Defend Our Freedoms Foundation (DOFF)
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz

If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.

The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.

-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.
 -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.
 -- Mahatma Gandhi

Proof of judge Lazzara sealing and hiding his orders from the plaintiff, plaintiff’s attorney and public

Posted on | August 12, 2009 | 23 Comments

 Please see that you can’t click and you can’t open judge Lazzara’s orders #10 and #11. These were orders in response to my motion to recuse judge Lazzara as being biased to Major Cook and motion to alter judgment and to rehear the case. He denied the motions but sealed his actual orders, that are supposed to provide legal basis and justification for his orders. Major Cook couldn’t get them and they were not sent to my office and they are being sealed and hidden from the public. How can I appeal his order, if I don’t know the basis, the reasoning for it. This is exactly the behavior that I saw in the totalitarian communist Soviet Union. I am sure that what attorneys saw in Nazi Germany. This is total lawlessness. If citizens of this country don’t rise immediately and protest this behavior of  judges, this total trampling on the constitutional rights and freedoms of the citisens, they will do anything and everything with you and to you.


U.S. District Court
Middle District of Florida (Tampa)

Cook v. Simtech, Inc. et al
Assigned to: Judge Richard A. Lazzara
Referred to: Magistrate Judge Elizabeth A. Jenkins
Cause: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Date Filed: 07/22/2009
Date Terminated: 07/22/2009
Jury Demand: None
Nature of Suit: 440 Civil Rights: Other
Jurisdiction: U.S. Government Defendant
Stefan Frederick Cook
716 Griffen Heights Court
Ruskin, FL 33571
represented by Orly Taitz
Office of Orlay Taitz
26302 La Paz, Suite 211
Mission Viejo , CA 92688
Simtech, Inc.
Larry Grice
CEO of Simtech
Defense Security Services
Louis B. Wingate
Robert M. Gates
United States Secretary of Defense
Barack Hussein Obama
de facto President of the United States
Date Filed # Docket Text
07/22/2009 1  MOTION for temporary restraining order by Stefan Frederick Cook. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit)(BSN) (Entered: 07/22/2009)
07/22/2009 2  Summons Issued as to Simtech, Inc., Larry Grice, Defense Security Services, Louis B. Wingate, Robert M. Gates, Barack Hussein Obama, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (BSN) (Entered: 07/22/2009)
07/23/2009 3  ORDER ATTACHED denying without prejudice 1 Plaintiff’s Application for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction. The Clerk is directed to terminate any pending motions and to close this case. Signed by Judge Richard A. Lazzara on 7/23/2009. (DMB) (Entered: 07/23/2009)
07/24/2009 4  MOTION for reconsideration re 1 Motion for TRO by Stefan Frederick Cook. (BSN) (Entered: 07/24/2009)
07/24/2009 5  COMPLAINT against Simtech, Inc., Larry Grice, Defense Security Services, Louis B. Wingate, Robert M. Gates, Barack Hussein Obama with Jury Demand filed by Stefan Frederick Cook. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit)(BSN) (Entered: 07/24/2009)
07/27/2009 6  ORDER ATTACHED denying 4 Plaintiff’s Motion to Reinstate Original Verified Application for TRO and Preliminary Injunction and dismissing case without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction. Signed by Judge Richard A. Lazzara on 7/27/2009. (DMB) (Entered: 07/27/2009)
07/27/2009 7  Summons Issued as to Simtech, Inc., Larry Grice, Defense Security Services, Louis B. Wingate, Robert M. Gates, Barack Hussein Obama, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (BSN) (Entered: 07/27/2009)
08/06/2009 8  MOTION for recusal of District Judge Richard A. Lazzara by Stefan Frederick Cook. (BSN) (Entered: 08/06/2009)
08/06/2009 9  MOTION to alter judgment, MOTION for ReHearing re 6 Order on motion for reconsideration, 3 Order on motion for temporary restraining order by Stefan Frederick Cook. (BSN) (Entered: 08/06/2009)
08/06/2009 10  ENDORSED ORDER denying 8 Motion for Recusal as frivolous and wholly without merit. Signed by Judge Richard A. Lazzara on 8/6/2009. (DMB) (Entered: 08/06/2009)
08/06/2009 11  ENDORSED ORDER denying as frivolous and wholly without merit 9 Plaintiff’s Motion to Alter Judgment and 9 Motion for Rehearing re: 6 Order on Motion for Reconsideration of 3 Order on Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. Signed by Judge Richard A. Lazzara on 8/6/2009. (DMB) (Entered: 08/06/2009)


23 Responses to “Proof of judge Lazzara sealing and hiding his orders from the plaintiff, plaintiff’s attorney and public”

  1. ch
    August 12th, 2009 @ 7:04 pm

    Not sure who hires Lazarra. Everybody has a boss, either a good boss or a corrupt boss. Sounds like some good newspaper stories are in the making here for the local Florida area, to humiliate him into acting legally if he is corrupt. Public pressure and outcry. Hope you can get on local radio shows in his area and newspapers. This type of behavior really needs cut in the bud, and spotlighted.

