OrlyTaitzEsq.com

TaitzReport.com

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation (DOFF)
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz


If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.





The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.

-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.
 -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.
 -- Mahatma Gandhi


Unclassified correspondence between Hillary Clinton and Sidney Blumenthal re Attorney Orly Taitz and article by Taitz on a suspicious timing of Bin Laden raid

Posted on | March 17, 2016 | 28 Comments

 

Press release

Law Offices of Orly Taitz

E-mails of Hillary Clinton and  her correspondence with her political advisor, Sidney Blumenthal were partially unclassified and revealed their correspondence about Attorney Orly Taitz and her legal actions challenging Barack Obama due to Obama’s use of a stolen Social Security number 042-68-4425 and his use of fabricated IDs. May 5, 2011 e-mail from Blumenthal mentions an article by Taitz where Taitz talks about an upcoming hearing in the 9th circuit of a case brought by Taitz on behalf of former UN ambassador, one of the most prominent African-American leaders, Alan Keyes and others, challenging legitimacy of Obama in light of Obama’s use of a stolen CT Social Security number and fabricated IDs. Bin Laden raid happened only  a couple of days before this court hearing. All the media that was scheduled to be present at the court hearing and report on Obama’s bogus IDs, turned its’ attention to Bin Laden. Taitz wrote that the timing of the raid was very convenient for Obama.

Taitz will be writing to the State Department seeking to  fully un-classify these e-mails and specifically  Clinton’s response, which is still classified. Taitz was subject to horrific persecution and defamation for seven years and she seeks disclosure, as to who ordered and orchestrated persecution and defamation of her, as an attorney, who revealed Obama’s use of a stolen Social Security number and fabricated IDs.

Please support Attorney Orly Taitz and her work to clean corruption in our government. Please, donate via pay-pal to OrlyTaitzESQ.com or via mail to:

29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, ste 100

Rancho Santa margarita, CA 92688

 

Unclassified correspondence between Hillary Clinton and Sidney Blumenthal re Attorney Orly Taitz and article by Taitz on a suspicious timing of Bin Laden raid

UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State

Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05786603 Date: 02/29/2016

RELEASE IN PART B5,B6

From: Sent: To: Subject: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com> Friday, May 6, 2011 1:25 AM ‘sbwhoeop Re: H: Memo on OBL photos; more to come soon on Libya. Sid From: sbwhoeop Sent: Thursday, ay 05, 2011 UtS:51 AM To: H Subject: H: Memo on OBL photos; more to come soon on Libya. Sid CONFIDENTIAL May 5, 2011 For: Hillary From: Sid Re: OBL photos Yes, there is a Third Way—on the Bin Laden photos. Show them to members of Congress in a special secure room, something like when members were permitted to view Abu Ghraib pictures. Here are the reasons: Having the members file through will provide testimony to the President’s feat. They will be not only be acknowledging but also enhancing his power. They will in effect become liegemen bowing before him, but not in any way they will resent or will protest. They will serve as witnesses to the magnitude of what he has done. Each of them will emerge speaking to the national and local press on what they have seen. Their words will be descriptive, but they will not be equivalent to graphic images that could be circulated themselves and have mischievous consequences. Having the whole Congress see the photos would have these likely impacts as well: The far right wing Tea Party Republicans would by their mere presence admit to the President’s status above them and to his effectiveness. There would also be a salutary effect at the beginning of the negotiations on the debt ceiling. It would curb the ability of the Republicans to appeal to partisan sentiment and indulge in partisan rhetoric, giving the administration more edge. Having members of Congress testify to the reality of the photos will suppress any potential “Deather” movement, that the administration has either fabricated the event or suppressed some aspect of it. (See below for article on the emergence of the “Deather” movement.) This event should be staged over two or three days, occupying most of a work week, and continuing to dominate the public and congressional mind. Don’t let the photos serve as trophies; instead take the Congress as trophy using the photos. Perhaps the NSC communications operation could have done more turning an absolute triumph into a PR fiasco. But I don’t quite know how. Kudos to Denis McDonough! URL: http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2011-05-05/osama-bin-laden-killing-launches-birthers-new-deatherconspiracy-theory-/p/ The Rise of Osama Death Conspiracies UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05786603 Date: 02/29/2016 UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05786603 Date: 02/29/2016 by Josh Dzieza May 5, 2011 I 12:16am Birthers who claimed President Obama was not born in the U.S. have moved on to another wild conspiracy theory: that Osama bin Laden was not really killed last Sunday—or was killed to shut him up, and then quickly buried at sea. Josh Dzieza explains. Osama bin Laden’s death couldn’t have come at a better time for the birthers, those who believe that President Obama was born in Kenya, or Indonesia, or renounced his citizenship, or for various other reasons is ineligible for office. Obama had just held an exasperated press conference in which he released his long-form birth certificate, and chided the nation to get back to more serious work. Launching the operation to kill the al Qaeda leader could be taken as an example of just the sort of serious duties lawmakers ought to be busy dealing with. Or, with its hasty ocean burial and lack of photographic evidence, it could be seen as just a bit too convenient. That latter is how birther activist, lawyer, and dentist Orly Taitz took the news. “Perfect timing!” Taitz exclaimed on her site. “Our court hearing is scheduled to start in just a few hours. Major networks are supposed to be there with cameras rolling. Suddenly, Obama announces that the body of Osama Bin Ladin [sic] is found and we need to prepare for a possible terrorist act.” She cited a rumor that bin Laden had been killed years ago and his corpse kept on ice, ready to be rolled out when a diversion was needed. The theory has been around for years, but promptly popped up again on May 1, when Alex Jones posted it on his site, InfoWars, also noting that it “follows the release of a highly suspicious birth certificate.” Soon, people like Taitz and Jones had a name: the deathers. Andy Martin, who is as close as a movement like the birthers comes to having a founder, says conspiracy peddlers like Taitz and Jones are ridiculous. He wants to redirect them to his new movement, which he prefers be called the doubters. “You have to ask who he’s covering for, if they had interrogated him, what he would have dropped in addition to those hard drives.” “Ironically, Obama has created a new birther movement,” says Martin. “He’s fanning the fires by giving just enough evidence to cast reasonable doubt.” Casting doubt is how Martin describes his role in the birther movement. He says he never claimed Obama was born in Kenya or Indonesia, just that he wanted to see the birth certificate (though he admits he started the Obama-is-a-Muslim meme). “You don’t have to fantasize, just say, ‘Why not show the original? If there’s an original document, why not show it?'” People like Taitz might use his research to pursue their own fantasies, says Martin, but he’s always stuck to the facts. “I’m the Joe Friday of the Republican Party,” he says. “Obama loved birthers who lied, like Orly Taitz, because you could just laugh at them—but he hated me, because I just kept asking.” Martin says he’s been convinced Obama’s birth certificate is “probably a valid document,” though he still has some . questions. Now he’s turning his attention to bin Laden’s death. On May 3, after flying back from Iowa, where he was campaigning for president, he filed an FOIA request for the “Bin Laden capture/kill archive” in order to “immediately counteract any conspiracy theories.” In the request, he warns: “We have learned from the original and continuing firestorm over the missing Obama birth certificate that secrecy leads to public skepticism. Skepticism inevitably leads to corrosion of confidence in government. You ought not to let that same process replicate itself in the case of the termination of bin Laden.” It’s that claim—to be out only for the truth—that Martin says makes the doubter movement more powerful than ones that paint fantastic alternative histories. “The reason the birther movement could never be stopped is because I launched it with truth and not lies—I knew there had to be a birth certificate, so why not show it?—it’s the same reason the doubter movement won’t be stopped.” Of course, Obama’s birth certificate was shown, though people can always doubt its authenticity. Highly classified documents pertaining to the killing of bin Laden never will be, meaning Martin can question forever. It remains to be seen whether the public will feel as entitled to see such documents as they did the birth certificate. In keeping with his strategy, Martin declines to say what exactly he expects to find other than “the truth,” saying only that what evidence we have raises questions. Why was bin Laden buried at sea? Who gave what orders? Why was he killed and not captured? In the first, he sees an offensive deference to Muslim tradition; in the second, he sees potential evidence of Obama’s dithering. But it’s the third he really presses. Bin Laden was worth more alive than dead, says Martin: We could have made propaganda of his trial, he says; we could have “paraded him down Pennsylvania Avenue in chains like the Romans.” Instead, Navy SEALs shot him, saying he was resisting—a story Martin points out keeps changing—and a story he finds patently ridiculous, anyway. “An old man with kidney problems? A 10-year-old with karate could have taken him.” Instead, Obama ordered him killed, Martin says. Sometimes, Martin implies political motives: Obama didn’t want a messy trial, Martin says—”he wanted the bonus without the onus.” Other times, Martin implies motives that are vaguely sinister: “You have to ask who he’s covering for, if they had interrogated him, what he would have dropped in addition to those hard drives.” UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05786603 Date: 02/29/2016 UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05786603 Date: 02/29/2016 But Martin says he is only asking questions, distancing himself from outright conspiracy theories—even as he fans them. It’s a fine line that some elected officials walked during the heyday of the birthers—remaining pointedly agnostic, saying they didn’t believe the theories, but why not release the certificate just the same. Recently Sen. Lindsey Graham seemed to echo John Boehner’s comment that he would “take [Obamaj at his word” about being a U.S. citizen, when the South Carolina lawmaker said he wants the president to release photos of bin Laden’s body to “prove it beyond a reasonable doubt”—though he said he himself was not a doubter. No polls have been done to see how many people believe bin Laden was killed, or was already dead, or that there’s something amiss in his killing, but theories have been making the rounds on fringe conservative blogs, and Yahoo has reported a spike in searches for “bin Laden not dead” and “bin Laden still alive.” Martin says he’s been inundated with ernails from his birther-days contacts, proposing all sorts of theories, from people he says will eagerly follow him on his new mission. Martin points out that anyone who directly questions bin Laden’s death will have an unwelcome audience right now. “In the euphoria of Osama’s death we’re overlooking these things in the same way in the euphoria of Obama’s inauguration we overlooked the facts around his birth,” he says. He gives it a week, saying nobody asks questions at the funeral—they ask them when the will is read. “I’m building a case now, like with the birthers, and all it will take is for a celebrity like Trump to put a match to it, and—boom!” Josh Dzieza is a reporter at The Newsweek Daily Beast company.. URL: http://www.theclailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2011-05-05/osama-bin-laden-killing-launches-birthers-new-deatherconspiracy-theory-/p/

