savings of every American. Recent proposed for a sweeping amnesty for at least 11 million illegals (real number range from 30-42 million illegals residing in the U.S.) will further destroy the U.S. job market and further bankrupt the U.S. economy. Recent proposals limiting the second amendment rights will take away the citizens rights to fight the dictatorial regime.

We have a citizen of Indonesia Barry Soebarkah, aka Barry Soetoro, claiming to be Barack Obama, who is usurping the U.S. Presidency with forged and stolen IDs. Obama defaulted in the Eastern District of California. Commissioner of Social Security defaulted in two cases: in MS and DC. both obama and Commissioner of Social Security  have nothing to negate the evidence against them.

Please, remember Nixon was forced to resign 6 month after he was reelected. It is up to you, up to each and every American to fight this criminal enterprise ruling the country and regain some decensy and some constitutional and civil rights. If you do not fight for your rights, the ruling criminal enterprise will take away more and more of your rights.

Liberty does not come cheap, you have to fight for your rights. Every American has to join the protests in front of the Federal buildings, offices of congressmen and senators and demand immediate hearing in the US Congress of Obama’s use of forged and stolen IDs. Now there are over 33,000    signatures on the petition by attorney Taitz for the U.S. Congress to investigate Obama’s fored IDs. To sign the petition, please, go to the website OrlyTaitzESQ.com. In the right upper corner of the first page of the web site  there is a picture of statue of Liberty with a red button “take action”. Please, click that button, it will lead you to the petition.

Every American citizen is urged to call each and every member of the U.S. House of Represntatives Committee for the Judiciary and demand investigation of Obama’s use of forged IDs and a stolen SSN.

Every American is urged to protest in front of the outlets of the controlled and censored puppet U.S. main stream media, which is indistinguishable in its emptiness from the official media of the Stalinist Soviet Union, Maoist China, Jihadist Iran or NAZI Germany in 1930s. If we do not protest this power grab by this foreign national with forged IDs Soebarkah-Soetoro-Obama, United States of America will resemble Germany in 1940s.

An official complaint of deprivation of the civil and constitutional rights in the United States, including the right to participate in lawful eletions is being filed with the Inter American Commission for Human Rights.

Together we will prevail and together we will defeat the criminal enterpise running this nation.

Law offices of Orly Taitz

29829 Santa Margarita ste 100

Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688

orly.taitzesq.com orly.taitz@gmail.com

for emergencies only call 949-683-5411


82 Responses to “We are proceeding with the demand for the hearing in the Judiciary committee: 5 justices never received the applications, none received the supplemental brief, no signatures anywhere”

  1. jesse
    February 19th, 2013 @ 9:46 am

    your name deserves to be recorded in the greatest light as one voice that stood up against the high crimes and treason being committed against our great republic. may your efforts be successful before it is too late for freedom and justice to once again be the law of the land. we are in perilous times and most of the government and media have failed to defend this great land. for the love of all that’s good and for those who paid with their lives to be free, please don’t give up.

  2. Karen Rice
    February 19th, 2013 @ 9:50 am
  3. Karen Rice
    February 19th, 2013 @ 9:54 am

    What chance/obtions does a citizen have when there is corruption in the courts… Do not the judges know that the failure to have received information is the fault of their staffs (who should be fired, by the way)–in the meantime, justice for Americans is being denied for those obstructing justice. This is so egregious and unconscionable, I can hardly believe it. Surely our SCOTUS judges have more scruples and more responsibility to the Constitution than it does to its corrupt clerks and others who subvert justice. Will someone answer me this question. Something DRASTICALLy IS WRONG WITH THIS PICTURE! Where are OUR rights?

  4. Tom Jefferson
    February 19th, 2013 @ 9:58 am

    Obviously Sotomayor and Kagan should have recussed themselves. Obama is apparently not the only unethical degenerate in town.

