4 Responses to “REPORT: DOJ Under AG Sessions Blocks Access to Hillary Clinton’s Benghazi Emails (VIDEO)”

1. ??????????????????
   August 10th, 2017 @ 12:35 pm

   What??????????

2. kw
   August 10th, 2017 @ 4:14 pm

   Rumors of a plea bargain offer to Hillary Clinton and the Clinton Foundation (CGI) in the form of ‘admit to committing email crimes as secretary of state’ and the DOJ will not prosecute. We the people say no deal. Prosecute the Clintons, the swamp and lock ’em up as promised. That is what caused for a successful Trump election. See it through Mr. President. Do it, because nobody is above the law.

3. Lorene B
   August 13th, 2017 @ 7:42 am

   What is Sessions going to do about it? We are all watching.

4. hapnHal
   August 13th, 2017 @ 11:33 am

   Finally, News that’s going to be NEWS, Hillary’s Benghazi Emails

   Court Orders State to Search Benghazi Emails of Clinton Advisors

   Your Judicial Watch had a major court victory this week in our effort to get accountability in the Obama/Clinton Benghazi scandal.

   This week, D.C. District Court Judge Amit P. Mehta ordered the State Department “to search the state.gov e-mail accounts of Huma Abedin, Cheryl Mills, and Jacob Sullivan,” former aides of Hillary Clinton during her tenure as secretary of state. Judge Mehta ordered the State Department to search in those accounts “for records responsive to [Judicial Watch’s] March 4, 2015, FOIA [Freedom of Information Act] request.”

   Of course, a JW FOIA lawsuit first broke open the Clinton email scandal – and Benghazi, too!

   Judge Mehta, an Obama appointee, described our Clinton-Benghazi FOIA lawsuit as “a far cry from a typical FOIA case. Secretary Clinton used a private e-mail server, located in her home, to transmit and receive work-related communications during her tenure as Secretary of State.”

   Further, Judge Mehta ruled:

   [I]f an e-mail did not involve any state.gov user, the message would have passed through only the Secretary’s private server and, therefore, would be beyond the immediate reach of State. Because of this circumstance, unlike the ordinary case, State could not look solely to its own records systems to adequately respond to [Judicial Watch’s] demand.

   ***

   [The State Department] has not, however, searched the one records system over which it has always had control and that is almost certain to contain some responsive records: the state.gov e-mail server. If Secretary Clinton sent an e-mail about Benghazi to Abedin, Mills, or Sullivan at his or her state.gov e-mail address, or if one of them sent an e-mail to Secretary Clinton using his or her state.gov account, then State’s server presumably would have captured and stored such an e-mail. Therefore, State has an obligation to search its own server for responsive records.

   ***

   State has offered no assurance that the three record compilations it received [from Secretary Clinton and her aides], taken together, constitute the entirety of Secretary Clinton’s e-mails during the time period relevant to Plaintiff’s FOIA Request. Absent such assurance, the court is unconvinced “beyond material doubt” that a search of the state.gov accounts of Abedin, Mills and Sullivan is “unlikely to produce any marginal return.”

   ***

   Accordingly, the court finds that State has not met its burden of establishing it performed an adequate search in response to Plaintiff’s FOIA Request and orders State to conduct a supplemental search of the state.gov e-mail accounts of Abedin, Mills, and Sullivan.

   https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/weekly-updates/weekly-update-benghazi-court-victory/

Leave a Reply