Want Access To All of Hillary's State Department E-Mails? Well Here is the Link

Comments

28 Responses to “Unclassified correspondence between Hillary Clinton and Sidney Blumenthal re Attorney Orly Taitz and article by Taitz on a suspicious timing of Bin Laden raid”

  1. EARTHPLANET
    March 17th, 2016 @ 8:16 am

    just extra proof everyone knows the fraudster in chief…

    i guess that’s why she knows they are not going to do anything…

  2. Jerry G
    March 17th, 2016 @ 8:16 am

    Reading the email from Obama and Hillary supporter Sidney Blumenthal is proof that he and others like him are not only mentally unstable but probably deranged.Either that or they are all on drugs.

  3. TurnRight
    March 17th, 2016 @ 8:29 am

    Interesting, the way “they” think to play Congress as though a troop of dancing bears.

    But what is hrod17’s (Hillary Rodham’s) reply from the next day? it’s not included at the top where it would be.

  4. Judy
    March 17th, 2016 @ 9:33 am

    The timing of the bin laden raid smells just like everything the kenyan does.

  5. Donna
    March 17th, 2016 @ 11:07 am

    Hillary book– it takes a village — should explain a lot. She was around in 1961 just as I was. I believe she was in on putting him in our house every since his birth in Kenya.

  6. Paula Hoehn
    March 17th, 2016 @ 11:46 am

    Bravo Orly,

    The saying, “You know you are over the target when you start receiving flak”, certainly pertains to your years-long fight to expose usurper-obama and his fraudulent identity documents.

