OrlyTaitzEsq.com

TaitzReport.com

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation (DOFF)
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz


If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.





The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.
-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.  -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.  -- Mahatma Gandhi

Press release: FOIA response received from the Department of Treasury, Requested documents are being scanned by the scanning unit of the IRS

Posted on | August 12, 2013 | 3 Comments

Press release

Law offices of Orly Taitz

FOIA response was received from Monica Frey, disclosure specialist for FOIA officer Amy P. Jones, Ms. Frey states that the requested documents are being scanned by the scanning unit (see letter attached)

Dr. Orly Taitz ESQ

Category: Uncategorized

Comments

3 Responses to “Press release: FOIA response received from the Department of Treasury, Requested documents are being scanned by the scanning unit of the IRS”

  1. DavidL
    August 12th, 2013 @ 1:13 pm

    .. so at most, it says they have jurisdiction over item B. d. which asks for nothing at all.

    How can they get away with this, when in one item you specifically ask about the US treasury conversations between another branch? At least they should admit to having jurisdiction over that.

  2. DavidL
    August 12th, 2013 @ 1:13 pm

    .. so at most, it says they have jurisdiction over item B. d. which asks for nothing at all.

    How can they get away with this, when in one item you specifically ask about the US treasury conversations between another branch? At least they should admit to having jurisdiction over that.

  3. G Michael Cleland
    August 13th, 2013 @ 10:35 am

    I can imagine that they will redact them to the point they are useless. I pray not! I wish someone in the judicial system would stand up. We’re still waiting.

Leave a Reply