OrlyTaitzEsq.com

TaitzReport.com

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation (DOFF)
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz


If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.





The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.

-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.
 -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.
 -- Mahatma Gandhi


Press release: A notice of appeal of the denial of the Default Judgment against Defendant Obama is filed. An Appellant’s brief will be filed at a later date upon an order by the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals

Posted on | April 1, 2013 | 35 Comments

Activity in Case 2:12-cv-02997-MCE-DAD Grinols et al v. Electoral College et al Notice of Appeal

Grinols Notice of Appeal and Ex Parte Expedited Motion0001 by orlytaitz1

caed_cmecf_helpdesk@caed.uscourts.gov

10:03 PM (4 hours ago)

to CourtMail
 This is an automatic e-mail message generated by the CM/ECF system.  Please DO NOT RESPOND to this e-mail because the mail box is unattended. ***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** Judicial Conference of the United States policy permits attorneys of record and parties in a case (including pro se litigants) to receive one free electronic copy of all documents filed electronically, if receipt is required by law or directed by the filer. PACER access fees apply to all other users.  To avoid later charges, download a copy of each document during this first viewing. However, if the referenced document is a transcript, the free copy and 30 page limit do not apply.

U.S. District Court

Eastern District of California – Live System

Notice of Electronic Filing

The following transaction was entered  by Taitz, Orly  on 4/1/2013 at 4:03  PM PDT and filed on 4/1/2013

Case Name: Grinols et al v. Electoral College et al
Case Number: 2:12-cv-02997-MCE-DAD
Filer: James Grinols
Keith  Judd
Thomas Gregory MacLeran
Edward  Noonan
Robert Odden
Document Number: 104

Docket Text: NOTICE of APPEAL by James Grinols, Keith Judd, Thomas Gregory MacLeran, Edward  Noonan, Robert Odden. (Taitz, Orly)

2:12-cv-02997-MCE-DAD Notice has been electronically mailed to:
Edward               A Olsen                                              , GOVT &nbsp &nbsp edward.olsen@usdoj.gov, karen.james@usdoj.gov, monica.lee@usdoj.gov, teisha.stogsdill@usdoj.gov
George               Michael Waters                                             &nbsp &nbsp george.waters@doj.ca.gov, lydia.sandoval@doj.ca.gov
Orly                 Taitz                                              &nbsp & nbsp orly.taitz@gmail.com
2:12-cv-02997-MCE-DAD Electronically filed documents must be served conventionally  by the filer to:

The following document(s) are associated with this transaction:

Document description:Main Document Original filename:n/a Electronic document Stamp: [STAMP dcecfStamp_ID=1064943537 [Date=4/1/2013] [FileNumber=6066519-0] [557fd4251fb7a2247d2f3b189dc3141cb76066da6b34e5d5677ecce74137dc27fed7 fcf33096d9df34ea7431d90e9a47eec0e65f04e15fc1562569240c8429fa]]

Dr. Orly Taitz ESQ

29839 Santa Margarita, ste 100

Rancho Santa Margarita,  CA 92688

Counsel for Plaintiffs

IN THE US DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

 

Grinols et. al.,                 )

Plaintiffs                          ) Case # 12-02997

V                                      ) Hon Morrison C. England Presiding

Electoral College et. al.,   )

Defendants                        )

 

NOTICE OF APPEAL OF THE MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT OF DEFENDANT BARRY SOETORO, AKA BARACK HUSSEIN SOEBARKAH, AKA HARRISON J. BOUNEL, AKA BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA  AND AN EXPARTE REQUEST TO STAY FURTHER PROCEEDINGS IN THIS CASE IN RELATION TO ALL PARTIES PENDING ADJUDICATION OF THE APPEAL WITH THE 9TH CIRCUIT 

