Defend Our Freedoms Foundation (DOFF)
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz

If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.

The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.

-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.
 -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.
 -- Mahatma Gandhi

Supplemental brief for the Supreme Court of the United States

Posted on | February 9, 2013 | 53 Comments


CASE #A-12606




Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ

29839 Santa Margarita ste 100

Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688

Ph.49-683-5411 fax 949-766-7603











Case at hand is scheduled to be heard on February 16, 2013 in a conference of all the justices of the Supreme Court of the United States.

This case came from the Supreme Court of California and was brought by Presidential Candidates: Edward Noonan, Thomas Gregory MacLeran and Keith Judd  against the Secretary of the State of California, seeking to stay the certification of the votes for the candidate for the U.S. President Barack Obama due to the fact that the aforementioned candidate committed fraud when he provided his declaration of the candidate and when the Democratic party submitted the certificate of the nomination  due to the fact that Barack Obama is not eligible for the position, as he is not a Natural born U.S. citizen, as required by the U.S. Constitution Article 2, section 1, §5. The declaration of the candidate aqnd the certification of the nomination were based on fraud, on Obama’s use of forged IDs, , stolen Connecticut social Security number 042-68-4425, use of a name that was not legally his use of Indonesian citizenship and based on aiding and abetting by corrupt governmental officials. most notable example of criminal aiding and abetting was signing by the chair of the Democratic Party of Hawaii Brian Schatz a falsified OCON (official certificate of nomination of a candidate) where the usual wording “eligible according to the provisions of the U.S. constitution” were removed in order to accommodate ineligible Obama.  

Plaintiffs provided the Supreme Court of California and the Supreme Court of the United States with over 100 pages of official records, sworn affidavits of senior law enforcement officials and  experts showing that Barack Obama is:

  1. A citizen of Indonesia, as listed in his school registration #203 from Assisi school in Jakarta Indonesia. As  a citizen of Indonesia Obama was never eligible and never legitimate for the U.S. Presidency.
  2.  Obama is using last name not legally his. Plaintiffs provided this court with the passport records of Stanley Ann Dunham,  deceased mother   of Barack Obama, showing that he is listed under the last name Soebarkah in her passport. He was removed from her passport in August of 1969 pursuant to the request and sworn statement of Ms. Dunham and signed by the U.S. consul in Jakarta Indonesia. As the requirement for removal as listed in the passport,  is obtaining a foreign allegiance, it is believed that Barack Obama Soebarkah was removed from his mother’s passport  when he obtained his Indonesian passport. Barack Obama cannot not serve as a U.S. president as the legal entity Barack Obama does not exist. The only legal entity based on the only verifiable record is Barack Obama Soebarkah.
  3. Obama does not have a valid U. S birth certificate. Plaintiff provided affidavits  from Sheriff of Maricopa County Arizona Joseph Arpaio, Investigator Zullo, experts Felicito Papa, Douglas Vogt, Paul Irey, showing that the image posted by Obama on Whitehouse.gov is a computer generated forgery. When there is a question of authenticity of a document, the only way to authenticate, is to conduct expert evaluation of the original document.  Registrar of the State of Hawaii and Director of Health and Deputy Attorney General of Hawaii in charge of the Health Department were obstructing justice and absolutely refused to comply with any subpoenas and produce the original 1961 birth certificate and as such there was never any authentication of the alleged birth certificate. After 4 years of obstruction of Justice, it is clear that the Hawaiian officials have nothing to show and genuine 1961 birth certificate for Barack Obama simply does not exist.

Obama does not have a valid Selective Service certificate. Based on the affidavit of Sheriff Arpaio and investigator Zullo, alleged copy of Obama’s Selective Service Certificate, is  COMPUTER GENERATED FORGERY. In this   supplemental brief Plaintiffs are providing additional evidence, a sworn affidavit from the Chief investigator of the Special investigations unit of the US Coast Guard (ret) and  former special agent of the DHS Jeffrey Stephan Coffman who attested under the penalty of perjury that Obama’s alleged selective service registration is a forgery. 

Plaintiffs submitted with their TRO and complaint the Affidavits of Sheriff Arpaio and investigator Zullo and as a supplement an affidavit of the Chief Investigator of the special investigations of the US Coast Guard Jeffrey Stephan Coffman. Based on those affidavits Obama’s alleged application for the selective service is a forgery. According to  5 USC § 3328.every man born after 1959 has to register with the Selective Service and cannot work in the executive branch if he did not register with the selective service.

(a)An individual—

(1)who was born after December 31, 1959, and is or was required to register under section 3 of the Military Selective Service Act (50 App. U.S.C. 453); and

(2)who is not so registered or knowingly and willfully did not so register before the requirement terminated or became inapplicable to the individual,

shall be ineligible for appointment to a position in an executive agency.

As Obama claims to be born in 1961 (without a valid birth certificate we don’t even know when he was born) he had a duty to register with the selective service. a forgery does not represent a registration, as such Obama is not eligible to be working in the executive branch of the U.S. government. he is not eligible to be a President in the White House or a janitor in the White House and it is a duty of this court to exercise its’ jurisdiction to rule Obama not constitutionally eligible.


