Posted on | September 12, 2013 | 13 Comments
Vladimir Putin’s letter to American people published in NY Times and can be read at link here: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/12/opinion/putin-plea-for-caution-from-russia-on-syria.html?_r=0
While clearly we should follow Reagan’s motto of “trust but verify”, which is an English translation of biblical Hebrew “Kapdeu v Hashdeu”, it is worth taking some time to consider this proposal. It might lead to no agreement and we are at square one, but it might be reasonable to at least consider it.
Clearly chemical weapons require attention of international community, however international treaties do not state that US should act alone and should strike every World leader US suspects of using Chemical weapons. There are UN forces and there are League of Arab Nations forces, which should be used first.
Further, Harry Reid, John Kerry and Barack Obama compared this to Holocaust in NAZI Germany. There are a number of differences between Syria and NAZI Germany.
First, we still do not have direct evidence that the attack was by Assad and not Al Qaeda rebels. If it was by Assad army, we do not know if Assad himself gave the orders.
Further, during WW2 estimated 65 million people died around the world. Syrian conflict is not a conflict of such proportions.
Moreover, we do not know whether we will help or hurt Syrians by toppling Assad, as it can lead to an al Qaeda government, which might be much more vicious and barbaric. We have seen how toppling of the U.S. ally in Egypt led to Muslim Brotherhood rule and persecution of Christians, women and other minorities. Al Qaeda government in Syria can be worse than Muslim Brotherhood.
We’ve seen how our new- found Al Qaeda friends turned against us in Benghazi and murdered our ambassador, which was later covered up by Clinton and Obama, who used a falsified CIA report. While original report stated that Al Qaeda was responsible for the attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, wheeling and dealing between the CIA, White House and the State Department led to a new report which blamed some obscure video for the attack. If Obama and Clinton could operate and even win a presidential election based on a falsified CIA report, they can do it again and operate on a falsified CIA report in Syria. How do we know that the CIA report about Syria was not falsified, particularly since German intelligence issued a report stating that Assad was not responsible and Carla Del Ponte, UN investigator, issued a report blaming the al Qaeda rebels for the prior chemical attack, which happened in spring of this year. So, situation in Syria is not the same as Nazi Holocaust.
Today Judge Napolitano gave an interview for Glenn Beck stating that the U.S. government used some chemical agent to subdue David Koresh and his Branch-Davidian sect and that 83 people died. Andrew Napolitano questioned, what would happen, if another power were to bomb the US. in response to actions of Janet Reno and Bill Clinton in Waco TX? MSNBC likened our use of Napalm bombs in Vietnam to chemical weapons, and Foreign Policy ran an article claiming that CIA gave Saddam Hussein information about Iranian forces and targets during Iran-Iraq war while knowing that Saddam has chemical weapons and is likely to use them.
Some are saying that Putin’s proposal should not be trusted since Putin used to be the director of the KGB. It is true that Putin was the director of KGB, it has to be considered, however George Walker Herbert Bush was the Director of the CIA. It is not uncommon for the top statesmen and diplomats to be working for national security agencies of prospective countries. Furthermore, we still do not know anything about Obama. While Obama claims that he studied in Columbia university for 2 years, the Student Clearing house shows him at Columbia for 9 months only and nobody knows where he was the remaining year and 3 months. We know that he traveled to Pakistan, he claimed that he was there only a month or so, however facts show him there for over a year. We do not know what he did there. His mother worked for Ford Foundation, which was a front for the CIA, and after Columbia university Obama worked for Business International Corporation, which is yet another CIA front company.
At issue is not whether Obama worked for CIA, but rather did he work for other agencies? After all, we are yet to find one judge who will hear on the merits the issue of Obama’s use of a stolen Social Security number 042-68-4425 of Harry Bounel, born in 1890, and his fabricated IDs. (see documents below) I say, we should be so lucky to find out that Obama worked only for the CIA and no other agency.