  5. Who Rules
    February 19th, 2013 @ 10:04 am

    Can the Congress overrule SCOTUS? Somewhere along the argument thread it was stated that Congress provided the jurisdiction to SCOTUS and that allows Congress to overrule SCOTUS.

  6. womanpower
    February 19th, 2013 @ 10:05 am

    Orly seems the Supreme’s will no longer protect our Consitution and we need to rise against this tryanny ….sickening to see no one will stand up for our founding fathers Ideologies but communism will die anyway in the USA!! It will not last and never does!!! keep fighting like we all are. I call my congress daily and religiously!!
    love you!!

  7. Treasonous Basterds
    February 19th, 2013 @ 10:08 am

    Which 4 Justices heard and denied your case? Are they the liberal ones? Can you contact the Supreme Court and demand that all 9 Justices sign a declaration that they reviewed the case? If they don’t agree to do so, then it can be safely assumed that they are all guilty of treason and high crimes and misdemeanors.

    Dr. Taitz, be safe. Aren’t you afraid that you might be thrown into a gulag any day now? How do you deal with all the attempts on your life and still manage not to fear for your safety?

  8. Mike Smith
    February 19th, 2013 @ 10:10 am

    I really don’t understand something.. his social number 042-68-4425 different web sites say it belongs to Jean Paul Ludwig and this web site says Harry J. Bounel’s why isn’t this matching..

  9. Carl
    February 19th, 2013 @ 10:11 am

    Orly, I have sent you some more money. Not huge amount, but I send $50 any time I can, hope it helps. Please know “We the People” will never give up. You are in my prayers continually. Your faithfulness is admirable your family must be very proud of you as we all are. I recommend you to everyone I know who cares for our beloved America. This issue will not die.

  10. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    February 19th, 2013 @ 10:11 am

    no, Ludwig is a mistake

  11. FreemanPaul
    February 19th, 2013 @ 10:12 am

    This is supposed to be a CONSERVATIVE COURT!!

    Why are they ruling against us??

    The Conservatives are led by their brains, Anton Scalia. They do what he tells them, especially Thomas.

    What is the matter with Scalia??? What is the matter with these so-called conservatives?

    We expect that the Obot-Justices will vote against us. But the majority? They are very right wing. Where is their duty? Their courage?

    There is something wrong with these so-called conservative justices. There is a screw loose somewhere. Rush better attack them, and soon

  12. Ray
    February 19th, 2013 @ 10:15 am

    Dr.Taitz, I don’t understand. 12A712 is a different case all together.

    Docket for 12A712
    Title: Marek A. Kwasnik, Applicant v. Federal National Mortgage Association

  13. Harvey Apple
    February 19th, 2013 @ 10:18 am

    I believe Judge Roberts is blackmailed/controlled/tainted by Obama.
    You may know about Roberts adopted children.
    If not, look at Roberts/Adoption/Obama.
    This is why he flipped on Obamacare.
    This is why he has no credibility as a Justice.

  14. ch
    February 19th, 2013 @ 10:18 am

    These clerks are “public servants” and you might show their names, positions, etc, and who is responsible for what, and what their chain of command is at the courts. Also the exact steps that a case is supposed to go through when it arrives. There would be files on each case that build showing each step it goes through, to final acceptance or rejection by the justices. This is public information. You should be able to request all information and notes pertaining to your cases, and other cases. These clerks have to be made public, and the phone numbers of their supervisors and their human resources office, so people can place official complaints. They are “obstructing justice” and have now become participatants in forgeries and manipulation of evidence in a court system.

  15. Jason Hodge
    February 19th, 2013 @ 10:18 am

    Remind everyone that the Federal Judiciary is NOT INDEPENDENT. The Constitution sets CONGRESS to define the jurisdiction of the Federal Courts. (Which is why Congress can tell the courts what it can and cannot rule upon, as it has done with past legislation such as NAFTA & GATT.)

  16. ch
    February 19th, 2013 @ 10:20 am


    Here is another the GAO, another government agency who has independent oversight, and may be able to launch an investigation into criminal actions of clerks in the Supreme Court.

