21 Responses to “Very important”

1. Parenthesis
   December 30th, 2010 @ 8:35 pm

   California Civil Code §1798.85. Security and Use of Social Security Numbers
   (a) Except as provided in this section, a person or entity may not do any of the following:
   (1) Publicly post or publicly display in any manner an individual’ s social security number. “Publicly post” or “publicly display” means to intentionally communicate or otherwise make available to the general public.

2. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
   December 31st, 2010 @ 5:45 am

   aside from the numbers of deceased individuals. number 042-68-4425 was assigned to another individual in CT, who was born in 1890 and who is deceased

3. chum lee
   December 31st, 2010 @ 6:49 am

   Orly, who was it assigned to?

   What is your proof? Is the proof authenticated? Meaning, is it original source info with an accounted-for chain-of-custody?

   Or is your proof just from internet databases that are known to often have incorrect info. For example, Equifax used to say I was dead and I needed to go through a whole rigamarole to get student aid.

4. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
   December 31st, 2010 @ 7:18 am

   several databases show the same data.
   Why don’t you do something productive and file an Amicus in my defense

5. Stella Artois
   December 31st, 2010 @ 8:51 am

   Orly,

   I’d be more worried about the State Bar of California than any amicus brief. The publishing of the SSN, especially after you’ve been put on actual notice of the California law, is egregious conduct. Of course, you should have already known the California law about this, but now you have actual notice. Or do you figure since the Bar hasn’t done anything about the rest of your behavior that you’re free to do as you please?

6. Max Zorin
   December 31st, 2010 @ 9:02 am

   You didn’t answer chum lee’s question: Are these databases the original source?

7. donna marie
   December 31st, 2010 @ 9:52 am

   There is a lot of evidence (like ss# fraud and birth certificate problem)that Barry is not a natural born citizen. But isn’t the best evidence our own laws? According to the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, Obama was not a US citizen at all because his mother was too young to confer citizenship on him. And according to the British Nationality Act of 1948, he was a British citizen because of his father’s British citizenship. So according to the combination of these two laws, he was a British citizen at birth–not American and not even a dual citizen. If I am understanding these laws correctly it seems to me that this issue is more important than the birth certificate or other issues. Please comment and let me know if I am going wrong here in some way.

8. chum lee
   December 31st, 2010 @ 10:16 am

   Orly, once again, who else does it belong to? You point to those databases, but they all have caveats that note they are not 100 per cent reliable.

   If you know who it also belongs to ask their relatives, or go through city records. Bottom line – you have no proof that trhe number was actually used by anyone else. Until you do.

   Look we have been through this, I don’t agree with you so why would I help you. Your gumption and incredible legs are simply not enough for me to take time out of my day to assist a cause I disagree with.

   On another note, I think you would have more appeal if you toned down the makeup.

9. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
   December 31st, 2010 @ 12:28 pm

   we have a pretty good idea, who was involved in this “luft gesheft”. There are people, who went to prison and stayed there for a long time with less circumstantial evidence, than we do.
   Pay attention: who are the players, particularly on the international arena. This is extremely dangerous. I don’t know if you have children. If you do, think of the danger they are in. This should be the reason for you to get of the couch and start working on the issue.
   Better yet, take a trip to Venezuella or Iran and think long and hard, if this is the future you want for your children.

10. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    December 31st, 2010 @ 12:34 pm

    I can’t give out all the info

11. Stephen
    December 31st, 2010 @ 3:45 pm

    If two parent citizenship was not a requirement for ‘Natural Born Citizenship’ there would be no logical reason for the adoption clause in Article 2 Section 1 because the founders were citizens of foreign born parents. It would take a generation to produce the first ‘Natural Born Citizen’.

12. Phil
    January 1st, 2011 @ 2:41 am

    Orly:…it’s too bad you have to get the “avalanche” of these posters that continue to ask you questions that you have already posted about, and with the help of (2) licensed investigators, at that!

    I’d like to know where have these “Obama-Bin -Laden” supporters been hiding? Have you not read her posts in the past that discuss this very item?

    Orly and The Patriots of America are fighting for our survival to stay free…not you “athiests, socialists,” “born-again breakfast clubbers”!

    You people are on “something” that is impeding the “receptors” of your brain to function and to discern the “…Rest of the Story…!” As Paul Harvey would always comment, near the end of his radio show!

    So it’s the same “parrot of politics” that you posters keep alive, when posting here! Orly has already discussed this with readers World-Wide! Where have you “little darlings” been? How many times does it take to “train you posters after lunch?”

    (Donna understands this subject, as well as Orly!)

    This is such “mindless mayhem” for you to continue to address this and continue to try to “break Orly down” with this “harassment”!
    Never fear, though, she has your post and she doesn’t need to respond to this “B.S. bagering” all the time! Once is enough! And…the fake S.S. number Obama has, doesn’t belong to him! If it did, why hasn’t he ever lived in Ct.?

    If he was born in Hawaii and “worked” in Hawaii, why no S.S. # for that state? Why? why? why? See how many “holes” we just shot through your posts!

    And since Obama has used 39 numbers, why aren’t you “vicars of virtue” asking about that? All you do is attack a “great Lady” who (IS) trying to help all of us, including you people!

    So what’s the matter, chum, and the other posters? Can’t stand Orly? the Birthers? the Conservatives? We are a “needle in your conscience!” And is it driving you to question your “judgement” of the “sacred” area of life: “politics, and ‘real’ freedom?” And guess who secured that “real freedom” for all Americans:…Patriotic, Christian Military! Not a bunch of “left-wing,” socialists/communists!!!

