OrlyTaitzEsq.com

TaitzReport.com

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation (DOFF)
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz


If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.





The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.
-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.  -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.  -- Mahatma Gandhi

Peta Lindsey case where the court ruled that the Sec of State’s duty is to check eligibility, does not show in legal search sites

Posted on | July 29, 2014 | 3 Comments

Peta Lindsey and Peace and Freedom party v Bowen is a case where the Secretary of State of CA Deborah Bowen threw of the ballot Pet Lindsey the 9th Circuit court of Appeals ruled that Secretary of State had a duty to assure lawful elections and has a right to throw a candidate of the ballot. This case does not show in “west law next” and other legal search websites.

I noticed that when I disclose this type of censorship, the ruling regime makes changes and re-instates cases that were deleted from legal searches. We will see if  our ruling mafia will re-insert this case.

Category: Uncategorized

Comments

3 Responses to “Peta Lindsey case where the court ruled that the Sec of State’s duty is to check eligibility, does not show in legal search sites”

  1. Kevin J Lankford
    July 29th, 2014 @ 10:21 am

    I personally had always assumed that attending to the qualification of candidates was one of the major responsibilities of any sec. of state.

  2. Karl
    July 29th, 2014 @ 10:43 am

    This is Justia’s fraudulent subterfuge and deceit (to hide the fact that Barry is NOT constitutionally eligible for to be POTUS) all over again!

    Justia caught red-handed hiding references to Minor versus Happersett in published U.S. Supreme Court rulings:

    https://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/2011/07/01/justia-com-caught-red-handed-hiding-references-to-minor-v-happersett-in-published-us-supreme-court-opinions/

    Justia’s fraudulent scrubbing of Minor v. Happersett 88 US 162 (1875) in 2008:

    https://serr8d.blogspot.com/2011/10/justiagate-fraudulent-scrubbing-of.html

  3. js/js
    August 2nd, 2014 @ 1:53 pm

    But didn’t Nancy Pelosi usurp this function
    in Hawaii? Who was the Sec of State there
    in 2007-2008? No proper certification or
    re-certification of Obot/Obama, because
    Nancy Pelosi had intervened with fraudulent
    DNC document certifications. Ask JB. Williams
    of Canada Free Press. I do not recall an SOS
    certfication of Obot in Hawaii before the
    2008 Electoral College. Huh? Who was it?
    Fukino, Hanabusa, Schatz?

    Check it, Danno!!!

Leave a Reply