Press release. Barack Obama, one of the defendants in Grinols v electoral college et all was subpoenaed to provide his IDs
Posted on | January 28, 2013 | 11 Comments
Law Offices of Orly Taitz
Attorney Orly Taitz representing plaintiffs: Presidential Electors from different parties and minor Presidential Candidates in Grinols et al V Electoral College, Barack Obama, Joe Biden in his capacity as the President of the Senate, US Congress, Governor of Ca and Secretary of State of California announced that a subpoena was issued for Barack Hussein Obama, aka Barry Soetoro, aka Barack Obama Soebarkah to produce all of his Identification papers. This new subpoena was issued after the presiding judge, Chief Judge of the Eastern District of California has granted the motion by the Department of Justice, representing the defendants, to give them more time to comply with the subpoenas issued by Taitz. During the January 3, TRO hearing Assistant U.S. Attorney Olsen stated that the U.S. attorneys Office will not represent defendant Obama, sued as an individual, however, since Obama is refusing the service of process in the White House and demands to be served with legal papers through the US Attorneys office, subpoena was sent to the US Attorneys office to be forwarded to the Defendant Obama.
Significant development in the case is a revelation that the US Attorneys Wagner and Olsen provided presiding judge Morrison England with information, which was not true. they filed an opposition to TRO (Temporary Restraining Order), where they opposed a motion by Taitz to stay certification of electoral votes for Obama and swearing in of Obama in light of his use by Obama of forged IDs and a CT Social Security number, which was never assigned to him according to the SSNVS and E-Verify. When US Attorneys Olsen and Wagner opposed the TRO, they claimed that they represented US Congress and US Electoral college. Taitz provided Judge England with evidence showing that Presidential Electors, U.S. Representatives and U.S. Senators were absolutely clueless about the fact that the U.S. attorneys office is representing them in this case, that the U.S. attorneys’ office filed such an opposition and they stated that the opposition to this TRO, presented by the Department of Justice was the opposite of what they, the defendants wanted to do. This development shows a pattern of Malfeasance and denial of honest service by the Department of Justice. It Shows that Holder Department of Justice is defrauding the US. Congress, U.S. Presidential Electors and the Presiding federal Judge and is complicit in cover up of Obama’s forged IDs. Subpoena and 60 B motion are here: