OrlyTaitzEsq.com

TaitzReport.com

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz


If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.





The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.

-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.
 -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.
 -- Mahatma Gandhi



These people are right. Any public office is a franchise, including the office of the U.S. President. Each official is supposed to purchase the bond. If such official, like AG or Judge do not provide honest service, violate their oath office, citizens should be able to sue and recover against the bond, but today courts prevent you from doing that. We are being denied the right to a jury of our peers in civil cases and we are denied our right to sue against the bonds of corrupt officials, who violate their oath of office

Posted on | November 24, 2012 | 15 Comments

CALL FOR COURT TO PROVE THEIR DULY AUTHORIZED TO RULE ….A recent Courtroom in Montana…

Inbox
x
kaye.burnett
11:48 AM (2 hours ago)

to bcc: me

 

STATE REPRESENTATIVE JOEL BONIEK – CALLS COURT TO PROVE THEIR DULY AUTHORIZED TO RULE-

Livingston, Montana JP court 11-19-12 Monday 1:30 pm.
Joel Boniek got a ticket for running a road-block last summer. His omnibus hearing was today downstairs in the law complex in Livingston. The small room was packed, by the time the judge sat down people had brought in extra chairs for the spectators. Judge Linda Budeski put the Boniek case first, saying the room was full of supporters. After that, it did not go well for the judge. The judge asked if Boniek had received full discovery. Boniek stated that he had not received a copy of the prosecutor’s bond, which he had asked for in writing. Boniek had a stack of Montana code books before him, place marked many times. Boniek stated that the prosecutor needed a bond, a license with an oath affixed to the back, and proof of the taxes paid on license. He read the code numbers, constitution phrases and concept and read it quietly to the judge
Judge: who are you expecting to provide this information (bond & oath)? Boniek: the law says she (Carrick) must provide it.
Boniek then reads from Title 7 and says the county commissioners must examine the bonds of every county employee to make sure they are in place.
” I talked to Commissioner Malone just the other day and he said not only hasn’t he done that, he doesn’t even know of any bonds. The employees are impersonating county officials”.
Judge: “we can certainly issue subpoenas for the information you want. Do you want to go ahead and set your trial date or do you want to wait?”
Boniek: “I don’t see any way that we can proceed until we know that county officials are properly installed and properly holding in office. Otherwise, we have a bunch of County officials fraudulently holding office and nothing can happen.”
Judge: “Ok an……. We ah……… can set the next one/month”
Boniek : “the next what one….?

[file position counter 03:15]
Judge … “the omnibus hearing” (to schedule trial date)

Boniek: “I think we should continue the omnibus, we have more matters to attend to…. I’m not sure I have the opportunity next month”
Judge: can we do it next month, do you want to do it in January?
Boniek: “well I’m objecting to you keeping me here….um…It seems to me that we can clear up some of these matters right now.”
Judge : I’m not exactly sure how we could clear those up and its certainly not anything I have jurisdiction to …air [?]
Boniek: “well dismiss it and look at the law then”
Prosecutor Kathleen Carrick :”and I’ll object to this whole…. This is not the time and place to be doing that. This is to set trial date only. Its not limine motion [pre-trial evidence rule], its not for argument, this is not the proper place to do this”
Boniek: “your honor, why is this woman speaking if she can’t prove she is an official officer?”
(multiple people now talking including Carrick)
Judge: “she’s a employee of the County”
Boniek: if she is an employee of the County, she needs to have a bond, I just read you the law
Carrick over Boniek (now red-faced): “I do not need to have a bond
Judge over Carrick: that’s entirely up to the county commissioners, that’s a separate branch of the government…. than this one…its not something that I have anything to do with”
Boniek: “uumpha..well maybe it is”
Judge: “well Mr. Boniek, I’m going to say that you are out of order with this…”
At that exact moment a man standing behind the prosecutor and up against the spectator’s left wall yelled out “bullshit” as the judge was speaking. The man wore dirty coveralls and a three-corner hat. It was clear by his demeanor that the man was upset. The man continued to berate the court and the judge lost control of the incident. A mild argument ensued between the heckler and a 6′ tall man in a dark blue shirt, apparently a plain clothes cop of some sort. Other police were summoned but the man remained, even after the judge quietly left the room. Someone said “the judge has abandoned ship” and ‘who is in charge here?’
Boniek stated that he was in control of the court and dismissed the case against himself. The plain-clothes policemen were arguing with Boniek and the heckler.
A 250-lb deputy came charging into the room and yelled that everyone must leave now. Half of the spectators filed out and half remained standing in the court, including Boniek, the heckler and 4 officers. As Boniek collected his papers and books, a 5′ 7″ man in a dark blue shirt accosted him, apparently some kind of policeman. The policeman pointed to Boniek’s waistband, which was covered with sweater and coat. The policeman suggested that Boniek was concealing a handgun, to which Boniek denied. The man continued to harass Boniek on this issue until a 6’1″ deputy in uniform stated that he was familiar with Boniek’s good character and that he could assure the policeman that Boniek had no gun. Boniek and the remaining 10 people in the room then exited into the hallway to find it lined with a cheering crowd large enough to block the exit entirely.

