Dr. Orly Taitz, Esquire

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz


If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.





The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.

-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.
 -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.
 -- Mahatma Gandhi



Ron Paul Warns Feds Could Launch Waco-Style Assault Against Bundy IRS demands Ron Paul’s list of donors…

Posted on | April 15, 2014 | 7 Comments

Ron Paul Warns Feds Could Launch Waco-Style Assault Against Bundy

IRS demands Ron Paul’s list of donors…

Share

No decision yet in MD case dealing with Obama’s use of a stolen CT SSN 042-68-4425. Ne decision in other cases as well

Posted on | April 15, 2014 | 2 Comments

U.S. District Court
District of Maryland (Baltimore)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:13-cv-01878-ELH

Orly Taitz v. Colvin
Assigned to: Judge Ellen L. Hollander
Cause: 05:552 Freedom of Information Act
Date Filed: 06/25/2013
Jury Demand: None
Nature of Suit: 895 Freedom of Information Act
Jurisdiction: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation
TERMINATED: 07/08/2013
represented byDefend Our Freedoms Foundation
29839 Santa Margarita Parkway, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688
PRO SE
Plaintiff
Orly Taitzrepresented byOrly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Parkway
STE 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688
949-683-5411
PRO SE
V.
Defendant
Carolyn Colvin
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
represented byAllen F Loucks 
Office of the United States Attorney
36 S Charles St Fourth Fl
Baltimore, MD 21201
14102094800
Fax: 14109620693
Email: allen.loucks@usdoj.gov
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Andrew George Norman 
Office of the United States Attorney
36 S Charles St Fourth Fl
Baltimore, MD 21201
14102094800
Fax: 14109620716
Email: andrew.norman@usdoj.gov
TERMINATED: 01/07/2014
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

V.
Interested Party
SSA Notify

 

Date Filed#Docket Text
06/25/20131COMPLAINT against Carolyn Colvin ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 14637067860.), filed by Defend Our Freedoms Foundation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Civil Cover Sheet)(apls, Deputy Clerk) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/28/2013: # 4 Summons) (apls, Deputy Clerk). (Entered: 06/28/2013)
07/02/20132ORDER directing Ms.Taitz to advise court within 14 days of intent re admission to the Courts bar or whether counsel will be entering their appearance; directing clerk to without issuance of summons pending further order of the court. Signed by Judge Ellen L. Hollander on 7/2/2013. (c/m 7/3/2013 aos, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 07/03/2013)
07/08/20133AMENDED COMPLAINT against Carolyn Colvin, filed by Orly Taitz.(aos, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 07/08/2013)
07/09/20134ORDER substituting Orly Taitz as plaintiff in lieu of Defend Our Freedoms Foundation; directing clerk to prepare and issue summons. Signed by Judge Ellen L. Hollander on 7/9/2013. (c/m 7/9/2013 aos, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 07/09/2013)
07/09/20135Summons Issued 60 days as to Carolyn Colvin, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: # 1 Summons, # 2 Summons)(c/m 7/9/2013 aos, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 07/09/2013)
07/16/20136SUMMONS Returned Executed by Orly Taitz. Carolyn Colvin served on 7/10/2013, answer due 9/9/2013. (aos, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 07/16/2013)
08/14/20137MOTION to Dismiss ( Responses due by 9/3/2013), MOTION for Summary Judgment ( Responses due by 9/3/2013) by Carolyn Colvin (Attachments: # 1 Memo of Law, # 2 Exhibit A, # 3Exhibit B, # 4 Exhibit C, # 5 Exhibit D, # 6 Text of Proposed Order)(Norman, Andrew) (Entered: 08/14/2013)
08/15/20138Rule 12/56 letter mailed to Orly Taitz. (c/m 8/15/2013 aos, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 08/15/2013)
08/21/20139RESPONSE in Opposition re 7 MOTION to Dismiss MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Orly Taitz. (Attachments: # 1 Exibit 1)(aos, Deputy Clerk) Modified on 8/21/2013 (aos, Deputy Clerk). (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/21/2013: # 2 Tracking receipt) (aos, Deputy Clerk). (Entered: 08/21/2013)
08/23/201310MOTION for Extension of Time by Carolyn Colvin Responses due by 9/9/2013 (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Norman, Andrew) (Entered: 08/23/2013)
08/23/201311ORDER granting Defendant’s 10 Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply Brief. Signed by Judge Ellen L. Hollander on 8/23/13. (dass, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 08/23/2013)
09/16/201312REPLY to Response to Motion re 7 MOTION to Dismiss MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Carolyn Colvin. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A–Cover Sheet, # 2 Exhibit A–Declaration, # 3Exhibit B–Cover Sheet, # 4 Exhibit B–Redacted FOIA)(Norman, Andrew) (Entered: 09/16/2013)
09/25/201313REPLY to Opposition re 7 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Orly Taitz. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Text of Proposed Order)(aos, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 09/26/2013)
11/26/201314MOTION/Request for the Defense to Prepare Vaugn Index by Orly Taitz (aos, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 11/26/2013)
12/11/201315(FILED IN ERROR- ATTY TO REFILE)REPLY to Response to Motion re 14 MOTION for the Defense to Prepare Vaugn Index filed by Carolyn Colvin. (Norman, Andrew) Modified on 12/12/2013 (aos, Deputy Clerk). (Entered: 12/11/2013)
12/12/201316QC NOTICE: 15 Reply to Response to Motion filed by Carolyn Colvin was filed incorrectly. 
****Please refile this document under category “Responses and Replies” using the event “Response to Motion”, and link the filing back to the original motion that was filed. It has been noted as FILED IN ERROR, and the document link has been disabled. 
(aos, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 12/12/2013)
12/12/201317RESPONSE to Motion re 14 MOTION for the Defense to Prepare Vaugn Index filed by Carolyn Colvin. Replies due by 12/30/2013. (Norman, Andrew) (Entered: 12/12/2013)
12/13/201318MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Ellen L. Hollander on 12/13/13. (dass, Deputy Clerk) (c/m 12/16/13) (Entered: 12/16/2013)
12/13/201319ORDER granting Defendant’s 7 Motion to Dismiss without prejudice and with leave to amend; denying Plaintiff’s 9 Motion for Summary Judgment without prejudice; setting deadline for Plaintiff to file a second amended complaint. Signed by Judge Ellen L. Hollander on 12/13/13. (dass, Deputy Clerk) (c/m 12/16/13) (Entered: 12/16/2013)
01/03/201420SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT against Carolyn Colvin, filed by Orly Taitz. (Attachments: # 1 table of evidence, # 2 Certificate of Service, # 3 Exhibit 1, # 4 Exhibit 2, # 5 Exhibit 3, # 6Exhibit 4, # 7 Exhibit 5, # 8 Exhibit 6, # 9 Exhibit 7, # 10 Exhibit 8, # 11 Exhibit 9, # 12 Exhibit 10, # 13 Exhibit 11, # 14 Exhibit 12, # 15 Exhibit 13, # 16 Exhibit 14, # 17 Exhibit 15, # 18 Exhibit 16, # 19 Exhibit 17, # 20 Exhibit 18, # 21 Exhibit 19, # 22 Exhibit 20, # 23 Exhibit 21, # 24 Exhibit 22, # 25 Exhibit 23)(aos, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 01/03/2014)
01/07/201421NOTICE to Substitute Attorney (Loucks, Allen) (Entered: 01/07/2014)
01/13/201422MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to the Second Amended Complaint by Carolyn Colvin Responses due by 1/30/2014 (Loucks, Allen) (Entered: 01/13/2014)
01/14/201423MEMORANDUM to Parties re Extension of Time. Signed by Judge Ellen L. Hollander on 1/14/2014. (c/m 1/14/2014 aos, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 01/14/2014)
01/14/201424Correspondence re: Extension of time for Response to Second Amended Complaint (Loucks, Allen) (Entered: 01/14/2014)
01/15/201425Supplemental to 24 Miscellaneous Correspondence, 23 Memorandum to Parties filed by Carolyn Colvin . (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit)(Loucks, Allen) (Entered: 01/15/2014)
01/15/201426MEMORANDUM to Parties granting 22 MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to the Second Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Ellen L. Hollander on 1/15/2014. (c/m 1/15/2015 CH/aos, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 01/15/2014)
01/22/201427RESPONSE to Defendant’s 22 MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to the Second Amended Complaint filed by Orly Taitz. (dass, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 01/22/2014)
01/30/201428MOTION to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint or, in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment by Carolyn Colvin Responses due by 2/18/2014 (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum of Law, # 2 Exhibit A, # 3 Exhibit B, # 4 Exhibit C, # 5 Exhibit D, # 6 Exhibit E)(Loucks, Allen) (Entered: 01/30/2014)
02/03/201429(Filed in Error)Rule 12/56 letter mailed to Orly Taitz. (aos, Deputy Clerk) Modified on 2/3/2014 (aos, Deputy Clerk). (Entered: 02/03/2014)
02/03/201430Rule 12/56 letter mailed to Orly Taitz. (c/m 2/3/2014 aos, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 02/03/2014)
02/19/201431RESPONSE in Opposition re 28 MOTION to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint or, in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment filed by Orly Taitz. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4)(aos, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 02/19/2014)
03/02/201432REPLY to Response to Motion re 28 MOTION to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint or, in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment and Response to Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Carolyn Colvin. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Text of Proposed Order)(Loucks, Allen) (Entered: 03/02/2014)
03/12/201433RETURN PLEADING ORDER. Signed by Judge Ellen L. Hollander on 3/12/2014. (Attachments: # 1 1st page of Ret Doc)(C/M 3/13/2014 aos, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 03/13/2014)
03/14/201434ORDER re Filings with the Court. Signed by Judge Ellen L. Hollander on 3/13/2014. (Attachments: # 1 Attachment 1, # 2 Attachment 2)(c/m 3/14/2014 aos, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 03/14/2014)
03/14/201435REPLY in Support of 31 Motion for Summary Judgment in Favor of Plaintiff filed by Orly Taitz. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6)(aos, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 03/14/2014)
Share

The RNC Sues The IRS On Tax Day

Posted on | April 15, 2014 | No Comments

The RNC Sues The IRS On Tax Day

The RNC Sues The IRS On Tax Day

Share

Please, listen to my interview on KCNR radio. I might be on that program again next Sunday

Posted on | April 15, 2014 | 1 Comment

Bev
6 approved
Submitted on 2014/04/13 at 4:42 pm

Another news packed Orly interview! This one was exceptionally good. It lasted 74 minutes (she is introduced at about 46 minutes into the 2 hour show). The hosts, Mark Kent and Linda, didn’t interrupt Orly. They questioned her and then listened to her answers with great respect and interest, as she deserves. Go to KCNR1460.com, Lineup & Archives, scroll to Sunday 8AM to 10AM, We The People; then download/play.

Share

How much did John Walton, major shareholder of First Solar and Walmart, pay to BLM per acre of land for his solar mega site? Why is BLM seeking to reduce the herds of wild horses and providing land to solar companies owned by Walmart owner?

Posted on | April 13, 2014 | 9 Comments

BLM Logo

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT NEWS RELEASE
Release Date: 02/19/14
Contacts:Jessica Kershaw (DOI), 202-208-6416
David Quick (BLM), 202-912-7413

Secretary Jewell Announces Two Solar Projects Approved in California, Nevada

Projects mark the 49th and 50th utility-scale renewable energy projects approved on public lands since 2009WASHINGTON, D.C. – As part of President Obama’s Climate Action Plan to reduce carbon pollution, create jobs and move our economy toward clean energy sources, Secretary of the Interior Sally Jewell today announced the approval of two solar energy projects located near the Nevada-California border that are expected to supply 550 megawatts of renewable energy, enough to power about 170,000 homes, and support more than 700 jobs through construction and operations.

Today’s approvals bring to 50 the number of utility-scale renewable energy proposals and associated transmission that the Interior Department has approved since 2009, including 27 solar, 11 wind, and 12 geothermal projects. Together, the projects could support more than 20,000 construction and operations jobs and, when built, generate nearly 14,000 megawatts of electricity, or enough to power 4.8 million homes. Thirteen of the projects are already in operation, including the Ivanpah Solar Electric Generating System, a 377-megawatt solar thermal plant that started commercial operations and delivering power to California’s electric grid last week.

“When President Obama first took office in 2009, there were no solar projects approved on public lands, and no process in place to move forward the hundreds of applications pending from businesses that wanted to harness renewable energy to help power our nation,” said Secretary of the Interior Sally Jewell. “With today’s milestone of 50 utility-scale renewable energy projects approved on public lands since our standing start in 2009, and with a number of those already producing energy for the nation’s electric grid, our clean energy future is bright.”

The first project is the 300-megawatt Stateline Solar Farm Project, a facility that will be built in San Bernardino County, California, on approximately 1,685 acres of public land located two miles south of the California-Nevada border.  Using photovoltaic panels, the facility will generate enough electricity to power approximately 90,000 homes and create an estimated 400 jobs during construction and 12 permanent jobs during operations.  The facility will connect to the grid via a 2.7-mile 220-kilovolt transmission line.

The second project is the 250-megawatt Silver State South Solar Project located near Primm, Nevada on approximately 2,400 acres of public land. The facility is expected to power approximately 80,000 homes and will be located adjacent to the 50-megawatt Silver State North Project, the first solar plant on public lands to deliver power to the grid.  Silver State South will also use photovoltaic panels and will generate an estimated 300 jobs during construction and 15 permanent operations jobs.

Both projects are proposed by the company First Solar and have commitments from Southern California Edison to purchase the projects’ output for 20 years.

“These solar projects reflect exemplary cooperation between the Bureau of Land Management and other federal, state and local agencies, enabling a thorough environmental review and robust mitigation provisions,” said BLM Principal Deputy Director Neil Kornze. “Secretary Jewell’s commitment to a landscape-level approach represents a responsible balance between the need for renewable energy and our mandate to protect the public’s natural resources.”

First Solar has agreed to undertake significant project design changes and mitigation measures to minimize impacts to wildlife, water, historical, cultural and other resources. For example, the BLM worked on the Stateline proposal to reduce the project’s footprint by more than 20 percent to avoid and minimize project impacts. In addition, as part of ongoing efforts to protect the threatened Desert Tortoise, the BLM is expanding the nearby Ivanpah Desert Wildlife Management Area by more than 20,000 acres and requiring that the developer protect three times the area that the project will disturb.

For the Silver State South project, the project design was modified to reduce the size of the facility by 100 megawatts.  Mitigation measures include soil stabilization to prevent erosion and polluted runoff.  In addition, the developer must fund over $3.6 million for Desert Tortoise mitigation and $3.5 million for studies intended to guide future efforts to protect the Desert Tortoise in the project area. The company must also assess the project’s potential adverse impact if archaeological properties at the site are found to be eligible for National Register of Historic Places listing.

“As we implement the President’s Climate Action Plan to generate jobs, cut carbon pollution and move our economy toward clean energy sources, we need to do so in a way that takes the long view and avoids or minimizes conflicts with important natural and cultural resources,” added Jewell.

Additional information on the projects is available here.

The BLM manages more than 245 million acres of public land, the most of any Federal agency. This land, known as the National System of Public Lands, is primarily located in 12 Western states, including Alaska. The BLM also administers 700 million acres of sub-surface mineral estate throughout the nation. The BLM’s mission is to manage and conserve the public lands for the use and enjoyment of present and future generations under our mandate of multiple-use and sustained yield. In Fiscal Year 2013, the BLM generated $4.7 billion in receipts from public lands.
–BLM–

In the Spotlight:

-FY 2015 BLM Budget Request 

-FY 2015 BLM Budget in Brief 

Last updated: 02-19-2014
Share

Pro Russian demonstrators took over a city in Eastern Ukraine. Reported dead on both sides. Russia might move to protect the Russian population. Stocks world wide might drop on Monday opening bell

Posted on | April 13, 2014 | 3 Comments

Ukraine tries to clear pro-Russian rebels, reports dead on both sides

Reuters - ‎4 hours ago‎
Moscow justified sending its military into Crimea, on Ukraine’s southern tip, by saying the Russian population there was under threat, and some in Western governments believe the Kremlin is preparing a similar scenario for eastern Ukraine. A Reuters …
ABC News - ‎5 hours ago‎
The unrest in Slovyansk and the nearby major industrial city Donetsk were the latest shows of spiraling anger in eastern Ukraine, which has a large Russian-speaking population and was also the support base for Viktor Yanukovych, the Ukrainian president …
Share

3 helicopters are circling here now, at 12:05 am

Posted on | April 13, 2014 | 21 Comments

Share

FBI whistle-blower alleges that only judges that were compromised in some way, were appointed for Federal judgeship. If this is true, this frightening and untolerable for every US citizen

Posted on | April 12, 2014 | 31 Comments

Share

Another Government Grab Battle Waged Against Property Owners In Colorado

Posted on | April 12, 2014 | 5 Comments

Another Government Grab Battle Waged Against Property Owners In Colorado

Share

Attorney Orly Taitz will be tomorrow on KCNR radio at 8:30 am

Posted on | April 12, 2014 | 2 Comments

Here is the info you requested:
The name of the program is
“Sovereign Minds”
10am-11am pst
KCNR 1460 am
For archived programs go to www.kcnr1460am.com
Share

Infowars.com, Drudgereport.com and a number of other large publications write about Obama reviving Birther controversy. Any day now 5 Federal courts are about to render opinion in cases by Attorney Orly Taitz dealing with Obama’s use of a stolen Ct Social Security number 042-68-4425, his fabricated birth certificate and a fabricated Selective Service registration with a fabricated 1980 USPS stamp. there is a serious concern that with his remarks Obama is attempting to influence the judges or attempting to prepare the public to a decision against him

Posted on | April 12, 2014 | 9 Comments

Obama Revives ‘Birther’ Controversy…

U.S. District Court
Southern District of Mississippi (Northern (Jackson))
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 3:12-cv-00280-HTW-LRA

Taitz et al v. Democrat Party of Mississippi et al
Assigned to: District Judge Henry T. Wingate
Referred to: Magistrate Judge Linda R. Anderson

Case in other court: Circuit Court of Hinds County, Ms, 251-12-00107 CIV

Cause: 18:1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act

Date Filed: 04/24/2012
Jury Demand: None
Nature of Suit: 470 Racketeer/Corrupt Organization
Jurisdiction: Federal Question
Plaintiff
Dr. Orly Taitz
Esq.
represented byOrly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Parkway, Ste. 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688
949-683-5411
Email: Orly.Taitz@gmail.com
PRO SE
Plaintiff
Brian Fedorkarepresented byBrian Fedorka
812 Shiloh Dr.
Columbus, Ms 39702
PRO SE
Plaintiff
Laurie Rothrepresented byLaurie Roth
15510 E. Laurel Rd
Elk, WA 99009
PRO SE
Plaintiff
Tom MacLeranrepresented byTom MacLeran
1026 Deer Ridge RD
Kingston Springs, TN 37082
PRO SE
Plaintiff
Leah Laxrepresented byLeah Lax
350 Market Str.
Highspire, PA 17034
PRO SE
V.
Defendant
Democrat Party of Mississippirepresented bySamuel L. Begley 
BEGLEY LAW FIRM, PLLC
P. O. Box 287
Jackson, MS 39205
601/969-5545
Fax: 601/969-5547
Email: sbegley1@bellsouth.net
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Scott J. Tepper – PHV 
GARFIELD & TEPPER
1801 Century Park East, Suite 2400
Los Angeles, CA 90067-2326
310/277-1981
Fax: 310/277-1980
Email: scottjtepper@msn.com
PRO HAC VICE
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Defendant
Secretary of State of Mississippirepresented byHarold Edward Pizzetta , III 
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
P.O. Box 220
550 High Street (39201)
Jackson, MS 39205-0220
601/359-3680
Email: hpizz@ago.state.ms.us
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Justin L. Matheny 
MISSISSIPPI ATTORNEY GENERAL’S OFFICE
P. O. Box 220
Jackson, MS 39205-0220
601-359-3825
Fax: 601-359-2003
Email: jmath@ago.state.ms.us
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Defendant
Barak Hussein Obamarepresented bySamuel L. Begley 
(See above for address)
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Scott J. Tepper – PHV 
(See above for address)
PRO HAC VICE
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Defendant
Obama for Americarepresented bySamuel L. Begley 
(See above for address)
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Scott J. Tepper – PHV 
(See above for address)
PRO HAC VICE
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Defendant
Nanci Pelosirepresented bySamuel L. Begley 
(See above for address)
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Scott J. Tepper – PHV 
(See above for address)
PRO HAC VICE
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Defendant
Dr. Alvin Onakarepresented byWalter W. Dukes 
DUKES, DUKES, KEATING & FANECA, PA – Gulfport
P.O. Drawer W (39502)
2909 13th Street, 6th Floor
Gulfport, MS 39501
(228) 868-1111
Email: walter@ddkf.com
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Defendant
Loretta Fuddyrepresented byWalter W. Dukes 
(See above for address)
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Defendant
Michael Astrue
Defendant
Jane Does
Defendant
John Does 1-100
Movant
James R. Grinolsrepresented byJames R. Grinols
PRO SE

 

