Dr. Orly Taitz, Esquire

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz


If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.





The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.

-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.
 -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.
 -- Mahatma Gandhi



Steve Stockman is challenging John cornyn for US Senate. so far they both were full of empty talk and hot air. Demand action from them, demand they submit to the judiciary committee actual proposed articles of impeachment based on Obama’s use of bogus IDs and other acts of fraud. If they don’t put their money where their mouth is, they are equally worthless

Posted on | December 10, 2013 | 26 Comments

 

http://www.politico.com/story/2013/12/steve-stockman-john-cornyn-texas-senate-primary-100924.html?hp=f3

Share

Comments

26 Responses to “Steve Stockman is challenging John cornyn for US Senate. so far they both were full of empty talk and hot air. Demand action from them, demand they submit to the judiciary committee actual proposed articles of impeachment based on Obama’s use of bogus IDs and other acts of fraud. If they don’t put their money where their mouth is, they are equally worthless”

  1. william Tynan Brown
    December 10th, 2013 @ 3:26 am

    YES!!! Where are the Articles of Impeachment, there is plenty of documented evidence that must be officially adjudicated for all to see

  2. william Tynan Brown
    December 10th, 2013 @ 3:28 am

    Under U S law the Obama massive fraud constitutes TREASON failure to bring Articles of impeachment would also constitutes TREASON

  3. Jessie J
    December 10th, 2013 @ 4:43 am

    Cornyn has already announced that he believes Obama is eligible.

  4. Bob69
    December 10th, 2013 @ 7:54 am

    Neither one is going to do squat. They are convinced it might hurt their election chances and there is absolutely nothing more important than being elected.

  5. Anonymous
    December 10th, 2013 @ 9:13 am

    in early November, you met with a Congressman and then you posted an assurance that a letter from you regarding this, would be submitted by that Congressman to the Judiciary Committee? If it has been submitted, isn’t that enough?

  6. Anonymous
    December 10th, 2013 @ 10:38 am

    Mrs. Taitz: In early November, you said that you had met with a Congressman who intended to submit your evidence to the Judiciary Committee. You posted a letter and said that it would be submitted the following day, I believe. Wasn’t the meeting on Nov 5? So if it is already submitted, why must it be submitted a second time?

  7. Anonymous
    December 10th, 2013 @ 10:38 am

    Mrs. Taitz: In early November, you said that you had met with a Congressman who intended to submit your evidence to the Judiciary Committee. You posted a letter and said that it would be submitted the following day, I believe. Wasn’t the meeting on Nov 5? So if it is already submitted, why must it be submitted a second time?

  8. Anonymous
    December 10th, 2013 @ 10:38 am

    Mrs. Taitz: In early November, you said that you had met with a Congressman who intended to submit your evidence to the Judiciary Committee. You posted a letter and said that it would be submitted the following day, I believe. Wasn’t the meeting on Nov 5? So if it is already submitted, why must it be submitted a second time?

  9. Anonymous
    December 10th, 2013 @ 10:39 am

    Mrs. Taitz: In early November, you said that you had met with a Congressman who intended to submit your evidence to the Judiciary Committee. You posted a letter and said that it would be submitted the following day, I believe. Wasn’t the meeting on Nov 5? So if it is already submitted, why must it be submitted a second time?

    P.S. Your website doesn’t seem to be working, for comments. When I hit Submit Comment, mine seems to disappear. Perhaps it is coming your way, but one doesn’t know.

  10. Anonymous
    December 10th, 2013 @ 10:40 am

    Mrs. Taitz: In early November, you said that you had met with a Congressman who intended to submit your evidence to the Judiciary Committee. You posted a letter and said that it would be submitted the following day, I believe. Wasn’t the meeting on Nov 5? So if it is already submitted, why must it be submitted a second time?

    P.S. Your website doesn’t seem to be working, for comments. When I hit Submit Comment, mine seems to disappear. Perhaps it is coming your way, but one doesn’t know.

  11. Alice Kramden
    December 10th, 2013 @ 10:41 am

    Mrs. Taitz: In early November, you said that you had met with a Congressman who intended to submit your evidence to the Judiciary Committee. You posted a letter and said that it would be submitted the following day, I believe. Wasn’t the meeting on Nov 5? So if it is already submitted, why must it be submitted a second time?

    P.S. Your website doesn’t seem to be working, for comments. When I hit Submit Comment, mine seems to disappear. Perhaps it is coming your way, but one doesn’t know.

  12. DavidL
    December 10th, 2013 @ 11:57 am

    It would be a political mistake to bring this up before the election. The left would make them look like a kook and would suppress the truth.

    In turn, this could result in a democrat taking a state-wide seat in Texas (which hasn’t happened for almost 20 years now).

    The right time to get on board with exposing the truth is after the election.

