OrlyTaitzEsq.com

TaitzReport.com

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation (DOFF)
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz


If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.





The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.
-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.  -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.  -- Mahatma Gandhi

Proposed schedule of depositions, notice of motion to disqualify Gary Kreep as a co-counsel due to conflict of interest

Posted on | September 13, 2009 | 9 Comments

keyes-v-obama-notice-prelim-letter-and-of-change-of-addresskeyes-v-obama-proposed-depositions

:09-cv-00082-DOC-AN Captain Pamela Barnett, et al v. Barack Hussein Obama, et al
(ANx), DISCOVERY, MANADR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Notice of Electronic Filing

The following transaction was entered by Taitz, Orly on 9/13/2009 at 8:09 PM PDT and filed on 9/13/2009
Case Name: Captain Pamela Barnett, et al v. Barack Hussein Obama, et al
Case Number: 8:09-cv-82
Filer: Pamela Barnett
Document Number: 63

Docket Text:
NOTICE filed by plaintiff Pamela Barnett. (Attachments: # (1) Letter proposed schedule of depositions, notice of motion to disqualify Gary Kreep as a co-counsel due to conflict of interest)(Taitz, Orly)
8:09-cv-82 Notice has been electronically mailed to:

David A DeJute     USACAC.Civil@usdoj.gov, David.Dejute@usdoj.gov

Gary G Kreep     usjf@usjf.net, elliotwilson@gmail.com

Orly Taitz     dr_taitz@yahoo.com

Roger E West     USACAC.Civil@usdoj.gov, Roger.West4@usdoj.gov

8:09-cv-82 Notice has been delivered by First Class U. S. Mail or by fax to: :

The following document(s) are associated with this transaction:

Document description:

Main Document
Original filename:C:\fakepath\Keyes v Obama notice prelim letter and of change of address.pdf
Electronic document Stamp:
[STAMP cacdStamp_ID=1020290914 [Date=9/13/2009] [FileNumber=8430660-0]
[0312cb8b7283043afcf479024934425fa2395058f2ff90dbaa27e1ff78c1da363e8a
e3ee5e4dd9052814e3679657d4522ecff99071c6def208815dbc0ff56e37]]
Document description:Letter proposed schedule of depositions, notice of motion to disqualify Gary Kreep as a co-counsel due to conflict of interest
Original filename:C:\fakepath\Keyes v Obama proposed depositions.pdf
Electronic document Stamp:
[STAMP cacdStamp_ID=1020290914 [Date=9/13/2009] [FileNumber=8430660-1]
[be843df3469f31a880b76761da28e6e51ec1a2265819a97ca46f39df82805b0d06ee
450a91f496dcb9e2c32a478fd6964ec5a04ea5d77e36a324c3f5c5d7cd7f]]

Category: Uncategorized

Comments

9 Responses to “Proposed schedule of depositions, notice of motion to disqualify Gary Kreep as a co-counsel due to conflict of interest”

  1. Henry Tisdale
    September 14th, 2009 @ 9:58 am

    Well done, my lady. We already have a formidable defendant, so we need no more adversaries.

  2. Buckwheat
    September 14th, 2009 @ 10:12 am

    I view this as a mistake. For the first time a judge has moved forward on one of these cases, but he appears to have been very firm about ordering the parties to work together. This kind of squabbling could test the judges resolve and put the case in peril. My suggestion would be to put the diffrences aside and move forward for the good of the case and the country. It would be a shame to lose what was recently gained.

  3. Harry H
    September 14th, 2009 @ 2:35 pm

    Yes, let Kreep creep back to his own case and leave yours alone. Hopefully the judge won’t force you and Kreep to be yoked together.

  4. James
    September 14th, 2009 @ 4:25 pm

    Dear Orly: Good for you. Getting rid of that intrusive Kreep is a damned smart move! He did his (Act) on the 8th and that means that he would do it again, later! Which means NOW you have a real chance to become very successful in your cases!

    No Chrisitan would’ve done what he did! So how…YOU GO GIRL AND YOU GET THAT (“PAPER PRESIDENT!”) OUT OF THE WHITE HOUSE! That 2-million People Patriotic March on the 11th/Sept. was just the beginning of the end of this USURPER!

    And all of us love you for your Very Strong Patriotism! Stay tough and stay street smart! And Davey C. sends his best! He will be in touch! And good to see that Dr. Edwin Vieira is part of the fight! And enjoyed, as well, the articles from Film Star, Chuck Norris, on wnd. He’s a good one for support! Your legion of supporters is growing!

    Take care Orly, and you ARE in my prayers and the prayers of countless others. And you might ask Judge Carter(?) why he’s allowing the Justice Dept. to make 2 more challenges to your lawsuit? I thought that 1 was all the other side was supposed to ever get??

    James Bond…

  5. Kevan Corkill
    September 14th, 2009 @ 4:46 pm

    God Bless YOU! Dr. Orly! 🙂 YOU are a wonderful Patriot! 🙂 Prayers for strength for YOU! 🙂

  6. James
    September 15th, 2009 @ 1:30 am

    Dear Orly:…Good for you! Filing that motion to have Creep leave was great! After what I learned about how he behaved in court, I’m surprised that Judge Carter didn’t hold him in Contempt!

    Hopefully, Judge Carter will grant this motion and this will leave you to conduct this case the way it’s supposed to be done! THE RIGHT WAY! Without any attorney acting like he’s trying to disrupt things, to help Obama out?!

    Good luck to you, Orly, and I will keep you in my prayers and have you asked why Carter allowed the justice dept to have another go at it on the 5th of Oct.? Why would these guys get more than 1 shot at this, before a trial (which is supposed to be speedy in nature!)? If you can come up with something with a legal manuver to get this show on the road, to force Obama’s people to (having) to do this RIGHT FREAKN’ NOW. That would be super! Take care, WONDER WOMAN! And Davey C. says hi. And he’ll be in touch with you! God Bless You! James..

  7. Merton D. Short
    September 15th, 2009 @ 12:55 pm

    As an active duty naval officer aboard an aircraft carrier temporarily based in Mombasa, Kenya, and serving as senior shore patrol officer there during the period when the birth of a person who claims to be POTUS is in question, I have a vested interest in the Constitutional status of subject person.

  8. Merton D. Short
    September 15th, 2009 @ 1:25 pm

    About forty years ago I was stationed aboard an aircraft carrier in port temporarily at Mombasa, Kenya with duty as senior shore patrol officer ashore at Mombasa. A person whose birth credentials are not known publically at this time claims status as POTUS. As the birth of subject person is in question I have vested interest in the Constitutional certification of subject person to serve as POTUS.

  9. Monsieur TGM
    September 15th, 2009 @ 8:41 pm

    Down with the CREEP Esq. Gary Kreep!