Dr. Orly Taitz, Esquire

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz


If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.





The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.

-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.
 -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.
 -- Mahatma Gandhi



Please, ask Justice Sotomayor why the issue of Obama’s forged IDs was not heard on the merits yet and let her know that the nation needs this heard on the merits in open court. Enough sweeping under the rug the biggest crime ever committed against this nation!

Posted on | January 28, 2013 | 13 Comments

Justice Sotomayor in the Bay area tonight 7pm Jan 28th – Event sold out though..

BO PE
1:47 PM (1 minute ago)

to me
Justice Sotomayor  at Fox Theatre, 2215 Broadway St., Redwood City/  Promoting her book My Beloved World.
Event Sold Out.
Share

Comments

13 Responses to “Please, ask Justice Sotomayor why the issue of Obama’s forged IDs was not heard on the merits yet and let her know that the nation needs this heard on the merits in open court. Enough sweeping under the rug the biggest crime ever committed against this nation!”

  1. Freedom
    January 28th, 2013 @ 2:04 pm

    She is not Justice Sotomayor. She is “Justice” Sotomayor. Her “appointment” is completely null and void since she was “appointed” by Constitutional fraud Barack Obama.

    All she can do is to immediately resign the seat on the Court which she is unlawfully occupying.

  2. alice h
    January 28th, 2013 @ 2:31 pm

    THEY STARTED IMPEACHMENT , THE FEDERAL COURTS HAVE STARTED IT !!!!!!!!!! LISTEN TO THIS MRS.ORLY http://larouchepac.com/node/25294… THEY ARE THROWING HIM OUT !! YAYAYAYAYYAYYAA

  3. Bart J
    January 28th, 2013 @ 3:44 pm

    She won’t hear it. She will lose her job.

  4. Hiapo
    January 28th, 2013 @ 3:46 pm

    These corrupt judges need to be brought to task. Checkmate!!!

  5. Larry
    January 28th, 2013 @ 3:47 pm

    Orly…you know Sotomayor and Hagen have BIG BROOMS…and they will use them…because IF he is shown to be illegal..then their appointments would be illegal as well.

  6. W. Tynan Brown
    January 28th, 2013 @ 3:51 pm

    Justice Sotomayer, nominated by Obama, a fraud, seh is required by juudicial ethics to recuse herself frombot the Conference and the case on the merits,this recusal is mandatory not discrestionay

  7. BOPE
    January 28th, 2013 @ 5:20 pm

    I forwarded my email below to the webmaster for the Public Information Office of the Supreme Court since no reply?or even autoreply from the Public Information Office..Going on Day 25.

    How is it the webmaster is suppose to reply in 2 days and the agents in the Public Information Office haven’t replied in a timely manner? I will let everyone know if I get a reply from the webmaster. Let’s see..

    It seems like they indicated they would respond in 2 business days based on the pop up window to confirm email has been sent..

    I quote:
    “We will reply with an automated response to your email to let you know that it has been received. You can expect to have a response from a member of our staff within two business days. For privacy purposes, do not include any personal information. ”

    NEED A REPLY TO MY REQUESTS- DOCKET 12A606 RULE TODAY JAN 28, 2013

    EMERGENCY – DOCKET 12A606 RULE TODAY (DAY 25)

    Agents of the Public Information Office of the Supreme Court of the United States of America located somewhere at 38N77W..Can you please indicate that you have even received my emails from Jan 4th till today..

    I have taken all the screen shots from this website everytime I have emailed this Public Information Office http://www.supremecourt.gov/contact/contact_pio.aspx that is the agent of the Supreme Court for the citizens of the United States of America.

    The response says ” Message Sent! Thank you for your request. Every effort will be made to provide a timely response.

    I am a Natural Born American Citizen and I have a right under the Constitution of the United States of America to have a ethical response and legitimate correspondance FROM the government OF the people,BY the people and FOR the people..

    YOUR WEBSITE SAYS WILL RESPOND IN A TIMELY MANNER…It is now DAY 25

    TIME SENSITIVE: EMERGENCY DATA
    Rule today Jan28th on Grinols Docket 12A606 hearing (LOOK AT THE DATA) per request on Jan 4th & other email requests to date.

