Dr. Orly Taitz, Esquire

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz


If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.





The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.

-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.
 -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.
 -- Mahatma Gandhi



Was John Roberts blackmailed by Obama & what does this mean for Orly Taitz’s SCOTUS hearing on 2/15.

Posted on | February 10, 2013 | 28 Comments

Was John Roberts blackmailed by Obama & what does this mean for Orly Taitz’s SCOTUS hearing on 2/15.

 
     
 
Inbox
 x 
     
 
 
Tom Lawson
4:53 PM (17 minutes ago)

 
to bcc: me
 
 
 
 
In case you don’t know, the SCOTUS is going to hold a PRIVATE, behind CLOSED DOORS, conference on whether to consider hearing in open Court, the FACTS about Obama’s past. However, if Obama, as this article indicates/asserts, Obama’s got Roberts by the short & hairy’s so it may be….Obama is going to win again.

God, I hope not.

Was Chief Justice John Roberts Blackmailed To Support ObamaCare?

 

Many of us have questioned what causedRoberts to switch his vote on ObamaCare at the last minute, as repo…, and doing so, so late that the Conservative Justices were forced to rewrite their majority opinion to be minority dissent. These facts may answer that question.

In 2000 Justice Roberts and his wife Jane adopted two children. Initially it was apparent that the adoptions were “from a Latin American country”, but over time it has become apparent that the adopted children were not Latin American, but were Irish. Why this matters will become evident.

In 2005 the NY Times began investigating Roberts life as a matter of his nomination to the Supreme Court by George Bush. The Times was shortly accused of trying to unseal the adoption papers and intending to violate the anonymity of the adoption process… however there is more to the story.

Drudge did an article in 2005
http://patterico.com/2005/08/04/drudge-says-new-york-times-is-inves…

The NEW YORK TIMES is looking into the adoption records of the children of Supreme Court Nominee John G. Roberts, the DRUDGE REPORT has learned.

The TIMES has investigative reporter Glen Justice hot on the case to investigate the status of adoption records of Judge Roberts’ two young children, Josie age 5 and Jack age 4, a top source reveals.

Judge Roberts and his wife Jane adopted the children when they each were infants.

Both children were adopted from Latin America.

A TIMES insider claims the look into the adoption papers are part of the paper’s “standard background check.”

Bill Borders, NYT senior editor, explains: “Our reporters made initial inquiries about the adoptions, as they did about many other aspects of his background. They did so with great care, understanding the sensitivity of the issue.”

Were the Children Adopted from Ireland?

Read more, click here.

MY COMMENTARY:

If these allegations prove to be true, Roberts could be kicked off of the Supreme Court and possibly the ruling on ObamaCare overturned. However, this poses another dilemma…

This would leave another open seat on the Supreme Court and another Obama appointee. Seems to me we’re damned if we do … we’re damned if we don’t … we lose again either way!

 

Share

Comments

28 Responses to “Was John Roberts blackmailed by Obama & what does this mean for Orly Taitz’s SCOTUS hearing on 2/15.”

  1. rosemary
    February 10th, 2013 @ 5:42 pm

    I understand Justice Roberts may have broken some sort of adoption law. I don’t make excuses even though it may have been for the good he thought he was doing. I could forgive him for that but for not following the Constitution in such important matters as upholding an unconstitutional healthcare law that enslaves every American and some whose lives will be lost prematurely because of it is unforgiveable. That said, he better make amends with the American people in ruling a right and just way in Orly’s case next week.

  2. Thomas The Paine
    February 10th, 2013 @ 5:49 pm

    Roberts was bought and paid for: He had over 1 billion dollars in his Vatican bank account.

    Just Google “John Roberts Vatican bank”.

  3. Geo. H
    February 10th, 2013 @ 5:57 pm

    Why don’t we read about this in our Newspapers? Why don’t we hear about this on TV?
    I’m truly afraid the fix is on. The Chicago political machine will overcome all opposition. Who wants to bet on Obama running for a third term?

  4. MaryAnn Genzel
    February 10th, 2013 @ 6:20 pm

    The adoption of the two children is not as unlawful as what Obama has done to our country. He is an illegal president.He is a criminal and there is so much evidence too prove it.There is proof that he was born in Keyna. He has purposely defruadeded the people of the United States, and drove us into debt.
    He has NO feelings of compasion for any part of what America stands for. He is a Muslim,and the sooner he is OUT of the white house,the better. He is out to distroy America. Impeacement is in order.

  5. MaryAnn Genzel
    February 10th, 2013 @ 6:25 pm

    This trial is not about Judge Roberts,it’s about Barack Hussein Obama. Let the truth come out!

