Defend Our Freedoms Foundation (DOFF)
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz

If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.

The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.

-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.
 -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.
 -- Mahatma Gandhi

Update on 6 legal actions against Obama

Posted on | December 27, 2011 | 19 Comments

1. Taitz v Fuddy January 6,  First Circuit court, Honolulu HI (Attorney Orly Taitz v Director of Health of HI, Loretta Fuddy). Subpoena for production of documents was served on the director of Health Fuddy.  I am asking my supporters to come to court to this hearing.

2. Farrar, Lax, Judy, Mac Leran, Roth v Obama, Brian Kemp, secretary of state of GA and Georgia Democrat Party ( Orly Taitz, attorney for Plaintiffs)- Trial January 26, Atlanta GA. I am asking my supporters to come to court to this hearing.

3. Keyes, Barnett et al v Obama et al (Attorney Orly Taitz representing former UN ambassador and presidential Candidate Alan Keyes, 10 state representatives and 30 members of the military) Petition for hear En Banc will be filed shortly in the 9th Circuit court of Appeals

4. Taitz v Astrue (Attorney Orly Taitz FOIA against Commissioner of SS Michel Astrue) in the District of Columbia Circuit, no date for the hearing yet

5.  Taitz v Ruemmler (Attorney Orly Taitz v White House counsel Kathy Ruemmler) in the DC circuit, not date yet

6. Taitz et al v Gardner et al (Attorney Orly Taitz is joined by 5 State Representatives of NH and 4 Presidential candidates). I just talked to a clerk from the Supreme Court of NH. According to rule 11 Supreme Court of NH can assume original jurisdiction when the actions of the agency are outside of  what represents normal conduct of the agency. I argued that in a number of prior cases Ballot Law commission and the Secretary of State removed individuals from the ballot for not being qualified, not being eligible. I brought examples of individuals who were not natural born citizens. In Obama’s case members of the commission defrauded the petitioners and the public by claiming that they have jurisdiction to only  check, if Obama filled out the form correctly and paid the $1,000 fee. According to the clerk of the court Supreme Court of New Hampshire simply declined to assume original jurisdiction. I do not have the actual order yet. I suspected that, as 4 out of 5 judges of the Supreme court of  NH, including the Chief Judge are appointees of the Democrat governors (Jeanne Shaheen and John Lynch). As I stated previously, I will be filing with the Supreme Court of the United States  a petition for stay of counting of Obama’s votes pending decision on certiorari petition. As NH is in the first circuit, it will go to Justice Breyer. If he denies, I will refile with one of the conservative justices. At any rate, the case is no longer in NH, it goes to the Supreme Court of the United States. There is no need to do outreach, e-mails and phone calls  in NH, as the case is no longer there,  but donations towards legal work, costs and travel  to prosecute these 6 cases will be greatly appreciated.


19 Responses to “Update on 6 legal actions against Obama”

  1. Bruce Irving
    December 28th, 2011 @ 9:00 am

    I watched the video of you before the New Hampshire group and was a bit disgusted by them. It was obvious that they had made their decision before you had finished speaking. I wanted to bring up one point that I’m sure you had investigated. Many investigators have found that Obama’s Social Security number (the one he is currently using) has been linked to a deceased person from Connecticut. I did some research on this myself, and the Social Security Administration is adamant about the fact that Social Security numbers are NOT RECYCLED. They estimate that there won’t be a need to do so until near the end of the 21st century. Also, in every place I looked, if there is more than one SS number associated with a person, (except in the cases that it is obviously an error ex. a single digit being different of the number only being used a single time) there is an obvious attempt at identity theft and fraud. Why is it then, that Mr. Obama has his name associated with at least THREE SS numbers and is currently using the SS number associated to a deceased person? He is a fraud, he has committed fraud by using this number on his taxes and registering for the Selective Service and on any credit card he may have applied for. Find out this information and Mr. Obama could quickly become Prisoner Obama!

  2. orly taitz
    December 28th, 2011 @ 10:03 am

    don’t you get IT, we have a criminal enterprise running the country. We have enormous corruption in courts, the judges are engaged in the cover up. Wake up, we live in a totalitarian regime, which is quickly becoming a fASCIST REGIME

  3. Bob T. Freeman
    December 28th, 2011 @ 10:43 am

    What is the name and SSN of the deceased person that Obama is using?

  4. Charles Imwold
    December 28th, 2011 @ 11:36 am

    I say hang in there Orly Taitz you have millions of US citizens pulling for you and your efforts to expose this fraud obama . Keep up the good work and the truth will come out . The lame stream media and the obama administration can’t hid the truth any more .

  5. Morton
    December 28th, 2011 @ 11:56 am

    So, I have two questions.

    1- When did the regime become totalitarian? Did it happen in stages, or was there a decisive event?

    2- If we are under a totalitarian regime, why are we trying to ask a corrupt system to correct itself? It seems like we need to work outside the system. no?

  6. Blabby
    December 28th, 2011 @ 12:00 pm

    How are “judges engaged in the cover up”? What evidence do you have?

