8 Responses to “Obama’s thugs are admitting on their blogs, that if states pass eligibility laws, citizens of such states will have standing in state courts and in federal courts under state statutes to sue Obama and people, who are aiding and abetting him. We need to pass those laws in as many states as possible. I need a 100% confirmation of the ID of Sterngard Friegen”

1. Politijabber
   January 30th, 2011 @ 8:55 am

   They ALREADY have standing in STATE courts to challenge the eligibility of any candidate, you fool. Standing is a federal doctrine.

2. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
   January 30th, 2011 @ 9:51 am

   not so. some state judges dismissed the cases, claiming no jurisdiction, no standing

3. Andrew Kryns
   January 30th, 2011 @ 11:24 am

   If I remember right, in high school we were led to believe that what made the US so much better than other countries is that US citizens had the right to have their grievances heard before a court of law. It was the duty of the court to hear these cases.
   My, how things have changed!! Not only have the cases been dismissed because of trumped up excuses such as “no jurisdiction”, “lack of standing”, “dismissed out of hand with no reason”, but in the case of LTC Laking, and many others, where he is the defendant, not permitted to present evidence to prove his case. The reason is those in government are greedy for power over the citizens and the patriots such as Orly are criminals for wanting to take it back according to the Constitution. Like a pressure cooker with a hot fire under it. With no freedom to vent/function, it will explode. The longer this is allowed to go on, the larger the explosion. As per Mark Lavin – “There I said it.”

4. old1
   January 30th, 2011 @ 6:16 pm

   You have to realize how big and involved this coup is. This is not a bunch of left of Mao Zedong aging hippies, this is a plot of the worlds richest players trying to destroy the only country resisting the evil New World Order. American capitalism is all that is standing in the way of the financial elites cry for world domination, a world currency, and the enslavement of the entire population other than those that figure their yearly profits in figures with ten zeros. They are trying to kill Freedom for us all. The puppet usurper and his Obots are simply an indicator of the problem, the real threat is the puppet masters. They control our underclass with the Government handouts that get their puppets elected From coast to coast. It will take something far greater than November 2 to break their hold on “our” Government, our Courts, and the talking heads that spread their propaganda daily. This will be the Greatest War we have ever fought! God help us win it!
   Orly never give up, America needs you and those like you, without your kind America is truly doomed!

5. tinaconnor
   January 31st, 2011 @ 5:38 pm

   Dr. Taitz,

   I am confused. Which cases were in state courts regarding Obama’s eligibility (we know he isn’t eligible!). I thought all your cases were before federal judges. Were some heard by CA state judges?

   Any clarification would be much appreciated!

   God bless,
   Tina

6. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
   January 31st, 2011 @ 7:22 pm

   yes, there were multiple cases by numerous plaintiffs around the country

7. John
   January 31st, 2011 @ 9:17 pm

   That Old1 fellow uses the thinly veiled code of the anti-semite in his paranoid rantings about world finances. I’d keep an eye on him, Orly.

8. Angus Knipe
   February 1st, 2011 @ 6:10 am

   > that US citizens had the right to have their grievances heard before a court of law. It was the duty of the court to hear these cases.

   No, “generalized grievances” such as “I don’t like that I have to pay more taxes” or “I don’t like that our President shakes hands with the Chinese prime minister” are not for the courts, they are for the ballot.

   “Standing” is a concept that ensures you can’t sue me if I beat up my neighbour, or if Orly gives me a 10% discount but not you. Courts are not for “I have a complaint” but only for “I have a case”.

   Funny that lawyers such as Orly – who should know better if she paid attention in law school – evoke a different impression on her blog.

Leave a Reply