This court is hereby notified that plaintiffs filed an appeal with the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals of an order by this court to deny the motion for Default Judgment against Defendant Barack (Barry) Soetoro, aka Barack Obama Soebarkah, aka Harrison (Harry) J. Bounel, aka Barack Hussein Obama (Hereinafter Obama) as well as a Motion for Reconsideration of the Denial of the Motion for Default Judgment against Defendant Obama. The District Court denied the Motion for the Default Judgment, claiming that Defendant Obama had to be served at his residence and not through the U.S. Attorneys’ office. In the Motion for Reconsideration Plaintiffs provided new evidence: two sworn affidavits  of process servers, attesting to the fact that Obama refuses to be served at his residence and demands to be served through the U.S. Attorneys’ office, as well a ruling from a previous related case, where U.S. District Court Judge David O. Carter demanded Obama to be served through the U.S. Attorneys’ office and refused to grant a default judgment due to the fact that Obama was not served through the U.S. Attorneys’ office. As such, two U.S. District Judges denied a default judgment against Obama for diametrically opposite reasons: one judge DEMANDED that Plaintiffs serve Obama through the U.S. Attorneys’ office, while another judge refused to grant the same default judgment, stating that Obama CANNOT BE SERVED THROUGH THE U.S. ATTORNEYS’ OFFICE. As such adjudication by the 9th Circuit is essential to resolve diametrically opposite rulings by two District Courts within the same circuit. This is particularly important, as currently such dismissals of cases against Obama with diametrically opposite rulings placed Obama above the law and outside the law, whereby he simply ignores any courts, shows contempt towards the whole nation and continues occupying the position of the President and Commander in Chief while using a stolen Social Secuity number, forged Selective service Certificate, forged Birth Certificate, last name not legally his and a foreign citizenship.  Plaintiffs state that the District Court in the case at hand erred and abused its’ judicial discretion by refusing to consider the fact that service of process at Obama’s residence was impossible, that  Obama consented to be served through the U.S. Attorneys’ office and the precedent from the U.S. District Court in Barnett, Keyes et al v Obama et al. 09-cv-082.  Plaintiffs assert that refusal to grant the Default Judgment and take into consideration paramount public interest and the interest of national security in relation to provided evidence of Obama using a stolen Social Security number, forged IDs, a name not legally his and a foreign citizenship, makes the Federal Court complicit in the cover up of the usurpation of the U.S. Presidency by an individual using forged and fraudulently obtained IDs. This possibly makes Federal court complicit in treason against the United States of America by allowing the  usurpation of the position of the U.S. President and Commander in Chief.

Additionally Plaintiffs seek a stay of all further proceedings in this case pending adjudication of the appeal at hand by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.

EX-PARTE MOTION  TO STAY FURTHER PROCEEDINGS IN THIS CASE PENDING A RULING ON THE APPEAL OF THE DENIAL OF THE MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT

Under local rule 144 and FRCP 6 Plaintiffs are bringing this ex parte expedited motion seeking a stay of all further proceedings in this case pending  adjudication of the appeal.

Ex Parte motion and expedited ruling is warranted for a number of reasons:

  1. An oral argument on defendants’ motion to dismiss is scheduled for April 18th, only two weeks from now. There is a danger of conflicting rulings by this court and the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals. A regular noticed motion for STAY on a regular 28 day schedule will end up being heard after the Defense motion to dismiss and will end up creating conflicting rulings. As such a motion to STAY FURTHER PROCEEDINGS should be reviewed by this court  on an expedited ex-parte basis PRIOR TO FURTHER PROCEEDINGS.
  2. Defendant Obama is the main defendant in this case. Decision by the 9th Circuit on the appeal regarding Defendant Obama will affect the decisions in regards to other defendants. If argundo this court rules in favor of the defendants, but the 9th Circuit rules that this court erred in not taking into consideration the sworn affidavits of two process servers and not taking into consideration the impossibility of serving Obama at his residence, as well as Obama’s consent to be served through the U.S. attorney’ office, and reverses the ruling in regards to  the motion for Default Judgment, then the decision by this court in regards to other Defendants will end up being reversed as well.
  3. Ex-Parte expedited ruling is warranted due to the enormity of Public interest in stopping the usurpation of the U.S. Presidency by a foreign citizen using a stolen Social Security number, forged Selective Service certificate and a forged birth certificate.   There is an enormous public interest in declaratory relief on the matter, adjudication of the matter and criminal prosecution of all high ranking federal and state officials, who are complicit in forgery, election fraud, Social Security fraud, usurpation of the U.S. Presidency and usurpation of the position of the Commander in Chief and possibly treason. This makes the case at hand akin to U.S. v Nixon 418 U.S. 683 (1974).

CONCLUSION

Based on all of the above Ex parte expedited motion to STAY all further proceedings pending a ruling by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals of the Appeal at hand is warranted and should be granted.