    When the hundreds of scurrilous emails were sent to you by clearly deranged and venomous people (usurper-obama operatives) making vile threats to you, it was a frenzied response to your relentless efforts to get court discovery of usurper-obama’s fraudulent documents, which every corrupt judge threw out of court.

    Hillary’s emails naming you are evidence of her, her minions’, and by extension usurper-obama’s abject fear of your legal efforts, and vindication of all your work to expose the arch-criminal, fraud and deceiver who has been squatting in the people’s White House for 7+ long years.

    ———
    Paula Hoehn

  7. Rich
    March 17th, 2016 @ 12:14 pm

    We need to do away with career politicians pronto. They don’t have any idea what it’s like to actually earn a living.

  8. TurnRight
    March 17th, 2016 @ 3:38 pm

    Think about it: If the media want to increase their viewership/readership and keep it going for months and months, these thousands of emails will provide them with the juiciest material known to feed to eager suspense devourers. The emails will seem like gifts from heaven parachuted right into the media’s laps, and they’ll have a blood frenzy going after what’s in them. And they don’t have to do much research or fact checking… it’s all done prima facie for them by the hands of the participants. This stuff oughta sink Hillary but good. Start digging 4th Estate!

  9. Orly Supporter...
    March 17th, 2016 @ 3:49 pm

    Well, it looks like all of them are NWO stooges!

    Orly, you are a real, live Saint!

    To putting yourself through all of this, to help SAVE America…

    God Bless You!

  10. Kevin J Lankford
    March 17th, 2016 @ 4:11 pm

    There is just not a single one in congress,the senate,the supreme court or all the lower courts who have let the fraud obama slide,the c.i.a. and f.b.i.who have protected him,or the cooperative media, who do not deserve the fate of mussolini.

  11. linda
    March 17th, 2016 @ 6:46 pm

    The Obama administration saved the raid on bin Laden for a time that they needed the distraction, just as the Bush administration had done (but never needed the distraction). The real Usama bin Laden died of Morfan’s syndrome on December 13, 2001. He was not, as our govt would have you believe, killed during the raid. They killed a bin-Laden “look-alike” of which there were many over the last 15 years.

  12. Baruch
    March 17th, 2016 @ 8:33 pm

    BRIEF AMICUS CURIAE
    OF PROF. EINER ELHAUGE ON THE JUSTICIABILITY AND MEANING OF THE NATURAL BORN CITIZEN REQUIREMENT

    http://www.scribd.com/doc/305074691/Harvard-Law-Professor-Einer-Elhauge-s-Amicus-Brief-Ted-Cruz-Not-Eligible-To-Be-President-3-16-2016

  13. Kevin J Lankford
    March 18th, 2016 @ 7:22 am

    @ #12;baruch,

    That is just more malarkey composed to justly deny cru’s natural born status while still defending the fraud obama.

    The claim that the founder and composers of our Constitution relied solely on british common law is totally incorrect when concerning citizenship. our founder chose the term “Natural Born Citizen” specifically for its distinction from english common law’s use of the word subject,rather than citizen. Our founders concept of the “citizens” of this new country as equal members of a society from which government derived its authority,was in complete contrast to the term “subject”, as used by english common law, which was a term to denote a possession.

    Though the term “subject” and “citizen” may often be used interchangeably, and considered the same,there can be no doubt our founders chose the use of the term “citizen” specifically,and that they derived the phrase “Natural Born Citizen” from Emmerich de Vattel’s book “The Law of Nations”. Any honest scholar or Constitutional lawyer know that it is the only source from it could have come and that our founders were as familiar with the “Law of Nations” as with english common law.Also it is the only source of a definition for the phrase “Natural Born Citizen”.

    This Einer feller is another fraud scholar,trying to pass off half truths to buttress bigger lies.

  14. bob69
    March 18th, 2016 @ 9:31 am

    Networks interrupted to announce the “killing” of the IMO already dead for years Osama bin Laden at the midway point of Donald Trump’s last show of the season of The Apprentice, the big one that announces the season winner. I do not doubt that timing was on purpose, probably at the direction of Obama’s brain, Valerie Jarrett.

