Defend Our Freedoms Foundation (DOFF)
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz

If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.

The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.

-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.
 -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.
 -- Mahatma Gandhi

Press release: Commissioner of Social Security defaulted in 2 Circuits, Obama is in default in CA

Posted on | February 18, 2013 | 7 Comments

Press Release

Law offices of Orly Taitz

Commissioner of Social Security administration previously defaulted in RICO (Racketeering case) related to him covering up Obama’s use of a stlen CT Social security number, which was never assigned to him according o E-Verify and SSNVS.

Now he defaulted in yet another circuit: US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Notice of Default and motion for the default judgment was filed in DC.

Obama is currently in default in the US District Court for the Eastern District of California

Judges of these courts have to finally issue a default judgment and order production of all the original documents as part of the post judgment discovery. It is time to put an end to this national nightmare and national disgrace. It is time to end the most egregious case of the elections fraud, forgery and treason.


CM/ECF Case Search Calendar Opinions Orders/Judgments Briefs XML TXT

Logout Help

If you view the you will be charged for 3 Pages   $0.30
General Docket United States Court of Appeals for District of Columbia Circuit

Court of Appeals Docket #: 11-5304 Docketed: 10/31/2011 Termed: 05/25/2012
Nature of Suit: 2895 Freedom of Information Act of 1974
Orly Taitz v. Michael Astrue
Appeal From:  United States District Court for the District of Columbia
Fee Status:  Fee Paid
Case Type Information:
     1) Civil US
     2) United States
Originating Court Information:
     District: 0090-1 : 1:11-cv-00402-RCL Lead: 1:11-cv-00402-RCL
     Trial Judge: Royce C. Lamberth, U.S. District Judge     Date Filed: 02/16/2011     Date Order/Judgment:     Date NOA Filed:     08/30/2011     10/25/2011

03/16/2012 Open Restricted Document RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION FILED [1364625] to motion for summary affirmance [1353593-2](Reply to Response by Mail and Response to Cross Motion due on 03/29/2012) combined with a MOTION FILED [STYLED AS “MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF THE APPELLANT”] by Orly Taitz for summary reversal [Service Date: 03/15/2012 by US Mail] Pages: 1-10. [11-5304]
04/27/2012 Open Document MOTION filed [1371429] by Orly Taitz for default judgment. (Response to Motion served by mail due on 05/07/2012) [Service Date: 04/24/2012 by US Mail] Pages: 1-10. [11-5304]
05/25/2012 Open Document PER CURIAM ORDER filed [1375820] denying motion for default judgment [1371429-2]; denying motion for summary reversal [1364625-2]; granting motion for summary affirmance [1353593-2], withholding issuance of the mandate. Before Judges: Rogers, Griffith and Kavanaugh. [11-5304]
06/04/2012 Open Document PETITION filed [1377943] by Appellant Orly Taitz  for rehearing en banc. [Service Date: 05/31/2012 by US Mail] Pages: 16-20. [11-5304]
06/20/2012 Open Restricted Document SUPPLEMENT [1380221] to petition for rehearing en banc [1377943-2] filed by Orly Taitz [Service Date: 06/18/2012] [11-5304]
07/30/2012 Open Document MOTION filed [1387271] by Orly Taitz to recall mandate (Response to Motion served by mail due on 08/09/2012) [Service Date: 07/26/2012 by US Mail] Pages: 1-10. [11-5304]
08/02/2012 Open Document CLERK’S ORDER filed [1387293] Upon consideration of appellant’s motion to recall the mandate, it is ORDERED that the motion be dismissed as moot.  No mandate has issued in this case.  A petition for rehearing en banc remains pending before the court.  The mandate issued July 24, 2012, in No. 11-5306, Taitz v. Ruemmler, where no petition for rehearing was received by the court.  [1387271-2] [11-5304]
08/09/2012 Open Document PER CURIAM ORDER, En Banc, filed [1388336] denying petition for rehearing en banc [1377943-2] Before Judges: Sentelle, Henderson, Rogers, Tatel, Garland, Brown, Griffith and Kavanaugh. [11-5304]
08/29/2012 MANDATE ISSUED to Clerk, District Court [11-5304]
01/29/2013 Open Document MOTION filed [STYLED AS “MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION DUE TO NEW EVIDENCE AND NEW DECISIONS”] [1417882] by Orly Taitz to recall mandate (Response to Motion served by mail due on 02/11/2013) [Service Date: 01/28/2013 by US Mail] Pages: 11-15 with attachments. [11-5304]












Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ

29839 Santa Margarita, ste 100

Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688

Phone 949-683-5411 fax 949-766-7603
















Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ, Appellant herein filed a motion for reconsideration/ motion to recall the mandate due to new evidence and new precedents by this court. This court ordered the Appellee, Commissioner of Social Security Administration  to respond by February 11, 2013. As of today, February 18.2013 Appellee did not comply with the court order and failed to respond to the motion. As such Appellant notifies this court the Appellee is in contempt of the court order and in default and therefore the Appellant is respectfully moving this court to grant the Appellants motion for reconsideration /to recall the mandate.


Respectfully submitted


/s/ Orly Taitz, ESQ

Certificate of service

I, Lila Dubert, am over 18 years old, not a party to this case. I attest that I served the Appellee with the attached Notice of Default / Motion for Default Judgment   through his Attorney , Helen Gilbert, Deputy U.S. Attorney by first class mail and/or ECF

555 4th Street, NW
Washington, DC
(202) 252-1900



Lila Dubert



7 Responses to “Press release: Commissioner of Social Security defaulted in 2 Circuits, Obama is in default in CA”

  1. enforcer?
    February 18th, 2013 @ 3:59 pm

    What FED bureaucracy is responsible for enforcing court default actions besides the hearing judge?

  2. James Holland
    February 18th, 2013 @ 4:09 pm

    Dr Orly,

    What is the penalty for defaulting in Federal Court? It appears nothing at this time.

  3. js/js
    February 18th, 2013 @ 6:01 pm

    Need a big shout out: “Book Him, Danno!!!”

  4. rs/sr
    February 18th, 2013 @ 10:16 pm

    Send the US Marines after him, better yet a drone i think he is a terrorist!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  5. e elizabeeth
    February 19th, 2013 @ 6:08 am

    you don’t have
    the necessary predicates
    so default is not real
    wake up, america!

  6. Perestroika
    February 19th, 2013 @ 6:56 am

    The fix was in all along, folks. They executed their operation according to plan. It’s Obama’s SEIU Army running the table in DC and throughout the entire federal government. They got their so-called messiah and they just won’t turn on a brother no matter what, even though he’s wasn’t raised in da’hood and by white radical elite communists. It’s a tragedy that they have been brainwashed all these years.

    Give up on DC, folks. They are not of us anymore. DC is an elite city-state that issues edicts and rules over the land. They are our taskmasters and we have voluntarily subjected ourselves to them far too long. We no longer have control of our federal government

  7. Davey Crockett
    February 20th, 2013 @ 10:00 pm

    Orly: if someone defaults in court, does that mean that You get to go to Discovery?

Leave a Reply