Date Filed#Docket Text
04/24/20121NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Secretary of State of Mississippi from Circuit Court of Hinds County, Ms, case number 251-12-107 CIV. ( Filing fee $ 350 receipt number 34643015410)Pursuant to Rule L.U.Civ.R. 5(b): within 14 days removing party must electronically file the entire state court record as a single filing; and all parties shall, within fourteen days after the Case Management Conference, file as separate docket items any unresolved motions that were filed in state court which they wish to advance. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A – First Amended Complaint, # 2 Civil Cover Sheet)(ND) (Entered: 04/25/2012)
04/25/20122RICO Notice – The Plaintiffs shall file within twenty (20) days a RICO case statement. This statement shall include the facts the Plaintiff is relying upon to initiate this RICO complaint as a result of the “reasonable inquiry” required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11. (ND) (Entered: 04/25/2012)
04/25/20123ANSWER to Complaint (First Amended Complaint) by Secretary of State of Mississippi.(Matheny, Justin) (Entered: 04/25/2012)
04/25/20124Joinder in Document by Democrat Party of Mississippi to 1 Notice of Removal,, filed by Secretary of State of Mississippi (Begley, Samuel) (Entered: 04/25/2012)
04/27/20125ANSWER to Complaint (First Amended Complaint) by Democrat Party of Mississippi.(Begley, Samuel) (Entered: 04/27/2012)
04/27/20126State Court Record by Defendant Secretary of State of Mississippi Volumes 20 (Attachments: # 1 Circuit Court Record Vol. 2, # 2 Circuit Court Record Vol.3, # 3 Circuit Court Record Vol. 4, # 4 Circuit Court Record Vol. 5, # 5 Circuit Court Record Vol. 6, # 6 Circuit Court Record Vol. 7, # 7 Circuit Court Record Vol. 8, # 8 Circuit Court Record Vol. 9, # 9 Circuit Court Record Vol. 10, # 10 Circuit Court Record Vol. 11, # 11 Circuit Court Record Vol. 12, # 12 Circuit Court Record Vol. 13, # 13 Circuit Court Record Vol. 14, # 14 Circuit Court Record Vol. 15, # 15Circuit Court Record Vol. 16, # 16 Circuit Court Record Vol. 17, # 17 Circuit Court Record Vol. 18, # 18 Circuit Court Record Vol. 19, # 19 Circuit Court Record Vol. 20)(Matheny, Justin) (Entered: 04/27/2012)
04/27/20127State Court Record by Defendant Secretary of State of Mississippi Volumes 5 (Supreme Court) (Attachments: # 1 Supreme Court Record Vol. 2, # 2 Supreme Court Record Vol.3, # 3 Supreme Court Record Vol. 4, # 4 Supreme Court Record Vol. 5)(Matheny, Justin) (Entered: 04/27/2012)
04/27/20128MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings by Secretary of State of Mississippi (Matheny, Justin) (Entered: 04/27/2012)
04/27/20129MEMORANDUM in Support re 8 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by Secretary of State of Mississippi (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A – A list of more than 100 known lawsuits challenging or related to President Obamas eligibility to be President, including approximately 50 rejected by federal courts, # 2 Exhibit B – April 1, 2012 Email correspondence)(Matheny, Justin) (Entered: 04/27/2012)
04/30/201210NOTICE of an Improper Attempt by the Defendant to Remove the case to the Federal Court, While it is being Considered by the Supreme Court of Mississippi, filed by Orly Taitz. (ND) (Entered: 04/30/2012)
04/30/201211MOTION (Demand) for Immediate Termination of Unlawful Proceedings in the Federal Court and MOTION (Demand) for Sanctions against the Defendant Secretary of State and Defendants Attorney, filed by Orly Taitz. (ND) (Entered: 04/30/2012)
04/30/201212MOTION for Scott J. Tepper to Appear Pro Hac Vice, filed by Democrat Party of Mississippi. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Good Standing)(ND) (Entered: 04/30/2012)
04/30/2012Pro Hac Vice fee paid by Scott J. Tepper, $ 100, receipt number 34643015537. (ND) (Entered: 04/30/2012)
05/02/2012TEXT-ONLY ORDER granting 12 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice that Scott J. Tepper be admitted pro hac vice in this case on behalf of the Democrat Party of Mississippi in association with local counsel and upon registration for electronic filing as required by the Court. NO FURTHER WRITTEN ORDER SHALL ISSUE FROM THE COURT. Signed by Magistrate Judge F. Keith Ball on 5/2/12. (JEJ) (Entered: 05/02/2012)
05/03/201213RESPONSE in Opposition re 11 MOTION to Dismiss MOTION for Sanctions filed by Secretary of State of Mississippi (Matheny, Justin) (Entered: 05/03/2012)
05/03/201214Response in Opposition re 10 NOTICE of an Improper Attempt by the Defendant to Remove the case to the Federal Court, While it is being Considered by the Supreme Court of Mississippi, filed by Orly Taitz. (ND) filed by Secretary of State of Mississippi (Matheny, Justin) (Entered: 05/03/2012)
05/04/201215MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings by Democrat Party of Mississippi (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit LFBC from WHite House, # 2 Exhibit COLB from Campaign, # 3 Exhibit DOH Verification re White House BC, # 4 Exhibit Hawaii Gov April 27 2011 News Release, # 5 Exhibit DOH White House Correspondence, # 6 Exhibit DOH 08-93 News Release, # 7 Exhibit DOH 09-063 News Release, # 8 Exhibit CDC Report re Birth Certificate History)(Begley, Samuel) (Entered: 05/04/2012)
05/04/201216**DISREGARD THIS ENTRY ** MEMORANDUM in Support re 15 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by Democrat Party of Mississippi (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit String Cite, #2 Exhibit Natural Born Citizen Decisions, # 3 Exhibit CRS Report Natural Born Citizenship)(Begley, Samuel) Modified on 5/8/2012 (RRL). (Entered: 05/04/2012)
05/04/201217ORDER STAYING DISCOVERY not relevant to the jurisdictional issues raised by the motions pending a ruling on the Motions for Judgment on the Pleadings. Signed by Magistrate Judge Linda R. Anderson on 5/04/2012 (WG) (Entered: 05/07/2012)
05/08/2012DOCKET ANNOTATION as to # 16 : Attorney advises that there is an error in this entry and it should be disregarded. It will be correctly filed as Document # 18 . (RRL) (Entered: 05/08/2012)
05/08/201218MEMORANDUM in Support re 15 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by Democrat Party of Mississippi (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C)(Begley, Samuel) (Entered: 05/08/2012)
05/08/201219Response in Opposition re 11 MOTION (Demand) for Immediate Termination of Unlawful Proceedings in the Federal Court and MOTION (Demand) for Sanctions against the Defendant Secretary of State and Defendants Attorney, filed by Orly Taitz. (ND) filed by Democrat Party of Mississippi (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Supreme Court Order)(Begley, Samuel) (Entered: 05/08/2012)
05/09/2012DOCKET ANNOTATION as to # 18 . L.U.Civ.R. 7(b)(2) requires that all supporting exhibits to a document be denominated by an exhibit letter or number and a meaningful description. Attorney is advised to follow this rule in future filings. (ND) (Entered: 05/09/2012)
05/11/201220MOTION to Remand to State Court, filed by Orly Taitz. (Attachments: # 1 Certified Mail Receipts)(ND) (Entered: 05/11/2012)
05/11/201221Response in Opposition re 20 MOTION to Remand to State Court, filed by Orly Taitz. (Attachments: # 1 Certified Mail Receipts)(ND) filed by Democrat Party of Mississippi (Begley, Samuel) (Entered: 05/11/2012)
05/15/201222RESPONSE in Opposition re 20 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Secretary of State of Mississippi (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1. Certified Copy of State Court Docket, # 2 Exhibit 2. March 20, 2012 E.mail Correspondence and attached Summons)(Matheny, Justin) (Entered: 05/15/2012)
05/15/201223ORDER STAYING DISCOVERY other than discovery relevant to the remand issue pending a ruling on the Motion to Remand. Signed by Magistrate Judge Linda R. Anderson on 5/15/2012. (WG) (Entered: 05/15/2012)
05/16/201224MOTION for Stay, filed by Orly Taitz. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 – USCA General Docket)(ND) (Entered: 05/16/2012)
05/16/201225MOTION for Sanctions, filed by Orly Taitz. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 – Long Form Birth Certificate, # 2 Exhibit 2 – Affidavit of Felicito Papa, # 3 Exhibit 3 – First Amended Complaint, Joe Arpaio, # 4 Exhibit 4 – First Amended Complaint, John Sampson, # 5 Exhibit 5 – First Amended Complaint, Douglas Vogt)(ND) (Entered: 05/16/2012)
05/16/201226Remark – DVD Placed in Exhibit Room. (ND) (Entered: 05/16/2012)
05/16/201227MOTION to Strike 25 MOTION for Sanctions of Orly Taitz by Democrat Party of Mississippi (Begley, Samuel) (Entered: 05/16/2012)
05/17/201228ATTACHMENT re 27 MOTION to Strike 25 MOTION for Sanctions of Orly Taitz Exhibit 1-Barnett v. Obama Order 2009-09-30 by Democrat Party of Mississippi (Attachments: # 1Exhibit 2-Taitz v Astrue Order 2011-06-02, # 2 Exhibit 3-Taitz v. Astrue Order 2011-7-21, # 3 Exhibit 4-Taitz v. Astrue Memo Op Order 2011-7-25, # 4 Exhibit 5-Taitz v. Astrue Order 2011-7-25)(Begley, Samuel) (Entered: 05/17/2012)
05/17/2012TEXT ONLY ORDER directing Clerk of the Court to restrict from public access Plaintiff’s Motion for Sanctions; document contains unredacted social security numbers. NO WRITTEN ORDER TO FOLLOW. Signed by Magistrate Judge Linda R. Anderson on 5/17/2012. (ACF) (Entered: 05/17/2012)
05/18/201229RESPONSE in Opposition re 24 MOTION to Stay Case filed by Secretary of State of Mississippi (Matheny, Justin) (Entered: 05/18/2012)
05/21/201230RESPONSE to Motion re 25 MOTION for Sanctions filed by Democrat Party of Mississippi (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit 1 Taitz.Astrue 811compel, # 2 Exhibit Exhibit 2 Taitz.Astrue 1011compel, # 3 Exhibit Exhibit 3 Taitz.Fuddy dismiss, # 4 Exhibit Exhibit 4 Taitz.Fuddy 112rehearing, # 5 Exhibit Exhibit 5 Taitz.Fuddy 212rehearing, # 6 Exhibit Exhibit 6 Taitz.Fuddy reciprocal, # 7 Exhibit Exhibit 7 Taitz.Nishimura mandamus)(Begley, Samuel) (Entered: 05/21/2012)
05/21/201231ATTACHMENT re 30 Response to Motion, Exhibit 8 Taitz DC Circuit Dismissal by Democrat Party of Mississippi (Begley, Samuel) (Entered: 05/21/2012)
05/23/201232REPLY to 22 Response in Opposition to Motion to Remand, filed by Orly Taitz. (ND) (Entered: 05/23/2012)
05/23/201233RESPONSE in Opposition to 27 MOTION to Strike 25 MOTION for Sanctions, filed by Orly Taitz. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit of Orly Taitz, # 2 Exhibit 1 – Obama’s Biography, # 3 Exhibit 2 – Affidavit of F. Papa, # 4 Exhibit 3 – Affidavit of L. Jordan, # 5 Exhibit 4 – SSNVS Report)(ND) (Entered: 05/23/2012)
05/23/201234RESPONSE in Opposition re 24 MOTION to Stay Case filed by Democrat Party of Mississippi (Begley, Samuel) (Entered: 05/23/2012)
05/24/2012TEXT ONLY ORDER directing the Clerk of the Court to restrict public access to Plaintiff’s response, ECF No. 33; document contains social security numbers. Plaintiff is directed to redact any such information prior to filing any documents in the future. NO WRITTEN ORDER TO FOLLOW. Signed by Magistrate Judge Linda R. Anderson on 5/24/2012. (ACF) (Entered: 05/24/2012)
06/06/201235MOTION to Supplement Counsel for MDEC’s Response 30 in Opposition to Plaintiff Taitz’s Motion for Sanctions 25 re 30 Response to Motion, by Democrat Party of Mississippi (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit MDEC Counsel Request to HI DOH for Verification of President Obamas Hawaiian Birth Cert, # 2 Exhibit Hawaii DOH Verification of President Obamas Hawaiian Birth-Issued May 31 2012)(Begley, Samuel) (Entered: 06/06/2012)
06/14/201236ATTACHMENT – Notice of Supplemental Authority in re 34 Response in Opposition to Motion by Democrat Party of Mississippi (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit 1.Taitz v. Astrue Affirmance(D.C.Cir. May 25,2012))(Begley, Samuel) (Entered: 06/14/2012)
06/18/201237MOTION for Judicial Notice of a Sworn Affidavit, Reply in Opposition to 35 MOTION to Supplement, and MOTION for an Emergency Evidentuary Hearing, filed by Orly Taitz. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit of Joseph M. Arpaio)(ND) (Entered: 06/18/2012)
06/26/201238Response to 36 ATTACHMENT – Notice of Supplemental Authority, filed by Orly Taitz. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 – Petition for EN BANC HEARING, # 2 Exhibit 2 – Affidavit by Sheriff Arpaio)(ND) (Entered: 06/26/2012)
07/05/201239RESPONSE in Opposition re 37 MOTION re 35 MOTION Motion to Supplement Counsel for MDEC’s Response [ECF No. 30] in Opposition to Plaintiff Taitz’s Motion for Sanctions [ECF No. 25] re 30 Response to Motion, MOTION Motion to Supplement Counsel for MDEC’s Response MOTION for Hearing filed by Democrat Party of Mississippi (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit 1.Voeltz notice of affidavit)(Begley, Samuel) (Entered: 07/05/2012)
08/22/201240MOTION to Expedite the case due to US National Security Concerns and Evidence of the Highest level of Breach of the U.S. National Security presented in this case, filed by Orly Taitz. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibits 1 – 19 in Support, # 2 DVD Video Transcript by Arpaio)(ND) (Entered: 08/22/2012)
08/29/2012NOTICE of Hearing on Motion 40 MOTION to Expedite, 8 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings, 15 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings, 11 MOTION to Dismiss MOTION for Sanctions, 20 MOTION to Remand to State Court, 24 MOTION to Stay Case : Motion Hearing set for 9/24/2012 09:30 AM in Courtroom 6A (Jackson) Wingate before District Judge Henry T. Wingate (TRS) (Entered: 08/29/2012)
09/24/201241Summons Issued as to Michael Astrue, Loretta Fuddy, Barak Hussein Obama, Obama for America, Alvin Onaka, and Nanci Pelosi. (ND) (Entered: 09/24/2012)
09/24/2012Minute Entry for proceedings held before District Judge Henry T. Wingate. APPEARANCES: Dr. O. Taitz and B. Fedorka, pro se plaintiffs; J. Matheny, S. Begley, and S. Tepper (via telephone), counsel for defendants. Motion Hearing held on 9/24/2012. The Court DENIED 20 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Orly Taitz, DENIED 11 MOTION to Dismiss MOTION for Sanctions filed by Orly Taitz. The Court DENIED plaintiff’s Taitz 24 Motion for Stay as moot and established a briefing schedule for the unanswered motions. The Court granted Taitz’s request for three weeks from the date of the hearing to reply to the defendant’s motions for judgment on the pleadings [docket nos. 8 and 15]. The plaintiffs will have the same three week period to file a RICO statement as directed in the RICO notice filed in the record by the Clerk of Court at docket no. 2. Defendants will have the time allotted by the rules to file a rebuttal. The court will schedule a hearing on those motions once they have been fully briefed. (Court Reporter Fred Jeske, 601-583-4383) (TRS) (Entered: 09/25/2012)
10/02/201242Letter from pro se plaintiff, Orly Taitz, Esq. (TRS) (Entered: 10/04/2012)
10/10/2012TEXT ONLY ORDER finding as moot 37 Motion for Hearing. NO FURTHER WRITTEN ORDER SHALL BE ISSUED. (TRS) (Entered: 10/10/2012)
10/10/201243AFFIDAVIT of Personal Service on Barack Obama and Obama for America, filed by Christopher-Earl: Strunk obo Orly Taitz. (Attachments: # 1 Mail Receipts / Expenses, # 2 Cover Letter)(ND) (Entered: 10/10/2012)
10/11/201244SUMMONS Returned Executed by Orly Taitz; Loretta Fuddy served on 10/8/2012, answer due 10/29/2012; Alvin Onaka served on 10/8/2012, answer due 10/29/2012. (ND) (Entered: 10/11/2012)
10/11/201245NOTICE of Proof of Service of Summons and First Amended Complaint, filed by Orly Taitz. (Attachments: # 1 Email on 10/9/2012, # 2 Affidavit of Christopher-Earl: Strunk, # 3 Distribution List by Lila Dubert)(ND) (Entered: 10/11/2012)
10/11/201246Notice of Filing of Petition to Multidistrict Litigation Panel to Coordinate and Consolidate Cases and MOTION to Bifurcate State and Federal Claims Based on Precedent of Miller V Campbell, filed by Orly Taitz. (Attachments: # 1 Documents in Support)(ND) (Entered: 10/11/2012)
10/15/201247RESPONSE in Opposition to 8 and 15 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings, filed by Orly Taitz. (ND) (Entered: 10/16/2012)
10/15/201248RESPONSE in Opposition to 8 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings, filed by Orly Taitz. (ND) (Entered: 10/16/2012)
10/15/201249RICO Statement filed by Orly Taitz. (ND) (Entered: 10/16/2012)
10/15/201250ATTACHMENTS – Exhibits 1 thru 8 in Support of 48 Response in Opposition to Motion, 47 Response in Opposition to Motion, filed by Orly Taitz. (ND) (Entered: 10/16/2012)
10/22/201251RESPONSE in Support re 8 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by Secretary of State of Mississippi (Matheny, Justin) (Entered: 10/22/2012)
10/23/201252SUMMONS Returned Executed by Orly Taitz; Obama for America served on 10/8/2012, answer due 10/29/2012. (Attachments: # 1 Cover Letter)(ND) (Entered: 10/23/2012)
10/23/201253REPLY to Response to Motion re 48 Response in Opposition to Motion, 18 Memorandum in Support of Motion, 15 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings, 47 Response in Opposition to Motion, 50 Attachment, 49 RICO Statement filed by Democrat Party of Mississippi (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit A.Taitz email refusing to serve MDEC counsel, # 2 Exhibit Exhibit B.Federal Express Air Bill Tracking Information #8769 2956 3811)(Begley, Samuel) (Entered: 10/23/2012)
10/24/201254NOTICE of Executed Summons, filed by Orly Taitz. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit of Process Server)(ND) (Entered: 10/24/2012)
10/25/201255RESPONSE in Opposition re 46 MOTION filed by Democrat Party of Mississippi (Begley, Samuel) (Entered: 10/25/2012)
10/25/201256Joinder in Document by Secretary of State of Mississippi to 55 Response in Opposition to Motion filed by Democrat Party of Mississippi (Matheny, Justin) (Entered: 10/25/2012)
