Petraeus affair is a security risk, but a foreign citizen with forged IDs and a stolen SSN is not a security risk
Posted on | November 11, 2012 | 5 Comments
Bob69 8 approved |
Submitted on 2012/11/11 at 8:12 am
The absurdity of the FBI being concerned about Petraeus affair being a national security risk, and not being concerned about the usurping con-artist, identity thief pretending to be a president being a security risk……..is breathtaking! As Obama told Russian Prime Minister Medvedev to tell Russian President Putin, “I’ll have more flexibility after my next election”. If that’s true Obama, being the narcissist he is, should now be flexible enough to kiss his own butt. Obama is the mother-of-all-security-risk for America and could never have passed even the lowest level security clearance had he been required to do so. The takeover of our government by a Marxist/Communist coup is indeed complete. Obama may have to throw more of his useful idiots under the bus, but through it all he will remain; playing golf and fundamentally destroying America. Oh, and Hillary’s schedule won’t allow her to testify at the closed Benghazi hearings. Any “investigation” of wrongdoing of this regime by Congress is a waste of time and simply a charade to make us think there is real opposition to the de facto dictatorship we now have. CONGRESS IS 100% USELESS!! |
Comments
5 Responses to “Petraeus affair is a security risk, but a foreign citizen with forged IDs and a stolen SSN is not a security risk”
Leave a Reply
November 11th, 2012 @ 5:25 pm
Isn’t the President of the United States of America required to have a TOP SECRET SECURITY CLEARANCE?
If Barrack HUSSEIN Obama does have a TOP SECRET SECURITY CLEARANCE, how did he get it, and who gave it to him.
What I’ve seen of Barrack HUSSEIN Obama’s vital documentation he legally couldn’t get any type of government job at any level.
Even Social Security’s “E-Verify” has confirmed that fact that they never, ever issued Barrack HUSSEIN Obama the Social security Number that he is currently using.
Doesn’t using a stolen Social Security Number to get into the White House make Barrack HUSSEIN Obama some kind of a criminal/crook?
America why are we allowing this to happen?
November 12th, 2012 @ 12:47 am
The POTUS doesn’t need a security clearance.
November 12th, 2012 @ 12:49 am
Former member of Congres Allen West thought his TS_SCI was bigger than the President’s – but he was wrong!
November 12th, 2012 @ 12:49 am
Former member of Congres Allen West thought his TS_SCI was bigger than the President’s – but he was wrong!
November 12th, 2012 @ 6:07 am
The president, as ridiculous as this seems, is not required to get any sort of security clearance. Obama could not possibly pass even the lowest level clearance.
Virtually everything most people thought about the CIA, FBI background checks, etc. being done on presidential candidates is wrong….they do nothing.
The main stream media will however, examine every aspect of a conservative candidates life, including dispatching a team of lawyers to shuffle through their trash looking for something damaging. Obama was immune to this by the MSM and got, and still gets a free pass.
As for getting on the ballot, in this years West Virginia Democrat primary a Mr. Judd who is an inmate in a federal prison serving 17 years on a felony charge in Texarkana, Texas, mailed in a form and $2500 and was placed on the ballot against Obozo. Mr. Judd got 41% of the vote.
No one is watching out for the people and the corruption is so bad it has enveloped the entire electoral process.
Most of having honest elections depended on honest people. This means we are now in deep do-do.