  17. Love God
    February 19th, 2013 @ 10:24 am

    How is it possible that over a million people saw the supplementary brief, on this website and the 9 judges of the Supreme Court of the US, never got to see it. The clerks returned the packages, I am told! But, the dates on the packages tell a different story!
    Then, what actually happened at the meeting of the 9 judges, on the day of the supposed hearing,i.e., 16 Feb?
    Oh! Just send them the links to the website, maybe they can all look it up here!
    This certainly is a lot of monkeying around.
    Knowing very well that the clerks there are more powerful and mischievous, why did you not contact the judges’ office to find whether the posts were delivered?
    This is getting weirder and weirder! Also, the “Screenshot of the docket at 10:27 am, no decision posted”, is actually the normal page one can see, when one types in the docket number. There is no fresh information on the screenshot.
    Is this a way to hoodwink people into thinking that you are making a ‘lot of effort’ to get to the bottom of this case?
    I think the attempt at this website is to keep people, who really ask questions, occupied in all the ‘trying to catch ones tail’. Or are you actually collecting information about dissidents?
    Now I understand why all the others like Arpaio, Zullo, Joseph Farah, Donald Trump, etc. never want to join you!
    I know that this comment will never be put up here, for all people to read. But I wanted to give my opinion, about the heights of unprofessional attitude.

  18. Hyacinth Bucket
    February 19th, 2013 @ 10:29 am

    Dear Orly, words cannot express the admiration and awe I have for your courage and perseverance. Like you, I grew up under a totalitarian regime and watch in horror how America, the former leader of the the Free World, is fast becoming an Orwellian dictatorship. The degree of complicity by the Congress, the courts, and the media is staggering. Is this truly the Land of the Free and the Brave if the only person with real insight and courage to openly challenge Obama’s criminal regime is an immigrant from the USSR and a mother of three? I realize there are other individuals challenging Obama’s legal standing and questioning his true intentions, but you stand out among them as an embodiment of remarkable strength and courage. And lots of charisma! The good inevitably prevails over the evil. All the best to you and thank you.

  19. James Smith
    February 19th, 2013 @ 10:30 am

    Karen Rice says; Something DRASTICALLy IS WRONG WITH THIS PICTURE! Where are OUR rights. And I say; our rights are enforced from the barrel of a gun and that’s why theirs a second amendment.

  20. FreemanPaul
    February 19th, 2013 @ 10:32 am

    CH makes a good point but here is a better one. The Justices hire all their own clerks. That privalege comes with the jobs.

    The Justices cannot hide behind the skirts of the clerks they themselves hired and whose salaraies they pay out of Court funds.

    Thomas hires his own clerks. So does Scalia. Etc etc. That’s just how it works.

    If the clerks are doing bad things, their bosses must fire them. Otherwise, their bosses are responsible for EVERYTHING they do.

    Thats just how it works.

    No hiding!

  21. Virginia W.
    February 19th, 2013 @ 10:33 am


  22. Update Orly Taitz Noonan Case: 1:25pm EST No Decision As Of Yet ~ 5 Of 9 Justices With No Signature For With-Held Pleadings Continues! « Political Vel Craft
    February 19th, 2013 @ 10:33 am

    […] | February 19, 2013 | […]

  23. Dee Fister
    February 19th, 2013 @ 10:37 am

    Dr. Taitz,

    I am losing faith in the legal system. Aren’t there any lawyers out there who are willing to help you figure out how to win a case?

  24. Glen
    February 19th, 2013 @ 10:51 am

    Have you given any thought to having a chain of possession of documents? Anyone who is involved in the acceptance and delivery of documents, to sign and date, time received and time, date, passed to next person in the line of delivery. It would cause ones involved to be serious about doing their job as required as
    public servants. Then give you a copy of all data. Just an idea that works. Please think about it.