10/26/201257MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction over Dr. Alvin T. Onaka and Loretta J. Fuddy, MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim for Relief; Insufficient Process; and Insufficiency of Service of Process by Loretta Fuddy, Alvin Onaka (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Declaration of Dr. Alvin T. Onaka, # 2 Exhibit Declaration of Loretta Fuddy, # 3 Exhibit Affidavit of Audrey Y. Gibo)(Dukes, Walter) (Entered: 10/26/2012)
10/26/201258MEMORANDUM in Support re 57 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction over Dr. Alvin T. Onaka and Loretta J. Fuddy MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim for Relief; Insufficient Process; and Insufficiency of Service of Process filed by Loretta Fuddy, Alvin Onaka (Dukes, Walter) (Entered: 10/26/2012)
10/29/201259Joint ANSWER to Complaint ( Taitz First Amended Complaint) by Barak Hussein Obama, Obama for America, Nanci Pelosi.(Begley, Samuel) (Entered: 10/29/2012)
10/31/201260RESPONSE in Support re 15 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings Joinder filed by Barak Hussein Obama, Obama for America, Nanci Pelosi (Begley, Samuel) (Entered: 10/31/2012)
11/02/201261NOTICE OF ACTION OF JPML STRIKING MOTION OF TAITZ TO COORDINATE AND CONSOLIDATE by Democrat Party of Mississippi, Barak Hussein Obama, Obama for America, Nanci Pelosi re 55 Response in Opposition to Motion, 46 MOTION (Begley, Samuel) (Entered: 11/02/2012)
11/05/2012Minute Entry for proceedings held before District Judge Henry T. Wingate. PARTICIPANTS: O. Taitz, plaintiff; S. Begley, S. Tepper, H. Pizzetta, J. Matheny, and W. Dukes, defense counsel. Telephone Conference held on 11/5/2012. A Motion Hearing was set for November 16 at 1:00 P.M., to hear oral argument on the 15 Motion of the Judgment on Pleadings, and 57 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction over Dr. Onaka and Loretta Fuddy, Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim for Relief, Insufficient Process and Insufficiency of Service of Process. All parties are expected to be present at the scheduled Motion Hearing. The Court DENIED plaintiff’s oral motion to allow a witness to testify by phone. Plaintiff was directed to provide the court with the addresses of the other pro se plaintiffs. (TRS) (Entered: 11/06/2012)
11/06/201262NOTICE – Response Regarding Requested Information, filed by Orly Taitz. (ND) (Entered: 11/06/2012)
11/06/2012NOTICE of Hearing on Motion 57 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction over Dr. Alvin T. Onaka and Loretta J. Fuddy MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim for Relief; Insufficient Process; and Insufficiency of Service of Process8 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings, 15 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings : Motion Hearing set for 11/16/2012 01:00 PM in Courtroom 6A (Jackson) Wingate before District Judge Henry T. Wingate (TRS) (Entered: 11/06/2012)
11/09/201263Letters from Brian Fedorka and Leah Lax. (ND) (Entered: 11/13/2012)
11/09/201264MOTION for an Emergency Evidentiary Hearing, filed by Brian Fedorka and Orly Taitz. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 – Order, # 2 Exhibit 2 – Blake Aff. et al., # 3 Exhibit 3 – Transcript, 9-24-12)(ND) (Entered: 11/13/2012)
11/09/201265RESPONSE in Opposition to 57 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction over Dr. Alvin T. Onaka and Loretta J. Fuddy MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim for Relief; Insufficient Process; and Insufficiency of Service of Process, filed by Brian Fedorka and Orly Taitz. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 – Aff. of Blake, # 2 Exhibit 2 – Certification, # 3 Exhibit 3 – Certification, # 4 Exhibit 4 – Certification)(ND) (Entered: 11/13/2012)
11/13/201266ATTACHMENT – Audio CD to Exhibit 1 in re 64 MOTION for Hearing, filed by Orly Taitz. (Maintained in Exhibit Room) (ND) (Entered: 11/13/2012)
11/13/201267Letters from Laurie Roth. (ND) (Entered: 11/13/2012)
11/13/201268Letter from Thomas Gregory MacLeran. (ND) (Entered: 11/13/2012)
11/14/201269Response in Opposition to 59 Joint ANSWER to Complaint and 60 RESPONSE in Support re 15 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings Joinder, filed by Brian Fedorka and Orly Taitz. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibits 1 – 13)(ND) (Entered: 11/15/2012)
11/15/201270REPLY to Response to Motion re 65 Response in Opposition to Motion, 57 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction over Dr. Alvin T. Onaka and Loretta J. Fuddy MOTION to Dismissfor Failure to State a Claim for Relief; Insufficient Process; and Insufficiency of Service of Process filed by Loretta Fuddy, Alvin Onaka (Dukes, Walter) (Entered: 11/15/2012)
11/16/2012Minute Entry for proceedings held before District Judge Henry T. Wingate. APPEARANCES: O. Taitz and B. Fedorka, pro se plaintiffs; J. Matheny, S. Begley, S. Tepper, and W. Dukes, counsel for defendants.Motion Hearing held on 11/16/2012. The parties provided oral argument on the 15 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by Democrat Party of Mississippi, 57MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction over Dr. Alvin T. Onaka and Loretta J. Fuddy MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim for Relief; Insufficient Process; and Insufficiency of Service of Process filed by Loretta Fuddy, Alvin Onaka, 8 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by Secretary of State of Mississippi. Plaintiff will have until 11/26 to submit no more than a 5 page brief which addresses: statutory or case authority which would allow the MS Secretary of State refusal to certify a candidate or to void the election results from the general election in MS; and a list summarizing plaintiff’s alleged RICO predicate acts with authority showing that these acts qualify as predicate acts under the RICO statutes. Counsel for defendants Onaka and Fuddy shall submit no more than a 5 page brief supplementing his motion to dismiss by 11/30, specifically addressing claims against Onaka and Fuddy in their individual capacity. The Court took under advisement plaintiff’s Laurie Roth and Leah Lax Motion to Withdraw.(Court Reporter Cherie Bond, 608-4186) (TRS) (Entered: 11/19/2012)
11/20/201271NOTICE of Additional Proof of Service per Court Request, filed by Orly Taitz. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6)(ND) (Entered: 11/20/2012)
11/21/201272MOTION to Strike 71 Notice (Other) Exhibits Five and Six of Plaintiffs’ Additional Proof of Service Per Court Request by Loretta Fuddy, Alvin Onaka (Dukes, Walter) (Entered: 11/21/2012)
11/26/201273Supplemental Brief in Response to Court Order, filed by Orly Taitz. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4)(ND) (Entered: 11/26/2012)
11/26/201274AMENDED DOCUMENT – by Brian Fedorka and Orly Taitz. Amendment to 73 Supplemental Brief in Response to Court Order. (ND) (Entered: 11/26/2012)
11/29/201275Letter from Laurie Roth. (Attachments: # 1 Envelope) (ND) (Entered: 11/29/2012)
11/30/201276MOTION to Remove Leah Lax from the Entire Lawsuit and MOTION to Sanction Orly Taitz, filed by Leah Lax. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A – Email on 7/3/12, # 2 Exhibit B – Letter from Alan Miller, # 3 Exhibit C – Email on 11/8/12, # 4 Exhibit D – Emails on 11/9/12, # 5 Envelope)(ND) (Entered: 11/30/2012)
11/30/201277MEMORANDUM in Support re 8 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings Supplemental Brief in Support of Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by Secretary of State of Mississippi (Matheny, Justin) (Entered: 11/30/2012)
11/30/201278ATTACHMENT re 77 Memorandum in Support of Motion Exhibit 1 ( A copy of the pages of Volume 15 of the Cyclopedia of Law and Practice (1905 ed.) quoted by Plaintiffs) by Secretary of State of Mississippi (Matheny, Justin) (Entered: 11/30/2012)
11/30/201279MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT re 57 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction over Dr. Alvin T. Onaka and Loretta J. Fuddy MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim for Relief; Insufficient Process; and Insufficiency of Service of Process58 Memorandum in Support of Motion, filed by Loretta Fuddy, Alvin Onaka (Dukes, Walter) (Entered: 11/30/2012)
11/30/201280RESPONSE in Support re 15 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings (Response to Taitz Fedorka Amended Supplemental Brief.) 11/26/12 filed by Democrat Party of Mississippi (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit 1.Taitzv.Sebelius Dismissal Order and Judgment)(Begley, Samuel) (Entered: 11/30/2012)
11/30/201281ATTACHMENT re 79 Memorandum in Support, by Loretta Fuddy, Alvin Onaka (Dukes, Walter) (Entered: 11/30/2012)
11/30/201282RESPONSE in Support re 15 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings (Response to Taitz/Fedorka amended Supplemental Brief. ECF74) filed by Barak Hussein Obama, Obama for America, Nanci Pelosi (Begley, Samuel) (Entered: 11/30/2012)
12/03/201283MOTION for Leave to Intervene as an additional Plaintiff, by James R. Grinols. (ND) (Entered: 12/03/2012)
12/03/201284Response in Opposition to 76 MOTION for Sanctions and MOTION for Sanctions against Leah Lax, filed by Orly Taitz. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 – Signature Page, # 2 Exhibit 2 – Chain of Emails, # 3 Exhibit 3 – Chain of Emails, # 4 Exhibit 4 – Email from Scott Tepper)(ND) (Entered: 12/03/2012)
12/12/201285MOTION for Default Judgment and Post Default Discovery as to Michael Astrue, filed by Orly Taitz. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 – Affidavit of Papa, # 2 Exhibit 2 – Affidavit of Jordan, # 3Exhibit 3 – SSNVS Certification, # 4 Exhibit 4 – Affidavit of Blake, # 5 Exhibit 5 – Affidavit of Zullo)(ND) (Entered: 12/12/2012)
12/13/201286ORDER directing Clerk of Court to restrict public access to document 85 and its attachments; personal identifiers contained therein. Plaintiffs are directed to redact the documents pursuant to FRCP 5.2 and refile. Plaintiffs are warned to redact any document filed in the future pursuant to FRCP 5.2 BEFORE filing the pleading or document. Plaintiffs are warned that their continued filing of documents containing personal identifiers will result in the imposition of sanctions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Linda R. Anderson on 12/13/2012. (ACF) (Entered: 12/13/2012)
12/14/201287Redacted MOTION for Default Judgment and Post Default Discovery as to Michael Astrue, filed by Orly Taitz. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 – Affidavit of Papa, # 2 Exhibit 2 – Affidavit of Jordan, # 3 Exhibit 3 – SSNVS Certification, # 4 Exhibit 4 – Affidavit of Blake, # 5 Exhibit 5 – Affidavit of Zullo)(ND) (Entered: 12/14/2012)
12/20/201288RESPONSE in Opposition re 83 MOTION to Intervene filed by Secretary of State of Mississippi (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 – August 21, 2012 Certification of Minnesota Republican Presidential Elector Nominees)(Matheny, Justin) (Entered: 12/20/2012)
12/20/201289RESPONSE in Opposition re 83 MOTION to Intervene filed by Democrat Party of Mississippi (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Grinols et al. v. Electoral College et al.)(Begley, Samuel) (Entered: 12/20/2012)
12/20/201290Joinder in Document by Barak Hussein Obama, Obama for America, Nanci Pelosi to 89 Response in Opposition to Motion filed by Democrat Party of Mississippi (Begley, Samuel) (Entered: 12/20/2012)
12/20/201291Joinder in Document by Loretta Fuddy, Alvin Onaka to 89 Response in Opposition to Motion filed by Democrat Party of Mississippi (Dukes, Walter) (Entered: 12/20/2012)
01/11/201392NOTICE of Filing a Petition for a Writ of Mandamus with the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, filed by Orly Taitz (Attachments: # 1 Emergency Petition)(ND) (Entered: 01/11/2013)
02/19/201393ORDER denying 85 Motion for Default Judgment; denying 87 Motion for Default Judgment Signed by District Judge Henry T. Wingate on 2/19/13 (TRS) (Entered: 02/19/2013)
02/25/201394MOTION for Reconsideration re 93 Order on Motion for Default Judgment, by Orly Taitz. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7Exhibit 7)(RRL) (Entered: 02/25/2013)
03/15/201395Remark: Petition for Writ of Mandamus is denied. Issued as Mandate: 3/6/13. (RRL) (Entered: 03/15/2013)
07/18/2013TEXT ONLY ORDER: Recently, Samuel Begley, counsel for defendants, telephoned this office asking permission to submit additional authority. The court did not speak to Mr. Begley, nor seek to learn the case authority offered. Defense may submit this additional authority by the end of the day (5 p.m.) on Friday, July 19, 2013. Should plaintiffs wish to respond, they may do so by the end of the day (5 p.m.) on Tuesday, July 23, 2013. The parties are not to submit narratives nor lengthy explanations regarding any submissions; the court seeks only the case cites, and a one or two sentence explanation of the parties purpose in submitting the authority. Submissions may be made by email to the chambers email address. The court anticipates issuing written opinions on the outstanding motions before the court within several days after the submission of any additional authority. Signed by District Judge Henry T. Wingate on 7/18/2013 (tn) (Entered: 07/18/2013)
01/08/2014Set Hearings: Telephone Conference set for 1/22/2014 10:00 AM before District Judge Henry T. Wingate (TRS) (Entered: 01/08/2014)
01/21/201496NOTICE of New Material Facts Related to the Case by Orly Taitz. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 – Letter to FOIA, # 2 Exhibit 2 – Letter from FOIA, # 3 Exhibit 3 – Memorandum Opinion, # 4Exhibit 4 – Certificate of Death).(TLC) (Entered: 01/21/2014)
01/22/2014Minute Entry for proceedings held before District Judge Henry T. Wingate via telephone.: Motion Hearing held on 1/22/2014. The parties agreed that re 24 MOTION to Stay Case filed by Orly Taitz, 20 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Orly Taitz, 40 MOTION to Expedite filed by Orly Taitz are all MOOT; and 46 MOTION filed by Orly Taitz was previously DISMISSED by the Court. Defense counsels were directed to respond to 96 Notice of New Material Facts Related to the Case within 14 days. The court will then review the submissions, and thereafter, will schedule another Telephone Conference. Further, the court discussed the recent blog posted on FogHorn of a Virgil E. Byrd, and advised the parties that the US Attorney will be asked to investigate this matter. (TRS) (Entered: 02/10/2014)
01/23/201497ATTACHMENT re 96 Notice (Other) by Orly Taitz. (TLC) (Entered: 01/23/2014)
02/03/201498Response in Opposition re 96 NOTICE of New Material Facts Related to the Case by Orly Taitz. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 – Letter to FOIA, # 2 Exhibit 2 – Letter from FOIA, # 3 Exhibit 3 – Memorandum Opinion, # 4 Exhibit 4 – Certificate of Death).(TLC) filed by Democrat Party of Mississippi (Begley, Samuel) (Entered: 02/03/2014)
02/04/201499Joinder in Document by Secretary of State of Mississippi to 98 Response in Opposition, filed by Democrat Party of Mississippi (Matheny, Justin) (Entered: 02/04/2014)
02/04/2014100Response in Opposition re 96 NOTICE of New Material Facts Related to the Case by Orly Taitz. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 – Letter to FOIA, # 2 Exhibit 2 – Letter from FOIA, # 3 Exhibit 3 – Memorandum Opinion, # 4 Exhibit 4 – Certificate of Death).(TLC) filed by Loretta Fuddy, Alvin Onaka (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit News Article – 12/11/13, # 2 Exhibit News Article – 12/12/13, # 3 Exhibit News Article – 1/13/14, # 4 Exhibit Rhodes v. MacDonald)(Dukes, Walter) (Entered: 02/04/2014)
02/04/2014101Joinder in Document by Loretta Fuddy, Alvin Onaka to 98 Response in Opposition, filed by Democrat Party of Mississippi (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit News Article – 12/11/13, # 2 Exhibit News Article – 12/12/13, # 3 Exhibit News Article – 1/13/14, # 4 Exhibit Rhodes v. MacDonald)(Dukes, Walter) (Entered: 02/04/2014)
02/05/2014102Joinder in Document by Barak Hussein Obama, Obama for America, Nanci Pelosi to 100 Response in Opposition, filed by Loretta Fuddy, Alvin Onaka, 98 Response in Opposition, filed by Democrat Party of Mississippi (Begley, Samuel) (Entered: 02/05/2014)
02/05/2014103Joinder in Document by Secretary of State of Mississippi to 100 Response in Opposition, filed by Loretta Fuddy, Alvin Onaka (Matheny, Justin) (Entered: 02/05/2014)
02/12/2014104Reply to Opposition and in Support of Relevance to New Material Facts submitted to the Court on 1/21/2013, filed by Orly Taitz. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 – Virgil E. Byrd comment, # 2Exhibit 2 – American Thinker Article, # 3 Exhibit 3 – 7/18/2013 Text Order)(ND) (Entered: 02/12/2014)
03/27/2014105MOTION for Leave to File Additional New Facts and Opinions filed by Orly Taitz. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 – Orly Taitz for AG PAC, # 2 Exhibit 2 – Transcription of Court Recording, 13-15085, # 3 Exhibit 3 – Supreme Court of Alabama Doc.)(ND) (Entered: 03/27/2014)
03/28/2014106RESPONSE in Opposition re 105 MOTION for Leave to File ADDITIONAL NEW FACTS AND OPINIONS filed by Democrat Party of Mississippi (Begley, Samuel) (Entered: 03/28/2014)
03/28/2014107Joinder in Document by Alvin Onaka to 106 Response in Opposition to Motion filed by Democrat Party of Mississippi (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Article – Senate Confirms Rosen as Director of State Department of Health)(Dukes, Walter) (Entered: 03/28/2014)
03/31/2014108Joinder in Document by Secretary of State of Mississippi to 106 Response in Opposition to Motion filed by Democrat Party of Mississippi (Matheny, Justin) (Entered: 03/31/2014)