Nov 24, 2012

Comments

15 Responses to “These people are right. Any public office is a franchise, including the office of the U.S. President. Each official is supposed to purchase the bond. If such official, like AG or Judge do not provide honest service, violate their oath office, citizens should be able to sue and recover against the bond, but today courts prevent you from doing that. We are being denied the right to a jury of our peers in civil cases and we are denied our right to sue against the bonds of corrupt officials, who violate their oath of office”

  1. Yoel
    November 24th, 2012 @ 2:49 pm

    I FIND THE FOLLOWING “TWEET” BY SHERIFF ARPAIO VERY DISTURBING : 3 Nov Joe Arpaio ‏@RealSheriffJoe
    Ava and I were dancing tonight at a dinner with the Consul General of Pakistan. pic.twitter.com/lSYYB0V4

  2. Yoel
    November 24th, 2012 @ 3:33 pm

    The “justice system” is supposed to be the “glue” which binds this nation together, but the “glue” has totally self-destructed and only a full-blown revolution can reverse the situation…

  3. Anonymous
    November 24th, 2012 @ 4:05 pm

    Then citizens will likely have to take the laws into their own hands if it keeps up. Those who put the thieves into office would become legal targets before the actual ones put into office, would be my guess. They are playing stealth, but JQ public could play it even better. All these things are going to cause a break down in society. That may be what these Marxists are after.

  4. Anonymous
    November 24th, 2012 @ 4:08 pm

    There seems to be remedies but no people to work them. They must have stocked the lower courts, etc. long before they did the higher ones by fraudulent votes, etc. Long even before they did the higher offices. Those manipulated computer programs played a massive part in all this from low to high. This has had to have been in the works for many years. There has been a deterioration in many places that is obvious.

  5. blackyb
    November 24th, 2012 @ 4:19 pm

    It looks as if the citizens will have to take the Laws into their own hands for some legal answer to the harms perpetrated upon the public. Those like minded people must have been placed from bottom to top aided by manipulated computer programs over the years. It looks as if they have electronically sewed up the butts of Americans from a legal standpoint. The towns, counties, cities and municipalities are no doubt affected and it has allowed the top dogs to operate with impunity. They have attacked the laws of contracts making any kind of contract not to be based upon law but on the whim of who are in a position to call it as they want.

  6. blackyb
    November 24th, 2012 @ 4:26 pm

    Where to begin would be likely no computers involved in any elections. All ballots counted by observers by both sides with officials guarding the count who are approved by both sides. This vote is too valuable to throw away and that is what the democrats likely have done. They have infliltrated the small towns, counties, and educational system over the years and are being seen as one voice and eliminating competition until they are like maggots working to destroy this country. They have managed to obscure laws and cheat until they have the man in the office who is not eligible to be there. From where I am looking, there seems to be no remedies that will be applied without force or massive opposition and that will take years. They knew this.

  7. blackyb
    November 24th, 2012 @ 4:33 pm

    All the while people have been thinking in terms of Constitutional laws and they are destroying remedies of Contract laws which is, a way to invalidate any laws.

  8. Gen. R.W. Johnson (U.S. Army, retired)
    November 24th, 2012 @ 5:54 pm

    Dr. Taitz, I didn’t know you were a sovereign citizen! Welcome aboard!

  9. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    November 24th, 2012 @ 6:10 pm

    ???
    what are you talking about?

  10. blackyb
    November 24th, 2012 @ 7:07 pm

    Sovereign citizens are said to be a growing threat to law enforcement. See the article of FBI–Sovereign Citizens.

  11. blackyb
    November 24th, 2012 @ 7:11 pm

    No one here is likely a soverieign citizen, we are overall just wanting a real President, our vote counted and our Constitution observed. We are seeking legal remedies where seem to be few, if any who are in a position to, willing to uphold Justice. Where is that all going to lead?

  12. Samuel
    November 24th, 2012 @ 9:32 pm

    General Johnson,

    I don’t know if you remember me, but I served under you for four years. I will always remember you as a great patriot who did his duty to defend this country from seditionists.

    Lt. Col. Samuel Bigelow, Ret.

  13. Mission Impossible
    November 25th, 2012 @ 1:07 am

    General: I saw a previous post that you had included your full rank: (Lt.). Or are you someone else?

  14. Timothy F. Balome
    November 25th, 2012 @ 9:16 am

    What statute requires judges to post a bond?

  15. Elizabeth
    November 25th, 2012 @ 9:38 am

    Mission Impossible,

    I noticed the same discrepancy
    between the two General Johnson’s.
    This poster appears to be contentious
    in a subtle way.

    Dr. Taitz mentioned someone
    impersonating Morgan Ward on
    one thread.

    Just sayin’…..

Leave a Reply