 

/s/ Orly Taitz

Counsel for Plaintiffs

03.31.2013

Cc Congressman John Goodlatte-

Chair of the Committee on the Judiciary U.S. House of Representatives

2309 Rayburn HOB
Washington, D.C. 20515
Phone: (202) 225-5431
Fax: (202) 225-9681

CC Congressman Darrel Issa-

Chair House Oversight Committee

2347 Rayburn House Office Building

Washington, DC 20515e Buo2347 Rayburn House Office Building

  • Washington, DC 20515
  • Phone: 202-225-3906
  • 2347 Rayburn House Office Building
  • Washington, DC 20515
  • Phone: 202-225-3906
  • Fax: 202-225-3303
  • Fax: 202-225-3303

Proposed order

IN THE US DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

 

Grinols et al                          ) Case # 12-cv-02997-MCE-DAD

V                                            ) ORDER

Electoral College et al           )

Plaintiffs filed an appeal of the order by this court to deny the Motion for Default Judgment against Defendant Barack (Barry) Soetoro, aka Barack Obama Soebarkah, aka Harrison (Harry) J. Bounel, aka Barack Hussein Obama (Hereinafter Obama) as well as a Motion for Reconsideration of the Denial of the Motion for Default Judgment against Defendant Obama.

Plaintiffs are seeking a stay of all further proceedings  in this case against all defendants pending adjudication of the appeal. Plaintiffs argue that the defendant Obama is the main defendant in this case and the ruling by the 9th Circuit in relation to Obama will affect all other defendants and there is a possibility of conflicting rulings if the stay is not granted. This court agrees.  Motion to STAY all further proceedings is GRANTED.  This court orders all further proceedings in this case STAYED pending adjudication of the Appeal with the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.

 

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR, CHIEF JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Comments

35 Responses to “Press release: A notice of appeal of the denial of the Default Judgment against Defendant Obama is filed. An Appellant’s brief will be filed at a later date upon an order by the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals”

  1. Pam Kakes
    April 1st, 2013 @ 4:32 pm

    It’s a good thing that rules are only for little people!

  2. James Smith
    April 1st, 2013 @ 7:23 pm

    Do American’s realize how far down the road we are. Were in real serious emanate dangerous life and limb peril. An Attorney has to appeal a denial of default when the same court that ordered to produce documents by defendant failed to do so and defaulted. I’m missing something here, I’ve never heard of appealing a denial of default before. The defendant defaults and fails to produce the court ordered documents because his HI. birth certificate has been proven a blatant forgery which couldn’t be authenticated anyway because how can you authenticate a blatant in our face forgery. obama isn’t an American and doesn’t act like an American. obama needs to be an American and that has not been shown for legally vetting our president to highest office.

  3. Paul Marko
    April 1st, 2013 @ 7:35 pm

    Do you think the 9th Circus is capable of understanding the conflict, let alone solve it?

  4. Smo
    April 1st, 2013 @ 7:50 pm

    Is this the case that went to the S.Court? What happened with that case/filing?

  5. will
    April 1st, 2013 @ 7:58 pm

    ihv.. i probably missed it but what was the idiot judges reason for denying the default judgement? need i guess?

    i could think of a few reasons..

    obama is black? and no i am not racist

    he added to his 401k?

    got a new robe and office space along with jacussi?

    AND LAST HE IS AFRAID FOR HIS LIFE?
    will

  6. George Washington
    April 1st, 2013 @ 9:24 pm

    Why is our judicial system doing everything that they possible can to twist their rulings around to where they make absolutely no legal sense what so ever?.

    All all the courts really in What’s His name’s back pocket?

    Sure looks that way.

    It appears as if the Judges are all playing the “3 Monkey Game”, SEE, HEAR, AND SAY NO EVIL, when it comes to a ruling involving What’s His Name’s lack of any valid documentations to even work anywhere at all in this Once great Nation of our, let alone live in the White House.

    Can’t they see that they are quickly allowing this Once great Nation to be rapidly destroyed with all their “NON RULINGS”, or “BOGUS RULINGS.

  7. George Washington
    April 1st, 2013 @ 9:36 pm

    What is now being allowed to happen here in our Once Great Nation, makes absolutely no sense what so ever.

    How can so many people in high position be so control and/or scared to do the right things. It just doesn’t make sense why or how this is allowed to happen in and at all level of government.

    Thank you, Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq. for your courage to step forward and lead this patriot effort to try and save our Once great Nation from being completely destroyed.

  8. George Washington
    April 1st, 2013 @ 9:40 pm

    What is now being allowed to happen here in our Once Great Nation, makes absolutely no sense what so ever. I’m completely dumbfounded on why and how this is allowed to happen.

    How can so many people in high positions be so controlled and/or scared to do the right things. It just doesn’t make sense why, or how this is allowed to happen in, and at all levels of our government.

    Thank you, Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq. for your courage to step forward and lead this patriot effort to try and save our Once great Nation from being completely destroyed.