    I ALSO REQUEST ALL CASES BROUGHT BY ORLY TAITZ BE LOOKED AT BY THE SUPREME COURT FOR JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT. NO JUDGE HAS ALLOWED ANY DATA TO BE EXAMINED. THIS IS A NATIONAL DISGRACE. NOT ONE…NOT ONE..HAS THE COURAGE TO EVEN LOOK…

    It’s been 3.25 weeks now or approximately 600 hrs has transpired… I haven’t gotten an autoreply or a response that my email requests(Jan 4th, Jan 7th, Jan 8th, Jan 9th, Jan 10th, Jan 11th, Jan 15th, Jan 16th, Jan 18th, Jan 21s, Jan 22nd, Jan 24th and now Jan 28th) has been forwarded to Justice John Roberts and the entire supreme court from this website.

    I request that this office and its agents forward this request and do the fiduciary duty you were assigned to do. If unable to do so, I request the reason for not doing so as an agent of the court and as an American citizen.

    A ruling should be made TODAY. (Negative) -204 hrs has passed since the apparent Justice John Roberts swore in Obama yesterday with full knowledge of the fact he and the supreme court needed to make a ruling on this issue before swearing him in..

    Orly’s rights to 1 million fraudently casted votes is also of concern. The person who has a fiduciary duty to see that her concerns are meted with justice denied her american rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness when he (last name England in a black robe) would not even review her concern.

    Justice for some and not for all is what I see currently. Sharon Reid retroactively vacated and removed testimony…I don’t see how this is not investigated… LIFE, LIBERTY AND PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS ARE BEING TRAMPLED ON…

    If your title is to remain Justice only by popularity, or by power or by self preservation, then you all have lied to yourselves and your hearts.. You then are the agents of yourselves and do not serve a better good than only for yourselves..

    Better late than never….
    One day people will accept the truth…
    Will there be any justice at 38N77W?

  8. Veritas
    January 28th, 2013 @ 5:29 pm

    She should have the good grace to recuse herself. How can she opine at all about Obama? Her job is at stake..if he goes, she goes, and if she decides PRO-Obama, but Obama is NOT eligible, then doesn’t she commit a kind of treason? It is like a bad soap opera.

  9. Dave Saunders
    January 28th, 2013 @ 5:46 pm

    W. Tynan Brown, could you quote precedent for a recusal of Justice Sotomayor? I would like to point out that Richard M. Nixon appointed four Justices, Burger, Blackmun, Powell and Rehnquistt, none of which recused themselves when matters pertaining to the President came before them. As a matter of fact, all four appointees voted against the President during the White House Tapes hearing. In addition, many other Justices have heard cases involving the President who nominated them to the Supreme Court. There is no precedent for Sotomayor or Kagan to recuse themselves.

  10. jamesdurwoodjohnson@yahoo.com
    January 28th, 2013 @ 8:49 pm

    Isn’t unconstitutional for any of What’s His Name’s appointee’s to the US Supreme Court to even be in the Court Room during the Conference on February 15th, involving what’s His Name?

  11. jamesdurwoodjohnson@yahoo.com
    January 28th, 2013 @ 8:58 pm

    If either of What’s His Name’s appointees to the Supreme Court show up at the Conference on February 15th involving What’s His Name, shouldn’t they be arrested for doing so?

  12. Rod Riddle
    January 29th, 2013 @ 6:43 am

    Tynan, they were asked to recuse themselves from the Communist Healthcare deliberations yet as we saw there they were upon high injecting their warped unamerican ideology. That pair doesnt feel as though they should be removed from hearing any case. In this case they want to make sure they’re in there to mock the Plaintiffs’ evidence.

  13. Davey Crockett
    January 29th, 2013 @ 1:34 pm

    Those people who attend this gathering should ask Soto if she plans on excusing herself from the (2/15) case? If she doesn’t answer it or she says that she won’t, then, grill her with questions, like: your cooperation is supposed to be MANDATORY, isn’t it?

Leave a Reply





*