  7. Billy Bob Neck
    December 28th, 2011 @ 12:58 pm

    @blabby – cuz the FACTS are obvious and they ain’t doing what they should. Stupid lie-berals.

  8. Paul Jackson
    December 28th, 2011 @ 1:16 pm

    “Billy Bob Neck
    December 28th, 2011 @ 12:58 pm

    @blabby – cuz the FACTS are obvious and they ain’t doing what they should. Stupid lie-berals.

    And exactly what is it, in your view, Billy Bob, that they “should” be doing that they’re not? They’re ruling on the law as it exists. That’s exactly what they’re supposed to do.

  9. MichaelN
    December 28th, 2011 @ 1:18 pm

    The supreme court is not bound by the rules of “standing”, they can hear a case if they think it has great “importance” and this matter IS absolutely unique AND has great IMPORTANCE.

    The judiciary are using “standing” as an EXCUSE to avoid hearing the matter.

    In Savorgnan v. United States, 338 U.S. 491 (1950)the Supreme Court heard this case because of the “importance” in “determining American citizenship”

    “Because of the importance of this decision in determining American citizenship, we granted certiorari.”

    Maybe this is the precedent we need.

    Get a case into the court and point-out to the court the “importance” and hold them to the prior precedent on this.

    Given the “importance” of this matter, it’s unique nature and with the court ducking and weaving to avoid hearing the matter, it certainly appears the courts/judges are “engaged in the cover-up”.


  10. Paul Jackson
    December 28th, 2011 @ 2:48 pm

    “The judiciary are using “standing” as an EXCUSE to avoid hearing the matter.”

    Standing is not an “excuse.” It is a requirement to bring a lawsuit… period.

    And Savorgnan is not on point.

  11. Morton
    December 28th, 2011 @ 3:39 pm

    But if the SCOTUS justices are appointed and confirmed by a corrupt regime, why are we looking to them for a solution? Isn’t civil disobedience looking more and more like our only recourse?

  12. Cody Robert Judy
    December 28th, 2011 @ 5:06 pm

    Information Video requesting Democrat Voters not waste their vote on the Fraud-In-Chief at Democrat Caucus and Primaries coming up in January with update spotlight of U.S. Supreme Court case with Esq. Orly Taitz.


    Cody Robert Judy

  13. Blabby
    December 28th, 2011 @ 9:05 pm

    @Billy Bob Neck: Saying the facts are obvious is akin to a child answering a parent, “Because.” It is meaningless. Be specific. What is the evidence of the often-mentioned conspiratorial cover up?

  14. RacerJim
    January 2nd, 2012 @ 1:13 pm


    Where have you been during the past 3 years? Feigning ignorance is akin to a child answering a parent, “I don’t know.” It is a LIE.

  15. Thomas/PatriotofPast
    January 9th, 2012 @ 8:47 am

    Blabby, if I may…
    There are THREE Branches of Government, and of the THREE is Judicial (Corrupt Courts) and Executive (Usurper Obama). If by chance YOU watched his First State of the Union Address… He BLATENTLY singled out The Supreme Court and THREATENED Them.
    So,to Simplify matters for YOU, ALL Courts under the Supreme Court (Federal down to State to City) are in one sense TIED to the EXECUTIVE BRANCH… They Fear Him.
    Simple huh?

  16. pi314159
    January 9th, 2012 @ 10:48 pm

    simple. astounding. amazing. I cannot believe he hasn’t been stopped yet.

  17. Starla
    January 11th, 2012 @ 12:47 pm

    Please Share & Send This Information Far And Wide Immediately Without Failure To Every American Citizen All Over The United States Of America!!


    From: Greg Goss blogging at “Greg Goss’s Blog”

    Posted on January 8, 2012 By gregnh

    “When we have an ineligible president, an unconstitutional monetary system, unconstitutional czars, unresponsive elected representatives, a thoroughly corrupt federal court system, undeclared wars in violation of the Constitution, an unconstitutional tax system, numerous federal agencies and departments that undertake roles far exceeding the limitations of the Constitution, serious and growing abridgement of specific constitutional rights originating from our Creator and guaranteed by the Constitution, unconstitutional infringement of the rights and prerogatives of the states on a massive scale, unconstitutional land grabs by an out-of-control federal government, outrageous abuses of governmental powers in a wide variety of areas (including the infamous TSA operation, the EPA, the IRS, the DHS, the ATF, the DEA, the CIA, the FBI, the Forest Service, the Fish and Wildlife Service as examples), a socialist welfare scheme that is both unconstitutional and is bankrupting the country, no federal budget for three years running, a “First Lady” who desires to be addressed as “Your Excellency” and has a personal staff paid for by the taxpayers as large as some small agencies, an administration overrun with individuals committed by their Marxist political philosophy to the overthrow of the Constitution and the rule of law, a so-called “Congressional Research Service” which manufactures lies intended to deceive the American people, a Department of Justice that is so corrupt that it defies comprehension and acts as if it is above the law, a corrupt Congress whose members openly exploit their positions of trust for personal financial and political gain, a Supreme Court with members who brazenly defy the obligation of recuse in the face of outrageous conflicts of interest, a Speaker of the House who proclaims that a bill must be passed before we can find out what is in it, unconstitutional “government sponsored enterprises” (including FNMA and Freddie Mac) which have incurred huge losses arising from politically-motivated policies and which losses were borne by the taxpayers while virtually destroying large sectors of the national economy, the passage of a plainly unconstitutional health care bill which will almost certainly destroy what is left of the economic vitality of the nation and insure the descent of the nation into a fiscal abyss from which there can be no recovery, election fraud on a massive scale, and on and on – well we just don’t have much of a Constitution left, in my opinion.”
    – David LaRocque, (Ret.) Commander USNR

