OrlyTaitzEsq.com

TaitzReport.com

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation (DOFF)
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz


If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.





The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.
-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.  -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.  -- Mahatma Gandhi

Request for proper submission sent to the Supreme Court

Posted on | July 29, 2010 | 14 Comments

Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ

29839 Santa Margaria PKWY, ste 100

Rancho Santa Margarita CA 92688

ph. 949-683-5411 fax 949-766-7603

Attn Mr. Danny Bickell

Clerk for Stays

Supreme Court of the United States

Via Certified Mail return receipt

07.28.10.

Dear Mr. Bickell,

On July 8, 2010 my Application for Stay 10A56 was docketed by the Supreme Court. On July 16th at 6pm PST/9pm EST I checked the docket, there was no response from Justice Thomas.

On Saturday July 17, when the Supreme Court was closed, I started getting e-mails and comments on my web site, stating that Justice Thomas denied my application on Thursday, July 15th.

I checked the Docket and found that someone made a  notation in the electronic docket on Saturday and backdated it for Thursday. Justice Thomas was in Utah at a time. Additionally, a log of orders on applications within the Supreme Court around July 15-17 showed other applications, but not mine.

Within a few days I called the Supreme Court and talked to the clerk’s office, to an employee by name Eric Fossum,  and asked  for a copy of the order or cover page of my application, where Justice Thomas signed the denial of my application. I was told, that there is no signature, no signed order and no signature on the cover of the application. When I asked Mr. Fossum, how do I know that Justice Thomas  actually read the application or even saw it, if there is no signature, Mr. Fossum was very careful in responding that it was reviewed in chambers. He did not even state that it was reviewed by justice Thomas, he stated that it was reviewed in chambers, which might mean by the clerk, without Justice Thomas ever seeing it. Please, note that Rule 22 specifically require the Justice to note such denial, not the clerk and not someone who happened to be in court on Saturday or someone who happened to somehow enter the electronic docket on Saturday and make an entry.

SUPREME COURT OF THE U.S. – RULES
..Part V. Motions and Applications
Rule 22. Applications to Individual Justices

1. An application addressed to an individual Justice shall
be filed with the Clerk, who will transmit it promptly to
the Justice concerned if an individual Justice has authority
to grant the sought relief.

2. The original and two copies of any application addressed
to an individual Justice shall be prepared as required by
Rule 33.2, and shall be accompanied by proof of service as
required by Rule 29.

3. An application shall be addressed to the Justice allotted
to the Circuit from which the case arises. An application
arising from the United States Court of Appeals for the
Armed Forces shall be addressed to the Chief Justice. When
the Circuit Justice is unavailable for any reason, the
application addressed to that Justice will be distributed to
the Justice then available who is next junior to the Circuit
Justice; the turn of the Chief Justice follows that of the
most junior Justice.

4. A Justice denying an application will note the denial
thereon. Thereafter, unless action thereon is restricted by
law to the Circuit Justice or is untimely under Rule 30.2,
the party making an application, except in the case of an
application for an extension of time, may renew it to any
other Justice, subject to the provisions of this Rule.
Except when the denial is without prejudice, a renewed
application is not favored. Renewed application is made by a
letter to the Clerk, designating the Justice to whom the
application is to be directed, and accompanied by 10 copies
of the original application and proof of service as required
by Rule 29.

5. A Justice to whom an application for a stay or for bail
is submitted may refer it to the Court for determination.

(emphasis added)

As there is no signature of Justice Thomas affixed to the denial, it is clearly an erroneous entry in the docket and therefore, I am requesting an erroneous entry to be deleted from the docket and  my Application for stay in Rhodes v Macdonald 10A56  properly submitted to  Justice  Thomas for review.  I am also requesting information in regards to the identity of the person, who made the notation of denial on the docket of 10A56 on Saturday, July 17th.

Sincerely,

Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ

cc Chief Clerk William Sutton

cc Chief Justice John Roberts

cc Public Integrity Unit Department of Justice

cc Inspector General Department of Justice

cc Civil rights Commission

cc UN Raporteur for Civil Rights Defenders

cc ICBP

Category: Uncategorized

Comments

14 Responses to “Request for proper submission sent to the Supreme Court”

  1. Kathy M
    July 29th, 2010 @ 5:01 am

    Perfect!!

    Keep the pressure on and maybe we can get the light of day to shine.

    Thanks and God Bless

  2. PorkRind
    July 29th, 2010 @ 5:19 am

    You think this will work? I have my doubts. I think it is time for a little face to face time with those young fellas at SCOTUS. They can’t ignore you then. If SCOTUS allows these sanctions to stand, then it is the beginning of tyranny! We’ll all be living in the woods hunting squirrels. But then, squirrels are good eating.

  3. Veritas
    July 29th, 2010 @ 8:44 am

    They are talking about it on GRETAWIRE FORUM with the thread titled:

    ORLY: Demand for PROPER SUBMISSION in Faulty SCOTUS

  4. PorkRoll
    July 29th, 2010 @ 8:46 am

    Hi, PorkRind. You’ve learned well from your master. Imitate, obfuscate and lie to defame others because your ideas are so vapid and baseless.

    BTW, do you like putting on my username as much as you like putting on your mom’s panties and high heels?