U.S. District Court
District of Maryland (Baltimore)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:13-cv-01878-ELH

Orly Taitz v. Colvin
Assigned to: Judge Ellen L. Hollander
Cause: 05:552 Freedom of Information Act
Date Filed: 06/25/2013
Jury Demand: None
Nature of Suit: 895 Freedom of Information Act
Jurisdiction: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation
TERMINATED: 07/08/2013
represented byDefend Our Freedoms Foundation
29839 Santa Margarita Parkway, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688
PRO SE
Plaintiff
Orly Taitzrepresented byOrly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Parkway
STE 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688
949-683-5411
PRO SE
V.
Defendant
Carolyn Colvin
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
represented byAllen F Loucks 
Office of the United States Attorney
36 S Charles St Fourth Fl
Baltimore, MD 21201
14102094800
Fax: 14109620693
Email: allen.loucks@usdoj.gov
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Andrew George Norman 
Office of the United States Attorney
36 S Charles St Fourth Fl
Baltimore, MD 21201
14102094800
Fax: 14109620716
Email: andrew.norman@usdoj.gov
TERMINATED: 01/07/2014
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

V.
Interested Party
SSA Notify

 

Date Filed#Docket Text
06/25/20131COMPLAINT against Carolyn Colvin ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 14637067860.), filed by Defend Our Freedoms Foundation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Civil Cover Sheet)(apls, Deputy Clerk) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/28/2013: # 4 Summons) (apls, Deputy Clerk). (Entered: 06/28/2013)
07/02/20132ORDER directing Ms.Taitz to advise court within 14 days of intent re admission to the Courts bar or whether counsel will be entering their appearance; directing clerk to without issuance of summons pending further order of the court. Signed by Judge Ellen L. Hollander on 7/2/2013. (c/m 7/3/2013 aos, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 07/03/2013)
07/08/20133AMENDED COMPLAINT against Carolyn Colvin, filed by Orly Taitz.(aos, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 07/08/2013)
07/09/20134ORDER substituting Orly Taitz as plaintiff in lieu of Defend Our Freedoms Foundation; directing clerk to prepare and issue summons. Signed by Judge Ellen L. Hollander on 7/9/2013. (c/m 7/9/2013 aos, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 07/09/2013)
07/09/20135Summons Issued 60 days as to Carolyn Colvin, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: # 1 Summons, # 2 Summons)(c/m 7/9/2013 aos, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 07/09/2013)
07/16/20136SUMMONS Returned Executed by Orly Taitz. Carolyn Colvin served on 7/10/2013, answer due 9/9/2013. (aos, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 07/16/2013)
08/14/20137MOTION to Dismiss ( Responses due by 9/3/2013), MOTION for Summary Judgment ( Responses due by 9/3/2013) by Carolyn Colvin (Attachments: # 1 Memo of Law, # 2 Exhibit A, # 3Exhibit B, # 4 Exhibit C, # 5 Exhibit D, # 6 Text of Proposed Order)(Norman, Andrew) (Entered: 08/14/2013)
08/15/20138Rule 12/56 letter mailed to Orly Taitz. (c/m 8/15/2013 aos, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 08/15/2013)
08/21/20139RESPONSE in Opposition re 7 MOTION to Dismiss MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Orly Taitz. (Attachments: # 1 Exibit 1)(aos, Deputy Clerk) Modified on 8/21/2013 (aos, Deputy Clerk). (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/21/2013: # 2 Tracking receipt) (aos, Deputy Clerk). (Entered: 08/21/2013)
08/23/201310MOTION for Extension of Time by Carolyn Colvin Responses due by 9/9/2013 (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Norman, Andrew) (Entered: 08/23/2013)
08/23/201311ORDER granting Defendant’s 10 Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply Brief. Signed by Judge Ellen L. Hollander on 8/23/13. (dass, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 08/23/2013)
09/16/201312REPLY to Response to Motion re 7 MOTION to Dismiss MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Carolyn Colvin. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A–Cover Sheet, # 2 Exhibit A–Declaration, # 3Exhibit B–Cover Sheet, # 4 Exhibit B–Redacted FOIA)(Norman, Andrew) (Entered: 09/16/2013)
09/25/201313REPLY to Opposition re 7 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Orly Taitz. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Text of Proposed Order)(aos, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 09/26/2013)
11/26/201314MOTION/Request for the Defense to Prepare Vaugn Index by Orly Taitz (aos, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 11/26/2013)
12/11/201315(FILED IN ERROR- ATTY TO REFILE)REPLY to Response to Motion re 14 MOTION for the Defense to Prepare Vaugn Index filed by Carolyn Colvin. (Norman, Andrew) Modified on 12/12/2013 (aos, Deputy Clerk). (Entered: 12/11/2013)
12/12/201316QC NOTICE: 15 Reply to Response to Motion filed by Carolyn Colvin was filed incorrectly. 
****Please refile this document under category “Responses and Replies” using the event “Response to Motion”, and link the filing back to the original motion that was filed. It has been noted as FILED IN ERROR, and the document link has been disabled. 
(aos, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 12/12/2013)
12/12/201317RESPONSE to Motion re 14 MOTION for the Defense to Prepare Vaugn Index filed by Carolyn Colvin. Replies due by 12/30/2013. (Norman, Andrew) (Entered: 12/12/2013)
12/13/201318MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Ellen L. Hollander on 12/13/13. (dass, Deputy Clerk) (c/m 12/16/13) (Entered: 12/16/2013)
12/13/201319ORDER granting Defendant’s 7 Motion to Dismiss without prejudice and with leave to amend; denying Plaintiff’s 9 Motion for Summary Judgment without prejudice; setting deadline for Plaintiff to file a second amended complaint. Signed by Judge Ellen L. Hollander on 12/13/13. (dass, Deputy Clerk) (c/m 12/16/13) (Entered: 12/16/2013)
01/03/201420SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT against Carolyn Colvin, filed by Orly Taitz. (Attachments: # 1 table of evidence, # 2 Certificate of Service, # 3 Exhibit 1, # 4 Exhibit 2, # 5 Exhibit 3, # 6Exhibit 4, # 7 Exhibit 5, # 8 Exhibit 6, # 9 Exhibit 7, # 10 Exhibit 8, # 11 Exhibit 9, # 12 Exhibit 10, # 13 Exhibit 11, # 14 Exhibit 12, # 15 Exhibit 13, # 16 Exhibit 14, # 17 Exhibit 15, # 18 Exhibit 16, # 19 Exhibit 17, # 20 Exhibit 18, # 21 Exhibit 19, # 22 Exhibit 20, # 23 Exhibit 21, # 24 Exhibit 22, # 25 Exhibit 23)(aos, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 01/03/2014)
01/07/201421NOTICE to Substitute Attorney (Loucks, Allen) (Entered: 01/07/2014)
01/13/201422MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to the Second Amended Complaint by Carolyn Colvin Responses due by 1/30/2014 (Loucks, Allen) (Entered: 01/13/2014)
01/14/201423MEMORANDUM to Parties re Extension of Time. Signed by Judge Ellen L. Hollander on 1/14/2014. (c/m 1/14/2014 aos, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 01/14/2014)
01/14/201424Correspondence re: Extension of time for Response to Second Amended Complaint (Loucks, Allen) (Entered: 01/14/2014)
01/15/201425Supplemental to 24 Miscellaneous Correspondence, 23 Memorandum to Parties filed by Carolyn Colvin . (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit)(Loucks, Allen) (Entered: 01/15/2014)
01/15/201426MEMORANDUM to Parties granting 22 MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to the Second Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Ellen L. Hollander on 1/15/2014. (c/m 1/15/2015 CH/aos, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 01/15/2014)
01/22/201427RESPONSE to Defendant’s 22 MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to the Second Amended Complaint filed by Orly Taitz. (dass, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 01/22/2014)
01/30/201428MOTION to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint or, in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment by Carolyn Colvin Responses due by 2/18/2014 (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum of Law, # 2 Exhibit A, # 3 Exhibit B, # 4 Exhibit C, # 5 Exhibit D, # 6 Exhibit E)(Loucks, Allen) (Entered: 01/30/2014)
02/03/201429(Filed in Error)Rule 12/56 letter mailed to Orly Taitz. (aos, Deputy Clerk) Modified on 2/3/2014 (aos, Deputy Clerk). (Entered: 02/03/2014)
02/03/201430Rule 12/56 letter mailed to Orly Taitz. (c/m 2/3/2014 aos, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 02/03/2014)
02/19/201431RESPONSE in Opposition re 28 MOTION to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint or, in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment filed by Orly Taitz. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4)(aos, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 02/19/2014)
03/02/201432REPLY to Response to Motion re 28 MOTION to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint or, in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment and Response to Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Carolyn Colvin. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Text of Proposed Order)(Loucks, Allen) (Entered: 03/02/2014)
03/12/201433RETURN PLEADING ORDER. Signed by Judge Ellen L. Hollander on 3/12/2014. (Attachments: # 1 1st page of Ret Doc)(C/M 3/13/2014 aos, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 03/13/2014)
03/14/201434ORDER re Filings with the Court. Signed by Judge Ellen L. Hollander on 3/13/2014. (Attachments: # 1 Attachment 1, # 2 Attachment 2)(c/m 3/14/2014 aos, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 03/14/2014)
03/14/201435REPLY in Support of 31 Motion for Summary Judgment in Favor of Plaintiff filed by Orly Taitz. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6)(aos, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 03/14/2014)

U.S. District Court
District of Columbia (Washington, DC)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:13-cv-01020-RCL

TAITZ v. DONAHUE et al
Assigned to: Chief Judge Royce C. Lamberth

 Case:1:11-cv-00402-RCL

Cause: 05:552 Freedom of Information Act

Date Filed: 07/05/2013
Jury Demand: None
Nature of Suit: 895 Freedom of Information Act
Jurisdiction: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff
ORLY TAITZrepresented byORLY TAITZ
29839 Santa Margarita Parkway
Suite 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688
(949) 683 – 5411
Fax: (949) 766 – 7603
Email: orly.taitz@gmail.com
PRO SE
V.
Defendant
PATRICK DONAHUE
Postmaster General
represented byEric J. Soskin 
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
20 Massachusetts Avenue, NW
Room 5134
Washington, DC 20530
(202) 353-0533
Email: eric.soskin@usdoj.gov
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Daniel Franklin Van Horn 
U.S. ATTORNEY’S OFFICE
Judiciary Center Building
555 Fourth Street NW
Room E4226
Washington, DC 20530
(202) 252-2506
Fax: (202) 514-8780
Email: daniel.vanhorn@usdoj.gov
TERMINATED: 10/28/2013

Defendant
DAVID C. WILLIAMS
Inspector General for the United States Postal Service
represented byEric J. Soskin 
(See above for address)
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Daniel Franklin Van Horn 
(See above for address)
TERMINATED: 10/28/2013

 

Date Filed#Docket Text
07/05/20131COMPLAINT against PATRICK DONAHUE, DAVID C. WILLIAMS ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 4616057627) filed by ORLY TAITZ.(Note: Portions of these exhibits are illegible on ECF.) (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(rdj) (Entered: 07/08/2013)
07/05/2013Summons (2) Issued as to PATRICK DONAHUE, DAVID C. WILLIAMS. (rdj) (Entered: 07/08/2013)
07/05/20132NOTICE OF RELATED CASE. Case related to Case No. 11cv402. (rdj) (Entered: 07/08/2013)
07/16/20133AFFIDAVIT of mailing by certified mail by ORLY TAITZ. (rdj) (Entered: 07/18/2013)
09/18/20134MOTION for Summary Judgment, MOTION for Default Judgment by ORLY TAITZ (td, ) (Entered: 09/20/2013)
10/10/20135NOTICE of Appearance by Daniel Franklin Van Horn on behalf of All Defendants (Van Horn, Daniel) (Entered: 10/10/2013)
10/10/20136NOTICE REGARDING SERVICE OF COMPLAINT by PATRICK DONAHUE, DAVID C. WILLIAMS (Attachments: # 1 Declaration Declaration of Daniel F. Van Horn, # 2 Text of Proposed Order)(Van Horn, Daniel) (Entered: 10/10/2013)
10/21/20137RESPONSE re 6 Notice filed by ORLY TAITZ. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibits (Note: Portions of these exhibits are illegible on ECF.), # 2 Text of Proposed Order)(rdj) (Entered: 10/22/2013)
10/24/20138REPLY re 6 Notice filed by PATRICK DONAHUE, DAVID C. WILLIAMS. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration Second Declaration of Daniel F. Van Horn)(Van Horn, Daniel) Modified on 10/25/2013 to correct event and linkage (rdj). (Entered: 10/24/2013)
10/24/20139NOTICE OF FILING REDACTED DOCUMENT to 7 Response to Document by ORLY TAITZ (The original PDF Document contained privacy information and was restricted pursuant to the E-Government Act.) (Note: Portions of these exhibits are illegible on ECF.)(rdj) (Entered: 10/25/2013)
10/25/201310NOTICE of Appearance by Eric J. Soskin on behalf of All Defendants (Soskin, Eric) (Entered: 10/25/2013)
10/28/201311NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF APPEARANCE as to PATRICK DONAHUE, DAVID C. WILLIAMS. Attorney Daniel Franklin Van Horn terminated. (Van Horn, Daniel) (Entered: 10/28/2013)
11/14/201312ANSWER to 1 Complaint by PATRICK DONAHUE, DAVID C. WILLIAMS.(Soskin, Eric) (Entered: 11/14/2013)
11/14/201313MOTION for Briefing Schedule by PATRICK DONAHUE, DAVID C. WILLIAMS (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Soskin, Eric) (Entered: 11/14/2013)
11/27/201314ORDER denying 4 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 4 Motion for Default Judgment. Upon consideration of the defendant’s Notice 6 and Reply 8 Regarding Service of Complaint and the entire record herein, it is hereby ORDERED that the plaintiff’s Motion 4 for Summary Judgment and Default Judgment is DENIED, without prejudice; and it is further ORDERED that defendants shall answer or otherwise respond to plaintiff’s complaint within 30 days after appropriations for the Department of Justice have been restored, so that the Answer filed on November 14, 2013, shall be deemed timely filed. Signed by Judge Royce C. Lamberth on November 27, 2013. (lcrcl2) (Entered: 11/27/2013)
11/27/201315ORDER granting 13 Motion for Briefing Schedule. Upon consideration of defendant’s Motion 13 to Set Briefing Schedule, it is hereby ORDERED that defendant’s motion is GRANTED; and it is further ORDERED that briefing in this matter shall proceed as follows: Defendants shall move for summary judgment no later than December 13, 2013; plaintiff shall file any response thereto no later than January 3, 2014; and defendants shall file a reply, if any, no later than January 24, 2014. Signed by Judge Royce C. Lamberth on November 27, 2013. (lcrcl2) (Entered: 11/27/2013)
12/05/2013Set/Reset Deadlines: Summary Judgment motions due by 12/13/2013. Response to Motion for Summary Judgment due by 1/3/2014. Reply to Motion for Summary Judgment due by 1/24/2014. (mpt, ) (Entered: 12/05/2013)
12/11/201317MOTION to Recuse under 28 USC 455 by ORLY TAITZ (rdj) (Entered: 12/12/2013)
12/12/201316MOTION for Summary Judgment by PATRICK DONAHUE, DAVID C. WILLIAMS (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A – Poulsen Declaration, # 2 Exhibit B – Eyre Declaration, # 3 Text of Proposed Order)(Soskin, Eric) (Entered: 12/12/2013)
01/03/201418Memorandum in opposition to re 16 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by ORLY TAITZ. (rdj) (Entered: 01/06/2014)
01/03/201420MOTION for Summary Judgment by ORLY TAITZ. (See Docket Entry 18 to view document) (jf, ) (Entered: 01/26/2014)
01/24/201419REPLY to opposition to motion re 16 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by PATRICK DONAHUE, DAVID C. WILLIAMS. (Soskin, Eric) (Entered: 01/24/2014)
01/24/201421Memorandum in opposition to re 20 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by PATRICK DONAHUE, DAVID C. WILLIAMS. (See Docket Entry 19 to view document) (jf, ) (Entered: 01/26/2014)
01/31/201422REPLY to opposition to motion re 20 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by ORLY TAITZ. (rdj) (Entered: 01/31/2014)