  13. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    December 10th, 2013 @ 1:58 pm

    that what our corrupt establishment said for 5 years: in 2008, 2010 and 2012. After elections they would not do anything, would not even talk to us. We have to bring this issue now and use it as a catalyst to weed out corrupt politicians

  14. william Tynan Brown
    December 10th, 2013 @ 4:03 pm

    YES!!! Articles on Impeachment IMMEDIATELY. There is sufficient documented evidence far worse than anything Nixon eve did

  15. william Tynan Brown
    December 10th, 2013 @ 4:05 pm

    YES!!! Articles on Impeachment IMMEDIATELY. There is sufficient documented evidence far worse than anything Nixon eve did

  16. Bob69
    December 10th, 2013 @ 5:28 pm

    Saying “wait until after the election” to take action on Barry’s fraud has never been anything but a delaying tactic. It was said to try to shut people up prior to the election, while knowing full well absolutely nothing would be done after the election.

    Don’t fall for that nonsense!

  17. Karl
    December 10th, 2013 @ 7:00 pm

    Judging from his intrusion into Alaska and other state primaries on behalf of RINOs, it appears to me that John Cornyn is a RINO masquerading as a conservative.

  18. DavidL
    December 10th, 2013 @ 7:42 pm

    Ms. Taitz – One can meet with them in private (away from the press) and get a politician to make a promise to investigate when/if they get elected, in exchange for votes.

    Let’s face it, in 2008-2012 we didn’t know who owned the SSN that Obama was using, and without Hawaii’s permission, nobody was ever going to get to the bottom of the records. The evidence just wasn’t strong enough for a politician to put their career on the line.

    It is different now, but still it is too high risk for a politician running for office to put their position out there before an election.

    So I maintain that correct play in this situation is private meetings and get commitment for action after the election in exchange for votes.

  19. Karl
    December 10th, 2013 @ 7:50 pm

    “There is sufficient irrefutable evidence FAR WORSE than anything Nixon ever did.”

    Exactly! Despite their self-serving promises made in order to gain the support and votes of constitutionalists, after these pompous, arrogant RINOs were safely in office, they not only REFUSED to honor their promises, but refused even to TALK to us. Such duplicity leaves us no choice but to use this issue to remove corrupt, spineless deceivers from office.

    “Actions speak louder than words!”

    They had their opportunity to expose Barry’s fraud. It is now time to replace them with people of honor who will truly represent us.

    “Fool me once, shame on YOU; fool me twice, shame on ME!”

  20. william Tynan Brown
    December 10th, 2013 @ 9:26 pm

    Today, December 10, the 2nd court of appeals in NYC ruled agaist the Holder justice department and infavor of CNN relative to an injunction barring the reporting of government corruption information that CNN already has and is prepared to report, everybody should call CNN and demant that the IMMEDIATELY report the government corruption information now that the injunction has ended, make certain that General Paul Vallely knows

  21. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    December 10th, 2013 @ 10:32 pm

    what do politicians do best? lying. they will promise you their firstborn in a private meeting and later will state that they never said it.
    I believe that Stockman is full of hot air, just like everyone else.
    Remember Alan West? He claimed that he will investigate
    Obama’s trip to Pakistan, what passport he used. When elected, he did nothing. He was full of hot air more than others. People wasted millions on Alan West campaigns and for what? He did absolutely nothing, all the money went down the drain.
    There are only a couple of people in congress that show some decency: Grassley, Sessions, a couple more. but so far even they are afraid.

  22. william Tynan Brown
    December 11th, 2013 @ 5:15 am

    everybody call CNN and demand the IMMEDIATE report of the RV and government corruption information in their possession. Must be reported IMMEDIATELY. Come on people time to stand up and be counted, your country needs you

  23. Thomas
    December 11th, 2013 @ 7:08 am

    We MUST Make Obama/SOETOROS Fake BC., SSN, and Selective Service Registration The NUMBER ONE TALKING POINT in ANY CAMPAIGN FOR CONGRESS!!!
    It MUST BE IN THEIR PLATFORM FOR ELECTION!

  24. william Tynan Brown
    December 11th, 2013 @ 2:24 pm

    everybody must call CNN,ASAP and demand that they report the information they possess on government corruption and report it IMMMEDIATELY, the 2nd circuit Court of Appeals ended the injunction yesterday, December 10, and still no report on CNN, Why?

  25. js/js
    December 11th, 2013 @ 7:28 pm

    If this nationwide ACA fraud in Obamacare is not prosecuted by the House Judiciary Comtee, then they are (Goodlatte, Issa, etc.) all —
    all totally complicit in nationwide fraud, uttering, misfeasance, bait-and-switch,
    consumer swindling, misrepresentation, money
    laundering, and Ponzi schemes, on and on and on. Not to mention tax fraud and tax violations.

    IMO. If the Congress refuses to act, then only
    martial law will be able to act in military
    tribunal format. Good grief. The voters of
    California had to remove Grey Davis for all
    the fraud and lies and budget deceptions, then how in the world of decency can obot and the obots get away with this Health Care, ACA mess? Huh? What is wrong with the people???

  26. william Tynan Brown
    December 12th, 2013 @ 6:05 pm

    Why is CNN delaying and spiking the story on the RV and government corruption? they appealed the Holder injunction and won, so why are they delaying the report?

Leave a Reply





*