  9. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    April 1st, 2013 @ 11:38 pm

    we have seen corruption in every circuit
    we have to push the issue. Russian disidents prevailed and one of their tactics was to bring to light all of the abuses and treason by the regime, show how illegal and embarassing the actions of Soviet judges were

  10. KBB
    April 2nd, 2013 @ 12:35 am

    And, Orly, you are the best at this tactic. I so admire and respect you for coming back at them from yet another ingenious angle. The corrupt judges must know that you will prevail, and they are probably wondering how much more they can take and how much longer they can keep the truth at bay, as more and more people are taking note of this fight and standing on your side. Thank you for being a tenacious pitbull. I know it’s going to pay off and I believe that now it will be sooner than later. Criminals make mistakes that do them in, and good guys (and gals) always win. Always. God keep you and your family safe.

  11. js
    April 2nd, 2013 @ 12:59 am

    Impeachment is the cure.

  12. James Y.
    April 2nd, 2013 @ 4:33 am

    Orly

    Why is SCOTUS sitting on your petition in Noonan v Bowen? There is nothing new on the docket since February 19th. Shouldn’t they have held a conference on ur petition by now?

    I would be glad to call them and check on it for you.

  13. republicansoldier
    April 2nd, 2013 @ 5:07 am

    I for one am all for getting rid of this Vacationer in Chief, however; I think i have picked up on something that might be reasoning as to why people are refusing to assist with this. Can you imagine for a minute that this all came to light and the Judicial Branch impeached him. Every African American in this nation would riot making the L.A. riots look like a picnic. The uproar of all the low educated voters that elected him would cause great devastation across the U.S. Perhaps that is why the government is stock piling weapons and setting aside FEMA camps because they fear that once the word is out they are going to be fighting a domestic war. I am not inclined to believe that NOT EVERYONE in our government at very high levels is a supporter of this man, and I would assume there would be a mutiny within the ranks but who knows. I just know with all the “racist” talk, CNN (The Communist News Network) will spin it into a racist situation and encourage rioters and such. Over half of Obama voters do not have access to TV or any other type of news but they will certainly play follow the leader once they see rioting and looting and killing and pillaging. Just Sayin!

  14. Francisco
    April 2nd, 2013 @ 5:18 am

    Case 12A606, still pending an Order for Certoriari fron the SCOTUS, seven weeks after the case was taken under Conference review on 2/15/2013.
    In researching the average maximum length of time usually taken by SCOTUS to issue an Order, the average is around six weeks.
    This time anomaly might mean that the Supremes have forgotten about the case, or that some type of political consideration have entered into the decision of determining if the documents presented by BHO, are indeed fraudulent.
    The possible politization of the SCOTUS decision, would probably be the last straw that would break the spine of our Constitutional Government.

  15. W. Tynan Brown
    April 2nd, 2013 @ 5:50 am

    What happened to the Petition for a Mandamus Order from the 9th Circuit? Did the Court ever rule on the request for a Mandamus Order?

  16. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    April 2nd, 2013 @ 5:51 am

    it actually became moot, as I asked to expedite the decision on the motion for Default judgment and the court ruled on it. Now, I am appealing the ruling. I am puting a pressure on them to act

  17. Wayne Inman
    April 2nd, 2013 @ 6:35 am

    Republicansoldier, It has always been IMO that the Hyinated American and their low information following always look forward to displaying the type of behavior that you discribed. They have not evolved to the point of full civilized human yet. If you think about it the great apes still like to steal food from their fellow great apes and the victim starts to break stuff around him and tears up his own home place where he is living at the time and the other apes get excited and join in for what they can steal and they also find it fun to tear up stuff and fight with each other. Think about it.

  18. Charles E. Cartwright
    April 2nd, 2013 @ 6:40 am

    This is the one that will stop the usurper in chief! How long before the court will rule and overturn the election and put romney in charge? We need this unquestioned ethics and business skills to turharound this nation!!

  19. Linda Merryman
    April 2nd, 2013 @ 6:40 am

    Dear Orly, God Bless your Spirit of Love and Hope, continue to be strong in your Faith in God, for his help is much needed here in America. We not only need to Pray for a break in your case, but also a Revival here to turn back to God our Creator. Has anyone heard anything more about the questioning of this Linda Joy Evans who most likely is a cover for the man in the Oval office? Can someone find out where that’s at now? I think it is a waste of the Sheriffs time! God Bless all and America!

  20. Germaine Petry
    April 2nd, 2013 @ 6:56 am

    How’s that recall effort going?