  1. 4.     Obama’s 2009 tax returns posted by Obama himself on line showed him using a CT Social Security number 042-68-4425, which failed both E-verify and SSNVS. Affidavit of investigator Albert Hendershot provided herein as an exhibit showed it being issued to Harrison (Harry ) J. Bounel, born in 1890 in Russia, immigrant to the United States, presumed to be deceased, whose death was either not reported to the SSA or deleted from the computer system by a treasonous and criminally complicit employee. Due to Obama’s use of a stolen SSN he is not eligible to work anywhere in the United States, not in the Federal Branch, not in any other branch, not in the private sector, not even to pick tomatoes or clean toilets. Based on his use of a stolen SSN the only thing Obama is eligible to is at least 18 month prison term and deportation. For that reason alone the Supreme Court of California erred in denying the application. This court has to either grant the application or remand it back to the Supreme Court of California for reconsideration.


Justices Antonin Scalia in his book “Making your case” p77 described a process of triage in the Supreme Court, he wrote: “Another factor distinctive to petitions for certiorari is that judges don’t like to spend a lot of time deciding what to decide. Indeed in most courts they won’t even read the brief in support of your petition, but will rely on summaries (or on the selection of particular briefs) by law clerks. And law clerks don’t like to spend much time on this job either.”

Unfortunately, the clerks do more than summaries. Taitz, counsel for the plaintiffs submits as Exhibit 3 a recent correspondence with the Supreme Court in regards to case Taitz v Astrue USCA District of Columbia Circuit no 11-5304, where Taitz caught the employees of the Supreme Court actively obstructing justice and tampering with the documents submitted to the Supreme Court.     Taitz provided the court with Federal Express receipts showing packages received by the Supreme Court and signed for by the employees of the Supreme Court, but never docketed and hidden from the Justices of the Supreme Court by the employees. These employees of the court were not appointed by the President, were not confirmed by the Senate, they never took an oath of allegiance and nobody knows where their allegiance lies.

This is only one of a number of suspicious activities in the Supreme Court of the

United States. Previously a case Lightfoot v Bowen 084524 by the same attorney Taitz  was deleted from the docket of the Supreme Court on inauguration day January 21, 2008, ostensibly to give an impression that there are no more challenges to Obama’s legitimacy. Only after the enormous pressure from the public,  media, state representatives and sworn affidavits from attorneys the case was reentered in the public docket. Clerk in charge for STAYs Danny Bickle repeatedly made incorrect statements claiming that all files were deleted due to some type of computer malfunction, which was not the case. Later, in March of 2009 during a meeting with attorneys and book signing in Los Angeles Taitz was able to discuss the case with Justice Scalia, who was absolutely clueless that the case even existed, even though according to the docket he was a part of the conference of justices who denied that case dealing with the legitimacy of the U.S. President and he voted to deny that case. One can believe that a judge would forget a case about some trivial dispute, but not a case dealing with the U.S. Presidency he supposedly discussed in conference only a month and a half earlier. It is clear that the case Lightfoot v Bowen was decided by the clerks, the names of the justices were printed on the order when the justices had no clue the case even existed. In a case at hand dealing with the usurpation of the U.S. Presidency this is high treason, for which guilty parties should be getting a life in prison or death penalty and the nation is entitled to know who these people are.      

In a different case Rhodes v MacDonald 10A56 (entered by the Supreme Court as

Taitz v MacDonald) a docket entry showing Justice Clarence Thomas denying an

application for STAY was made retroactively on a weekend when Justice Thomas was thousands of miles away giving a seminar in Utah. When Taitz demanded to see an actual signature by Justice Thomas on the order to deny stay or on the cover page of the application, she was referred to Eric Fossum, the same

employee, who signed the denial letter in the Taitz v Astrue case, who admitted to her on the phone that there is no signature of Justice Thomas either on the order or on the cover page of the petition. As such, there is no proof justice Thomas ever saw the petition or ever read a word written in the petition. When citizens went to the Supreme Court and requested copies of the pleadings in aforementioned cases, they were told that there are no such documents available.

Noonan v Bowen is a case which provides an undeniable evidence of usurpation of the U.S. Presidency by a criminal, a citizen of Indonesia who claims that his name is Barack Obama, who is using all forged IDs and a stolen Social Security number and a last name not legally his. Allowing this usurpation to go on is an act of HIGH TREASON. The nation has a right to know who is committing high treason: 9 justices of the Supreme Court of clerks, who hide the pleadings and sworn affidavits from justices. For that reason plaintiffs respectfully demand signatures of the justices on the order or on the front page of the application. If there are no actual signatures of the justices the plaintiffs and the nation as a whole will know that the justices never saw a word of pleadings an the case was “ruled upon” by court employees with unknown allegiance.   Plaintiffs also demand to know the names of the court employees who summarized the case, provided it to the justices and compiled the list of approved or denied applications. Plaintiffs, U.S. Congress, law enforcement and World Community at large deserve to know who committed HIGH TREASON, who should be tried for high treason, who should be getting a penalty which is customary in such cases, which is a life in prison or death penalty.


