OrlyTaitzEsq.com

TaitzReport.com

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation (DOFF)
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz


If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.





The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.

-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.
 -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.
 -- Mahatma Gandhi


Request for default was received in DC today, demand that the clerks of the US district court for the District of Columbia post the default against the Social Security administration, so that we can get the application the the CT SS ID Obama is fraudulently using

Posted on | May 17, 2011 | 19 Comments

Taitz v Astrue filed first amended complaint
Exhibits 1, 2 and 3 of 8 exhibits
Exhibit 4 Part 1 of 2 parts
Exhibit 4 Part 2 of 2 parts
Exhibit 5 Part 1 of 2 parts
Exhibit 5 Part 2 of 2 parts
Exhibit 6, 7 and 8 of 8 exhibits

Comments

19 Responses to “Request for default was received in DC today, demand that the clerks of the US district court for the District of Columbia post the default against the Social Security administration, so that we can get the application the the CT SS ID Obama is fraudulently using”

  1. Veracity
    April 19th, 2011 @ 5:47 am

    Could you please elaborate on what is exactly in this amended complaint? Perhaps explain it to in layman’s terms for the non-legal thinking mind? Not everyone here has a great legal mind like yourself.

    From what I have read, it looks like ssdd.

  2. Chum Lee
    May 18th, 2011 @ 3:36 am

    Orly,

    I thought that United States defendants have 60 days to answer a Complaint, not 30. That is in the FRCP. I could be wrong, it may actually be 90.

    Also, have all three persons been served (Astrue, Holder, and the local US Attorney)?

  3. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    May 18th, 2011 @ 5:52 am

    FOIA has different guidelines. All have been served by April 3rd

  4. Chum lee
    May 18th, 2011 @ 6:21 am

    Thanks! I did not know that about FOIA. I have never dealt with FOIA litigation. I have another question (my last one).

    I am very confused about the dates. A Complaint was filed on 2/16/2011. You filed an Amended Complaint on 4/8/2011. That, to me, would cancel out the first Complaint the deadlines began anew. Now you stated everyone was served by 4/3/2011, but PACER seems to say otherwise. First, we both know that the First Amended Complaint could not have been served prior to its actual filing. Second, the Complaint needed to be reserved since it was served to the wrong address of the US Attorney (after 4/3/2011).

    Also, I do not see any affidavit indicating service of the First Amended Complaint on Astrue on PACER.

    So how is the US late in its response?

  5. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    May 18th, 2011 @ 8:12 am

    I served them on March 24 th. Michael astrue got his papers on March 28th. US attorney got his April 3 rd. He was supposed to file an answer by May3rd the latest, he did not do that

  6. Super Patriot
    May 18th, 2011 @ 8:28 am

    30 days does not appear in the Civil Rules, so why are you using it? All U.S. defendants have 60 days to answer.

    Also, if the complaint wasn’t filed until April 8th, how could your service on March 24th have been valid? Where was the issued summons?

    I think Judge Lambert is going to lose his patience with stunts like this.

  7. Chum Lee
    May 18th, 2011 @ 8:48 am

    When was the Amended Complaint served?

    The time for am answer is pushed back?

  8. Starla
    May 19th, 2011 @ 1:24 pm

    NEWS RELEASE – LEGAL PROOF THAT [THE 100%SERIAL CRIMINAL FAKE IMPOSTER] pRESIDENT OBAMA’S CERTIFICATE OF LIVE BIRTH IS A FORGERY

    http://www.scribd.com/fullscreen/55594183

  9. Starla
    May 19th, 2011 @ 1:26 pm

    NEWS RELEASE – LEGAL PROOF THAT [THE 100% SERIAL CRIMINAL FAKE IMPOSTER] pRESIDENT OBAMA’S CERTIFICATE OF LIVE BIRTH IS A FORGERY

    http://www.scribd.com/fullscreen/55594183

  10. Starla
    May 19th, 2011 @ 1:28 pm

    OUTSTANDING MUST SEE & MUST HEAR VIDEO!!!!

    “JEROME CORSI’S FIRST INTERVIEW POST-RELEASE OF “‘WHERE’S THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE? THE CASE THAT BARACK OBAMA IS NOT ELIGIBLE TO BE
    PRESIDENT’”

    Tuesday, May 17, 2011

    https://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2011/05/jerome-corsis-first-interview-post.html#comment-form

    * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

  11. DMV
    May 21st, 2011 @ 5:00 am

    Orly, if the elites are so corrupt, why are you fighting this in the courts where judges will not give you a fair hearing? Isn’t it time for civil disobedience or Second Amendment remedies?

  12. BuenaVistaMall.com
    May 21st, 2011 @ 8:42 am

    Why do Israel and other countries treat Obama as if he is President of the United States?

    They know he is a liar / usurper.

    Are they blackmailing him?

    They are complicit in his felonies.

  13. Chum Lee
    May 21st, 2011 @ 9:26 am

    Orly,

    I do not understand your timing. The summons was not served on the US Attorney’s correct address until much later than April 3, 2011. The docket states this fact. So what value is the April 3, 2011 date?

    That is what I fail to understand since the clock for responses does not begin until all parties are properly served the original summons.

  14. Alec
    May 21st, 2011 @ 10:39 am

    DMV, why should Orly change strategy–when she is making so much progress? Starla, thanks for the links.

  15. Redd
    May 21st, 2011 @ 10:53 am
  16. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    May 21st, 2011 @ 11:51 am

    they were, I sent to the court a certified mail receipt, showing the correct address

  17. Pv
    May 21st, 2011 @ 12:28 pm

    5/21/2011 9:28:25 AM #

    Late last night I googled “Harrison J Bounel” and got 890+ results (it was 896 or 893 — almost 900, but can’t remember exactly).

    This morning, at 5:30 a.m. (PDT), I did another google search for Harrison J Bounel, wanting to see how fast the news was traveling, and got “About 707 results (0.12 seconds)”.

    Huh??? It went down? Not at all what I expected.

    At 6:00 a.m., another google search yielded 698 results… at 6:30 a.m., 689 results… and at 7:15 a.m. I got 642 results…

    Is someone scrubbing the web? Why else would the hits be decreasing instead of increasing?

    << | | >> | Reply | Quote

    Mia

  18. C Ward
    May 21st, 2011 @ 12:50 pm

    Obama’s Social Security Number Tied To An Alias Harrison J Bounel – 5/18/11

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X6tvti9um6k

    didn’t know if you’d heard this or not. So why is he talking on the radio & not taking this to the FBI?

  19. Joebanana
    May 21st, 2011 @ 1:47 pm

    Aren’t there “law”enforcement agencies within the government who are REQUIRED to investigate fraud? And, when such agencies are notified by an official complaint, yet choose to ignore such complaint, wouldn’t that be “neglect of duty”? Isn’t neglect of duty a serious crime?

Leave a Reply