  6. Berlin
    February 10th, 2013 @ 6:30 pm

    As Marlene Dietrich said in her last film, directed by Maximilian Schell, “Was ist eigentlich echt hier?” (What is REALLY real here?)

    Marlene would not allow herself to be filmed, so Schell relied on montage, clips, audio, innuendo, staged recreations, etc, to create the “illusion” of Dietrich.

    Obama could be the subject of a film using Schell’s technique.

    We never really see WHO he is, or what strings he is pulling. Good citizens are his unwilling marionettes.

    “Was ist EIGENTLICH ECHT HIER?”

  7. carolinmd
    February 10th, 2013 @ 9:06 pm

    When the ruling came down declaring Obamacare a tax and therefore legal, and we moved past the “what the heck just happened” moment, then came the moment “he must have been blackmailed” as being the only logical answer. This information is new to me as of today, as well as the news of John Roberts opening the door to a Court hearing on the merits of Orly Taitz’s Scotus hearing.
    Roberts act, if true, was traitorous and the repercussions suffered by this disastrous decision is justifiably impeachable. But he has a chance to redeem himself as a man and a human being if he does the right and honest thing in his judgement of the case against Mr. Obama that Orly Taitz is presenting to the Court.
    Once again, the fate of our country is in this one man’s hands.

  8. JAK
    February 10th, 2013 @ 10:10 pm

    I have formed the opinion that there is something that doesn’t pass the socially acceptable if not legal smell test. I would like to know all circumstances associated with the adoptions. I find it puzzling as to why the Roberts would adopt in violation of Irish law. It is possible that there is a Latin American connection involving the parents which though embarrassing to a man of law/Justice might be a legal pathway for adoption. In any case I put him in the column of spineless lawyers who are given the power to dole out justice to/for honest, upright citizens.

  9. Bart J
    February 10th, 2013 @ 10:50 pm

    Since I believe that Justice Roberts reads Orly’s web site, I’ll ask him to be honorable by confessing to the fact that he was being blackmailed. This should eliminate the Obamacare ruling, cause Obama’s appointees to be eliminated and to save us all. Justice Roberts, you know that there are death panels and rules written into the law that will cause the death of thousands of elderly people. If you were blackmailed, you need to come forward and reverse yourself. The judge, in your case, is God. He will judge you for your actions for all eternity. It hardly seems worth it.

  10. James Smith
    February 10th, 2013 @ 11:04 pm

    What do you think it means. It means America is severely debt raped and badly wounded by these enemy infiltrators and unfortunately they appear to have communist banker money control at the present. The United States Supreme Court knows damn good and well the whole nation is watching to see if they confess to high treason again, period, everyone deserves a second chance but most likely Posse’s will be formed by the Sheriff’s. They will need patriots to be sworn-in as legal warrant posse law enforcers and we all will go and arrest these blatant in our face new world order one world government blatant extremely dangerous enemy treasonous traitors. I mean what do you think is going to happen, does anyone really believe America land of the free, home of the brave and the heavily armed patriot citizens will allow America to be conquered by a bunch of chicken necks sociopathic freaks that think they can rule the Unite States with an iron hand and a black boot stomping a human face in forever you would be very delusional, we/I will fight in defense of country. The problem reaction solution psychos babble trash is also coming to an end. The arrests will be carried out in a legal manor by Sheriff’s swearing out warrants for all their arrests. Vigilantly is a crime, so don’t do it, besides they should have a trial that they did in fact NDAA denied us. It will begin in one state after the other until the infiltrating conquering-enemy has nowhere to go except prison or worse, watch. Americans need to be talking to their Sheriff’s right now about these complicit accomplice traitors are to be criminally arrested for immediate relief from this collaborating enemy takeover infiltrated federal government one world government communist china conquering tyranny. Police chiefs seem to be mostly criminally complicit in this takeover scheme probably because their appointed and not voted in office by citizens like Sheriff’s.

  11. Larry from RI
    February 11th, 2013 @ 4:37 am

    The ruling by Razzle Dazzle Roberts will be “even if what you say is all true,the harm to this country will be too much,if we proceed with your case.Case denied.”

    The Razzle Dazzle is in!!! I hope and pray that I’m wrong.

  12. Diane
    February 11th, 2013 @ 6:10 am

    I just happened to swing by. Very interesting website you have :)

  13. Prayerful Hands
    February 11th, 2013 @ 7:39 am

    Well, I have tried to understand how Roberts has done something illegal? I need some kind of explanation on this. What could Roberts have done to say that he’s being blackmailed?
    …………
    Let’s PRAY that he makes amends on the 15th?!