Justices Kagan and Sotomayor should recuse themselves from this consideration due to the fact that they are appointees of Barack Obama and if the court rules that he was not eligible for office, their very nomination becomes questionable, as such their opinion might be biased.


What is the most troubling is not that a criminal with forged IDs like Obama was able to get in the White House, but the magnitude of corruption, lawlessness, criminality  and flagrant treason in the top positions of power in the U.S. Government and judiciary, as well as regime controlled media. This brief is not only a statement of facts, but also a warning that if members of the judiciary do not clean up their act, do not stop being criminality complicit with our Criminal in Chief, this country will descend to the levels of NAZI Germany in 1940s.

The similarity to NAZI Germany is startling. In 1932 when Hitler came to power there were thousands of highly educated judges in Germany, graduates of the world renown universities of Heidelberg and Berlin, Germany had a Constitution. However, either out of fear or due to corruption being bought and paid for, those judges simply ignored the Constitution and looked the other way when thousands were denied their Constitutional rights, when later they were deprived of their property and any economic rights and ultimately deprived of liberty and life itself. It is startling that out of thousands of judges not one single judge rose to declare Hitler’s actions to be unconstitutional. If only one judge in Germany in 1932-1945 were to show one drop of honesty, integrity and adherence to the German Constitution and were to issue a declaratory relief ruling Hitler’s actions to be unconstitutional, possibly the lives 65 million people around the World could have been spared.

Similarly,  in the past four years of Obama regime in spite of hundreds of pages of sworn affidavits of top law enforcement officials and experts, not one judge showed the integrity of character, honesty and decency to rise against a foreign national with forged IDs and a stolen Social Security number usurping the U.S. Presidency.

From 2008, when Obama first got “elected” judges claimed that it was too late to challenge him, that the challenge needs to be brought during the next election. During the 2012 Primary judges claimed that it is too early, that plaintiffs need to wait for Obama to be nominated by the nominating convention. After the nominating convention judges either dismissed cases without explanation, as it was done by the Supreme Court of California in the case at hand or came up with some bogus excuses. One of the excuses was that Obama is a President and it is up to Congress to impeach him.

First, this case and a number of other cases were brought before Obama was sworn in in 2013, so he needs to be treated as an individual, candidate for the U.S. Presidency. Moreover, Obama never really qualified for the impeachment.   In order to be eligible for the impeachment one has to be a legitimate U.S. President ab initio. In Obama’s case he was never a legitimate candidate.

In his book “active Liberty, interpreting the U.S. constitution” Justice Breyer described his visit of the former Soviet Union and his attempts to teach Russian judges that Democracy and independent judiciary are possible, that it does not have to be a “telephone Justice” when the ruling regime tells judges what to do and how to rule.  Based on the behavior of the U.S. judges during the Obama regime, it is clear that Justice Breyer did not teach the Russian judges democracy and the independence of the judiciary but it is the other way around, the Russian judges taught American counterparts some telephone justice akin to the “judges letters” sent to judges during the NAZI regime.

Let us not forget another peculiar fact: two political figures who have hidden their IDs or engaged in some falsification of their IDs were Joseph Stalin and Adolph Hitler. Stalin falsified his date of birth in order to either cover up the illegitimacy of his birth or prior service as a double agent with “Ohranka”, being a hired thug for both the bolshevics and the special services of the Szar. Hitler ordered the building containing his birth records to be demolished. Possibly it was done due to persistent rumors that his illegitimate father was an offspring from an out of wedlock relationship of his grandmother with a Jewish man. This did not mash with Hitler’s policy of extermination of Jews. Regardless of reasons, people who hide the circumstances of their birth who use forged IDs are inherently dangerous as no one knows who they are, what is their allegiance and end goals.   What is most important is that corruption of the Judiciary leads to disastrous results. The U.S. Constitution is the Supreme law of the land. The longest serving Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States of America John Marshall  stated in Cohens v Virginia (1821) “We have no more right to decline the exercise of jurisdiction which is given, than to usurp that which is not given. The one or the other would be treason to the constitution.” The case at hand is the most important case of the violation of the U.S. constitution and it is the duty of the Supreme Court to interpret it and rule. Moreover, in Fletcher v Peck (1810) the same Chief Justice John Marshall and the rest of the Supreme Court found for the first time a state law to be unconstitutional. In Fletcher the Supreme Court found a state law built on bribery to be unconstitutional. Similarly, in the case at hand certification of a candidate for president built on fraud, forgery, Social Security fraud, selective Service fraud and identity theft is unconstitutional as well.

It is time, it is high time for the Supreme Court of the United States to act, to assume the jurisdiction, as not doing so will be treason to the constitution. It is time to act and rule that the certification of the electoral votes for a Presidential candidate, which were obtained based on fraud, use of forged IDs and a stolen Social Security number as a basis for the proof of identity and Natural born status, is indeed unconstitutional and null and void. The Supreme Court of the United States has therefore the power and the duty to advise the Supreme Court of the State of California that it erred in its decision and that indeed certification of votes for candidate Obama was unconstitutional and null and void.