 

General Docket
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Court of Appeals Docket #: 13-16359Docketed: 07/03/2013
Nature of Suit: 2441 Civil Rights Voting
James Grinols, et al v. Electoral College, et al
Appeal From: U.S. District Court for Eastern California, Sacramento
Fee Status: Paid
Case Type Information:
     1) civil
     2) united states
     3) null
Originating Court Information:
     District: 0972-2 : 2:12-cv-02997-MCE-DAD
     Court Reporter: Kelly Ann O’Halloran
     Court Reporter: Kathy Lynn Swinhart
     Trial Judge: Morrison C. England, Junior, Chief District Judge
     Date Filed: 12/12/2012
     Date Order/Judgment:     Date Order/Judgment EOD:     Date NOA Filed:     Date Rec’d COA:
     05/23/2013     05/23/2013     06/22/2013     07/03/2013
Prior Cases:
     13-15627     Date Filed: 04/03/2013     Date Disposed: 06/20/2013     Disposition: Jurisdictional Defects – Judge Order
     13-70744     Date Filed: 02/28/2013     Date Disposed: 04/01/2013     Disposition: Denied – Judge Order
Current Cases:
     None

 

JAMES GRINOLS
Plaintiff - Appellant,
Orly Taitz, Esquire, Counsel
Direct: 949-683-5411
[COR LD NTC Retained]
Dr. Orly Taitz. ESQ
29839 Santa Margarita
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688
ROBERT ODDEN
Plaintiff - Appellant,
Orly Taitz, Esquire, Counsel
Direct: 949-683-5411
[COR LD NTC Retained]
(see above)
EDWARD NOONAN
Plaintiff - Appellant,
Orly Taitz, Esquire, Counsel
Direct: 949-683-5411
[COR LD NTC Retained]
(see above)
KEITH JUDD
Plaintiff - Appellant,
Orly Taitz, Esquire, Counsel
Direct: 949-683-5411
[COR LD NTC Retained]
(see above)
THOMAS GREGORY MACLERAN
Plaintiff - Appellant,
Orly Taitz, Esquire, Counsel
Direct: 949-683-5411
[COR LD NTC Retained]
(see above)
   v.
ELECTORAL COLLEGE
Defendant - Appellee,
Edward Alan Olsen, Esquire, Assistant U.S. Attorney
Direct: 916-554-2821
[COR NTC Assist US Attorney]
USSAC – Office of the US Attorney
501 I Street
Sacramento, CA 95814
PRESIDENT OF THE SENATE
Defendant - Appellee,
Edward Alan Olsen, Esquire, Assistant U.S. Attorney
Direct: 916-554-2821
[COR NTC Assist US Attorney]
(see above)
GOVERNOR OF CALIFORNIA
Defendant - Appellee,
George Michael Waters
[COR NTC Dep State Aty Gen]
AGCA-Office of the California Attorney General
Firm: 800-952-5225
1300 I Street
P.O. Box 944255
Sacramento, CA 94244-2550
SECRETARY OF STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Defendant - Appellee,
George Michael Waters
[COR NTC Dep State Aty Gen]
(see above)
U.S. CONGRESS
Defendant - Appellee,
Edward Alan Olsen, Esquire, Assistant U.S. Attorney
Direct: 916-554-2821
[COR NTC Assist US Attorney]
(see above)
BARACK OBAMA
Defendant - Appellee,
Edward Alan Olsen, Esquire, Assistant U.S. Attorney
Direct: 916-554-2821
[COR NTC Assist US Attorney]
(see above)

JAMES GRINOLS; ROBERT ODDEN; EDWARD NOONAN; KEITH JUDD; THOMAS GREGORY MACLERAN,

Plaintiffs – Appellants,

v.

ELECTORAL COLLEGE; PRESIDENT OF THE SENATE; GOVERNOR OF CALIFORNIA; SECRETARY OF STATE OF CALIFORNIA; U.S. CONGRESS; BARACK OBAMA,

Defendants – Appellees.

07/03/2013  1 
16 pg, 598.71 KB
DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Mediation Questionnaire due on 07/10/2013. Transcript ordered by 07/22/2013. Transcript due 08/21/2013. Appellants James Grinols, Keith Judd, Thomas Gregory MacLeran, Edward Noonan and Robert Odden opening brief due 09/30/2013. Appellees Electoral College, Governor of California, Barrack Obama, President of the Senate, Secretary of State of California and U.S. Congress answering brief due 10/30/2013. Appellant’s optional reply brief is due 14 days after service of the answering brief. [8691173] (GR)
08/09/2013  2 
1 pg, 33.88 KB
Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: EPM): The Court of Appeals’ records do not indicate that appellants have filed a Mediation Questionnaire in accordance with Circuit Rule 3-4. Within seven (7) days of the filing of this order, appellants shall: (a) file a Mediation Questionnaire (available on the court’s website, www.ca9.uscourts.gov); (b) dismiss the appeal voluntarily pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42(b); or (c) show cause in writing why this appeal should not be dismissed pursuant to Ninth Cir. R. 42-1. Failure to comply with this order will result in dismissal pursuant to Ninth Cir. R. 42-1. [8737981] (WL)
08/09/2013  3 
4 pg, 285.79 KB
Filed (ECF) Appellants James Grinols, Keith Judd, Thomas Gregory MacLeran, Edward Noonan and Robert Odden Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 08/09/2013. [8738289] (OT)
08/09/2013  4 
2 pg, 32.33 KB
Filed (ECF) Appellants James Grinols, Keith Judd, Thomas Gregory MacLeran, Edward Noonan and Robert Odden Correspondence: Certificate of service of the Mediation questionnaire. Date of service: 08/09/2013 [8738328] (OT)
08/10/2013  5 
74 pg, 2.75 MB
Filed (ECF) Appellants James Grinols, Keith Judd, Thomas Gregory MacLeran, Edward Noonan and Robert Odden Correspondence: Request for a transcript for the 04.22.2013 hearing made. transcript fee paid in full previously. Date of service: 08/10/2013 [8738556] (OT)
08/10/2013  6 
56 pg, 2.61 MB
Filed (ECF) Appellants James Grinols, Keith Judd, Thomas Gregory MacLeran, Edward Noonan and Robert Odden Correspondence: request for 04.22.2013 transcript, receipt and corrected transcript. Date of service: 08/10/2013 [8738557] (OT)
08/27/2013  7 
1 pg, 35.54 KB
Filed (ECF) Appellants James Grinols, Keith Judd, Thomas Gregory MacLeran, Edward Noonan and Robert Odden Notice of Reporter Default per 9th Circuit Rule 11-1.2. Date of service: 08/27/2013 [8758967] (OT)
08/29/2013  8 
1 pg, 33.21 KB
Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: LBS): The court is in receipt of appellants’ notice of Court Reporter Kathy Swinhart’s default for not filing a certified transcript of the April 22, 2013 proceeding. Appellant is informed that a certified transcript of the April 22, 2013 proceeding was filed in the district court on May 21, 2013. The briefing schedule is unchanged. [8761961] (WL)
09/04/2013  9Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Opening Brief by Appellants James Grinols, Keith Judd, Thomas Gregory MacLeran, Edward Noonan and Robert Odden. New requested due date is 09/23/2013 at 11:59 pm. [8767060] (OT)
09/04/2013  10Streamlined request [9] by Appellants James Grinols, Keith Judd, Thomas Gregory MacLeran, Edward Noonan and Robert Odden to extend time to file the opening brief is not approved. The opening brief is presently due September 30, 2013. [8767453] [13-16359] (AT)
09/29/2013  11Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Opening Brief by Appellants James Grinols, Keith Judd, Thomas Gregory MacLeran, Edward Noonan and Robert Odden. New requested due date is 10/29/2013 at 11:59 pm. [8801051] (OT)
09/30/2013  12Streamlined request [11] by Appellants James Grinols, Keith Judd, Thomas Gregory MacLeran, Edward Noonan and Robert Odden to extend time to file the brief is approved. Amended briefing schedule: Appellants James Grinols, Keith Judd, Thomas Gregory MacLeran, Edward Noonan and Robert Odden opening brief due 10/30/2013. Appellees Electoral College, Governor of California, Barrack Obama, President of the Senate, Secretary of State of California and U.S. Congress answering brief due 11/29/2013. The optional reply brief is due 14 days from the date of service of the answering brief. [8801445] (CB)
10/08/2013  13Case rejected from Circuit Mediation Program. [8813812] (LW)
10/29/2013  14 
66 pg, 683.8 KB
Submitted (ECF) Opening Brief for review. Submitted by Appellants James Grinols, Keith Judd, Thomas Gregory MacLeran, Edward Noonan and Robert Odden. Date of service: 10/29/2013. [8842619]–[COURT UPDATE: Replaced brief, resent notice. 11/01/2013 by ASW] (OT)
10/30/2013  15 
336 pg, 22.01 MB
Submitted (ECF) excerpts of record. Submitted by Appellants James Grinols, Keith Judd, Thomas Gregory MacLeran, Edward Noonan and Robert Odden. Date of service: 10/29/2013. [8844663]–[COURT UPDATE: Replaced PDFs, resent notice. 11/01/2013 by ASW] (OT)
11/01/2013  16 
2 pg, 86.24 KB
Filed clerk order: The opening brief [14] submitted by appellants is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 7 copies of the brief in paper format, accompanied by certification, attached to the end of each copy of the brief, that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. Cover color: blue. The paper copies shall be printed from the PDF version of the brief created from the word processing application, not from PACER or Appellate ECF. The Court has reviewed the excerpts of record [15] submitted by appellants. Within 7 days of this order, filer is ordered to file 4 copies of the excerpts in paper format, with a white cover. The paper copies must be in the format described in 9th Circuit Rule 30-1.6. [8847634] (LA)
11/18/2013  17Received 7 paper copies of Opening brief [14] filed by Appellants. [8866331] (SD)
11/18/2013  18Filed Appellants’ paper copies of excerpts of record [15] in 2 volume(s). [8866526] (LA)
11/20/2013  19Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Answering Brief by Appellees Electoral College, Barrack Obama, President of the Senate and U.S. Congress. New requested due date is 12/30/2013 at 11:59 pm. [8869918] (EAO)
11/20/2013  20Streamlined request [19] by Appellees Electoral College, Barrack Obama, President of the Senate and U.S. Congress to extend time to file the answering brief is approved. Amended briefing schedule: the answering brief for Appellees Electoral College, Barrack Obama, President of the Senate and U.S. Congress is due 12/30/2013. The optional reply brief is due 14 days after service of the last-served answering brief. [8870540] [13-16359] (AT)
11/22/2013  21Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Answering Brief by Appellees Governor of California and Secretary of State of California. New requested due date is 12/30/2013 at 11:59 pm. [8874062] (GMW)
11/22/2013  22Streamlined request [21] by Appellees Governor of California and Secretary of State of California to extend time to file the answering brief is approved. Amended briefing schedule: the answering brief for Appellees Governor of California and Secretary of State of California is due 12/30/2013. The optional reply brief is due 14 days after service of the last-served answering brief. [8874432] [13-16359] (AT)
12/10/2013  23 
5 pg, 104.79 KB
Filed (ECF) Appellees Electoral College, Barack Obama, President of the Senate and U.S. Congress Motion to extend time to file Answering brief until 01/29/2014 at 11:59 pm. Date of service: 12/10/2013. [8896180] (EAO)
12/11/2013  24 
1 pg, 83.55 KB
Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: GS): Granting Second Motion (ECF Filing) filed by Appellees Barack Obama, Electoral College, President of the Senate and U.S. Congress; Granting Motion (ECF Filing) motion to extend time to file brief filed by Appellees Barack Obama, Electoral College, President of the Senate and U.S. Congress Appellees Electoral College, Barack Obama, President of the Senate and U.S. Congress answering brief due 01/29/2014. The optional reply brief is due 14 days after service of the answering brief. [8897081] (GS)
12/18/2013  25 
5 pg, 800.72 KB
Filed (ECF) Appellees Governor of California and Secretary of State of California Motion to extend time to file Answering brief until 01/29/2014. Date of service: 12/18/2013. [8907079] (GMW)
12/18/2013  26 
1 pg, 85.79 KB
Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: GS): Granting Second Motion (ECF Filing) filed by Appellees Governor of California and Secretary of State of California; Granting Motion (ECF Filing) motion to extend time to file brief filed by Appellees Governor of California and Secretary of State of California Appellees Governor of California and Secretary of State of California answering brief due 01/29/2014. The optional reply brief is due 14 days after the last-served answering brief. [8907805] (GS)
01/29/2014  27 
108 pg, 13.02 MB
Submitted (ECF) Answering Brief and supplemental excerpts of record for review. Submitted by Appellees Governor of California and Secretary of State of California. Date of service: 01/29/2014. [8958410] (GMW)
01/29/2014  28 
283 pg, 4.97 MB
Submitted (ECF) Answering Brief and supplemental excerpts of record for review. Submitted by Appellees Electoral College, Barack Obama, President of the Senate and U.S. Congress. Date of service: 01/29/2014. [8958566] (EAO)
01/30/2014  29 
2 pg, 85.8 KB
Filed clerk order: The answering brief [27] submitted by Governor of California and Secretary of State of California is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 7 copies of the brief in paper format, accompanied by certification, attached to the end of each copy of the brief, that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. Cover color: red. The paper copies shall be printed from the PDF version of the brief created from the word processing application, not from PACER or Appellate ECF. The Court has reviewed the supplemental excerpts of record [27] submitted by Governor of California and Secretary of State of California. Within 7 days of this order, filer is ordered to file 4 copies of the excerpts in paper format, with a white cover. The paper copies must be in the format described in 9th Circuit Rule 30-1.6. [8959378] (CT)
01/30/2014  30 
2 pg, 85.8 KB
Filed clerk order: The answering brief [28] submitted by appellees is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 7 copies of the brief in paper format, accompanied by certification, attached to the end of each copy of the brief, that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. Cover color: red. The paper copies shall be printed from the PDF version of the brief created from the word processing application, not from PACER or Appellate ECF. The Court has reviewed the supplemental excerpts of record [28] submitted by appellees. Within 7 days of this order, filer is ordered to file 4 copies of the excerpts in paper format, with a white cover. The paper copies must be in the format described in 9th Circuit Rule 30-1.6. [8959383] (CT)
01/31/2014  31Filed Appellees Electoral College, Barack Obama, President of the Senate and U.S. Congress paper copies of supplemental excerpts of record [28] in 2 volumes. [8961380] (TLH)
01/31/2014  32Received 7 paper copies of Answering brief [28] filed by Appellees. [8961646] (SD)
02/03/2014  33Filed Appellees Governor of California and Secretary of State of California paper copies of supplemental excerpts of record [27] in 1 volume. [8963300] (TLH)
02/03/2014  34Received 7 paper copies of Answering brief [27] filed by Governor of California and Secretary of State of California. [8963523] (SD)
02/10/2014  35COURT DELETED INCORRECT/DUPLICATE ENTRY. Notice about deletion sent to case participants registered for electronic filing. Correct Entry: [36]. Original Text: Filed (ECF) Appellants James Grinols, Keith Judd, Thomas Gregory MacLeran, Edward Noonan and Robert Odden Correspondence: request for extension of time for 30 days to file a reply to appellees brief. Date of service: 02/10/2014 [8971757] (OT)
02/10/2014  36 
2 pg, 38.93 KB
Filed (ECF) Appellants James Grinols, Keith Judd, Thomas Gregory MacLeran, Edward Noonan and Robert Odden Motion to extend time to file Reply brief until 03/14/2014 at 11:59 pm. Date of service: 02/10/2014. [8973445] (OT)
02/11/2014  37 
1 pg, 84.07 KB
Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: GS): Granting Motion (ECF Filing) filed by Appellants James Grinols, Keith Judd, Robert Odden, Edward Noonan and Thomas Gregory MacLeran; Granting Motion (ECF Filing) motion to extend time to file brief filed by Appellants James Grinols, Keith Judd, Robert Odden, Edward Noonan and Thomas Gregory MacLeran. The optional reply brief is due 03/14/2014. [8974659] (GS)
03/14/2014  38 
42 pg, 327.01 KB
Submitted (ECF) Reply Brief for review. Submitted by Appellants James Grinols, Keith Judd, Thomas Gregory MacLeran, Edward Noonan and Robert Odden. Date of service: 03/14/2014. [9017394]–[COURT UPDATE: Attached corrected brief. Resent NDA. 03/20/2014 by RY]–[Edited: Attached corrected tables. Removed transcript (counsel notified motion required). Resent NDA. 03/20/2014 by RY] (OT)
03/18/2014  39 
20 pg, 128.63 KB
Filed (ECF) Appellants James Grinols, Keith Judd, Thomas Gregory MacLeran, Edward Noonan and Robert Odden Motion to take judicial notice of. Date of service: 03/18/2014. [9021470] (OT)
03/19/2014  40 
4 pg, 39.92 KB
Filed (ECF) Appellants James Grinols, Keith Judd, Thomas Gregory MacLeran, Edward Noonan and Robert Odden Motion to file oversized brief. Date of service: 03/19/2014. [9023308]–[Edited: Removed Reply brief (re-attached to correct entry: [38].) 03/20/2014 by RY] (OT)
03/24/2014  41 
1 pg, 39.31 KB
Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: GS): The appellants’ motion to file an oversized reply brief of 7,679 words is granted. The reply brief submitted on March 14, 2014 shall be filed. The appellants are reminded that all briefs must include a certificate of compliance of compliance regarding the word count in the brief. See 9th Cir. R. 32-1. With regard to the appellants’ alternatively to divide the reply brief in two, the appellants are reminded that if multiple answering briefs are filed, an appellant or group of jointly represented appellants is limited to filing a single brief in response to the multiple briefs. See 9th Cir. R. 28-5. [9027946] (RT)
03/24/2014  42 
2 pg, 85.3 KB
Filed clerk order: The reply brief [38] submitted by appellants is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 7 copies of the brief in paper format, accompanied by certification, attached to the end of each copy of the brief, that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. Cover color: gray. The paper copies shall be printed from the PDF version of the brief created from the word processing application, not from PACER or Appellate ECF. [9029220] (LA)

