OrlyTaitzEsq.com

TaitzReport.com

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation (DOFF)
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz


If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.





The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.
-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.  -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.  -- Mahatma Gandhi

TaitzReport.com: Undeniable proof that Reuters is polling a much higher percentage of Democrats than Republicans

Posted on | June 30, 2016 | 2 Comments

TaitzReport.com: Undeniable proof that Reuters is polling a much higher percentage of Democrats than Republicans

By Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ

06.29.2016

Just a couple of days ago Attorney Orly Taitz has shown that ABS/Washington post intentionally misled the public by over-polling Democrats.

Now Taitz found undeniable proof that Reuters is also misleading the public and grossly over-polling Democrats in order to mislead the public into believing that Clinton is leading and to disenfranchise and demoralize Trump voters.

Please see the graph from the latest Reuters poll. Reuters is not revealing the percentage of Dems and GOPers they are polling, however it can be figured by looking at the poll below.

The poll shows that Trump is beating Clinton among independents 31/26, with a 5% margin.

Additionally, Trump has more support in his own party than Clinton in her party.

Among Republicans Trump 76%, while Clinton has only 71% of Democrats.

Further, Trump takes away more Dems than Clinton takes GOPers. Trump takes 11% of Dems, while Clinton takes   only 8% of GOPers.

Considering that according to the latest polling there are only 3% more Dems, it means that Trump should be leading overall. However, Reuters claims that Hillary leads with a 9% margin, no less.

How can that happen? How can she be leading if he is leading Independents with a 5% margin, if he consolidated his party by a higher percentage and takes a higher percentage of the opposing party?

The only possible explanation, is that Reuters, just like ABC/WashPost, is grossly manipulating the polls by polling a grossly higher percentage of Democrats.

For this reason the public should demand to remove Reuters from polling averages and from the reports by the networks and major news organizations. Taitz is urging her supporters to call networks and urge them to allow Taitz to appear and disclose to the public these manipulations https://www.realclearpolitics.com/docs/2016/Reuters_Ipsos_June_18_to_22_2016.pdf

Reuters Trump-Clinton support

 

Category: Uncategorized

Comments

2 Responses to “TaitzReport.com: Undeniable proof that Reuters is polling a much higher percentage of Democrats than Republicans”

  1. MinutemanCDC_SC
    July 14th, 2016 @ 2:19 am

    Making equations of lines 1, 2, 5, and 6 of the table, then solving for x, y, and z, gives these approximate proportions:
    57½% Democrats;
    30% Republicans;
    12½% Independents.

    Here are the algebraic calculations, just for reference.
    9x + 13y + 17z = 12
    48x + 8y + 17z = 30
    432x + 624y + 816z = 576
    432x + 72y + 153z = 270
    552y + 663z = 306

    8x + 68y + 34z = 31
    27x + 5y + 18z = 17
    216x + 1836y + 918z = 837
    216x + 40y + 144z = 136
    1796y + 774z = 701

    1190748y + 513162z = 464763
    427248y + 513162z = 236844
    763500y = 227919
    y = 0.29852, or 29.852 %

    48x + 8y + 17z = 30
    27x + 5y + 18z = 17
    864x + 144y + 306z = 540
    459x + 85y + 306z = 289
    405x + 59y = 251
    8x + 68y + 34z = 31
    18x + 26y + 34z = 24 (double 9x + 13y + 17z = 12)
    -10x + 42y = 7

    17010x + 2478y = 10542
    -590x + 2478y = 413
    17600x = 10129

    So x = 0.57551, or 57.551%,
    y = 0.29852, or 29.852%, and
    z = 1 – 0.57551 – 0.29852 = 0.12597, or 12.597%.

    I verified these values for x, y, and z in the original equations. Keep in mind that there were only 2 significant digits in 12
    of the 16 numbers and only 1 significant digit in the other 4, resulting in precision varying from ±0.735% to ±10%.

    48x + 8y + 17z = 30
    27.62448 + 2.38816 + 2.14149 = 32.15413

    27x + 5y + 18z = 17
    15.53877 + 1.49260 + 2.26746 = 19.29883

    9x + 13y + 17z = 12
    5.17959 + 3.88076 + 2.14149 = 11.20184

    8x + 68y + 34z = 31
    4.60408 + 20.29936 + 4.28298 = 29.18642

  2. MinutemanCDC_SC
    July 24th, 2016 @ 10:36 pm

    I hereby revise my comment above. My calculations were incorrect.

    Of the sample of 1339 registered voters, calculate the proportion that were Democrat (d), Republican (r), and Independent (i) from the percentages in the table below, written here as decimal fractions in three equations.
    Line 1, Hillary Clinton (Democrat): 0.41 d + 0.08 r + 0.26 i = 0.43
    Line 2, Donald Trump (Republican): 0.11 d + 0.76 r + 0.31 i = 0.34
    Lines 5+6+7, none of the 4 candidates: 0.08 d + 0.09 r + 0.26 i = 0.12

    Making equations of lines 1, 2, and the total of 5, 6, and 7 of the table, then solving for d, r, and i, gives these approximate proportions:
    37% Democrats (d);
    29% Republicans (r);
    34% Independents (i).

    Just for reference, here are the algebraic calculations.

    0.71d + 0.08r + 0.26i = 0.43 (line 1)
    0.11d + 0.76r + 0.31i = 0.34 (line 2)
    0.08d + 0.09r + 0.26i = 0.12 (totaling columns of lines 5, 6, and 7 creates line 8)

    0.1846d + 0.0208r + 0.0676i = 0.1118 (line 1 x 0.26)
    0.0208d + 0.0234r + 0.0676i = 0.0312 (line 8 x 0.26)
    0.1638d – 0.0026r = 0.0806 (subtracting creates line 9)

    0.2201d + 0.0248r + 0.0806i = 0.1333 (line 1 x 0.31)
    0.0286d + 0.1976r + 0.0806i = 0.0884 (line 2 x 0.26)
    0.1915d – 0.1728r = 0.0449 (subtracting creates line 10)

    0.03803328d + 0.044928r = 0.01392768 (line 9 x 0.1728)
    0.00049790d + 0.044928r = 0.00011674 (line 10 x 0.0026)
    0.03753538d = 0.01381094 (subtracting isolates “d”)
    d = 0.3679445898776035, or 37%.

    0.1638d – 0.0026r = 0.0806 (line 9 again)
    0.1915d – 0.1728r = 0.0449 (line 10 again)
    0.0313677d – 0.00049790r = 0.01543490 (line 9 x 0.1915)
    0.0313677d – 0.02830464r = 0.00735462 (line 10 x 0.1638)
    0.02780674r = 0.00808028 (subtracting isolates “r”)
    r = 0.2905871022636958, or 29%.

    i = 1 – d – r = 0.3414683078587, or 34%.

    Democrat = 37%; Republican = 29%, Independent = 34%.

    Of the 12 percentages used in the table, there were only 2 significant digits in 8 of the 12 and only 1 significant digit in the other 4, resulting in, at best, 2 digit precision, or technically, only 1 digit precision. Plugging the calculated percentages (37%, 29%, and 34%) into line 3 arrives correctly at the total of 6%, as listed. But plugging them into line 4 calculates 2.6% instead of the 5% listed, which indicates that the percentages by party listed on line 4 are very low and are unreliable.

Leave a Reply