It is the Constitutional duty of the Supreme Court of the United States to advise both the U.S. Congress and the Legislatures of each and every states of the same, so that the U.S. congress can follow the provisions of the XXs amendment “…if the President elect shall have failed to qualify, then the Vice-President elect shall act as President until a President shall have qualified, and the Congress may by law provide for the case wherein neither a President nor a Vice President elect shall qualified, declaring who shall then act as president, or the manner in which one who is to act shall be selected”. Since Obama’s eligibility is based on forged and stolen IDs, he never qualified and can never qualify as a natural born U.S. citizen status cannot be acquired retroactively. Since Obama never qualified, his selection of the Vice Presidential candidate was not constitutional either, the whole ticket was unconstitutional. Plaintiffs believe that the most Democratic way of selecting a qualified President is a new election, a special election. It is true that there was never a special election for the U.S. President, however there were multiple special elections for the U.S. Representatives, senators and state governors.  Moreover, there is always a first. It appears that ObamaForgeryGate will lead to a first special election for the U.S. President. However, ultimately based on the XXth amendment it will be the jurisdiction of the U.S. Congress to decide in which manner the next president to be chosen upon removal from office of one usurping the position by fraud and forgery. At the moment the most important task is for the U.S. Supreme court to exercise its’ jurisdiction and issue an opinion declaring Barack Obama to be constitutionally ineligible for the U.S. Presidency due to identity fraud and use of forged and stolen IDs as a basis of establishing his identity and eligibility.    


1. Supplemental brief and attached sworn affidavits of Chief investigator of the Special Investigations Unit of the U.S. Court guard Jeffrey Stephan Coffman provided an undeniable evidence that Candidate Barack Obama was never eligible to be employed anywhere in the executive branch of the U.S. government; not as a President in the White House and not as a janitor in the White House as he used a  laughable flagrant forgery claiming it to be a genuine Selective Service registration created in 1980. For this reason alone the Supreme Court of the United States should either grant the application or remand the case at hand back to the Supreme Court of California for reconsideration. Moreover, based on this evidence the Supreme Court of the United States should appoint a special prosecutor similar to Archibald Cox in Watergate and Kenneth Starr in MonicaLewinskyGate to investigate and prosecute the criminal aspects of the Selective service Fraud, Identity theft/fraud, elections fraud and usurpation of the presidency by Obama on ObamaForgeryGate.

2. Obama’s 2009 tax returns posted by Obama himself on line showed him using a CT Social Security number xxx-xx-4425, which failed both E-verify and SSNVS. Affidavit of investigator Albert Hendershot showed it being issued to Harrison (Harry ) J. Bounel, born in 1890 in Russia, immigrant to the United States, presumed to be deceased, whose death was either not reported to the SSA or deleted from the computer system by a treasonous and criminally complicit employee.  Due to Obama’s use of a stolen SSN he is not eligible to work anywhere in the United States, not in the Federal Branch, not in any other branch, not in the private sector, not even to pick tomatoes or clean toilets. Based on his use of a stolen SSN the only thing Obama is eligible to is at least 18 month prison term and deportation. For that reason alone the Supreme Court of California erred in denying the application. This court has to either grant the application or remand it back to the Supreme Court of California for reconsideration.

3. Due to the fact that this is the most important case of National Security and due to the fact that justices of the Supreme Court were clueless about other cases brought before them and supposedly discussed in conference and due to the fact that on prior occasions clerks of the court and other employees of the Supreme Court have hidden cases from the justices, there have to be the actual signatures of the justices showing that they actually read the case, that it was not ruled upon by the employees of the court who have hidden the case from the justices and simply printed an order.

4. Justices Kagan and Sotomayor should recuse themselves from this consideration due to the fact that they are appointees of Barack Obama and if the court rules that he was not eligible for office, their very nomination becomes questionable, as such their opinion might be biased.

5. Supreme Court should exercise its’ jurisdiction and issue a ruling on Obama ‘s eligibility based on all the evidence presented.


/s/ Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ

Counsel for the plaintiffs



I, Orly Taitz, attest that I served the defendant by first class mail on 02.08.2013 at the following address:

Kamala Harris-Attorney General of California

1300 I St, Sacramento, CA 95814

/s/ Orly Taitz

cc U.S. and International media

cc Congressman Gregg Harper (R-MS)


United State House Administration Subcommittee on Election

307 House Office Building

Washington DC 20515

ph 202-225-5031

fax 202-225-5797

ccGregg Harper, Mississippi, Chairman

Aaron Shock, Illinois

Rich Nugent, Florida

Todd Rokita, Indiana

Bob Brady, Pennsylvania, Ranking Member

Charlie Gonzalez, Texas

cc Congressman Darrell Issa


House Oversight Committee

2347 Rayburn House Building

Washington DC, 20515


cc Congressman Mike Rogers


House Intelligence Committee

133 Cannon House Office building

Washington DC 20515


cc Congressman Sam Johnson


House Subcommittee on Social Security

House Ways and Means Committee

2929 N Central Expy, 240

Richardson, TX 75080


cc Congressman Dana Rohrbacher


House Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations’

House Committee on Foreign Affairs

2300 Rayburn House Building

Washington DC 20515


US Commission

on Civil Rights

624 Ninth Street, NW

Washington, DC 20425 C



Public Integrity Section

Department of Justice

950 Pennsylvania Ave, NW

Washington DC 20530-0001


Inter -American Commission on Human Rights

1889 F Street, N.W.. Washington, D.C., 20006 U.S.A..

Tel.: 202-458-6002,     202-458-6002. Fax: 202-458-3992.


Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR)

Special Rapporteur on the Situation of Human Rights Defenders

The Honorable Mrs. Margaret Sekaggya

Palais des Nations

CH-1211 Geneva 10, Switzerland

International Criminal bar Hague


Head Office

Neuhuyskade 94

2596 XM The Hague

The Netherlands

Tel : 0031 (70) 3268070              0031 (70) 3268070      

Fax : 0031 (70) 3353531

Email: info@bpi-icb.org

Website: www.bpi-icb.org

Regional Office – Americas / Bureau régional – Amériques / Oficina regional – Américas

137, rue St-Pierre

Montréal, Québec, Canada, H2Y 3T5

Tel : 001 (514) 289-8757              001 (514) 289-8757      

Fax : 001 (514) 289-8590

Email: admin@bpi-icb.org

Website: www.bpi-icb.org


Laura Vericat Figarola


Secretaria Barcelona


Address: Avenida Diagonal 529 1º2ª

08029 Barcelona, España

tel/fax 0034 93 405 14 24


United Nations Commission for

Civil Rights Defenders

Orsolya Toth (Ms)

Human Rights Officer

Civil and Political Rights Section

Special Procedures Division

Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights

tel: + 41 22 917 91 51

email: ototh@ohchr.org






53 Responses to “Supplemental brief for the Supreme Court of the United States”

  1. JERRY
    February 9th, 2013 @ 5:50 pm

    Federal Court Indicts President Obama should not see end of his second term! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EIFW3yDcZw0

  2. Yoel
    February 9th, 2013 @ 6:37 pm

    “We’ll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false.” – WILLIAM CASEY, Director of Central Intelligence, 1981.

  3. Irmgard Fitzgerald
    February 9th, 2013 @ 6:41 pm

    Wow, this is a very powerful letter to the supreme court. I pray every night for Obama to be ex spelled from the White House.He will bankrupt this beautiful country.

  4. John Frigehn Geltam
    February 9th, 2013 @ 6:47 pm

    Thats great stuff – let those justices know who’s the boss!

  5. Ray
    February 9th, 2013 @ 7:58 pm

    a word of pleadings “an” the case was “ruled upon” by court employees with unknown allegiance. Should be “and”.

  6. Ray
    February 9th, 2013 @ 8:30 pm

    stolen Connecticut social Security number “042-68-4425”

    using a CT Social Security number “xxx-xx-4425”, which failed both E-verify and SSNVS


  7. Ray
    February 9th, 2013 @ 8:43 pm


    This is just absolutely brilliant. In as sane world there is no way that this case would not result in turning the present administration up side down.

    It breaks my heart to say that the world has gone completely insane. I fully expect the Supreme Court is split, half living in fear, and the other half in the tank.

    God help us.

    ps please don’t take any of this out of moderation.

    I only wish I was as articulate as you are versed in the English language.

    God Bless

  8. JD
    February 9th, 2013 @ 10:06 pm

    I suspected for a long time that this was the case. The pure math did not work. They claim that they receive 10,000 cases a year to hear. They accept maybe a 120 or so. The take two months off in the summer.

    10,000 cases divided by 44 weeks = 227 cases per week to decide. When would they ever have time to decide the cases they do accept.

    Its just not possible to review 227 cases per week. The clerks are definitely in charge. If a lawyer can’t state the nature of the case as it relates to the Constitution, on the first page, forget about it. Thats just the way it is. Hopefully the clerks share the same ideology as the justice. There is only one exception. If Obama was to lose a case (at the last court of appeals), the justices would definitely hear the case.

    The law only applies to the pee-ons of the world. The ruling class are exempt from all the laws they write. Maybe thats why it takes riots in some countries to change the way things are done. It appears that the whole world is corrupt and lying has become the national pass time.

  9. Love God
    February 10th, 2013 @ 1:02 am

    Why is the date changed from 15th to 16th of Feb.? Is a false flag, like an engineered economic collapse planned for the 15th or is there something worse planned? If such things happen then no one pays attention to ‘o’s BC and SSN!
    In any case, I feel this case will never see the light of day and this issue will be kicked around like a football for the entertainment and distraction of a set of people, who are intelligent enough to ask questions.
    And when good minds are distracted in this manner, the crooks, who can perpetually arm-twist the judiciary, will go about doing their mean business of killing US of A from the inside out! And along the way, they will employ more muslims with ‘brotherhood’ affiliations into the government, like the recent Brennan.
    Why don’t people focus on the issues which can be curbed by political efforts- like gun-control issue, use of drones for killing citizens, islamization of education, illegal immigrant amnesty issue, increasing number of food stamp recipients, taxation, obamacare shockers, election fraud, etc.????
    I feel if those issues are checked and defeated, then you can save a country from becoming a banana republic and a standing joke in front of the world!
    If at this attempt on the 16th Feb., even with all the irrefutable evidence, nothing can be done, kindly do a favor and focus on issues faced directly by the people. Why waste the time and efforts of intelligent minds on problems which cannot be resolved??

