Supreme Court ignoring its own rules – Please check this situation

Dear WND,

Please — can you check this situation and report on it?

You can call Orly Taitz at 949-683-5411 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting              949-683-5411      end_of_the_skype_highlighting to learn more.

The Supreme Court, apparently protecting Obama, is violating
its own rules. The clerks are refusing to file Dr Taitz’s
motion (to stay politically motivated sanctions against
her) to Justices Thomas and Alito.

But Supreme Court Rule 22 specifically provides the clerks’
duty is to accept and forward such applications promptly to
the Justices.

It says the Justices – not the clerks – approve or deny and
are to note their action. Instead, a clerk denied her motion
to Justice Thomas, without docketing. When she resubmitted
addressed to Justice Alito, the clerk refusing to accept,
docket or forward. They hung up the phone on her when she
protested.
                                          ,
Please read Taitz’s own words below, and also Rule 22. Most
importanly, please call her to get the facts.

The issue here goes beyond Obama. The Supreme Court simply
cannot be allowed to selectively violate its own rules when
politically convenient.

This urgently needs Sunshine.  It needs to be rectified.

The Administration has failed, and the Congress has almost
failed, but if the Judicial branch fails — at the highest
level — then we are all doomed!

———————————————-
Terence Brennan 
Please see below.

————————————————————-
Taitz has written:

“My application was never denied, since there is no
signature from Justice Thomas, there was only a docket entry
made by the clerk on Saturday the 17th, when the court was
closed, Justice Thomas was in Utah, and it was backdated the
15th, even though there was no such notation on Friday, July
the 16th and it is not noted on the log. We downloaded the
log, it is missing. There has to be a criminal investigation
of what is going on.”

“In regards to my Application for stay, I talked to the
clerks office of the Supreme Court. One of the clerks, who
refused to give out his name, stated that the clerk for the
stays, Danny Bickel, is too busy and cant talk to me, but
that he is returning my application sent to Justice Alito
without docketing it and without giving it to Alito. I
asked, why. This is totally against the rules, as one can
resubmit the application, if one justice denies it.
Theoretically I can resubmit it 9 times. The clerk refused
to give me any answer and slammed the phone in my face.”

————————————————————-
SUPREME COURT OF THE U.S. – RULES
..Part V. Motions and Applications
Rule 22. Applications to Individual Justices

1. An application addressed to an individual Justice shall
be filed with the Clerk, who will transmit it promptly to
the Justice concerned if an individual Justice has authority
to grant the sought relief.

2. The original and two copies of any application addressed
to an individual Justice shall be prepared as required by
Rule 33.2, and shall be accompanied by proof of service as
required by Rule 29.

3. An application shall be addressed to the Justice allotted
to the Circuit from which the case arises. An application
arising from the United States Court of Appeals for the
Armed Forces shall be addressed to the Chief Justice. When
the Circuit Justice is unavailable for any reason, the
application addressed to that Justice will be distributed to
the Justice then available who is next junior to the Circuit
Justice; the turn of the Chief Justice follows that of the
most junior Justice.

4. A Justice denying an application will note the denial
thereon. Thereafter, unless action thereon is restricted by
law to the Circuit Justice or is untimely under Rule 30.2,
the party making an application, except in the case of an
application for an extension of time, may renew it to any
other Justice, subject to the provisions of this Rule.
Except when the denial is without prejudice, a renewed
application is not favored. Renewed application is made by a
letter to the Clerk, designating the Justice to whom the
application is to be directed, and accompanied by 10 copies
of the original application and proof of service as required
by Rule 29.

5. A Justice to whom an application for a stay or for bail
is submitted may refer it to the Court for determination.

6. The Clerk will advise all parties concerned, by
appropriately speedy means, of the disposition made of an
application.
————————————————————-