Please come to my court hearing on Obama’s bogus IDs, October 20, 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, 95 7th str. San Francisco. Please, forward to other media outlets for publication
Posted on | September 1, 2015 | 5 Comments
Press Release
Law Offices of Orly Taitz
On October 20, 2015, 9th Circuit court of Appeals will hold a hearing in Grinols et al v Electoral College, US Congress, Obama, Biden, Governor of CA, Secretary of State of CA. The case brought by Attorney Orly Taitz on behalf of multiple plaintiffs. One of the plaintiffs, James Grinols was a GOP elector, another plaintiff, Keith Judd, was a Democratic party Presidential candidate who gained 40% of the vote and came second after Obama in West Virginia Presidential primary in 2012. The courts held this case until now.
This is a strong case as the District Court judge, Hon. Morrison England, already found that Judd has standing to proceed with the case and discovery. However, this lower court judge claimed that this is not a justiciable issue, meaning that no court has jurisdiction to rule whether the presidential candidate is eligible. This decision is outrageous and unconscionable as during the same time the same district and the 9th Circuit found that they have jurisdiction to rule on the matter and confirmed the decision of the Secretary of State of CA to kick of the ballot another candidate, Peta Lindsey. Her attorney claimed that it was not justiciable and the court found it to be justiciable.
If the 3 judges on the panel of the 9th Circuit have one grain of decency and moral values, they will find that this is a justiciable question and should allow Attorney Taitz to go back to the district court and proceed with discovery and subpoena the original Connecticut Social Security application for SSN 042-68-4425, which Obama is fraudulently using and which was issued to Harrison J Bounel, presumed to be deceased without heirs. Taitz would be able to subpoena the originals for other bogus IDs Obama is using. See the file of IDs below. Now, with Obama’s signing of the nuclear arms agreement with Iran, this is more important than ever. Taitz is asking all supporters, all decent, law abiding members of the public to be in court in a show of support for the plaintiffs. The case will be held October 20, 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, 95 7th street, San Francisco. This is Obama’s stronghold, there will be a lot of Obama’s supporters in the audience and it will be important to have plaintiffs’ supporters in the audience as well.
Evidence of forgery, fraud, fabrication in Obama’s IDs
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| JAMES GRINOLS; ROBERT ODDEN; EDWARD NOONAN; KEITH JUDD; THOMAS GREGORY MACLERAN,Plaintiffs – Appellants,v.ELECTORAL COLLEGE; PRESIDENT OF THE SENATE; GOVERNOR OF CALIFORNIA; SECRETARY OF STATE OF CALIFORNIA; U.S. CONGRESS; BARACK OBAMA,Defendants – Appellees. |
| 08/11/2015 | 44 | Notice of Oral Argument on Tuesday, October 20, 2015 – 09:00 A.M. – Courtroom 2 – James R Browning US Cthse, 95 7th St, San Francisco, CA.View the Oral Argument Calendar for your case here.When you have reviewed the calendar, download the ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF HEARING NOTICE form, complete the form, and file it via Appellate ECF or return the completed form to: SAN FRANCISCO Office. [9642573] (GEV) [Entered: 08/11/2015 12:05 PM] |
Comments
5 Responses to “Please come to my court hearing on Obama’s bogus IDs, October 20, 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, 95 7th str. San Francisco. Please, forward to other media outlets for publication”
Leave a Reply
EVIDENCE AGAINST OBAMA — YouTube Indiana Trial of Obama !
Petition the White House to institute Edward Snowden, National Whistleblower – Patriots against Government Corruption Day
OrlyTaitzEsq.comTAITZ REPORT
Official Facebook
IMPORTANT NOTICES – PLEASE READ!
Historic DVD Now Available!
DVD of the historic trial in GA and DVD of a historic testimony in NH, where evidence was provided showing Obama using a forged birth certificate and a stolen social security number. The DVDs are in a beautiful commemorative case with personal autographs from attorney Dr. Orly Taitz $22.50 each +$2.50 for shipping and handling.
---------
To order these DVDs, donate $25.00 by credit card on the website RunOrlyRun.com and email orly.taitz@gmail.com with you name and address. Or send a $25.00 check with your name and address to: Orly Taitz for US Senate 2012, 29839 Santa Margarita ste 100, RSM, CA 92688.
Advertisement / Sponsors
29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy,
Ste 100
Rancho Sta Margarita, CA 92688
orly.taitz @gmail. com
(949) 766-7687
--------------------------------------
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld
--------------------------------------
Bumper Sticker
$9.99 thru PayPal--------------------------------------
--------------------------------------Orly Taitz Photo Collections
September 1st, 2015 @ 7:25 am
On point 23 of the affidavit, you list a typo of 1963 third grade for a 1969 picture.
Dual Citizenship makes the claim of being a United States Natural Born Citizen impossible if we are to follow the intent of the definition. The expression of intent of this 100% being subject to the jurisdiction of only one nation, the United States of America at birth, by both parents being citizens thereof, appears to effectually be codified in the 14th Amendment and therefore in U.S. Constitutional Law.
Elk v. Wilkins, 112 U.S. 94 (1884) @101-102,103
Chief Justice Taney, in the passage cited for the plaintiff
Page 112 U. S. 101
But an emigrant from any foreign state cannot become a citizen of the United States without a formal renunciation of his old allegiance, and an acceptance by the United States of that renunciation through such form of naturalization as may be required law.