  21. Rod Riddle
    April 2nd, 2013 @ 7:02 am

    Republican Soldier, you nailed it. The establishment knows that the Obama look a likes would use the situation to break into jewelry stores, Dept stores, Liquor Stores, chicken restaurants, homes, etc, to steal everything they can. They don’t care about Obama just like they didn’t care about Rodney King. They just use it as a way to destroy property and steal things.

  22. Mary
    April 2nd, 2013 @ 7:38 am

    Orly is it not feasible to go after Pelosi first for forging the documentation to put Obama on the ballot for the Democratic Party as a means to further expose Obama?

  23. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    April 2nd, 2013 @ 8:19 am

    they sent a certified copy to the Sec of state of AZ and KS. The problem is that it is a certified copy of the same forgery

  24. NESARA
    April 2nd, 2013 @ 9:33 am

    @James Smith: yes! That’s what I was thinking. How could a judge rule against a default judgement? This is clear to me that he’s in on it too! This is totally ridiculous! A kid in Jr high could do this!
    ………….
    Orly, these people are not being ethical or legal in any shape, way, and form. How about going through that judge from the State of washington, if he’s available? And I forgot his name. He’s the one that said some good things about your legal efforts. I think he’s retired, but can a judge come out of retirement, to handle a case?

  25. Russell Bennett
    April 2nd, 2013 @ 10:01 am

    I don’t think Sec. Bennett ever got a certificate from Hi. I believe he got a letter that no one should have accepted. If Hi was sending a real certificate it would not needed to be picked up. The judges are afraid to order Hi to allow the Microflim to be examined know it does not exist. Access to that would be the final straw.

  26. Russell Bennett
    April 2nd, 2013 @ 10:01 am

    I don’t think Sec. Bennett ever got a certificate from Hi. I believe he got a letter that no one should have accepted. If Hi was sending a real certificate it would not needed to be picked up. The judges are afraid to order Hi to allow the Microflim to be examined know it does not exist. Access to that would be the final straw.

  27. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    April 2nd, 2013 @ 10:02 am

    so why didn’t thy ask for the microfilm and the original?

  28. Rod Riddle
    April 2nd, 2013 @ 12:56 pm

    Bennett is a coward. The Surprise Az Tea Party gave him an ultimatum that if he had aspirations to become Gov then he needed to do his job and tell Hi to allow access to the microfiche. He waffled under pressure from John McCain not to press the issue and just accept a bogus letter from Hi. Bennett is just another coward going along for the ride.

  29. Smo
    April 2nd, 2013 @ 3:39 pm

    (1)Where do the defense funds come from?

    (2)Are they public record?

    Sure would be nice to see a running clock debt on those funds. Also, with the number of cases filed and the different states.

    Also, does the original person who had the s.s.# have relatives? That would be an interesting interview.

  30. Yoel
    April 2nd, 2013 @ 3:57 pm

    On and on and on posts simple minded Marxist, compulsive liar, unrepentant America hater, perverted loser, practicing Pagan, and self confessed KKK member Patrick McKinnion (“PatGund”) of Fogbow. Apparently, he is every bit as clueless that his posts are obvious as a preschool child who closes his eyes believing that in so doing he renders the entire world dark and himself invisible. Evil sorcery and black magick is totally ineffective against the beloved of יהוה

  31. John W Martin
    April 2nd, 2013 @ 4:47 pm

    Is there a time limit for them to respond or will they just sit on it forever?

  32. Karl Wirnich
    April 2nd, 2013 @ 5:13 pm

    @ Charles E. Cartwright: If the SCOTUS does rule against Obama and remove him due to eligibility it would probably put Biden in charge. They would need clear cut evidence of wide spread conspiracy to commit electoral fraud to remove both, but in that instance the next person in line would be Speaker of the House.

  33. blackyb
    April 2nd, 2013 @ 9:43 pm

    One exists in Kenya. If one does not exist in Hawaii then it should fall back on fraud and Kenya, as he has stated himself.

    The intent of having an original is such as these cases, rare as they seem to be.
    Copies that are certified are for convenience and the clerk is certifying the copy is a copy of the supposed original on file. That is all they have to go by.

    The question lies not with the certification but with the original that the certified copy was taken from, so the intent of the law to have the original was to satisfy questions on the original. The question of certifican is not questionable, but what they have certified from. Don’t they get it?

  34. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    April 2nd, 2013 @ 9:59 pm

    no set time limit

  35. John W Martin Jr
    April 3rd, 2013 @ 7:14 am

    No time limit, no hearing, no action. They have covered their bases at your expense. Typical Obot doctrine get what you want and have someone else pay for it.

Leave a Reply





*