    Keeping fingers crossed for the much awaited SCOTUS case. Besto!

  10. James Smith
    February 10th, 2013 @ 1:21 am

    Absolutely brilliant, very cleaver, bravo. If they were Joe the plumber right now I think they would need to check their plumbing for a overload in their britches.

  11. David Milberg
    February 10th, 2013 @ 2:13 am

    Will you accept the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States whichever way they go? I understand there is a teeny, tiny chance that they may rule Obama eligible; if that happens what will you do?

  12. TJ Marvin
    February 10th, 2013 @ 3:27 am

    ATTENTION: to all of you that have a computer. Make a new folder and place it on your desk top. Then put a note pad inside the new folder. Next copy the letter titled Supplemental Breif for the Supreme Court of the United States. Next paste the letter on the note pad. I know you can do that b/c 4 years ago I had a computer. I gave it to my daughter in Tn. before I moved to Fl. from Tn. I can’t do that with this iPhone. If Dr. Orly’s site gets scrubbed then you will have it. PLEASE do this!

  13. Annie
    February 10th, 2013 @ 4:34 am

    Isn’t the case to be reviewed the *15th* not the 16th?

  14. Tim Rich
    February 10th, 2013 @ 5:02 am

    Many thanks Orly to you for fighting against this evil dictatorship disguised as a parody of a free, democratic society.
    Why evil dictatorship? Because not a single court has had the honesty of assessing all your cases and similar cases based on the facts presented and not a single court has decided to allow full discovery ON ALL OF BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA’S DOCUMENTS!!!

    Keep fighting until you are fully vindicated on ALL your complaints:
    1) on ALL the forged documents (especially the forged short and long form birth certificates, etc.);
    2) on the ineligibility of Barack Hussein Obama to be president of the USA simply because he is NOT a “natural born citizen”, a condition that is required by the Constitution of the USA and that requires BOTH of Obama’s parents to have been American citizens at the time of his birth (his father was never ever an American citizen)!!!

    And I can tell you in advance that they will NOT recuse themselves, I am pretty sure of that!! They did not in previous cases I believe in various cases where they should have done so.


    Many thanks to you again Orly for your fight. Keep fighting until a complete, full win, not any half-baked win.

  15. Franklin Lancaster
    February 10th, 2013 @ 5:37 am

    I’m so happy that the Supreme Court will be hearing Obama’s eligibility case and that finally, ONCE AND FOR ALL, we will know whether or not Obama is eligible. I’m sure he will be found ineligible but I’m prepared to accept the verdict whichever way it goes and move on.

    Thanks for everything and good luck!!!

  16. Veritas
    February 10th, 2013 @ 6:06 am

    Interesting the idea of Kagan and Sotomayor’s having to recuse themselves.

    What a conflict of interest.

    For them to vote in a way detrimental to Obama would mean they lose their jobs; yet, even then, would their votes EVEN count?

    It is one of the oddest moments in American history!

  17. Fish Food
    February 10th, 2013 @ 6:18 am

    That’s a lot of work for something that will never be read by any of the justices. Should make the clerk’s day, though.

  18. DonnaLS
    February 10th, 2013 @ 6:35 am
  19. DonnaLS
    February 10th, 2013 @ 6:37 am
  20. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    February 10th, 2013 @ 7:04 am

    it was a typo in the draft and was corrected

  21. Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ Supplemental Brief for SCOTUS in Obama Eligibility Case :: American Exceptionalism
    February 10th, 2013 @ 7:15 am

    […] on all the evidence presented. /s/ Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQCounsel for the plaintiffs02.08.2013Supplemental brief for the Supreme Court of the United States Categories : AEI, Events, Links, […]

  22. TJ Marvin
    February 10th, 2013 @ 7:30 am

    FoxNews and the socalled Conservative radio host are guilty of aiding and abetting. Why people keep watching and listening to them is beyond me.

  23. TJ Marvin
    February 10th, 2013 @ 7:32 am

    Dr. Orly you have hushmail when get a chance to get to it.

  24. Richard
    February 10th, 2013 @ 7:55 am

    Excellent work Orly. Hopefully the cowards in the media will cover this event and equally hopefully the justices will actually do their job. Is there a way we can contact the justices ahead of time and express our concern?

  25. Baruch
    February 10th, 2013 @ 8:02 am


    Since you draw conclusions with the Nazi Germany, you can mention that the Constitution there was suspended and people swore their allegiance not to the Constitution but directly to the Fuhrer.

