PDF: New pleadings filed today in Taitz v Obama, Judge Royce Lamberth Washington DC
Posted on | May 24, 2010 | 4 Comments
New pleadings filed today in Taitz v Obama, Judge Royce Lamberth Washington DC
Category: Uncategorized
Comments
4 Responses to “PDF: New pleadings filed today in Taitz v Obama, Judge Royce Lamberth Washington DC”
Leave a Reply
-
EVIDENCE AGAINST OBAMA — YouTube Indiana Trial of Obama !
EVIDENCE AGAINST OBAMA — Indiana Trial of Obama, 2nd Copy
Evidence on Barack Obama
Obama File with Exhibits
Affidavit of Paul Irey
Obama file Exhibits 1 - 7
Obama file Exhibit 8 - Part 1
Obama file Exhibit 8 - Part 2
Obama file Exhibits 9-13
Obama file Exhibits 14-21
Request for Docs under FOIA and Emergency Motion for Reconsideration
Exhibits sent to Inspector Generals and CongressPetition the White House to institute Edward Snowden, National Whistleblower – Patriots against Government Corruption Day
URGENT! PLEASE SIGN PETITION TO CONGRESS
OrlyTaitzEsq.com
TAITZ REPORT
Subscribe today to stay in touch with our progress. Send this channel out to your email lists. Thank you for your support. CHANNEL (Google Plus) SUBSCRIBE TO YOUTUBE Official Facebook
Recent Posts
IMPORTANT NOTICES – PLEASE READ!
Historic DVD Now Available! DVD of the historic trial in GA and DVD of a historic testimony in NH, where evidence was provided showing Obama using a forged birth certificate and a stolen social security number. The DVDs are in a beautiful commemorative case with personal autographs from attorney Dr. Orly Taitz $22.50 each +$2.50 for shipping and handling. --------- To order these DVDs, donate $25.00 by credit card on the website RunOrlyRun.com and email orly.taitz@gmail.com with you name and address. Or send a $25.00 check with your name and address to: Orly Taitz for US Senate 2012, 29839 Santa Margarita ste 100, RSM, CA 92688.Advertisement / Sponsors
29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy,
Ste 100
Rancho Sta Margarita, CA 92688
orly.taitz @gmail. com
(949) 766-7687
--------------------------------------
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld
--------------------------------------
Bumper Sticker
$9.99 thru PayPal--------------------------------------
--------------------------------------Orly Taitz Photo Collections
Pages
- #409755 (no title)
- …Defendant Obama defaulted in Grinols et al v Obama et al
- …Grinols Subpoenas
- ..Grinols Order, Summons, TRO, Complaint
- .Affidavit of Mike Zullo
- 1. Judd v Obama
- 2. Farrar v Obama
- 3. Taitz v Sebelius
- 4. Taitz v Indiana, IN Judge Orders Trial
- 5. Taitz v Astrue
- 6. Mississippi Filed Complaint Update
- 7. Taitz Walters v Sec of State Kansas
- Videos
- Video: Orly before NH Election Committee
May 24th, 2010 @ 7:23 pm
After the trial at Atlah, this came to my mind:
Osama Bin Laden worked for the USA in Russia
Obama also worked for the USA in Pakistan
Osama was from a very wealthy family
Obama is said was very well accommodated since the Pakistan mission
Osama after being kicked off he used his money against the NY Towers and other important buildings
Obama used all those contacts to become wealthy and get his way to the Presidency.
I am wondering…..just wondering…..
May 24th, 2010 @ 9:39 pm
Let’s hope that Judge Lamberth uses some common sense when deciding on this.
Since this number was issued in 1976-1977, there is only one way that a number could be issued from Conn. without actually living there. That is to have a mailing address in Conn.
Now for the common sense.
Say you are a 16 year old looking to get his first job. Do you
(a) Go to the nearest Social Security office and fill out the form in order to get the card as fast as possible so you can get that summer job as fast as possible; or
(b) (1) Have someone on the mainland fill out the card for you
(2) Once filled out, they have to mail it back to you for your signature
(3) You then send it back to them with your birth certificate (that is needed in applying for a social security number )
(4) He then files the form, but instead of putting your address on it as the mailing address so that the card is sent directly to you, a Conn. mailing address is put on the application
(5) The card is sent to the mailing address in Conn and is then sent on to you in Hawaii.
I ask you, if this number were obtained through legitimate means, which is the more likely scenario a 16 year old boy would use – (a) or (b) ? Obviously it would have been (a). This would have resulted in a number issued from Hawaii – not Conn. Thus seeing as the number was issued from Conn, procedure (b) would have to have been used. Therefore by plain common sense that a 16 year old boy would have used procedure (a) and not (b), it shows this number was not obtained legitimately.
May 25th, 2010 @ 2:49 am
and now POLITICO is reporting that BILL CLINTON dissed “BIRTHERS” at a talk at YALE UNIVERSITY just recently!
If BILL is having conniptions at YALE, that means that the whole chain of the DEMOCRATIC PARTY COMMAND is worried silly!
They are all wilting before our very eyes!
There is light coming through the dark clouds of deceit and Treason!
May 25th, 2010 @ 5:34 am
They very well could be the same person. Same build, same soft voice, same height, same long lankey hands, etc.!!!! Same ideology!!!!!!