    “The above opinion is that of David LaRocque, a Vietnam veteran. David served in the U.S. Navy as a naval aviator. He has a B.S degree in metallurgical engineering and an MBA degree in finance/accounting. He retired from the U.S. Naval Reserve with the rank of Commander USNR, and is also a retired Trans World Airlines captain with 32 years of service in both domestic and international flying. As a plaintiff in the Barnett case, he attended all three hearings in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California in Santa Ana, CA presided over by Judge David O. Carter.

    In addition, LaRocque worked with several local colleagues on eligibility issues. He and two of his colleagues met on two occasions in the offices of their congressman, Rep. Brian Bilbray (Rep-CA 50) to discuss their concerns regarding Obama’s eligibility, once with Rep Bilbray himself. More recently, on June 9, 2011, they met with Mr. Steve Danon, Chief of Staff to Rep. Bilbray to discuss the issue of allegations of criminal acts committed by Obama in connection with the release of a fraudulent document purported to be an original long form Hawaiian birth certificate.”

    Read The Entire Article Here:

    From: Greg Goss blogging at “Greg Goss’s Blog”

  18. Starla
    January 11th, 2012 @ 2:22 pm



    By Steve McCann
    January 6, 2012


    “The mask is fully off. Barack Obama is the most corrupt, power-mad president in this nation’s illustrious history. By his actions in bypassing Congress and making appointments that should be subject to Senate approval while the Senate is still in session and innumerable extra-constitutional actions since he became president, he is following in the footsteps of the despots who dominated the 20th century.

    In late September of 2008, it became clear to me that Barack Obama would be elected president. Based on his background, education, motivation, and indoctrination, I saw a man who could single-handedly destroy the country and someone with no respect for the history, the Constitution, or the people of the United States. The specter of a megalomaniac who was a stranger to the truth and would or say or do anything to achieve or retain power overcame me. In Barack Obama and his fellow travelers, I saw what I feared the most since I came to this country: a person and a political mindset that would, if allowed, spell the end of the noblest experiment in the history of mankind.


    I had to survive a war that was precipitated by those who were initially elected by the people in a democratic fashion. Yet once in power, they began to systematically usurp and overthrow the rule of law. Their lust for power led them to shred any written constitution or traditions as they systematically imposed new regulations, laws, and executive orders geared primarily to centralize authority in the government as individual rights and liberties were extinguished. In due course, they and their cronies became the government, as the people were powerless to stop them.

    The people of Germany, the most advanced society in continental Europe, or Italy in the first four years of the 1930s, would have found it incredible to imagine what became of those countries by 1945. They would not think it even remotely possible.

    The history of the United States and its traditions of liberty and individual freedom should be a bulwark against the successful emergence of people like Obama and his cronies.

    Yet why are the media, or the opposition party, or the members of Congress or the judiciary not shouting from the highest hilltop and taking action to stop these power-grabs? Has this country enjoyed peace and prosperity so long that everyone is jaded and preoccupied with him- or herself, or in a self-induced stupor either ignoring what’s happening or saying that these unconstitutional steps are minor? Is it because Obama happens to have black skin and everyone is too intimidated by political correctness to speak? Or is it as it was in Germany, Italy, and Russia among many — a belief that the worst could never happen here?

    I have seen and experienced the worst that man can offer, I am not intimidated, and I will say without reservation that Barack Obama and his cronies have the same mindset in their tactical approach, philosophy, and lust for power that was extant in Benito Mussolini and the Fascists in the early days of their regime. If the apologists for those in power in Washington want to vilify me for that comparison, so be it.

    To the American people, it is far beyond time to wake up to who this man in the White House is and what his ambitions are. As for the Republicans in the Congress or running for office, the task is upon your shoulders to stop Barack Obama in his tracks before he goes any farther. It is time to do your sworn duty to preserve and protect the country. And for the Democrats who are so blinded by party loyalty that they would sell their country for the proverbial thirty pieces of silver, the long-term difficulties and potential downfall of the greatest nation on earth will be your legacy.

    See The Must Read Urgent Wake-Up Call Article Here:


    Please read ALL of the comments under the above Urgent Must Read article!! I have read them all. Many of the comments under this article are chilling & stunning.

    * * * *



    By Stella Paul
    January 9, 2012

    See The Entire Article Here:


    * * * *


    Timothy Birdnow
    January 9, 2012

    See The Entire Article Here:


  19. Dan Pine
    January 11th, 2012 @ 8:30 pm

    So the lesson here is: even decorated veterans can be stupid-heads.

Leave a Reply