2 Responses to “SMOKING GUN=> NEW EMAILS Show Coordinated Targeting of Conservative Groups and Cover-Up By Obama IRS”

1. poetopoet
   July 31st, 2015 @ 1:02 pm

   Impeachable offences and treason by President Barrack Hussein Obama:

   Obama caught and proud of the act of facilitating in the commission crimes that relate to a doctrine of Aiding and Abetting a sworn enemy by treaty he approved and wants the congress too approve it. Obama encourages a sworn know enemy of these United States of America, with nuclear weapons in the near future, while Obama waits for the crime and genocide to be completed while he is out of office, be that the end of Israel by nuclear attack or on U.S. soil.

   Obama by giving the command and demanding the sum (150) borrowed One Hundred and Fifteen Billion U.S. Dollars to be given to the Muslim Nation of Iran to plan and build Nuclear Weapons in their own time frame is not only Aiding and Abetting a future crime and spread Iran’s rein of terror and terrorists.

   When the methodical fools roll over and take over a free nation once based and founded upon the words of “In God We Trust” become redundant as “shall not be infringed” there is no turning back!

   “18 U.S. Code § 2381 – Treason
   Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.”

   “The U.S. Supreme Court found in: Rosemond v. United States,___ U.S. ___, 134 S. Ct. 1240, 1245 (2014). The defendant’s conduct need not facilitate each and every element of the crime; a defendant can be convicted as an aider and abettor even if the defendant’s conduct “relates to only one (or some) of a crime’s phases or elements.”

   “A person may be convicted of aiding and abetting despite the prior acquittal of the principal. Standefer v. United States,447 U.S. 10, 20 (1980); United States v. Mejia-Mesa, 153 F.3d 925, 930 (9th Cir.1998). Moreover, the principal need not be named or identified; it is necessary only that the offense was committed by somebody and that the defendant intentionally did an act to help in its commission. Mejia-Mesa, 153 F.3d at 930 (citing Feldstein v. United States, 429 F.2d 1092, 1095 (9th Cir.1970)).”

2. poetopoet
   July 31st, 2015 @ 1:07 pm

   Impeachable offenses and treason by President Barrack Hussein Obama:

   Obama caught and proud of the act of facilitating in the commission crimes that relate to a doctrine of Aiding and Abetting a sworn enemy by treaty he approved and wants the congress too approve it. Obama encourages a sworn know enemy of these United States of America, with nuclear weapons in the near future, while Obama waits for the crime and genocide to be completed while he is out of office, be that the end of Israel by nuclear attack or on U.S. soil.

   Obama by giving the command and demanding the sum (150) borrowed One Hundred and Fifteen Billion U.S. Dollars to be given to the Muslim Nation of Iran to plan and build Nuclear Weapons in their own time frame is not only Aiding and Abetting a future crime and spread Iran’s rein of terror and terrorists.

   When the methodical fools roll over and take over a free nation once based and founded upon the words of “In God We Trust” become redundant as “shall not be infringed” there is no turning back!

   “18 U.S. Code § 2381 – Treason
   Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.”

   “The U.S. Supreme Court found in: Rosemond v. United States,___ U.S. ___, 134 S. Ct. 1240, 1245 (2014). The defendant’s conduct need not facilitate each and every element of the crime; a defendant can be convicted as an aider and abettor even if the defendant’s conduct “relates to only one (or some) of a crime’s phases or elements.”

   “A person may be convicted of aiding and abetting despite the prior acquittal of the principal. Standefer v. United States,447 U.S. 10, 20 (1980); United States v. Mejia-Mesa, 153 F.3d 925, 930 (9th Cir.1998). Moreover, the principal need not be named or identified; it is necessary only that the offense was committed by somebody and that the defendant intentionally did an act to help in its commission. Mejia-Mesa, 153 F.3d at 930 (citing Feldstein v. United States, 429 F.2d 1092, 1095 (9th Cir.1970)).”

Leave a Reply