  25. Supreme Court justices deny and trash the very US Constitution which gives them their lifetime appointment livelihoods « moralmatters.org
    February 19th, 2013 @ 10:55 am

    […] We are proceeding with the demand for the hearing in the Judiciary committee: 5 justices never recei… […]

  26. Amazing
    February 19th, 2013 @ 10:55 am

    Capitalism with morality is just about gone now. Capitalism cannot function with an immoral people…that’s what experts said way back in the 1500’s

  27. Cheryl
    February 19th, 2013 @ 10:58 am

    I called the office for the Judiciary Committee this morning and let them have my opinion on this. They need to act.

  28. poetopoet
    February 19th, 2013 @ 10:59 am

    “It’ not over until the Fat-Lady sings” and Orly Taitz, is no Fat-Lady, but to justices are.

  29. T. W.
    February 19th, 2013 @ 11:00 am

    It seems as thought the “court clerks” are not getting the filings or pleadings packets to the individual judges. How can this take place and is there a way to bypass the clerks and contact the judges directly? Are they supposed to sign off on a denial or acceptance of a case and how can we see if they have or haven’t. I don’t believe that our conservative judges are corrupt I believe they are not getting the chance to see the requests and have all nine conference upon the topics. Major problem, and if this is the case the clerks are definitely in the wrong and need to be exposed. Keep up the fight !!

  30. Paul Marko
    February 19th, 2013 @ 11:00 am

    What exactly does “proceeding to demand a hearing” imply. Do you have to refile on the same procedural basis, or file an entirely separate complaint as a follow-up? What do you estimate the amount of time to resolve this new road-block?

  31. steve
    February 19th, 2013 @ 11:15 am

    God bless you, Orly. This is truly a David vs. Goliath battle for the truth. Not a lot of hope here….Our government has been taken over by hostile forces with a dedication to the destruction of America, and we are powerless to do anything about it??? It seems that the only one in the country with the balls to stand against this travesty is a woman…namely, you, Orly. I will be proud to stand with you against these assholes…

  32. Jim Duggan
    February 19th, 2013 @ 11:22 am

    Jason, SCOTUS can always hear constitutional challenges. If Congress could prevent it, don’t you think they’d have done that with Obamacare?

  33. Idaho Fortress
    February 19th, 2013 @ 11:23 am

    Does this mean the court didn’t order Obummer to leave the White house?

  34. Thomas The Paine
    February 19th, 2013 @ 11:24 am

    It’s been all over for years: John Roberts had over one billion in his Vatican Bank account.

    Google “John Roberts Vatican Bank”

  35. Iamacitizen2
    February 19th, 2013 @ 11:29 am

    when is your hearing date on your appeal in CA over Judge Englund’s mess up? I am trying to remember who the new judge is and can’t find the info on this site anywhere???

  36. Iamacitizen2
    February 19th, 2013 @ 11:35 am

    Ray the number you have is wrong
    the correct number is: 12A606

  37. Rebelmom
    February 19th, 2013 @ 11:48 am

    Obama swoon Justice Roberts will ignore the suit due to the fact he had two illegally adopted children and black mailing him for his tilt! Check it out and fight hard, Roberts will be the most hated justice of all time!

  38. Rebelmom
    February 19th, 2013 @ 11:48 am

    Obama swoon Justice Roberts will ignore the suit due to the fact he had two illegally adopted children and black mailing him for his tilt! Check it out and fight hard, Roberts will be the most hated justice of all time!

  39. Rebelmom
    February 19th, 2013 @ 11:48 am

    Obama swoon Justice Roberts will ignore the suit due to the fact he had two illegally adopted children and black mailing him for his tilt! Check it out and fight hard, Roberts will be the most hated justice of all time!

  40. Rebelmom
    February 19th, 2013 @ 11:48 am

    Obama swoon Justice Roberts will ignore the suit due to the fact he had two illegally adopted children and black mailing him for his tilt! Check it out and fight hard, Roberts will be the most hated justice of all time!