  2. Ed
    August 12th, 2009 @ 7:04 pm

    Yoy know this could be a good thing. Ask yourself why would he seal his decision…(I’m not an attorney so I may not correct in my reasoning).
    But by sealing his decision, he has to my way of thinking, admited there is something that would give standing, that there is evidence/proof that contradicts what he has ruled on. Like a circle it keeps comming back to te same thing never ending.
    And he’s most likely being blackmailed by Barky and his czars, after all they broke law by nmeeting with te Supremes, without notifying you to be present, then erased the docket..why??.
    JUST don’t give in, or up.
    There must be legal presidence somewhere that could be cited to unseal the record.

  3. Henry Tisdale
    August 12th, 2009 @ 7:14 pm

    Why is the staff of Judge Lazzara telling us who inquire about opening these orders, that they are there for public review. You are correct Orly, one cannot click on 10 and 11.

    I think this should be reported to the Supreme Court as it is truly a travesty of our system of jurisprudence. Judge Lazzara and his staff should be held responsible and explain to the higher court their reasons for keeping these orders sealed and secret.

    Personally, they may be attempting to show that it is a computer hardware or software problem. But it that is true, why will they not release these orders in hard copy to those who request them?

  4. Jim Buzzell
    August 12th, 2009 @ 7:21 pm

    Orly–Bring discrimination charges against the judge on behalf of Maj. Cook; his reason for sealing the record is obvious, he was order to do so by someone senior to him. Nevertheless, his actions is predidicial and the case can be appealed to a higher court for lack of disclosure.

  5. Leon Brozyna
    August 12th, 2009 @ 8:42 pm

    Dr. Taits;

    While I agree with you and understand your fury at having this case treated so cavalierly, I suspect that the judicial system (and throughout its history) is filled with cases being summarily dismissed by judges as being frivolous and without merit, with nothing being added to the judge’s decision, leaving the plaintiff and attorney out in the cold.

    1) Speaking purely as a layman, it sounds like Cook v Simtech can be filed anew in Florida, but only on basis of wrongful dismissal and to seek damages. Throwing everything but the kitchen sink into the mix in hopes that something will stick and that the court will look at the wider picture seems to be wishful thinking. [I think they should and I think you’re right, but it’s kind of hard to argue with a judge.] The court may look at wrongful dismissal & damages and hear that part and award damages, but it won’t solve the real problem.

    2) As for ridding the country of our defacto President, it seems that can only be done directly via Quo Warranto filed in DC, and we’ve already seen how responsive that course of action has been. I would guess that using Cook would only have that tossed out as being a moot point, since his orders have already been revoked.

    3) It seems that the best course of action via the military option would be to have several (the more, the better) active duty military file suit (restraining order against the chain of command) seeking proof of the defacto President’s eligibility before being deployed. That might start to draw serious attention if the lower ranks of the military are seen as digging in their heels at the prospect of being deployed under a questionable Commander In Chief.

    4) It would seem that another possible pool of plaintiffs would be anyone who can demonstrate a specific and particular damage suffered because of a law or executive order signed by B.O. and rather than seek relief from damages, perhaps it could be argued that the law itself is unconstitutional because of who signed it and his ineligibility to hold the office.

    In the meantime, there’s still Keyes et al v Obama et al, and the hope that that case gets discussed on its merits. No matter what happens, it sounds like there’s still a long road ahead, with most judges/legislators reluctant to rock the boat. Disgusting.

    Leon Brozyna
    CW2, USA (Ret)

  6. ch
    August 12th, 2009 @ 9:09 pm

    If a sheriff is the top law enforcement agent in a county, perhaps you can talk with the country sheriff to meet with the judge and deal with the judge’s illegal activities.

  7. DB
    August 12th, 2009 @ 9:26 pm

    File a “Judicial Misconduct” with the appropriate Circuit Court. There should be information on the GA District Court website. From personal experience, a JM can work. It just takes a lot of detail and documentation.

  8. DB
    August 12th, 2009 @ 9:29 pm

    Fl. instead of Ga.

  9. Tony Stark
    August 12th, 2009 @ 10:06 pm

    If you are going to challenge his being fired on a Quo warranto basis then you need to bring that suit in


    – by Federal Statute that is the only court with authority to entertain a quo warranto

  10. TP
    August 12th, 2009 @ 10:32 pm

    Who got to this judge? Does any judge have a backbone or private parts and morals anymore?