    If there was a bin Laden thrown in the sea it was most likely Osama’s son, Hamza bin Laden, who was said to be at the compound when the raid occurred, but I believe has not been accounted for, seen or heard from since.

  15. Thomas Bennington
    March 18th, 2016 @ 9:44 am

    Orly:
    I clearly remember having a conversation with a colleague about the 9th Circuit hearing on Obama’s birth certificate docketed for May 2. We know the tactics of the Globalists in charge and we were discussing what kind of World changing event would be staged as a smoke screen for this hearing. We were guessing it would be a nuke going off and were discussing which city Obama would detonate one in. When the raid happened and Obama announced he killed Bin Laden, I was relieved a nuke didn’t happen. When the administration changed their story three times, it was clear to me not everyone was fully briefed on the lie.

  16. John
    March 18th, 2016 @ 7:56 pm

    How is this career criminal not in prison, WTF!

    https://youtu.be/kypl1MYuKDY

  17. John
    March 18th, 2016 @ 8:13 pm

    From, Gary North

    November 2016 Depends on One Man. It Is Not Trump.
    James Comey.
    Ring a bell?

    http://www.garynorth.com/public/14966.cfm

  18. John
    March 18th, 2016 @ 9:22 pm

    And now she has a NSA problem, add that to the list also.

    http://observer.com/2016/03/hillary-has-an-nsa-problem/

  19. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    March 19th, 2016 @ 5:20 am

    Comey submits his case to Attorney General, Loretta Lynch. She will not file any charges.

  20. John
    March 19th, 2016 @ 7:04 am

    Loretta Lynch will take it to Obama, but as Gary said, “James Comey has leverage on a scale that no bureaucrat ever has. Hoover had leverage, but not on this scale. The issue is public: the security of her emails. Comey risks nothing if he goes public after about a 30-day delay.

    After the press conference, if Obama fires him, Hillary is toast. So is Obama’s legacy.

    If Obama tells Lynch to stall until January 20, Clinton II’s presidency is toast. Obama probably escapes intact.

    If Comey deep-sixes the findings, the political dance goes on.

    Will he deep-six it? I don’t know. It depends on his sense of justice. “

  21. John
    March 19th, 2016 @ 7:48 am

    ‘This is Willful Deceit’: Tantaros Says Hillary Knew Email Security Risks

    http://insider.foxnews.com/2016/03/18/andrea-tantaros-says-hillary-clinton-knew-risks-having-private-email

  22. John
    March 19th, 2016 @ 7:52 am

    Tantaros asserted that each instance Clinton used the Blackberry, every email sent, is a separate felony.

  23. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    March 19th, 2016 @ 1:40 pm

    Comey had for years all of the info on Obama’s use of bogus IDs and he covered it up. He is in the tank

  24. Don in Oklahoma
    March 20th, 2016 @ 2:31 pm

    That just goes to show that they know you and read everything you have to say. Keep up the good work.

  25. John
    March 20th, 2016 @ 2:58 pm

    BOOM: And now Supreme Court nominee Merrick Garland has asked a hypothetical question on the Long Form Birth Certificate issue at a Yale moot court trial,

    We know that Garland is ANTI 2ND AMENDMENT!
    We know that he is PRO EXECUTIVE POWER.
    We know that he FAVORS ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS.

    He’s a full blown liberal hack.

    Now we know where he stands on presidential candidate Donald J. Trump.

    Check it out.
    http://www.americasfreedomfighters.com/2016/03/20/boom-obamas-supreme-court/#

  26. hapnHal
    March 20th, 2016 @ 10:14 pm

    I’m going to buy a “Hillary For Prison” T Shirt
    and start wearing it. Better yet, I’ll start selling them. I’m running into people already wearing them.

  27. Danny Stewart
    March 21st, 2016 @ 7:59 am

    Strange that my responses are usually deleted.

  28. John
    March 21st, 2016 @ 8:29 pm

    Keep Try’n Danny, keep it clean, so let’s hear ya!

Leave a Reply