  14. Wayne Inman
    February 11th, 2013 @ 8:21 am

    obama is a criminal and a forigner and needs to go to jail but I blame congress for allowing him to get away with what he is doing. Also congress allowed him to run up the dept, cut the military, passed obama care, will not have him arrested for fruad or for gun running or the murder of Americans around the world.

  15. James
    February 11th, 2013 @ 1:57 pm

    Even if Roberts was booted from the court for something illegal,Obama could be in jail before any type action would begin on his case. Also the 2 losers he appointed would go back to licking fellow commrads boots and would be of no concern to any legal matter of Roberts.

  16. Thomas The Paine
    February 11th, 2013 @ 2:07 pm

    Washington DC is the most corrupt seat of government on the entire planet. They are the biggest enemy facing the American People.

    Only a George Washington or better yet a Maximilen Robespierre can restore The Republic.

  17. Raisor Whyre
    February 11th, 2013 @ 3:34 pm

    I thought Orly was going to restore the Republic, Thomas The Paine? It is highly insulting to leave a comment saying only a George Washington or Maxmilen Robespierre could do this when America has Orly Taitz here fighting for all of the citizens!

  18. Raisor Whyre
    February 11th, 2013 @ 3:34 pm

    I thought Orly was going to restore the Republic, Thomas The Paine? It is highly insulting to leave a comment saying only a George Washington or Maxmilen Robespierre could do this when America has Orly Taitz here fighting for all of the citizens!

  19. Grace
    February 11th, 2013 @ 3:34 pm

    I believe that there may well be another reason for this sudden “news” about Roberts. Maybe this is a ‘veiled’ threat against his wife and those beautiful children. Could it be?
    What was the reason behind the sudden resignation of David Souter right at the time of Obama’s election in 2008? He was a Reagan appointee also.

  20. alice h
    February 11th, 2013 @ 4:19 pm

    ok so roberts just got busted out on the illeagal adoption .. now with that out of the way , i pray to god he does the right thing with obama and lets it go to court ..DO THE RIGHT THING ROBERTS !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  21. Tim McGuire
    February 11th, 2013 @ 4:47 pm

    Chief Justice Roberts has a chance to expose the largest fraud in the past 500 years. I would hope he wants to be on the right side of this case. America can stand the truth but it may never recover from this lie.

  22. Bruriah Sarah
    February 11th, 2013 @ 5:55 pm

    I hope that Judge Roberts realizes that there is alot more at stake. If this country continues in this path of taking away constittutional rights etc, what chance do Justice Roberts’ children have of having a country that will endow his children with inalienable rights that our Founding Fathers foresaw? And what about Justice Scalia? or any of the other Justices? What do their wearing of the Black robe means if our constitional freedoms are stripped away? They are supposed to defend the Constituton. If not now, when?

  23. js/js
    February 11th, 2013 @ 6:34 pm

    History and Human decency demand that Roberts
    open the doors, and adjudicate the entire case,
    in open sessions on obot eligibility. That said,
    one cannot imagine this as more than another
    game, joke, trick, etc. Wake me, all, if I am
    wrong. We shall see. IMO.

  24. Love God
    February 12th, 2013 @ 9:07 am

    If he goes the obamacare way all are cooked for sure! If he has a bit of conscience, he might do the right thing! At least posterity will remember him as the person who baled out his country in adverse conditions. Or else he too will be enlisted among the ones who were in cahoots with a totalitarian dictator, from god knows where. Just like the infamous judges who covered up for Hitler!

  25. Connie
    February 14th, 2013 @ 10:44 pm

    I was just reading posts on other sites, and people are scared, fed up, with all of the rapid changes that are coming because of Obama. I just read that in Missouri, the magazines, and high assault rifles will begin to be collected,.. don’t know if that is accurate or not..

    But I predict.. that the support of this site, will keep increasing..

    People are really fed up, and waking up..

    I will be in special prayer tomorrow for this Court hearing..

    God bless you , Orly, and all of you, for being Americans.. and standing up for what is right. God is still on our side..

    Love and Prayers
    Connie

  26. Connie
    February 14th, 2013 @ 10:50 pm

    Yes, the judges need to realize, they may not be as immune or protected as they might think, if all War breaks out in this Country, Love God, you are so right.

    With love to you all,
    Connie

  27. Denise
    February 17th, 2013 @ 8:42 am

    Was Roberts the SCJ whose island vacation property was burglarized a couple of yrs ago?

  28. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    February 17th, 2013 @ 10:17 am

    no, it was Breyer

Leave a Reply





*