  11. flora naderi, attorney at law & CPA
    August 13th, 2009 @ 12:36 am


    As above indicates the reasons for denial:

    ENDORSED ORDER denying as frivolous and wholly without merit

    What other possible reasons are you wanting to know? I don’t know the type of evidence you filed with your motions, but unless you have credible evidence, the judge has the right to deny the motions based on above reasons.

    Let me know if you need help. Good Luck

    Your Friend, Flora

    Let me know if I can help in any ways. thanks, Flora

  12. Civis Naturaliter Natus
    August 13th, 2009 @ 2:36 am

    This is a travesty of justice, against a Patriot in Arms, who volunteered to serve, despite his pancreatic disease…A Hero for all ages, Major Stephen Cook!

    This guy has more character in his pinky-toe, that obama has in his whole fake persona…

  13. Michael
    August 13th, 2009 @ 2:41 am


    I sent you an e-mail which nails it on the head regarding ‘natural born’ and Obama’s false affidavit in Arizona when he claimed ‘natural born’ status.

  14. Taylor
    August 13th, 2009 @ 3:01 am

    Dr. Taitz,

    Another gutless wonder on the bench! This judge is the main reason we need to be more active and vociferously when it comes to the selection of our judges. It is obvious this man-if you can call him a man, is displaying his ideology and party affiliation over our constitution. We need to figure out how the people can reverse these judges being selected for lifetime appointments because it’s clear his actions have nothing to do with upholding the law, serving the people, nor the constitution of the United States of America! Please don’t get discouraged and continue to fight the “good” fight. Thank you for all you have done and will do in the future.

  15. Betty
    August 13th, 2009 @ 9:27 am

    What can the public do to help here? Who can we send letters, emails to regarding the conduct of this so called “judge”?

  16. bobsearle
    August 13th, 2009 @ 9:38 am

    The “judge” in this case has left himself open to appeal!! WIDE open!

    You can base your appeal of his use of profanity, personal smears on your character as an attorney, a woman, a doctor, and personal behavior which is not becoming an officer of the court. Much less not addressing one issue at hand.

    Include the draft in your notice to appeal, and his nazi behavior should change quickly.

    Just my $.02

  17. bobsearle
    August 13th, 2009 @ 10:10 am

    Sorry, I needed to include the fact the judge has not published his opinion, and in document 3 orders the case to be closed denying your right to petition which is document 5. Wow, didn’t even assign a magistrate for discovery! How do you close a case before receiving the petition?

    What constitution?

  18. leo
    August 13th, 2009 @ 10:33 am

    This judge was put in by Bill Clinton thats why nothing will ever happen with this case.

  19. Arch Hughes
    August 13th, 2009 @ 11:40 am

    When I attempt to access your blog1 site I am warned with a pop up that appears to come from my Firefox browser that the site is reported
    to be an attack site which installs programs on computers.

    Either your blog1 has been hacked or some web maven is acting to prevent people from visiting your site with this security threat report.

    Regards, Arch Hughes

  20. LTC William F. Reade USA (Ret)
    August 13th, 2009 @ 12:40 pm

    I sent you a link before for The Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA) which protects service members’ reemployment rights when returning from a period of service in the uniformed services, including those called up from the reserves or National Guard, and prohibits employer discrimination based on military service or obligation. The U.S. Department of Labor’s (DOL) Veterans’ Employment and Training Service (VETS) administers USERRA. This Act is very important tp Guard and Reserve personnel and will create a problem recruiting if it gets bad press.

    I believe this is a way to start and get something going It willmake big news with Veterans if they deny to act on the Major’s complaint. This firm has Goverment contracts which they can lose so I am certain they will blow the whistle on DOD whose influence is is also in violation of USERRA

    This happened to me many years ago and the company lost the Gov. Contracts and went out of business.

    Good Luck and keep up the pressure
    Bill Reade

  21. Howard
    August 14th, 2009 @ 11:49 pm

    I stopped in the Tampa Fed Courthouse today to check on docket items 10+11. This seemed fishy. I asked about 10+11 not being accessible online. She looked it up and stated that the docket entry is all there is. There is no signed paper and that if you need something for an appeal to print out the docket listing as it exists online.
    Seems lame to me.

  22. Martin Pinsky
    August 15th, 2009 @ 9:16 am

    SUE MSNBC AND KEITH OLBERMAN–HE HAS SLANDERED YOU publically calling you a CON WOMAN–you of all people–
    what a country you are in now-


  23. DeRacer
    August 15th, 2009 @ 2:06 pm

    “Побольше бы таких статей”