OrlyTaitzESQ.com

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz


If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.





The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.

-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.
 -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.
 -- Mahatma Gandhi



Please, send me this entry by Lyle Denniston and copy of the scotusblog. I need to know the position of Lyle Denniston and what exactly did the court mean by “Denied stay but did not act on any other aspect of the case”

Posted on | February 20, 2013 | 4 Comments

Javier
0 approved

It appears that the SCOTUS clerks may be up to their normal tricks of concealing what really happened during Tuesdays orders. At 9:50am (Tuesday;2/19/2013) a live scotusblog.com entry by Lyle Denniston stated — ‘In answer to a question, the Court denied a stay in the case of Noonan v. Bowen (12A606), but did not act on any other aspect of that case.’ — Several hours later the Supremecourt.gov docket showed ‘Application (12A606) denied by the court. It appears the docket ‘denied’ entry was intentionally entered in error or meant to be misleading, and that it is likely that more orders will come for case 12A606 on 2/10/2013. My bet is that we will have good news in this application. Truth can only be concealed for so long, and the momentum is surely running against this corrupt foreigner and his organization that has usurped the office of POTUS and occupied the people’s White House.

 

Comments

4 Responses to “Please, send me this entry by Lyle Denniston and copy of the scotusblog. I need to know the position of Lyle Denniston and what exactly did the court mean by “Denied stay but did not act on any other aspect of the case””

  1. My 2 Cents
    February 20th, 2013 @ 2:47 am

    You can find Lyle’s comment here Orly:

    http://www.coveritlive.com/index2.php?option=com_altcaster&task=viewaltcast&altcast_code=3e812837a1&ipod=y

    Just scroll down to 9:50am and you’ll find it.

    You can read about Lyle Denniston online if you Google his name:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lyle_Denniston

    Wishing you all the best.

    Keep up the good work.

  2. Veritas
    February 20th, 2013 @ 6:00 am

    This is how ORYR is reporting it:
    —-

    The U.S. Supreme Court in typical fashion denied without comment Dr. Orly Taitz’s application for stay for the California electoral challenge Noonan v Bowen.

    Dr. Taitz sought to strip California’s electoral votes from Barack Obama based on his Article II ineligibility, his forged birth certificate, his forged Selective Service, and his Connecticut Social Security Number.

    Included were Affidavits from DHS Special Agent Stephen Coffman and Debt Collector Albert Hendershot attesting to Obama’s identity fraud.

    It is reported that the U.S. Supreme Court Law Clerks did not even forward the pleadings to Five of the justices.

    And as usual SCOTUS Squatters Sotomayor and Kagan did not recuse themselves. No conflicts of interest there, right?

  3. Thomas
    February 20th, 2013 @ 6:18 am

    Will Kagan and Sotomeyor recuse themselves? IF they do not, it would be another Crime committed AGAINST the People.

  4. Suzie
    February 25th, 2013 @ 5:40 pm

    Orly, So Mr. Denneson said they denied stay but did not act on any other portion of the case. Does this mean that the Supreme Court is done with the case. They do not act/comment or do anything regarding all of the massive fraud evidence?

Leave a Reply