The distinction between citizenship by birth and citizenship by naturalization is clearly marked in the provisions of the Constitution, by which
“No person, except a natural born citizen or a citizen of the United States at the time of the adoption of this Constitution shall be eligible to the office of President,”
and
“The Congress shall have power to establish an uniform rule of naturalization.” Constitution, Article II, Section 1; Article I, Section 8. By the Thirteenth Amendment of the Constitution, slavery was prohibited. The main object of the opening sentence of the Fourteenth Amendment was to settle the question, upon which there had been a difference of opinion throughout the country and in this Court, as to the citizenship of free negroes ( 60 U. S. 73; Strauder v. West Virginia,@ 100 U. S. 303, 100 U. S. 306.
This section contemplates two sources of citizenship, and two sources only: birth and naturalization. The persons declared
Page 112 U. S. 102
to be citizens are “all persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof.”
The evident meaning of these last words is not merely subject in some respect or degree to the jurisdiction of the United States, but completely subject to their political jurisdiction and owing them direct and immediate allegiance.
And the words relate to the time of birth in the one case, as they do to the time of naturalization in the other. Persons not thus [completely] subject to the jurisdiction of the United States at the time of birth cannot become so afterwards except by being naturalized, either individually, as by proceedings under the naturalization acts, or collectively, as by the force of a treaty by which foreign territory is acquired.
[Read this last statement AGAIN]:
“Persons not thus [completely] subject to the jurisdiction of the United States at the time of birth cannot become so afterwards except by being naturalized, either individually, as by proceedings under the naturalization acts, or collectively, as by the force of a treaty by which foreign territory is acquired.”
In other words, there is NO United States Natural Born Status, only a “Naturalization” or “Operation of Law, and NOT by Nature” Status at work for Dual Nationals in U.S. Constitutional Law.
The Natural Born Citizen Clause came about as a means to exclude dual nationals at birth, especially those children of foreign citizen fathers. Its introduction into the United States Constitution began with John Jay’s letter to George Washington, July 25, 1787 states:
“Permit me to hint whether it would not be wise and seasonable to provide a strong check to the admission of foreigners into the administration of our national government; and to declare expressly that the commander in chief of the American army shall not be given to, nor devolve on any but a natural born citizen.”
And that John Jay advised intent was inserted into the Constitution. The 100% being free of any and ALL foreign influence, was what was argued as the intent of the language of the opening clause of the 14th Amendment by the men who debated and passed it.
Under Original Intent and interpretation of the 14th Amendment, Obama fails to qualify as a 14th Amendment Citizen without a US Citizen Father and by having foreign dual or multi-national citizenship at birth:
The Congressional Globe, 1st session, May 30, 1866
The debate on the first section of the 14th Amendment
https://memory.loc.gov/ammem/amlaw/lwcglink.html#anchor38
Senator Jacob Howard (R-Michigan) authored a “subject to the jurisdiction” clause into the 14th Amendment. Upon his introduction, the ff. are his remarks.
Part 4 (column 2), page 2890
Mr. Howard: The first amendment is to section one, declaring “that all persons born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the States wherein they reside…This is simply declaratory of what I regard as the law of the land already, that every person born within the United States, and subject to their jurisdiction, is by virtue of natural law and national law a citizen of the United States. This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers accredited to the Government of the United States, but will include every other class of persons.
Senator Trumbull of Illinois, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee concurred:
Part 4 (columns 1-2), page 2893
Mr. Trumbull: The provision is, “that all persons born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens.” That means “subject to the complete jurisdiction thereof”… What do we mean by “subject to the jurisdiction of the United States”? Not owing alliance to anybody else. That is what it means.
…It cannot be said of any…who owes allegiance, partial allegiance if you please, to some other Government that he is “subject to the jurisdiction of the United States.”
…It is only those persons who completely within our jurisdiction, who are subject to our laws, that we think of making citizens; and there can be no objection to the proposition that such persons should be citizens.”
Part 4 (columns 2-3), page 2895
Mr. Howard: I concur entirely with the honorable Senator from Illinois, in holding that the word “jurisdiction” as here employed, ought to be construed so as to imply a full and complete jurisdiction on the part of the United States…that is to say, the same jurisdiction in extent and quality as applies to every citizen of the United States now.”
September 1st, 2015 @ 10:22 am
Orly: I have been praying each day for your case successes…
And will continue to do so…
Come on, Patriots, fill that court room with supporters for Orly…
Hang tough, Orly…!
September 1st, 2015 @ 5:15 pm
Brian,
Look’s like you’ve done your homework. this is great, I see the one paragraph that should have disqualified Obama from the get go,
“And that John Jay advised intent was inserted into the Constitution. The 100% being free of any and ALL foreign influence, was what was argued as the intent of the language of the opening clause of the 14th Amendment by the men who debated and passed it.
Under Original Intent and interpretation of the 14th Amendment, Obama fails to qualify as a 14th Amendment Citizen without a US Citizen Father and by having foreign dual or multi-national citizenship at birth:”
Thumb’s up!
September 1st, 2015 @ 8:45 pm
Hoping for you that no one gets to these judges the way someone obviously got to Judge England.
It would be helpful if you posted the link to your video press conference from after the Grinols hearing, to refresh our memories. You handled yourself brilliantly that day.
October 8th, 2015 @ 7:20 pm
Updates From Doctor Orly Taitz ESQ. And Ed Noonan On Obama’s Counterfeit
Identity Investigation.
Date: October 9, 2015
Time: 8:00 PM – 10:PM eastern
Call In Number: 347-989-8853 (press number 1 to get on the air)
Listen on line and join the chat:
https://www.blogtalkradio.com/wheresobamasbirthcertificatexcom/2015/10/10/orly-taitz-and-ed-noonan-with-updates-on-obamas-fraud-investigation