Supreme Court Justice To Student: If Taxes Go Too High ‘Perhaps You Should Revolt’
Posted on | April 19, 2014 | 7 Comments
Category: Uncategorized
Comments
7 Responses to “Supreme Court Justice To Student: If Taxes Go Too High ‘Perhaps You Should Revolt’”
Leave a Reply
-
EVIDENCE AGAINST OBAMA — YouTube Indiana Trial of Obama !
EVIDENCE AGAINST OBAMA — Indiana Trial of Obama, 2nd Copy
Evidence on Barack Obama
Obama File with Exhibits
Affidavit of Paul Irey
Obama file Exhibits 1 - 7
Obama file Exhibit 8 - Part 1
Obama file Exhibit 8 - Part 2
Obama file Exhibits 9-13
Obama file Exhibits 14-21
Request for Docs under FOIA and Emergency Motion for Reconsideration
Exhibits sent to Inspector Generals and CongressPetition the White House to institute Edward Snowden, National Whistleblower – Patriots against Government Corruption Day
URGENT! PLEASE SIGN PETITION TO CONGRESS
OrlyTaitzEsq.com
TAITZ REPORT
Subscribe today to stay in touch with our progress. Send this channel out to your email lists. Thank you for your support. CHANNEL (Google Plus) SUBSCRIBE TO YOUTUBE Official Facebook
Recent Posts
IMPORTANT NOTICES – PLEASE READ!
Historic DVD Now Available! DVD of the historic trial in GA and DVD of a historic testimony in NH, where evidence was provided showing Obama using a forged birth certificate and a stolen social security number. The DVDs are in a beautiful commemorative case with personal autographs from attorney Dr. Orly Taitz $22.50 each +$2.50 for shipping and handling. --------- To order these DVDs, donate $25.00 by credit card on the website RunOrlyRun.com and email orly.taitz@gmail.com with you name and address. Or send a $25.00 check with your name and address to: Orly Taitz for US Senate 2012, 29839 Santa Margarita ste 100, RSM, CA 92688.Advertisement / Sponsors
29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy,
Ste 100
Rancho Sta Margarita, CA 92688
orly.taitz @gmail. com
(949) 766-7687
--------------------------------------
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld
--------------------------------------
Bumper Sticker
$9.99 thru PayPal--------------------------------------
--------------------------------------Orly Taitz Photo Collections
Pages
- #409755 (no title)
- …Defendant Obama defaulted in Grinols et al v Obama et al
- …Grinols Subpoenas
- ..Grinols Order, Summons, TRO, Complaint
- .Affidavit of Mike Zullo
- 1. Judd v Obama
- 2. Farrar v Obama
- 3. Taitz v Sebelius
- 4. Taitz v Indiana, IN Judge Orders Trial
- 5. Taitz v Astrue
- 6. Mississippi Filed Complaint Update
- 7. Taitz Walters v Sec of State Kansas
- Videos
- Video: Orly before NH Election Committee
April 19th, 2014 @ 5:22 pm
More from Justice Scalia
JUSTICE SCALIA: ‘FOOLISH’ TO HAVE THE SUPREME COURT DECIDE IF NSA WIRETAPPING IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL
Thursday in an interview conducted at the National Press Club in Washington, D.C., Justices Antonin Scalia and Ruth Bader Ginsburg talked about their views of the First Amendment. Moderator Marvin Kalb questioned Scalia about whether the NSA wiretapping cloud be conceivably be in violation of the Constitution:
Justice Antonin Scalia said, “No because it’s not absolute. As Ruth has said there are very few freedoms that are absolute. I mean your person is protected by the Fourth Amendment but as I pointed out when you board a plane someone can pass his hands all over your body that’s a terrible intrusion, but given the danger that it’s guarding against it’s not an unreasonable intrusion. And it can be the same thing with acquiring this data that is regarded as effects. That’s why I say its foolish to have us make the decision because I don’t know how serious the danger is in this NSA stuff, I really don’t.”
https://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-TV/2014/04/19/Justice-Scalia-It-Is-Foolish-To-Have-The-Supreme-Court-Decide-if-NSA-Wiretapping-Is-Unconstitutional
April 20th, 2014 @ 3:33 am
“Those who would give up basic liberty to purchase temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety, and will eventually loose both.” Benjamin Franklin
And, never forget. It was for freedom that Christ poured his blood out on that tree. He has risen!
April 20th, 2014 @ 6:12 am
Well MR. JUSTICE… Taxes have been TO HIGH for over 40 YEARS!!! The Damn Government Just Takes LITTLE PIECES Here and There Until We Have What We Have NOW!!!
April 20th, 2014 @ 11:03 am
The claim that “no right is absolute” is merely the rationalizing of its nascent infringement. Any act that causes harm to person or property, even though in the exercising of ones right, can be criminally prosecuted without the presumed need to restrict others from the free exercise of any right.
The second Amendment is the perfect example. The amendment is quite clearly worded to imply the right of the people to possess firearms is absolute. Those who do use a firearm in criminal acts cannot diminish that right for others. At least that is the properly understood intent of our Second Amendment.
April 21st, 2014 @ 10:59 am
The criteria are set forth in the Declaration of Independence.
Deciede for yourself whether they have been met or not.
April 21st, 2014 @ 4:57 pm
It’s too bad the SCOTUS didn’t do their job when they had the chance in several cases; one such as the o-care travesty!
April 21st, 2014 @ 5:01 pm
tech problems…the jerks are still working over time!
The SCOTUS should’ve done their jobs on several occasions; like with the O-Care!