Docket Text:
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Andrew S. Hanen.  Appearances: Dr. Orly Taitz;. Kimberly E. Helvey, Colin Kisor, Daniel David Hu;(Court Reporter: S.Heinz)(03:04-03:35). Court addressed Parties. [74] Second MOTION to Dismiss, or, in the Alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment by Sylvia Burwell, Jeh Johnson, Barack Obama, U.S. Border Patrol-Discussed. Parties may file anything that they would like for the Court to review by 03/11/16.
The following transaction was entered on 3/1/2016 at 4:27 PM CST and filed on 3/1/2016

1:14-cv-00119 Notice has been electronically mailed to:

Colin Kisor colin.kisor@usdoj.gov

Daniel David Hu daniel.hu@usdoj.gov, CaseView.ECF@usdoj.gov, JJones5@usa.doj.gov, sKempen@usa.doj.gov

Kimberly E. Helvey Kimberly.E.Helvey@usdoj.gov, Kimberly.Wiggans@usdoj.gov

Orly Taitz orly.taitz@hushmail.com

17 Responses to “The hearing in Taitz v Johnson, Obama et al was held today. The argument by the government is shocking”

1. john
   March 1st, 2016 @ 4:00 pm

   That attorney will be turned into the bar association for wrongful judicial conduct according to United States law before this Court. That attorney also is telling a Judge Hanen he has no right or standing to bring a Claim to and stand up with this case or carry on as United States Law allows even though Judge Hanen is doing it properly and within Legal rights per judicial law !!. What is next is obamas choice as always !! I don’t believe any United States law allows for our Government to have any sovereign immunity whatsoever even if obama made it a law under his reigning of the American Taxpaying Peoples creating a possible Civil War ?

2. John
   March 1st, 2016 @ 4:37 pm

   That is Ludicrous, then I guess Judge Hanen will decide on March 12th ?

3. Larry
   March 1st, 2016 @ 6:09 pm

   In the “banana republic” known as AMERIKA the government attorneys are right and will always be right.

4. Svit
   March 1st, 2016 @ 8:08 pm

   It works exactly the same shocking way where and when probate court decides to be abusive to respondents–they just don’t say so outright. Many simply lose everything they own and end up captured, destroyed and penniless.

5. taino21
   March 1st, 2016 @ 8:18 pm

   This should be an easy decision for Judge Hanen if he doesn’t get coerced. What the lawyers for the government have argued is basically that, our Constitution is dead and we have again become subjects and we are no longer a Constitutional Republic. This is treason at the highest!

6. d42
   March 1st, 2016 @ 9:19 pm

   Hi Orly,
   Thank you so much for continuing this case. I wish I knew you had a hearing today. I must say this Judge does seem sympathetic to your case. I do understand that it is difficult to sue the government when they may be negligent however, it would seem to me a intentional act is not negligent. It is processed, studied, reviewed and then acted on. Thats deliberate. And the gov should be held accountable.

   I feel, probably along with millions, that we have lost any say in what our government does to us. The idea that you would have to sue the government to make them stop from potentially hurting us is unbelievable.

   Now with Cruz and Rubio unqualified candidates it just makes me sick. The presidency is nothing more than a stepping stone to riches and status that no one will ever know. And anyone who gets in the way of that will be destroyed.

   jd

7. W
   March 2nd, 2016 @ 4:21 am

   If what he says is true that the govt. is above the law and courts, then why did they show up at all?

8. DSP2
   March 2nd, 2016 @ 6:37 am

   There is not anything in the US Constitution that enumerates any immigration power to Congress nor the President. It clearly states in the Constitution anything outside of the Constitution shall be within the realm of the States. Read the ninth and tenth amendments. The Feds are only making an assumption of authority and power, well it’s not in the Constitution.

9. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
   March 2nd, 2016 @ 6:37 am

   they are saying that the government has sovereign immunity in immigration issues

10. Rich
    March 2nd, 2016 @ 7:40 am

    The power being used today by the establishment is deficit spending entitlements. It is a road to utter chaos. Hell. God is going to win this war being waged against him by the drug and sex addicts. The insanity of liberals was on vivid display in the court room, which has been made off limits to GOD by the insane. Rom 1:21-32 is playing out and has been since St. Paul pointed it out in the first century.

11. DSP2
    March 2nd, 2016 @ 7:51 am

    We are a country ruled by representation of We the People and not by a King. Sovereign immunity is for monarchy rule. Next line of BS from the feds please.

12. EyeballNews
    March 2nd, 2016 @ 8:52 am

    I’m not a lawyer, but I looked in 8USC 1226 and the words “sovereign” or “immunity” appear nowhere in that statue.

    Here’s the law that talks about who is and is not allowed to enter. The part I included below covers people who try to enter illegally. Not sure if this helps, but the rest of that statute covers other things.

    8 USC 1182. Aliens with Diseases of Public Health Significance

    6) Illegal entrants and immigration violators
    (A) Aliens present without admission or parole
    (i) In general

    An alien present in the United States without being admitted or paroled, or who arrives in the United States at any time or place other than as designated by the Attorney General, is inadmissible.
    (ii) Exception for certain battered women and children

    Clause (i) shall not apply to an alien who demonstrates that—

    (I) the alien is a VAWA self-petitioner;

    (II)(a) the alien has been battered or subjected to extreme cruelty by a spouse or parent, or by a member of the spouse’s or parent’s family residing in the same household as the alien and the spouse or parent consented or acquiesced to such battery or cruelty, or (b) the alien’s child has been battered or subjected to extreme cruelty by a spouse or parent of the alien (without the active participation of the alien in the battery or cruelty) or by a member of the spouse’s or parent’s family residing in the same household as the alien when the spouse or parent consented to or acquiesced in such battery or cruelty and the alien did not actively participate in such battery or cruelty, and

    (III) there was a substantial connection between the battery or cruelty described in subclause (I) or (II) and the alien’s unlawful entry into the United States.

13. Baruch
    March 2nd, 2016 @ 11:11 am

    Judge Hanen masterfully compacted the whole case in one simple question and it looks unlikely that he will be satisfied with the answer.

14. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    March 2nd, 2016 @ 11:30 am

    you never know

15. The Constitution...
    March 2nd, 2016 @ 1:48 pm

    Boy, why did they not just do this by skype?

    They made Orly go all that way, just to hear these insane-puppets babble about their illegalities!!!!

    Hey, O, you are as illegal as Cruz and Rubio!

    This is what happens when Congress hasn’t [grown a pair!]!!!

16. The Constitution...
    March 2nd, 2016 @ 1:52 pm

    Here’s something that Trump will take care of when he gets into the Oval Office!!!

    And these treasonous lefties in the DOJ/WH, etc., will get their due, as time goes by!

    One way or another, this crap is going to end!
    And Patriots in America really would like to do this the sane, civilized way…

    But make no mistake, you treasonous goof-balls, either the easy way…or the [hard way]…that is the question!

17. roger carlson
    March 2nd, 2016 @ 2:35 pm

    If the government lawyers statement was correct the USDOE/NRC would be removing all the spent fuel from the 100 nuclear plants around the country and sending it to Yucca Mountain Nuclear Waste Repository in Nye County, Nevada.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yucca_Mountain_nuclear_waste_repository

    Obviously he is missing something! rdc

Leave a Reply