November 16 court hearing in MS is before the electoral college meeting. Update on the conference today
Posted on | November 5, 2012 | 2 Comments
There were 6 attorneys against me on the call: 2 for Fuddy and Onaka, 2 for Dem party, Obama, Pelosi and Astrue and 2 for the Sec of State
Originally judge Wingate stated that I can subpoena witnesses to this hearing, but Tepper stated that he wants to depose the witnesses and he will not have enough tme. So November 16 hearing will be without witnesses.
Fuddy and Onaka are claiming lack of personal jurisdiction over them.
Dem party, Obama, Pelosi and Astrue already filed an answer, they do not claim lack of jurisdiction, but they claim that there is not enough evidence pled against them to sustain the case and they want to dismiss.
One thing is different about this case, is that this is the only case, where Obama’s alleged birth certificate was entered into evidence by the defence and Scott J Tepper sought to have a judicial notice that it is valid and that Obama was born in HI and that he is natural born.
I filed an opposition and a motion for sanctions. Judicial notice is filed on something that is not subject to disagreement, to dispute. I was saying that when Tepper filed it, he had evidence that it is a forgery, he had a press conference from Arpaio, multiple affidavits.
Tepper responded that when they filed it in May of this year they had no reason to believe that it is a forgery. He also sent a letter to HI, to dirctor Loretta Fuddy asking authentication. He attached an image to this letter and a copy of Obama’s BC. (Henry Wayland Blake, PhD sent me an affidavit, saying that it is an altered image, that they doctored the original BC to make it look more genuine. They flattened it to have one layer, as I submitted pres conference from Arpaio and Zullo and others, saying that multiple layers, particularly a separate layer with the stamp of the registrar is a sign of forgery. ) Fuddy did not respond. Onaka responded in a carfully crafted letter stating that
a. there is a document on file
b information in this copy correpondents to the information on file
(which of course is absolutely nothing)
So, I am demanding discovery on this issue and sanctions, saying that this is evidence of falsification upon falsification. I told the judge today that this is likeWatergate: the worst thing was cover up. Here we have evidence of cover up: they refuse to produce originals and there is futher obstruction of justice and falsification to make it look more genuine, cover the initial evidence of forgery.
Tepper attacked me, called me names right and left, said that he will not have time to depose witnesses, so the judge scheduled a hearing on the motions to dismiss and he said that after November 16, if he does not grant their motion to dismiss on the pleading we can schedule other motion hearings and discovery.
I do need help with paperwork, there are 6 attorneys, a lot of work. One thing is clear, more cover up is being done, more evidence of falsification of records
Comments
2 Responses to “November 16 court hearing in MS is before the electoral college meeting. Update on the conference today”
Leave a Reply
November 5th, 2012 @ 12:40 pm
Yep, you’ll win this one for sure!
November 5th, 2012 @ 3:13 pm
Orly: how can the judge go along with anything Tepper demands? The judge should make him comply with the 16th timeframe, shouldn’t he? It’s only the 5th today. Hey, Tepper how come you need so much time? I think he’s pranking you! This is what a (D) does…he tries to make it hard for the other side! Will you have an attorney there, in that number of (6), to be of help? And hopefully, the courtroom will be filled with Dr Orly supporters!!!