OrlyTaitzEsq.com

TaitzReport.com

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation (DOFF)
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz


If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.





The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.
-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.  -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.  -- Mahatma Gandhi

Supreme Court not following its OWN RULES

Posted on | July 28, 2010 | 8 Comments

Supreme Court not following its OWN RULES

Wednesday, July 28, 2010 6:38 PM
From:
To:
dr_taitz@yahoo.com
Wednesday, July 28, 2010  21:21 ET

Dr Taitz,

This is madness. Now the the Supreme Court is being run at
the whim of its clerks. A lawless Supreme Court is a
monster!

Can you directly contact the Chief Justice without going
through the clerks?

Anyone can understand the Rule 22, it is simple and clear.
By the rule, your applications MUST be transmitted to the
judges. ONLY the judges can deny them, not the clerks. And
you CAN RESUBMIT to EACH of the judges.

SUPREME COURT OF THE U.S. – RULES
..Part V. Motions and Applications
Rule 22. Applications to Individual Justices
1. An application addressed to an individual Justice shall be filed with the Clerk, who will transmit it promptly to the Justice concerned if an individual Justice has authority to grant the sought relief.
2. The original and two copies of any application addressed to an individual Justice shall be prepared as required by Rule 33.2, and shall be accompanied by proof of service as required by Rule 29.
3. An application shall be addressed to the Justice allotted to the Circuit from which the case arises. An application arising from the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces shall be addressed to the Chief Justice. When the Circuit Justice is unavailable for any reason, the application addressed to that Justice will be distributed to the Justice then available who is next junior to the Circuit Justice; the turn of the Chief Justice follows that of the most junior Justice.
4. A Justice denying an application will note the denial thereon. Thereafter, unless action thereon is restricted by law to the Circuit Justice or is untimely under Rule 30.2, the party making an application, except in the case of an application for an extension of time, may renew it to any other Justice, subject to the provisions of this Rule. Except when the denial is without prejudice, a renewed application is not favored. Renewed application is made by a letter to the Clerk, designating the Justice to whom the application is to be directed, and accompanied by 10 copies of the original application and proof of service as required by Rule 29.
5. A Justice to whom an application for a stay or for bail is submitted may refer it to the Court for determination.
6. The Clerk will advise all parties concerned, by appropriately speedy means, of the disposition made of an application.

I will probably call the court, and they will probably tell
me it is not my case and that they aren’t going to discuss
it.  I want to help but I really don’t know what to do!

Terence Brennan
Response from Orly

I highlighted the part, where it says, that the Justice denying the application will note the denial thereon. Do you see, that it says that the justice needs to note the denial, not some faceless clerk. My application was never denied, since there is no signature from Justice Thomas, there was only a docket entry made by the clerk on Saturday the 17th, when the court was closed, Justice Thomas was in Utah, and it was backdated the 15th, even though there was no such notation on Friday, July the 16th and it is not noted on the log. We downloaded the log, it is missing. There has to be a criminal investigation of what is going on. Can you help me reach the Civil rights commission, the department of Justice public integrity unit and your congressmen and senators. If this can go on in the Supreme Court (don’t forget how my Application of Lightfoot v Bowen was deleted before the conference) anything can happen,

I really need you people to burn the phones of your Congressmen and senators. They are really vulnerable now, it is only 3 months before the election. If we don’t get to the bottom of it now, it will be extremely difficult later. Please, go to the town hall meetings, demand meetings with your congressmen at their   home offices, you have to get of your couches and work very hard now. This needs to be heard on the merits by the Supreme Court.
Orly 
Category: Uncategorized

Comments

8 Responses to “Supreme Court not following its OWN RULES”

  1. Emmer Oyd
    July 28th, 2010 @ 7:19 pm

    I will repeat this because you can’t stand the truth, Taitz. Why is the fact that you were fined $20,000 and are too cheap to post bond pending appeal a fucking national emergency? Please tell us why? While your few remaining supporters may be stupid enough to buy your load of BS most of us are not.

  2. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    July 28th, 2010 @ 8:25 pm

    I offered to post bond, read my appeal, it was not allowed. So, next time before you curse and use F words, why don’t you use your brain and read the pleadings.
    Additionally it was not the matter of money. Do you really think that the tax on the tea was so great, that it made the colonists destitute and made them throw the tea bags into Boston Harbor? No, it was not the matter of money, it was the matter of principles and dignity.

  3. BruceWho
    July 28th, 2010 @ 8:40 pm

    It looks like the treatment you are receiving from the Supreme Court is just another event that justifies saying that the onset of “tyranny” has clearly occurred in the USA and will only get worse as we get closer to the November election. Just what will the Supreme Court Clerks do when Arizona submits their appeal? Will they delete this appeal too or say it does not have “standing?” It is apparent that the wheels and gears of our Justice System have been disconnected and We the People are on our own.

  4. PorkRoll
    July 28th, 2010 @ 9:19 pm

    Is it not ironic that Emmer Oyd’s username is a play on the word ‘hemorrhoid’? Good Lord, he’s almost as irritating and his posts make my eyes burn and itch when I read them.

  5. Phi
    July 28th, 2010 @ 11:17 pm

    Lady Liberty:…
    You’ll have to excuse another member of American society that doesn’t know how to post very well.

    Americans like “Bummer Void” can’t help himself…he seems to have a “political tique,” that makes him go “SPastic” when he reads truth! Not all Americans have this “irrational,” psychological aberration!

    It just seems to be the occasional, “politically uneducated” poor-soul that come on your site, that can’t “control” themselves, and only know how to lash out at “nice, decent, ‘accomplished,’ and a respectable person like yourself.

    It is hoped that in the future, he will find a cure for his very deep “pyschological affliction”? But there are some Americans that have to learn the “hard-way” about what’s really going on in D.C. and around the nation! When a voter can’t “discern” truth, then, that person will “wander” through life, until it smacks him right between the eyes!

    Or maybe it’s cause he’s finally realizing that Obama is an “illegal” alien, afterall…and this might have put a dent in his “nano-thinking process,” and he can’t handle the truth…cause he likes living in a “fantasyland”?? He may even “worship” “big brother”??

    Why? Cause he’s like the “illegals,” in that he wants something for nothing from the prez! And he thinks “wealth distribution” is a great idea–to take from someone who’s earned it, to give to another, that hasn’t earned it! But…this is NOT the role of the prez nor the Congress!”

    Good for you in speaking up with your rebuttal. He actually got told off by a “Real Lady”! And ya know why he talks with that “vulgar, political tique,” cause he probably hasn’t progressed in life beyond his “unstable, neurological matrix”…which makes communication with others very “probelmatic” and on the level of: He can’t “grunt in full sentences,” as a result???

    And this also happens when a person doesn’t receive the proper upbringing!

    But we do wish him well…?

    Davey Crockett…

  6. Daisy Mae
    July 29th, 2010 @ 9:44 am

    Phil, what happened to the last letter of your name? OMG, is Orly’s blog now being tampered with by those dastardly SC clerks?

  7. Alec
    July 29th, 2010 @ 10:40 am

    Hey Emmer Oyd, maybe if you smear Preparation H all over yourself it will help your condition. What goes around comes around. One day you will reap what you sow by attacking a hero like Orly who has more integrity and intelligence in her little toe than you have total. If you Obots win, you will discover the hard way tyranny and what Orly is trying to prevent.

  8. JManuola
    July 29th, 2010 @ 11:39 am

    So what do you do next, Orly? A rule has been violated. Obviously you’re not the sort of person to just sit and gripe about it. There has to be a remedy for when a rule is violated. What is it?

Leave a Reply