  41. Rebelmom
    February 19th, 2013 @ 11:48 am

    Obama swoon Justice Roberts will ignore the suit due to the fact he had two illegally adopted children and black mailing him for his tilt! Check it out and fight hard, Roberts will be the most hated justice of all time!

  42. Juan Grande
    February 19th, 2013 @ 11:49 am

    Is the end, or just he beginning of the end?

    Maybe it is the end of the end? It is your call Orly. Where do we go from here?

  43. Rebelmom
    February 19th, 2013 @ 11:49 am

    Obama swoon Justice Roberts will ignore the suit due to the fact he had two illegally adopted children and black mailing him for his tilt! Check it out and fight hard, Roberts will be the most hated justice of all time!

  44. James Holland
    February 19th, 2013 @ 11:57 am

    Dr Orly,

    Well after an exhaustive search to call someone at the Supreme court to report the clerks behavior, oddly The FBI can’t do anything, the DoJ can’t do anything, The Supreme Court Public Affairs office knows nothing, the Administration of Courts office knows nothing. So this automyous organization is immune to any contact from outside.

  45. Iamacitizen2
    February 19th, 2013 @ 12:05 pm

    For you ORLY:

    Don’t Quit (author unknown)

    When things go wrong as they sometimes will,
    When the road you’re traveling seems all uphill,
    When the funds are low and the debts are high,

    And when you want to smile but you have to sigh,
    When care is pressing you down a bit
    rest if you want, but don’t you quit!
    Life is strange with its twists and turns,
    As everyone of us sometimes learns,

    Don’t give up though the pace seems slow,
    You might succeed with another blow,
    Success is failure turned inside out,
    The silver tint of the clouds of doubt,

    And you never can tell how close you are,
    It may be near when it seems so far,
    So stick to the fight when you’re hardest hit,
    It’s when things seem worst that

  46. Perestroika
    February 19th, 2013 @ 12:21 pm


  47. Christopher Braun
    February 19th, 2013 @ 12:47 pm

    Congress created the courts inferior to the Supreme Court. They have the constitutional power to alter, re-organize or abolish any of these inferior Federal courts. Only the Supreme Court is independent (allegedly).

  48. Braulio
    February 19th, 2013 @ 12:53 pm

    Termites of greed and high treason are eating away the building of our nation! We must fumigate!

  49. John Kent
    February 19th, 2013 @ 12:56 pm

    Dr. Taitz,

    On behalf of thousands of Americans, we thank you for trying. History will show that you fought the good fight.

    May God Bless you and may he have Mercy on us all.

  50. DonnaLS
    February 19th, 2013 @ 1:14 pm

    To Mike Smith – Response from private investigators Susan Daniels and Niel Sankey – “Susan Daniels: Obama is not using Jean Paul Ludwig’s CT social security number. He is using someone else’s. And in their delight in denouncing the use of Ludwig’s, they include a new addition to the Social Security Administration’s website that says a person does not have to live in the state for which the number has been set aside. That was never written there before Obama’s fraudulent use of his number was challenged.””Neil Sankey: I will simply agree with, and support what Susan says.

    This Ludwig story was not of my doing either, and I had no part in it, it was well subsequent to the compilation of lists and other data. I am firmly of the belief that these matters should be thoroughly and properly investigated, but by the correct Authorities who have the power to access the necessary material at source, i.e. the FBI, CIA etc. My job, as a concerned citizen with experience in this field is to raise the matter and present it for such investigation. I also performed that function with the lists I provided to Doctor Taitz, which are now exhibits in her lawsuits.”

  51. micky fleming
    February 19th, 2013 @ 2:03 pm

    God …..is my light amongst the darkness….Keep up the fight….God will defend the rightfully…..the truth will set us free…MLK

  52. Ben Dover
    February 19th, 2013 @ 2:06 pm

    You need to start following the Supreme Court Rules. File a motion for rehearing TONIGHT.

  53. Irma Gerd
    February 19th, 2013 @ 2:11 pm

    I bet SCOTUS didn’t even make copies of what they had for distribution! File again! They will eventually have to take it up. When they do, Checkmate!

