OrlyTaitzEsq.com

TaitzReport.com

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation (DOFF)
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz


If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.





The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.

-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.
 -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.
 -- Mahatma Gandhi


Please, let me know if you can help in a campaign to kick Jan Brewer (Arnold)out of the governor’s mention in AZ. This despicable traitor has to go, and not a minute too soon

Posted on | April 19, 2011 | 3 Comments

Jim

The excuse she gave was lame :

“As a former Secretary of State (sic), I do not support designating one person as the gatekeeper to the ballot for a candidate, which could lead to arbitrary or politically-motivated decisions,” Brewer wrote in her veto message to House Speaker Kirk Adams.

Did she even read the bill ? One main part of the bill is that the bill allows the decision of the Secretary of State to be challenged in court ( giving the average citizen standing to sue ). This is totally the opposite of what she gave as her reasoning for the veto – designating one person as the gatekeeper to the ballot for a candidate. This puts the ultimate decision in the courts , thus NOT designating one person as the gatekeeper to the ballot for a candidate. This means that any relevant records could be subpoenaed. If he produced the COLB ( which by the way he has never presented to any court for examination ) – which the watered down version of this bill would allow, a resident could sue challenging the authenticity of that COLB and possibly subpoena the actual long form certificate. There is a severability clause in the bill. Even if the bill went to court and they found that the requirements of producing the documents were found to be unconstitutional, the part giving citizens standing to sue would remain in effect.

This is why Brewer’s comments make no sense. The reason she gave for vetoing the bill is actually a reason to SIGN THE BILL. The bill would hold the Secretary of State accountable through the courts.

Also , she made this comment on Greta : “The vote was a distraction” ( Note: a line straight out of the Dem talking points ) A distraction from what ? Even if the vote was a distraction, how is signing the bill a distraction? I guess her solution then is to have no standards at all in determining the qualifications of candidates on the ballot. After,all, she was the SOS of AZ in the 2008 election and she didn’t impose any. Is she just covering her a$$ with this veto ?

Sign a petition to recall Jan Brewer – Bernadette Arnold of the second American revolution

Comments

3 Responses to “Please, let me know if you can help in a campaign to kick Jan Brewer (Arnold)out of the governor’s mention in AZ. This despicable traitor has to go, and not a minute too soon”

  1. Edie Wiske
    April 19th, 2011 @ 6:30 am

    I am not from AZ but would be willing to volunteer to phone/contact people in AZ to recall her or to encourage a legislative override of her veto!! Please contact me and let me know how I can help!!

  2. Chum lee
    April 19th, 2011 @ 9:55 am

    Jim:

    You are incorrect. The standing is to file a lawsuit against the Secretary of State and not Obama. The purpose of the suit is to determine whether the materials provided to the Secretary of State were sufficient under the statute. Under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and state analogues – other documents would not be relevant, and not subject to discovery.

  3. tai game mobile
    July 5th, 2013 @ 12:15 pm

Leave a Reply





*