14 Responses to “Update: no decision yet from Judge Hanen in my cases, which include evidence of Obama’s use of a stolen CT SSN 042-68-4425”

1. Lorene B
   May 26th, 2015 @ 10:44 am

   Is this judge not capable of making a decision?

2. Randy
   May 26th, 2015 @ 12:00 pm

   https://DrudgeReport.com headline at 1900 GMT:
   COURT BLOCKS OBAMA AMNESTY

3. Randy
   May 26th, 2015 @ 12:20 pm

   https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/may/26/appeals-court-deals-blow-obama-amnesty/

4. Paula Hoehn
   May 26th, 2015 @ 12:52 pm

   Dear Orly,

   https://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/05/26/appeals-court-refuses-to-lift-hold-on-obama-immigration-action/?intcmp=latestnews

   Appeals court refuses to lift hold on Obama immigration action
   Published May 26, 2015·
   FoxNews.com

   Excerpt:
   “A federal appeals court refused Tuesday to allow the implementation, for now, of President Obama’s executive action that could shield from deportation as many as 5 million illegal immigrants.

   The U.S. Justice Department had asked the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to reverse U.S. District Judge Andrew Hanen’s earlier decision temporarily halting the administration’s plan. Hanen issued the temporary hold in February, after 26 states filed a lawsuit alleging Obama’s action was unconstitutional.

   Two out of the three judges on a court panel, though, voted Tuesday to deny the government’s request, as the underlying case is argued.”

   ——
   Paula Hoehn

5. poetopoet
   May 26th, 2015 @ 1:02 pm

   Great News: There are some American Patriots left, though so few and so far away We the People tend to forget them.

   “ By Stephen Dinan – The Washington Times – Updated: 2:27 p.m. on Tuesday, May 26, 2015
   A federal appeals court upheld an injunction against President Obama’s new deportation in a ruling Tuesday that marks the second major legal setback for an administration that had insisted its actions were legal.

   The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ruled in favor of Texas, which had sued to stop the amnesty, on all key points, finding that Mr. Obama’s amnesty likely broke the law governing how big policies are to be written.

   “The public interest favors maintenance of the injunction,” the judges wrote in the majority opinion.

   Read more: https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/may/26/appeals-court-deals-blow-obama-amnesty/#ixzz3bH8s6BW7
   Follow us: @washtimes on Twitter

   Mr. Obama had acted in November to try to grant tentative legal status and work permits to as many as 5 million illegal immigrants, saying he was tired of waiting for Congress to act.

   The full amnesty had been scheduled to begin last week, while an earlier part had been slated to accept applications on Feb. 18. But just two days before that, Judge Andrew S. Hanen issued his injunction finding that Mr. Obama had broken the law.

   Judge Stephen A. Higginson dissented from Tuesday’s ruling, saying he would have left the fight over immigration policy to the White House and Congress, saying Mr. Obama should have broad discretion to decide who gets deported and how he goes about that.

   Read more: https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/may/26/appeals-court-deals-blow-obama-amnesty/#ixzz3bH8l3NBR
   Follow us: @washtimes on Twitter”

6. jobethian
   May 26th, 2015 @ 1:10 pm

   Judge Hanen ruling has been upheld by the 5th Circuit.
   https://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/05/26/appeals-court-refuses-to-lift-hold-on-obama-immigration-action/

7. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
   May 26th, 2015 @ 1:40 pm

   that is good and expected, but let’s see what will happen in SCOTUS. Roberts and/or Kennedy might swing towards Obama. Roberts swung towards Obama on Obamacare

8. Bravo, Orly...
   May 26th, 2015 @ 2:23 pm

   Let’s all continue to work at and pray for America and Dr Orly!

9. Judy
   May 26th, 2015 @ 4:06 pm

   https://hotair.com/archives/2015/05/26/breaking-fifth-circuit-upholds-injunction-against-executive-amnesty/
   good article here

10. js/js
    May 27th, 2015 @ 10:16 am

    There should also be a lawsuit on behalf of the

    estate of Harrison Bounel, the victim in this.

    Where is Tom Fitton on this? Relatives, huh?

    Tell me, Danno!!!

11. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    May 27th, 2015 @ 12:17 pm

    as far as I know he had no heirs, so we can’t file a case on behalf of an estate

12. dicky ventinberger
    May 27th, 2015 @ 2:09 pm

    I agree with js/js someone should have a lawsuit against Harrison Bounel with SS# attached and see who shows up for court.. He will have to be sworn in as Harrison Bounel..I have a feeling he won’t show up

13. js/js
    May 27th, 2015 @ 9:58 pm

    Interesting idea. Agree.

    Bounel is still the victim, needs justice.

    Sue then Obot and Michelle for ID theft of the

    SSN and identity fraud. Recipients and co-

    conspirators too, etc.

    Keep hope alive, Danno.

    Also sue AG Blumenthal and state of CONN for

    allowing and promoting SSA fraud. (1977-1978).

    Do it soon, Danno!!!

14. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    May 28th, 2015 @ 5:15 am

    Joseph, I can’t sue on behalf of Bounel. An attorney cannot sue on behalf of someone who never hired this attorney. Also, I can’t sue Blumenthal, I have no evidence that Blumenthal had anything to do with this. I can’t just sue with no reason, they will sue me back for malicious prosecution.
    If you want to sue them, this is your business.

Leave a Reply