  54. Bruriah Sarah
    February 19th, 2013 @ 2:20 pm

    Dr. Taitz

    There are several possibilities here –
    1. The justices are telling the truth and have not seen the case. Then the question would be why since Justice Roberts agreed to it. And why 5 out of 9? Why is it that the other Justices had access to it?
    2. The Justices are not telling the truth. Rather than uphold the constitution, the law, etc. they opted out and would leave this to someone else to do.
    3. If this technicality is true, then why not get the assistance of Judicial Watch or any of these organizations to understand why the case has been stymied. And why an obvious breach of law is allowed to continue.
    Then, with their help, why not reapply to the Supreme Court for a hearing…? It is not because they ruled on it – therefore it is still an open matter.

    Lawyers please weigh in.

  55. Update Orly Taitz Noon Case: U.S. Supreme Court Denies! « Political Vel Craft
    February 19th, 2013 @ 2:21 pm

    […] Dr. Orly Taitz […]

  56. Ray
    February 19th, 2013 @ 2:27 pm

    OK, I see now that the court has posted the denial. What a bunch of commies. May they all get God’s just reward.


  57. MinutemanCDC_SC
    February 19th, 2013 @ 2:33 pm

    Docket no. 12A606 has been scrubbed; there is nothing there. The docket history is blank at http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/12a606.htm .

    Jason, Congress has been neutralized/neutered since the morning after Nov. 4, 2008, as evidenced by the silent “no objections” at the confirmation hearings on Jan. 8, 2008, and proven by the repeat non-performance on Jan. 4, 2012. At least Sen. Jim DeMint (R-SC) had the integrity to resign before he had to (be forced to) forswear himself a second time.

    For all the chatter about impeachment, Congress has yet to pass even the slightest censure or objection to Mr. Obama’s Stalinist dictatorship. I have no knowledge of any such resolution even being presented to Congress, much less voted upon. Of course, I have no knowledge of an incalculably vast number of things.

  58. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    February 19th, 2013 @ 2:36 pm

    no, it was not scrubbed, it is there

  59. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    February 19th, 2013 @ 2:42 pm

    no, by the rules I can’t file again

  60. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    February 19th, 2013 @ 2:43 pm

    motions for rehearing are allowed with petitions for a writ of certiorari. Show mw a rule that allows a motion for a rehearing for a stay

  61. Rod
    February 19th, 2013 @ 3:29 pm

    What reason was given for denial of this case?

  62. Rod
    February 19th, 2013 @ 3:29 pm

    What reason was given for denial of this case?

  63. BitterClinger
    February 19th, 2013 @ 3:38 pm

    If you are surprised by this outcome, then you evidently haven’t been paying attn for the last 4 years. People are protecting Obama, they know he is not eligible. “Birthers”are ridicued both in the MSM and conservative radio. I don’t see much of a chance at ousting Obama, he has all the chips.

  64. Obama Fraud Ids: Every U.S. Citizen Is Urged To Call The Judiciary Committee Of The U.S. House Of Representatives! « Political Vel Craft
    February 19th, 2013 @ 3:41 pm

    […] | February 19, 2013 | […]

  65. Bud Jones
    February 19th, 2013 @ 3:58 pm

    > Show mw a rule that allows a motion for a rehearing for a stay

    Rule 42.2 describes rehearing of a writ for extraordinary relief. This is the rule used in death penalty cases and this is a DEATH PENALTY CASE.

    Please incluyd all new evidence and threats to your safety anc car. Do it now, you and the country is in danger.

  66. ch
    February 19th, 2013 @ 4:08 pm

    1. Names of law clerks.
    2. Pictures of law clerks.
    3. Court rules for how a case is handled.
    a. Stamped in.
    b. Entered on docket.
    c. Where are hard copies kept.
    d. What clerk reviewed Taitz.
    e. What is summary clerk wrote for judges.
    f. What date did Roberts receive, stamped into his office.
    g. What comments did he make.
    h. What date stamped out of his office for distribution.
    i. When did judges receive/stamped into their offices.
    j. What were their comments.
    k. Request signatures of all judges on all their paperwork.