  5. Marlys Richter
    July 29th, 2010 @ 1:43 pm

    Who has authority over the clerks of the Supreme Court? Who oversees, Who hires, fires or signs their paychecks? I doubt if the Supreme Court Justices themselves, do, so who does?

  6. Redd
    July 30th, 2010 @ 11:27 am

    Commie cheats…
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JKs5n9G9uGA

  7. BruceWho
    July 30th, 2010 @ 11:41 am

    After reading some of the Internet blogs on the hijacking of our judicial system, I ran across a blog that presented the issue of how to obtain “standing” from the judges: “I have come to understand the concept of standing by following the eligibility suits. Here is what I do not get. How does a young girl who is an atheist and whose father claims that his daughter should not be exposed to the pledge of the allegiance because of the word God. How is this man or his daughter uniquely harmed? The atheist population in this country is huge. The last poll I saw said that 60% of self proclaimed Democrats have no belief in God. That is a large group. So how is it that any time a person complains about some seeing a bible or hears the word God achieve standing when they represent such a huge group? Anyone who has complained about seeing nativity scenes around Christmas is always given standing. Basically, anyone with an anti-God complaint is given standing. Why? How are they uniquely harmed? How about all of the Americans told not to display the Stars and Stripes in front of there homes because some people in the community may be offended. How do these clowns get standing? Someone explain to me how any person can be harmed by having the flag flown in their neighborhood? Yet these people get standing and win. The only answer I can come up with is you have to be Anti-God or anti-American to get a case before the courts today. Thank you to all the Carter, Clinton, and Obama appointees.” If LTC Lakin goes to prison, he then can prove that he has standing because his freedom, liberty, property, and right to happiness have been degraded. If Dr. Taitz pays the $20,000 she gets standing because she can prove loss of freedom, liberty, property, and right to happiness have been also degrade. And they are calling this a “Justice System?” What a sick joke! The TEA Parties are clearly justified in that We The People have a right to make the hijackers of justice accountable for the anarchy they are causing in this great country of ours. I continue to hear about the technicalities of the law and a case being dismissed because of it. What about “the spirit of the law” regarding “due process,” having grievances heard by a Constitutionally authorized judicial system? Where is “reason” when a case is denied and/or thrown out because of an dotted letter “i” or “t” or a particular format? Or what about a case that has been reviewed in a “judge’s chambers” by who, the Cheshire Cat? The judges need to be forced into the situation where they have to prove that We The People/citizens of the USA do not have “standing” on these Constitutional issues, not the opposite.

  8. will
    July 30th, 2010 @ 12:51 pm

    ihv>>> i would like to know just how much more of this crap will the citizens of the USA put up with before there is an outright rebellion against this corrupt justice system and govt?

    i think its time, in no uncertain words, that we are tired of being ignored. its time they either do what is right or get the hell out of our govt..
    will

  9. Jackie Morrison
    July 30th, 2010 @ 2:07 pm

    Orly,
    Why have you NOT posted the link to the youtube I sent you where one can clearly see Obama admit he is not an American citizen and was NOT born in America???? Did you get it? if not, here it is… please, please use it!

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MwhKuunp8D8&feature=player_embedded

  10. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    July 30th, 2010 @ 3:17 pm

    I got information that it is doctored, it is not genuine and cannot be used

  11. Yephora
    July 30th, 2010 @ 5:01 pm

    Orly, you are correct. It is very slickly doctored. Be careful folks: some of these ‘discovered’ evidences are deliberately put out there as ‘proofs’ for us to jump upon so we can be embarrassed and discredited later.

  12. F.A. Leonetti
    July 30th, 2010 @ 5:57 pm

    Dr. Orly:
    Although I do not agree with everything being said or done on this site, I will say this about your tact on the Pres scandal.

    For the most part you are on track. You are taking the the correct approach. Until you are allowed to make presentation of all the facts you must find show cause and remedy in the proper manner.
    Although quite simplistic in analogy, you are like a herdsman’s sheep dog. Until that dog finds the lead sheep so the herd will follow into the pen to be sheered, it will take a lot of barking and “”nipping”” at the heels of the flock to be ”heard”.
    STAY ON TASK, STAY ON POINT AND KEEP TIGHT CONTROL. YOU ARE MAKING PROGRESS. THAT IS EVIDENT BY THE RESISTANCE YOU ARE GETTING.
    Best Regards,
    Peace
    F.A. Leonetti

  13. Phil
    July 30th, 2010 @ 6:00 pm

    Lady Liberty:…
    Is it true that if someone does go to prison, that they (Lt C. Lakin) will have standing, to finally get that well-deserved “discovery”?

    And Pork-Roll:…LOL! I love it!

    Yeah…this nonsense has to end! They’re playing “pre-dictatorship” games with us! But I’m not laughing or enjoying this. So they best watch out…cause I and a lot of Patriots are going to speak some “real-prayers”…! And when Patriots “pray,” use the words:…”in the Name of Jesus…!”

    And remember C.E.T.s, if you prank off God and people who are sticking up for what’s right…there will come a time, when “HE will NOT be mocked!” Remember how Noah was made fun of…? And then, they stopped their evil and their laughter, when it started to “r-a-i-n”? Think about it…!

    Davey Crockett…

  14. ObamaRelease YourRecords
    July 30th, 2010 @ 6:06 pm

    The video of Obama is edited… he never said that.

    The original video of that has a disclaimer at the bottom saying such.

Leave a Reply