  26. Geneva
    February 10th, 2013 @ 8:13 am

    This is brilliant & I truly appreciate your diligence to unveil the truth. How is Obama any different than the 911 terrorists? They infiltrated our nation, learned our ways, assimilated to our culture & then struck at the heart.

    Obama’s entire purpose is extremely vivid. Become an American by whatever means necessary, coerce people into believing he’s a bright person, gain political power, provide resources to enemy invaders, weaken America’s defense & infiltrate with tyrants. He has followed his mentors with precision.

    God help us by allowing your pursuit to prosper & for others to arise with courage enough to do the same.

  27. Kathy F
    February 10th, 2013 @ 8:22 am

    Thank you Dr. Taitz for proceeding forward.

    This will be THE defining moment in our countrie’s history to determine whether or not the Constitution is still upheld in this land. This issue is so obvious (the fraud by Obama) that there can not be any “grey” decisions by the court. If the Constitution is not upheld by this court’s decision and they will not protect the American citizens against tyranny and fraud; then the US citizens no longer have an obligation to pay any more FEDERAL taxes to fuel their own demise. I pray that the Supreme Court justices will be brave and strong enough to reach justice.

    Our Prayers are with you.

    Kathy F.

  28. Baruch
    February 10th, 2013 @ 8:26 am

    The correct version of the the previous message is shown below; please discard the old version


    Since you draw comparisons with the Nazi Germany, you can mention that the Constitution there was suspended and people swore their allegiance not to the Constitution but directly to the Fuhrer.

  29. ch
    February 10th, 2013 @ 8:38 am

    If a sheriff is the supreme law in a county, then who is the supreme law where the US Supreme Court resides? Can you talk with that law enforcement agency and have them coordinate delivery of materials by hand to the justices, and show cause for criminal obstruction of justice by the clerks? You may be able to get law enforcement to help ensure the court functions properly and even arrest those who are toying with the materials that arrive there. Obstruction of justice is a criminal offense, I think.

  30. Earl Gordon
    February 10th, 2013 @ 9:40 am

    “Many people, especially , ignorant people, want to punish you for speaking the truth, for being correct, for being you.
    Never apologize for being correct, or being years ahead of your time.
    If you are right and you know it, speak your mind, even if you are a minority of one, the truth is still the truth.”

  31. Kay
    February 10th, 2013 @ 10:29 am

    Your brief is BRILLIANT. I just forwarded an e-mail that I received from a Senator to your hush account. Please take look at it. We hve someone on our side. Good luck to you. Please let any of us know if we can help. I wish I could go to Washington with you because I am not too old to hold a picket sign – just too broke to go….

  32. Kay
    February 10th, 2013 @ 10:46 am

    Also – just noticed that the Supreme Court docket is 12A606 so I am not sure if this makes a difference to the clerks, but the numbers are different. Maybe it should be corrected along with the date, Feb 15th. Just wondering. Luck to you.

  33. Scot Workman
    February 10th, 2013 @ 11:48 am


    I commend you on your continued perseverance in fight the Obama regime! I have been following and supporting you since the beginning. I just wish I could support you financially as I am still unemployed. If there is anything that I can do to support your efforts, please let me know.

    I know a lot about website design and development and IT management.

    God Bless Your Family and YOU!

    Scot Workman

  34. TJ Marvin
    February 10th, 2013 @ 2:59 pm

    Dr. Orly this morning I told ORYR and George. ORYR has it up but George doesn’t yet.

  35. TJ Marvin
    February 10th, 2013 @ 3:09 pm

    😆 I wonder why Huffington Post isn’t reporting this one 😆

  36. TJ Marvin
    February 10th, 2013 @ 3:14 pm

    I hope FoxNews is proud of themselves for not reporting this. GRRRRR

  37. nick
    February 10th, 2013 @ 3:31 pm

    My name is Nick I’m writing you a letter to let you know how dissatisfied about our politicians I am . It’s a known fact that the republicans signed a deal with the democrats in 1982 to not question their selection for presidents qualification or voter fraud. Now you I have to really ask what the hell are you doing you were a prisoner of war for what was it 5 years and went threw a living hell the entire time for what just to sell your sole to the devil the democrats. There are more people that knows barack obama isn’t qualified to be president . I think all politicians really need to be taught what the constitution really says even in the book he wrote about his father right their in black and white right out of his mouth his father was born in Kenya so he could of even born in the white house he still doesn’t qualify or doesn’t anyone really care about our constitution. I went to Arlington cemetery with my girlfriend about 5 weeks ago to look at all the men and women that died for this country if they only knew it was for nothing because the republicans sold us out and I’m a registered republican and right now it’s sad to say. I thought you would really be the one to stand up for this country for what you went threw for it .Now I see that DHS over the last 10 months has bought 21 million rounds of 40 caliber hollow point bullets they say enough for a 30 year civil war is that what our politicians really want their are millions of people that will stand up for our rights. I’VE ALREADY MET WITH MY STATE SHERIFF AND GAVE HIM ALL THE INFORMATION HE NEEDS TO CHECK IN TO THE USERPER IN THE WHITE HOUSE

    i sent this letter along with this supplimental breaf to SENATOR JOHN MCCAIN

  38. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    February 10th, 2013 @ 4:25 pm

    who is George?