    And why did you people ‘accept’ the “pontiffers,” along the way, whom you trusted to “tell you the truth” about politics…as well as this Crisis, which is (as Orly says) “extremely serious”!

    Orly…you don’t have to keep answering their “out-of-date” remarks! After a while, their posts are as “sour as spoiled milk”!

    Just ignore them…or post and vent! But Orly is a lot “nicer” to you people than you deserve! Now, aren’t you lucky you live in a “free” society? Try that in a socialis/communist nation, huh? You people have no idea as to what we face, it we don’t win this! You’re like “Babes in Toyland!” Not a clue as to what’s going on!!

    None of you (IMO) have the guts to do something constructive here! As it takes “effort” to become constructive!

    Orly, I think they are just “pranking you”…and/or they are part of the “Soros-utopian-con”…or better known as: “SUC!” And, yes, it does!

    They don’t deserve your time! If they are going to post to “piss off the Pope,” then, not only are they “anal-retentive,” but also, don’t let them take up your valuable time and efforts to even waste your time. Unless, of course, you “vent”? And you certainly deserve to do that!

    They act like they’re [“paid!”] to post here, Orly, to slow you down and maybe waste your time? And that’s a distinct possibility!

    I have seen this going on in a group I post in at my end here! We just had one more “banned” (which comes to about 6 from the past) by the “owner,” to offer him the time to “think of what he’s been doing”!

    Those of us in the group, were tired of the “uncivilized bashing” this person was posting all the time, attacking us, and with no rhyme or reason and with “foul-froth” in his language! Don’t let these “collared cartoons” mess with your mind!

    With anyone who comes in and posts like this, it’s a good bet that he/she/they have been “put up to it,” by someone with “mucho denaro”!? Or as a favor to someone!?

    Cause, IMO, if they still have their mental faculties and are still able to discern truth: when they see it, hear it, or come across it in life, they will finally “see the light”! And they will admit this!

    And we’ve had at least one person in that other group I discussed that actually WAS surprised to finally learn of the “dirty deception” of Obama!

    Cause then, this guy was able to view everything Obama does in connection with the treason he’s pulling off! That light bulb “above his head” finally went off! And this info was the same info I sent to you some time ago! There was lots of posting in the group that finally “woke this guy up!”

    But I’d let these “know-it-alls” find the info themselves! Don’t even waste any further time with explaining this to them, Orly! They don’t deserve the “time of day”!
    And chum, you might have more appeal, if you toned down the B.S.!

    While Stella & “The Dangling Paticiple” & Max, all should stop worrying about the law of S.S. # as the # doesn’t belong to Obama! So Orly has done nothing illegal! All’s fair in Love and War!

    And this is Survival…so stop beating that “dead horse” of public scrutiny of an “illegal S.S. #” being used by Obama, since the C.I.A. created his whole persona! And if you don’t know that…then, you are stuck in a “time-warp!” Why else doesn’t he want any of his records shown?

    Davey Crockett…

13. Jim
    January 1st, 2011 @ 7:51 am

    Actually, the number she printed in the post is not the number he is using. It is not a valid number ( one of the digits is wrong ). Therefore, she is not violating any law

14. Ro
    January 1st, 2011 @ 9:16 am

    Surely those laws don’t apply when an illegal alien has stolen someone elses identity. This what Obama has done. Incidently, when Obama was senator, he used a different social security number. His income tax for 2010 shows the 040 number and when he was senator he used a different number beginning with a 5. Can’t recall the rest.

    Chum Lee, you are disrespectful to Orly. She doesn’t deserve that and you should apologize. Attacking the messenger is stupid don’t you think?

    Obama is here to destroy this country. He is a communist. here is the link to those facts:
    http://www.newzeal.blogspot.com

15. chum lee
    January 1st, 2011 @ 10:36 am

    Ro,

    If she is so right, go and break a federal law and have her defend you by arguing that the DOJ is run by an illegal appointee due to an illegal president!

    Are you brave like birthers claim Lakin to be or just a keyboard warrior?

16. Parenthesis
    January 1st, 2011 @ 11:45 am

    Jim – Actually, she changed that number without bothering to note the change after I made my post. But she still has up the correct number in the post immediately below mine.

    I wonder how quickly she will change that.

17. Yephora
    January 1st, 2011 @ 1:26 pm

    Chum,

    Being right and receiving justice are two entirely different things. A keen legal mind should be able to grasp the distinction.

18. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    January 1st, 2011 @ 4:07 pm

    I don’t need to change the number, it belongs to a deceased individual. If Obama feels that I invaded his privacy by publishing this CT number, he can sue me, but than he will have to unseal his SS application and his long form Birth Certificate and proof that he is legally using this number. Please, pretty, do me a favor, sue me for publishing the CT ss number 042-68-4425.
    Any questions?

19. Phil
    January 1st, 2011 @ 10:30 pm

    Orly:…LOL! Oh, yeah! Poor chum just has to “twist that dagger” in a little more! To suggest that anyone just go out and deliberately get arrested for something…is a lot different than being “forced” into making that “major decision” to put yourself in harms way!

    And Patriots are NOT in the habit of trying to do “anything” wrong! As well, Orly just sent out an “invitation” to Obama…so now, we’ll see who’s the “keyboard warrior,” with “no guts”!

    Davey Crockett…

20. Fred Berfune
    January 2nd, 2011 @ 8:24 am

    Can anyone file an amicus brief to support you, Orly? I’ve written a 114 page brief, but I don’t know if they take them from private citizens. How many copies should I make?

21. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    January 2nd, 2011 @ 9:09 am

    you need to make 40 pages and one copy for Solicitor general

Leave a Reply