    There is a heavy paper trail at the Supreme Court. Find the rules, then get evidence the paperwork was handled or not handled according to the rules of the court.

    Find out why Roberts did not require 2 justices appointed by Obama to recuse themselves.

    The law clerks are wearing masks but all of their work is paid for by the public, and therefore answerable to the public.

    This will help Judiciary in their investigation.

  67. steve
    February 19th, 2013 @ 4:45 pm

    it is time for a potest on them but we all have jobes but i do have vac time lol

  68. steve
    February 19th, 2013 @ 4:46 pm

    sorry protest

  69. Bruriah Sarah
    February 19th, 2013 @ 5:00 pm

    Dr. Taitz

    I looked up the rules for filing with the Supreme Court:


    You might consider section XIIII

    and also:


    See Rule 12 – 6,7 and 8

  70. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    February 19th, 2013 @ 5:06 pm

    no reason, just as in the Supreme Court of CA

  71. Bruriah Sarah
    February 19th, 2013 @ 5:18 pm

    Dr. Taitz

    I don’t know if this rule is applicable to the Supreme Court – but here is something on Rule 41 – on Stays:


  72. Bob Porrazzo
    February 19th, 2013 @ 5:37 pm



  73. chris
    February 19th, 2013 @ 7:05 pm

    Stay Strong Orly – thank you for what you are doing – we have to defeat this invasion and looting of our country by this undermining administration! Obama is a fraud and I would love for you to succeed –

  74. Ed Lawson
    February 19th, 2013 @ 9:20 pm

    Is there any judge who has not been compromised willing to preside over this case. If not then we have the only response anyone could expect. Now what:(

  75. ron G
    February 19th, 2013 @ 11:35 pm

    The Supreme Court has been compromised and is now corrupt.

  76. Francisco
    February 21st, 2013 @ 7:23 am

    How did the honorable clerks of the Supreme Court decided which of four of the nine justices would receive the briefs ?
    Did they play some Bingo game ?
    And when the nine justices sat down in that famous Conference, and five of then did not have the copies that were extended to the other four, did they protested, and raised hell about it ?
    If not, did they feel upholding the Constituon and determining if an Impostor now resides at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. was not that important an issue ? Questions and more questions !!

  77. Francisco
    February 21st, 2013 @ 8:23 am

    Third day, and with almost all petitions for Certiorari denied, case 12A606 is still pending !!
    This does not vogue well for the Impostor in Chief !!

  78. Sandra
    February 22nd, 2013 @ 8:06 am

    Can we as a peoples petition him out of office. I know we would get more than enough people to do this. We are living under a corrupt administration and it is absolutely frustrating that no one in our congress and now it seems the supreme court (even hate to call it the ‘supreme’ court). This potus really needs to be handcuffed and let out of office straight to federal prison.

  79. Harold Call
    February 23rd, 2013 @ 6:34 pm

    Dr. Taitz, You have my heartfelt admiration and thanks for the work you are doing. Out here in the West we say, “She’s a woman who rides for the brand.” Noone could ask for more. Be safe, may God be with you always. Sincerely, Harold Call

  80. Elizabeth
    February 23rd, 2013 @ 7:18 pm


    Sandra, I would love to see this
    idea to petition him out of office,
    achieve fruition.

    I found the link which is above
    to begin this call to ‘arms’
    so to speak.

    Are you willing to take it on?
    It requires certain wording and
    should be comprehensive but not
    too lengthy.

  81. Elizabeth
    February 23rd, 2013 @ 7:49 pm

    Sandra, I took your idea and ran with it.
    Here is the petition which I have written
    and hope it will be a help in ridding
    this nation of scoundrels and crooks.


  82. Femevonsebese
    June 28th, 2013 @ 2:09 pm

Leave a Reply