  39. Bill W.
    February 10th, 2013 @ 4:32 pm

    Whoever he is, he can’t get it up!

  40. amigo
    February 10th, 2013 @ 4:47 pm

    Posted as News Tips on Brietbart and Drudge

    Danny Bickel and other Court Clerks have been hiding or changing court documents for years – High Treason. Why isn’t the news media all over this. Check out Dr. Orly’s Supplemental brief ” 315 MILLION U.S. CITIZENS DEMAND TO KNOW, WHO IS COMMITTING TREASON AND AIDING AND ABETTING THE USURPATION OF THE U.S. PRESIDENCY: IS IT DONE BY 9 JUSTICES OF THE SUPREME COURT OR BY THE STAFF ATTORNEYS AND CLERKS OF THE COURT WHO HAVE HIDDEN THE PLEADINGS AND EVIDENCE IN THIS CASE FROM THE JUSTICES”. Several years agoI wrote the House and Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman’s and reported Danny Bickel but obviously they did nothing.

  41. Denna Miller
    February 10th, 2013 @ 5:41 pm

    As Annie previously asked, is the date the 15th or 16th of Feb. for the SCOTUS to review the case? It was previously stated it would be in conference on the 15th which is Friday. The 16th will be on Saturday.
    Please post date.
    Thank you for all you are doing for our country.

  42. TJ Marvin
    February 10th, 2013 @ 6:06 pm

    George Miller

  43. Supplemental brief for the Supreme Court of the United States | NCRenegade
    February 10th, 2013 @ 6:32 pm

    […] More… div.rax_subscribe { width:60%; float:left; border:8px solid #EBEBEB; text-align:center; background-color:#D0E4F5; } div.rax-email-subscribe { background-color:#4086C7; padding:5px 8px; height:60px; } div.rax-email-subscribe span { color:#FFF; font-size:12px; } div.rax-email-subscribe input.rax-button { font-size:14px !important; padding:2px !important; *padding:0px; } div.rax-other-subscribe { margin:10px 5px; } div.rax-other-subscribe img { display:inline; } .clear { padding:0; margin:0; clear:both; } .rax-credit { width:60%; text-align:right; font-size:9px; color:#CCC; } .rax-credit a { text-decoration:none; font-size:9px; color:#CCC; } .rax-credit a:hover { text-decoration:none; } Subscribe to NC Renegade Posts via Email […]

  44. Concerned Citizen
    February 10th, 2013 @ 6:44 pm

    If all is true, then Obama is guilty of the felony of Aggravated Identity Theft, Mail and Immigration Fraud. These article describes the punishment: http://www.identitytheft.com/identity-theft-punishment

  45. Anonymous
    February 11th, 2013 @ 12:10 am

    He is commiting treason and trying to over through the united states government! Unfortunately, he has had help! This must be addressed to save America and the constitution as well as the bill of rights! Our nation is in terrible trouble! God bless the republic of the united states of America! God bless this brave woman for taking this on! May we all be as brave as her!!!!

  46. First Contact Radio – February 11, 2013 | First Contact Radio
    February 11th, 2013 @ 7:26 am

    […] coming after State of the Union address Controversy Bubbles Up Over Newtown Children’s Choir Supplemental brief for the Supreme Court of the United States 3MIN News February 11, 2013: The Sun is Liquid? Nostradamus Concerning Comets in the future Relax […]

  47. Francisco
    February 12th, 2013 @ 12:32 pm

    I sent a couple of suggestions about the 1875 case, Minor v Happersett, in which the Supreme Court at that time opined about what a ‘natural born citizen’ described in our Constitution, really means. Reading that opinion, it is clear that the Usurper should be in jail, or already having been deported to Indonesia or Kenya.
    Why were these suggestions erased ?

  48. Virginia W.
    February 13th, 2013 @ 9:24 am

    The date is the 15th. There was a clerical error by the court (surprise, surprise) and it has been corrected. It’s ON for the 15th.

  49. Kenneth A Schuster
    February 14th, 2013 @ 9:58 pm

    Dear GOD please let this be true.Please help America to recover from the damage done by obama.Amen.

  50. Andrew Stebbins
    February 15th, 2013 @ 12:44 pm

    Good luck. I hope you are successful.

  51. Natural Born Thriller | The Radical Middle
    February 19th, 2013 @ 3:05 pm

    […] court without much luck. I found a post, which I assume is the brief, on Taitz’s website, titled: Supplemental Brief for the Supreme Court of the United States (you have to scroll down to see […]

  52. Lean muscle formula Diet
    July 10th, 2014 @ 1:14 pm

    It’s an remarkable piece of writing for all the internet viewers; they will take benefit from it I am sure.

  53. l arginine pills
    July 17th, 2014 @ 3:17 am

    What’s up to all, it’s genuinely a nice for me to pay a quick visit
    this website, it consists of helpful Information.

Leave a Reply