9 Responses to “This is huge! Top story #5 in the world according to GoogleNews.com, an article featuring a protest against Obama, as well as a report on legal challenges by Attorney Orly Taitz against Obama due to Obama’s use of a stolen CT SSN and bogus IDs”

1. Shelly
   July 21st, 2014 @ 4:24 pm

   Love it!! Keep up the good work Orly!!

2. js/js
   July 21st, 2014 @ 4:54 pm

   Boy oh boy! Can’t beat it either. Poor Sergei
   Brinn, Google CEO, will now have to choke on
   his kosher/halal chicken. He will choke to
   death, with embarassment, over Orly’s big
   victory.!!!

   Kudos to Lady Liberty, Joan of Arc, Citizen One!

   Praise her, Danno!!! Job, well done. IMO.

3. Virginia W.
   July 23rd, 2014 @ 9:06 am

   Congratulations Orly! “The lip of truth shall be established forever; But a lying tongue is but for a moment.” Proverbs 12:19

   My fellow Americans and I are forever indebted to you for the sacrifices you and your family have made. May you & yours continue to be abundantly blessed!

4. Connie
   July 23rd, 2014 @ 10:33 am

   Orly, Bless you!!! We are on God’s side!!! We are on the winning side!!!

   With love to all,
   Connie

5. hope
   July 23rd, 2014 @ 10:46 am

   Off Topic, but VERY important article about court case involving Obamacare…

   **************

   7/21/2014 @ 11:35AM
   Halbig v. Burwell Would Free More Than 57 Million Americans From The ACA’s Individual & Employer Mandates

   The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, often described as the second-highest court in the land, could rule on Halbig v. Burwell as early as tomorrow. Halbig is one of four lawsuits challenging the legality of the health-insurance subsidies the IRS is dispensing in the 36 states that did not establish a health-insurance Exchange under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, or “ObamaCare,” and thus have Exchanges established by the federal government. Though the PPACA repeatedly states those subsidies are available only “through an Exchange established by the State,” and there are indications IRS officials knew they did not have the authority to issue subsidies through federal Exchanges, the IRS is dispensing billions of dollars of taxpayer subsidies through federal Exchanges anyway. The Halbig plaintiffs are employers and individuals from six federal-Exchange states who are being injured by the IRS’s actions because those illegal subsidies trigger taxes against them under the PPACA’s employer and individual mandates. The plaintiffs want relief from those illegal taxes, and the only way to get it is to ask federal courts to put a stop to the illegal subsidies. Recent media coverage of Halbig, driven by one-sided blog posts from the consultant group Avalere Health and the left-leaning Urban Institute and Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, has misrepresented the impact of a potential ruling for the plaintiffs by ignoring three crucial facts: (1) a victory for the Halbig plaintiffs would increase no one’s premiums, (2) if federal-Exchange enrollees lose subsidies, it is because those subsidies are, and always were, illegal, and (3) the winners under such a ruling would outnumber the losers by more than ten to one.

   Halbig Critics & Media Allies Overlook Three Crucial Facts…Read rest of article:

   https://www.forbes.com/sites/michaelcannon/2014/07/21/halbig-v-burwell-would-free-more-than-57-million-americans-from-the-acas-individual-employer-mandates/?&_suid=1406043716874031751095689833164

6. Dan
   July 23rd, 2014 @ 11:01 am

   Amen! Keep working against the delays, obfuscation, denials, and law-breaking. The truth will win.

7. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
   July 23rd, 2014 @ 12:11 pm

   I hope so

8. joebanana
   July 23rd, 2014 @ 12:17 pm

   Dear Dr. Taitz
   Since the US court system is so dysfunctional and corrupt, wouldn’t an international criminal court be more receptive of international crimes committed by obama? Such as signing meaningless pacts, treaties, sanctions, etc. Not to mention crimes of fraud against the American public, including election fraud, wire fraud, mail fraud, cyber fraud, using forged documents to get on a ballot, etc.

9. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
   July 23rd, 2014 @ 12:56 pm

   the prosecutors of the ICC are investigating this

Leave a Reply