 

Share

Please, contact Clark county sheriff, DA, AG, FBI, House oversight committee, demand immediate investigation of Rory and Harry Reid for public corruption, embezzlement of public funds, violation of oath of office, deprivation of honest services, fraud, use of BLM for de facto theft and possibly treason.

Posted on | April 12, 2014 | 11 Comments

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/09/04/Harry-Reid-s-Son-Representing-Chinese-Solar-Panel-Plant-In-5-Billion-Nevada-Deal

HARRY REID’S SON REPRESENTING CHINESE SOLAR PANEL PLANT IN $5 BILLION NEVADA DEAL

 2316

Email ArticlePrint articleSend a Tip

The son of Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV), Rory Reid, is the primary representative for ENN Energy Group, a Chinese energy company seeking to build a $5 billion solar panel plant on a 9,000-acre Clark County desert plot in Laughlin, Nevada.

ENN scored big when Clark County commissioners unanimously voted to sell the Chinese company the public land for just $4.5 million, despite the fact that it was appraised at $38.6 million.

Sen. Reid has been one of ENN’s biggest supporters, having recruited the company during a 2011 trip to China. According to Reuters, last month Sen. Reid tried to “pressure Nevada’s largest power company, NV Energy, to sign up as ENN’s first customer.”

Both Rory Reid and Harry Reid deny having ever discussed the $5 billion Chinese solar panel plant deal:

“I have never discussed the project with my father or his staff,” said Rory Reid. Kristen Orthman, a spokeswoman for the senator, said he had not discussed the project with his son.

This isn’t the first time the Reids have come under fire for alleged cronyism. In 2003,allegations emerged that Nevada industries frequently lobbied Sen. Reid through his well-connected relatives.

 

IMMEDIATE NEWS RELEASE
12 April 2014 – 12 Nisan 5774
Colonel Robert F. Cunningham
Post Office Box 3456
Albuquerque NM 87190
505 796 4651
1,126 words.
SEND US YOUR RATE CARD

BUNDY RANCH: ROUND ONE A DRAW


ALBUQUERQUE, NM – 12 April 2014 – DAMNED LIE EXPOSED: Senator Harry Reid’s attempt to sell publicly-owned open range to China for untold pounds of gold into his graft holdings just went sour. Harry Reid’s son Rory is a former Clark County (NV) Commissioner and now lobbies for China’s ENN Energy Group to blackmail NV Energy into buying all the power generated by a multi-million dollar “green energy” solar field and panel manufacturing. ENN’s ENN Mojave Energy LLC and Brightsource Energy has paid the Reids very well for their involvement in securing – make that “attempting to secure” – nine thousand (9,000) acres from BLM at a cost of $4,500,000: between eleven and fifteen percent below its actual value. And legal or not, ENN officers Mu Megn and DeLing Zhou have donated generously to Reid’s and fellow-corruptor’s: President Obama, Senator Bill Nelson (D-FL), Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) and Senator Deborah Ann Greer-Stabenow (D-MI); good communists all.

This ‘incident’ is not about taxes, it is about the God Players On Government Payroll, rightly named by this reporter decades ago as G-POG-Ps. The United SOCIALIST States’ Bureau of Land Management has temporarily pulled in their god-playing horns from their knowingly illegal occupation of property-use and property-livestock against Cliven Bundy and his family, Clark County, Nevada: and those ‘tin-foil hat’ Citizen Restorers that arrived on the scene armed and ready to STAND THEIR GROUND! The only language any out-of-control entites really understand.

BLM Director Neil Kornze said, “Based on information about conditions on the ground, and in consultation with law enforcement, we have made a decision to conclude the cattle gather because of our serious concern about the safety of employees and members of the public. We ask that all parties in the area remain peaceful and law-abiding as the Bureau of Land Management and National Park Service work to end the operation in an orderly manner.” Evidently his own G-POG-P rectum being on the line for a very real potential bloodbath got through to him.

The “we-ARE-the-government” with uncounted immediate threats met more than their match in a display of Citizen Restorers who could and would require body-for-body-PLUS despite a deliberate attempt by the Bastards That Be to shut down communications towers to eliminate both viral reports from the scene and phone-to-phone talk between those Citizen Restorers. In order for G-POG-Ps to manufacture ‘evidence’ and deliberately incite violence they must have complete cover and secrecy. You know, ‘reports’ of ‘investigations’ that are NEVER made public without layer upon layer of ‘editing’ and redaction, if at all.

A mistake G-POG-Ps won’t make twice is with respect to communications. Before the next “we-ARE-the-government” FALSE FLAG or legislated enslavement attempt, direct-to-satellite communications will be eliminated from public access and all those cell-phone towers will be re-set to jam all Citizen’s Band and Commercial radio channels (taxi, delivery, trucking, private medical, et cetera). That specific government-use frequencies will still be available to the G-POG-Ps can be eliminated by a round through the “bucket” or hanging pods at the top. Then another through the tower itself to cut wires, power supplies and bunkered boxes just for the hell of it. If the public who paid for them can’t use them, why should the G-POG-Ps have unlimited access?

Citizen Restorers are fully aware of government’s illegal monitoring private communications along with virtually uncountable other UN-Constitutional activities. Without exception, each and every alphabet-agency is knowingly eye-ball deep in this duly-declared illegal war upon the citizens who are NOT on government payroll. That involvement extends to State, County and local government virtually intact.

To Wit: County Sheriffs are the Chief Executive Officer across the board and can order and enforce ANY other governmental level personnel to stand-down or vacate the county as they deem appropriate. The County Sheriff can deputize anybody at any time, and once deputized that deputy must follow any and all legal commands/orders of that Sheriff including their established Chains of Command. That means, with support of the actual (High) Sheriff, a Deputy can do the same thing.

A Sheriff that permits ANY un-Constitutional activity whatsoever in their jurisdiction, or is involved in it themselves, must be removed from office immediately, without further adieu and face the same ‘this criminal’ charges that would apply to any other non-government entity. If they are part, parcel and party to G-POG-P atrocities, they must be dealt with accordingly. Civilly if possible, violently if necessary. And don’t forget or excuse the Black Robed Bastards on any relevant bench.

And be it fully understood: if G-POG-Ps weren’t about the business of creating these potentially violent confrontations (to test citizen tolerance) there wouldn’t be any! Therefore, any violence and results thereof are the sole and exclusive liability and responsibility of said G-POG-Ps! If the duly-elected County Sheriff cannot or will not shut these atrocities down, immediately: the Citizen Restorers are then and there required to shut these atrocities down as expediently as possible and should spare no effort in doing so.

CAUTION: NEVER attend an open-hostilities situation as a spectator, nor to just demonstrate. Keep all ‘demonstrations’ at safe distances; and STAND YOUR GROUND fully and openly armed, locked and loaded with safetys ON and record everything. Once the G-POG-Ps assume they have any advantage they will begin hostilities that must be instantly countered. If the G-POG-Ps have their weapons open and pointed, open and point yours and with the same determination. When ALL of the G-POG-Ps bring their weapons down, follow suit, but not until. All of them means ALL OF THEM, not a few nor one here and another yonder. Make absolutely certain that if the G-POG-Ps want a fight they are going to pay a very bloody personal price for it. Nothing else will work. Absolutely nothing.

CAUTION: when any citizen is forced to STAND THEIR GROUND in self-defense against G-POG-Ps, even against tasering, never waste rounds on body armor: head shots only. Penetration isn’t required as impact will break the neck and a broken neck takes them permanently out of the fight. Aren’t head shots more difficult? Not to anybody who can actually shoot. The difference is a bird on the wing or broadside of a barn. Center shots in the face shield are ideal but will be rare at a distance.

Thanks to obviously out-of-control G-POG-Ps, there is but one cure: Our Republic, Constitution and Bill of Rights will be restored the same way they were established. The only differences will be quality of powder, caliber of shot, and numbers of dead and injured. This will not be a Civil War as G-POG-Ps and lying media will claim, it will be a war of Citizen Restorers overthrowing corrupt, murderous politicians, bureaucrats, manipulators, courts, police and as many media liars as necessary. Bunkerville, Clark County, Nevada, being the latest example.

- 30 -


Quote with author credit or url.

 

Share

Barbaric: Muslims Sew the Mouth And Eye Shut Of A Girl Who Professed “Jesus As Her Savior”

Posted on | April 12, 2014 | 4 Comments

Barbaric: Muslims Sew the Mouth And Eye Shut Of A Girl Who Professed “Jesus As Her Savior”

Barbaric: Muslims Sew the Mouth And Eye Shut Of A Girl Who Professed “Jesus As Her Savior”

Share

Thugs in CA government disenfranchised voters who are livid about the new law that would allow boys claiming that they are girls inside to use girl’s locker rooms, showers and toilets. CA government became a government of psychopaths completely detached from the people

Posted on | April 12, 2014 | No Comments

 

Court Report

 

Sitting in court on Friday, I was struck by the casual way that the Secretary of State’s attorney argued to disenfranchise thousands of people. He seemed to be unmoved by the reality of what would happen if the court accepted his arguments.

 

As the attorney for Privacy For All Students described improperly rejected signatures and the need for access to the documents to show that the referendum actually qualified, the State lawyer (paid by the tax payers) almost seemed bored.

 

And apparently this attorney is not alone in his contempt for the rights of the voters.  Other government attorneys are echoing his arguments even while they are compensated by the voters they wish to disenfranchise.  A number of counties have filed legal objections to producing documents that would shine a light on the signatures improperly rejected.  Because so many of you have asked about your county, below I will note the counties that are helping hide the process that eliminated more than one out of every five signatures.

 

Recently I shared the candid statement of a county registrar who said that in his eighteen years in that position, this was the first time that a proponent of a referendum had ever asked to inspect the results.  The law is clear.  It is the right of the referendum proponent to examine the rejected signatures.  Why?  In order to challenge improper results.

