OrlyTaitzEsq.com

TaitzReport.com

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation (DOFF)
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz


If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.





The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.
-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.  -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.  -- Mahatma Gandhi

Texas v White was a deicision of a divided court in the aftermass of occupation, has as much legitimacy as the decisions of bundestag or German high court during WW2

Posted on | November 12, 2012 | 3 Comments

Obama’s operatives are flaunting the decision of the divided Supreme Court in Texas v White.

Let’s not forget that the Supreme Court also came up with other decisions that we believe today to be false. Among them was the decision to fine(sanction) Susan b. Anthony for voting or Dred Scott decision ruling that slavery was justified. How about the decision depriving Virginia Minor of her voting rights in minor v Hapersett? Liberals and Obama operatives love to critisize the Supreme Court for citizens United opinion.

Not every decision of the Supreme Court withstood the test of time. We univerally believe that some decisions of the Supreme court were wrong. Majority of the Supreme Court got it wrong in Texas v White, just as they got it wrong in Dred Scott and in Minor.

Category: Uncategorized

Comments

3 Responses to “Texas v White was a deicision of a divided court in the aftermass of occupation, has as much legitimacy as the decisions of bundestag or German high court during WW2”

  1. leo derosia
    November 13th, 2012 @ 1:40 am

    I disagree on minor, the Constitution did not grant anyone the right to vote until 1919. SC Judges do not write law. Minor was famous for desscription of a NBC which is someone “born in a country to parents who are its citizens, these are the natives or natural born citizens”. Straight out of federal common law which of course was law of nations.

  2. Jake Rollins
    November 13th, 2012 @ 2:56 am

    Leo… You are dead wrong. Minor was a simple voters rights case. Nothing more.

    And Orly… Dred Scott was abrogated by the 14th Amendment. Though perhaps you would like to go back to the times prior. Minor was abrogated by the 19th Amendment. Don’t you want to vote? Texas v White is still the law if the land. Justice Scalia says so even today.

  3. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    November 13th, 2012 @ 4:13 am

    that only proves my point that Dred Scott and Minor are decisions that were not correct, those decisions perpetuated deprivation of civil rights and voting rights for women and minoritie. Texas v White perptuates deprivation of souverignty rights for the states. it is unconscionable and against public policy

Leave a Reply