 

I have also shared some of the things we have found already.  With persistence we have pushed through the many obstacles to actually see rejected signatures and other documents in some counties.

 

We have witnessed signatures that were thrown out because the county claims that the signer was not registered even though a registration is in the county data base.

 

We have uncovered signatures that were rejected because a county employee decided that the signature is slightly different than the signature on the voter registration card or the signature provided on an electronic pad at the DMV.  (Remember the Pacific Justice Institute attorney, Matt McReynolds, that had his signature rejected because it was not a perfect match with his voter registration card.  In the years after Matt filled out that registration card, he went blind and can no longer see his signature.)

 

Signatures have been rejected because the print in the address section looked different than other print by this signer or it looked too much like the print of a husband or wife.

 

All of these wrong or questionable decisions (and the resulting tens of thousands of rejected signatures) have apparently been accepted in the past without protest.  But with our challenge, new and even more creative tactics have to be employed to hide the evidence of mistake or abuse.

 

The Secretary of State’s attorney made it clear to the judge that he felt that the attorneys for the 58 counties should be involved in this process, and that we should delay until they could take part.

 

Several county attorneys anticipated the call to circle the wagons and have started to focus on one very creative argument first advanced by the attorney for the Secretary of State.  They concede that the State may be required to provide certain information about the signers that have been rejected.  But before they provide this information, we must mail to each of the 131,000 voters a ”notice to consumer”.  Of course, we cannot provide such a notice even if the law did require this because they will not provide the contact information for the “consumer”.

 

These county attorneys understand the impossibility of their request.  Here is how one addressed the issue in a response to a PFAS attorney:

 

I recognize, however, that this is academic since compliance with those procedures would require access to the very names and contact information that the County is not able to disclose at this time. 

 

First they produce an inaccurate count.  Then they frustrate our apparently unprecedented effort to examine the evidence.  Then they claim that privacy will not allow them to provide the documents we need to take to court to challenge this.  And throughout all of this they are encouraging more taxpayer paid attorneys to join the fight and see if they can overwhelm us with costs and stall tactics.

Share

Pro-Russia forces take over the police headquarters in the largest city of Eastern Ukraine

Posted on | April 12, 2014 | No Comments

Donetsk police chief forced out as Ukraine’s eastern cities stormed by pro 

Telegraph.co.uk - ‎6 minutes ago‎
Ukraine’s eastern cities of Slaviansk, 90 miles from the border with Russia, and Donetsk, the regional capital, were stormed by gangs of pro-Russia militants on Saturday.
Share

Clarification from the White House: when Obama said that he knows where is his birth certificate, he meant his Kenyan birth certificate.

Posted on | April 12, 2014 | 5 Comments

Obama Revives Birther Controversy to Rally Supporters

NRO | “Just to be clear, I know where my birth certificate is, but a lot of people don’t,” he quipped to a cheering audience.

 49 Comments
PS. Obama’s nervous, forced laughter might be a sign that an adverse decision is coming soon and he prepares his troops for a counter attack

 

Share

that id what I see on top news on Google: no mention of Bundy ranch, no mention of Ukraine or MH 370

Posted on | April 12, 2014 | No Comments

Share

A victory for American people against the ruling globalist organized crime! BLM just announced that they will pull out of Clive Bundy ranch

Posted on | April 12, 2014 | 6 Comments

A victory for American people against the ruling globalist organized crime! BLM just announced that they will pull out of Clive Bundy ranch

Keep in mind, this victory is temporary, there is more to be done. we need to make sure BLM returns the cattle to Bundy and returns stolen land to other ranchers.

There has to be a prosecution of Harry and Rory Reed and BLM executives, whereby the BLM was used as a tool in de facto theft of acres and acres of land from ranchers.

We are seeing similar instances of de facto RICO, criminal enterprises, where land, homes and other properties were taken   in bogus eminent domain schemes, where corrupt and bribed officials took the land and houses from people in eminent domain and sold it to developers for cents on a dollar. Later developers made a fortune, corrupt officials and judges got their cut and thousands of people were robbed by their government acting like a Chicago mob.

Share

Were there jury trials or was it one judge, who could have been compromised and blackmailed by something in his NSA and FBI files or receiving some consideration?

Posted on | April 12, 2014 | 3 Comments

[Please Must Watch]…It’s Not Just Nevada, BLM Land-Grabbing 90,000 Deeded Acres in Texas Too

by CRUSADER SANTO

By Rick Wells

While the eyes of the nation are focused upon the rural Nevada town of Bunkerville and the Bundy Ranch, another significant land grab is underway in the other half of the country. While less physically confrontational at present, government oppression is none the less at the root of a dispute on the border between Oklahoma and Texas. It’s an on-going process, following the migration of the Red River, which the feds define differently dependent upon their their “needs.”

Tommy Henderson lost a lawsuit thirty years ago and with it 140 acres of his ranchland. The BLM victory resulted in the Oklahoma/Texas border being redrawn a mile to the south of where it had previously been.

Henderson received nothing in exchange for his land. Not one cent, and the BLM is back for more. This time they’ve got their eyes on roughly 90,000 acres. And they are employing similar tactics to what won for them in the eighties.

BLM seeks to use the previous lawsuit as precedent in their attempt to steal land along a 116 mile stretch of the Red River. The natural migration of the Red River is at the heart of the dispute and the opportunity being seized upon by the Feds.

BLM is making a claim that the land never belonged to Texas, which the landowners vehemently dispute.

Tommy Henderson explains the absurdity of the BLM claims. He asks, “How can BLM come in and say ‘Hey, this isn’t yours’ even though it was patented from the state, you’ve always paid taxes on it, our family’s paid taxes for over a hundred years on this place. We’ve got a deed to it, but yet they walked in and said it wasn’t ours.”

Continue Reading: http://gopthedailydose.com/2014/04/11/not-just-nevada-blm-land-grabbing-90000-deeded-acres-in-texas-too/

Share

I will not be surprised if the militia will engage in citizen’s arrest of Rory and Harry Reid, as well as BLM executives for major theft

Posted on | April 12, 2014 | 24 Comments

BOMBSHELL – SENATOR HARRY REID IS BEHIND NEVADA BUNDY RANCH LAND GRAB

 

http://www.teapartycrusaders.com/obama/nevada-cattle-rancher-standoff-blm-killed-hundreds-endangered-desert-tortoises/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=tfOVg5R4ngA

Share

Call your congressmen, demand MH-370 hearing, 3 Americans disappeared with this plane. Demand a subpoena for NSA and CIA executives and their data on the name of the recipient of this phone call by the pilot, names of 5 passengers, who loaded their luggage, but did not board the plane. Enough with pathological lying.

Posted on | April 12, 2014 | 4 Comments

Breaking: Missing #MH370 Co-Pilot Tried to Make a Call As Plane Flew Over Malaysia

Share

Clive Bundy and his daughter Shiree Bundy are asking for your help

Posted on | April 12, 2014 | 2 Comments

Cuttin Up Radio
10 hrs ·
Here the letter just receive from Bundy’s daughter, Shiree Bundy Cox
“I have had people ask me to explain my dad’s stance on this BLM fight. Here it is in as simple of terms as I can explain it. There is so much to it, but here it is in a nut shell.
My great grandpa bought the rights to the Bunkerville allotment back in 1887 or around there. Then he sold them to my grandpa who then turned them over to my dad in 1972. These men bought and paid for their rights to the range and also built waters, fences and roads to assure the survival of their cattle, all with their own money, not with tax dollars.
These rights to the land use are called preemptive rights. Somewhere down the line, to keep the cows from overgrazing, came the bureau of land management. They were supposed to assist the ranchers in the management of their ranges while the ranchers paid a yearly allotment which was to be use to pay the BLM wages and to help with repairs and improvements of the ranches. [my highlighting, Don]
My dad did pay his grazing fees for years to the BLM until they were no longer using his fees to help him and to improve. Instead they began using these moneys against the ranchers. They bought all the rest of the ranchers in the area out with their own grazing fees. When they offered to buy my dad out for a pittance he said no thanks and then fired them because they weren’t doing their job. He quit paying the BLM but tried giving his grazing fees to the county, which they turned down.
So my dad just went on running his ranch and making his own improvements with his own equipment and his own money, not taxes. In essence the BLM was managing my dad out of business. Well when buying him out didn’t work, they used the endangered species card. You’ve already heard about the desert tortoise.
Well that didn’t work either, so then began the threats and the court orders, which my dad has proven to be unlawful for all these years. Now they’re desperate. It’s come down to buying the brand inspector off and threatening the County Sheriff. Everything they’re doing at this point is illegal and totally against the constitution of the United States of America.
Now you may be saying, “how sad, but what does this have to do with me?” Well, I’ll tell you. They will get rid of Cliven Bundy, the last man standing on the Bunkerville allotment and then they will close all the roads so no one can ever go on it again. Next, it’s Utah’s turn. Mark my words, Utah is next. Then there’s the issue of the cattle that are at this moment being stolen. See even if dad hasn’t paid them, those cattle do belong to him.
Regardless of where the cattle is my father’s property. His herd has been part of that range for over a hundred years, long before the BLM even existed. Now the Feds think they can just come in and remove them and sell them without a legal brand inspection or without my dad’s signature on it. They think they can take them over two borders, which is illegal – ask any trucker. Then they plan to take them to the Richfield Auction and sell them. All with our tax money. They have paid off the contract cowboys and the auction owner as well as the Nevada brand inspector with our tax dollars. See how slick they are? Well, this is it in a nut shell. Thanks”
Shiree Bundy Cox
PS We Need you to show up tomorrow April 12th. We need lots – tons of people now.
Date: April 12, 2014
Time: 8am - BLM goes home
Place: Bunkerville Exit on I-15, 3 miles south of Mesquite. Go east 2 miles toward Bunkerville.
Bring: sun protection, its getting hot. Water, food, cameras.
DO NOT bring: Guns or wear Cammo patterned clothing.
This needs to be peaceful law-abiding people showing support. No more, no less.
PPS – Please forward this to friends.
Share

Is Obama regime planning a slaughter at Bundy ranch and switching off the cell towers in the area and setting the “no-fly” zone in order to keep it quiet and contain the news?

Posted on | April 12, 2014 | No Comments

ALERT -- Cell towers in #Bundy cattle ranch area shut down...

ALERT — Cell towers in #Bundy cattle ranch area shut down…

ALERT -- FAA Designates #Bundy Cattle Ranch a No-Fly Zone
Share

BREAKING: NSA said to have exploited Heartbleed for intelligence for years…

Posted on | April 12, 2014 | No Comments

BREAKING: NSA said to have exploited Heartbleed for intelligence for years...

BREAKING: NSA said to have exploited Heartbleed for intelligence for years…

Share

Hidden inflation

Posted on | April 12, 2014 | 1 Comment

Producer prices accelerate 0.5%

Fort Wayne Journal Gazette - ‎7 hours ago‎
WASHINGTON – The prices companies receive for their goods and services jumped in March led by gains for food, clothing, jewelry and chemicals.
Share

I believe we might see a collapse of Ukrainian economy before Russia goes into Eastern Ukraine. this can start economic contagion in Europe and US

Posted on | April 12, 2014 | No Comments

What we saw, is that Ukraine was reselling Russian gas to Europe and making profit on it. Putin appeared on Russian TV and stated that according to existing contracts with Ukraine, Russia is entitled to get an advance payment for gas from Ukraine and demanded an advance payment. Ukraine stopped payments to Russia and sought help from Europe, from EU.

Well, Europe cannot help, it, itself is dependent on Russian gas. Additionally we see an unrest in Donbas, the most industrialized area of Ukraine, which includes coal mining, coke mills and steel making. We see large crowds, demonstrations, taking over of the police stations, government buildings in Donetsk, Dnepropetrovsk and Lugansk (Luhansk). Without Russian oil and Donbas, with a weak and unstable government, Ukrainian economy might crumble, which will make the population seek help from Russia and referendums similar to Crimean seeking secession from Ukraine and joining Russia. We are seeing other former Soviet republics on the verge of economic collapse. The question is: will it precipitate the global economic contagion? This is a real possibility.

Eastern Ukraine Police Station Seized By Pro-Russia Group

TIME - ‎22 minutes ago‎
UKRAINE-RUSSIA-CRISIS-POLITICS-SLAVYANSK Armed pro-Russian activists guard a police station in the eastern Ukrainian city of Slavyansk after it was seized by a few dozen gunmen on April 12, 2014.
Share

Posted on | April 12, 2014 | No Comments


Dear LIGNET Reader:

As President Barack Obama’s continued lack of leadership puts America’s national security in peril, LIGNET, Newsmax’s intelligence and forecasting online service, has issued a new global forecast.

The Russian annexation of Crimea and mass troop movements by Moscow must be viewed as a major game changer in international norms. The last time an invasion of this magnitude occurred was when Saddam Hussein annexed Kuwait in 1990 to make it Iraq’s 19th province.

With U.S. strength and leadership, Russia’s recent actions could have been prevented or at least mitigated. It may be too late for Crimea, but the United States cannot allow the contagion to spread.

The difference between Russia and the West right now is that Russia has a strategy that it is willing to follow, while the West is hoping the problem disappears.

In this geopolitical chess match, the Russian is outmaneuvering the American at every turn.

The bottom line is that Vladimir Putin’s ground troops are the least of America’s worries. The Russian president’s financial moves are what affect us all. And he’s running circles around Barack Obama where it will hurt Americans the most — from forging relationships with China and India, to his accumulation of gold, oil and other strategic resources.

Please continue reading below for LIGNET’s Global Forecast.

Sincerely,
LIGNET.com

Share

Posted on | April 11, 2014 | 1 Comment

Orly,
I tried to post a comment at your website regarding Senator Jeff Sessions for President in 2016. I could not make it happen through the “obot” challenge, etc.. I felt I did all requested actions, still, my comment was not received and recorded.
Anyhow, I called Senator Sessions DC Office and told his Staffer that Senator Sessions should run for President of the United States in 2016 as he is only one of a very few Senators who actually cares for and about American Citizens, the other Senators being Cruz and Lee.
Sincerely,
Larry Driscoll
Williams, AZ 86046
Share

MUSLIMS HOLD RALLY In Support of 9-11 Terrorists & World Trade Center Bombers (Video)

Posted on | April 11, 2014 | 3 Comments

MUSLIMS HOLD RALLY In Support of 9-11 Terrorists & World Trade Center Bombers (Video)

Share

Russians are claiming that missing plane is in Kandahar, Afghanistan, close to Pakistan. They claim that the passengers are alive and located in 7 huts. So far there is no proof of any version

Posted on | April 11, 2014 | 3 Comments

MH370 in Afghanistan Kandahar version

Inbox
x
Share
« go backkeep looking »