OrlyTaitzEsq.com

TaitzReport.com

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation (DOFF)
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz


If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.





The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.
-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.  -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.  -- Mahatma Gandhi

Notice of contempt by the Appellee, Comissioner of Social Security of the court order to file an answer and request for judgment for the Appellant was docketted in the District of Columbia

Posted on | February 20, 2013 | 1 Comment

United States Court of Appeals for District of Columbia Circuit

Court of Appeals Docket #: 11-5304 Docketed: 10/31/2011
Termed: 05/25/2012
Nature of Suit: 2895 Freedom of Information Act of 1974
Orly Taitz v. Michael Astrue
Appeal From: United States District Court for the District of Columbia
Fee Status: Fee Paid
Case Type Information:
1) Civil US
2) United States
3)
 
Originating Court Information:
District: 0090-1 : 1:11-cv-00402-RCL Lead: 1:11-cv-00402-RCL
Trial Judge: Royce C. Lamberth, U.S. District JudgeDate Filed: 02/16/2011Date Order/Judgment:Date NOA Filed:08/30/201110/25/2011

 

04/27/2012 Open Document MOTION filed [1371429] by Orly Taitz for default judgment. (Response to Motion served by mail due on 05/07/2012) [Service Date: 04/24/2012 by US Mail] Pages: 1-10. [11-5304]
05/25/2012 Open Document PER CURIAM ORDER filed [1375820] denying motion for default judgment [1371429-2]; denying motion for summary reversal [1364625-2]; granting motion for summary affirmance [1353593-2], withholding issuance of the mandate. Before Judges: Rogers, Griffith and Kavanaugh. [11-5304]
06/04/2012 Open Document PETITION filed [1377943] by Appellant Orly Taitz for rehearing en banc. [Service Date: 05/31/2012 by US Mail] Pages: 16-20. [11-5304]
06/20/2012 Open Restricted Document SUPPLEMENT [1380221] to petition for rehearing en banc [1377943-2] filed by Orly Taitz [Service Date: 06/18/2012] [11-5304]
07/30/2012 Open Document MOTION filed [1387271] by Orly Taitz to recall mandate (Response to Motion served by mail due on 08/09/2012) [Service Date: 07/26/2012 by US Mail] Pages: 1-10. [11-5304]
08/02/2012 Open Document CLERK’S ORDER filed [1387293] Upon consideration of appellant’s motion to recall the mandate, it is ORDERED that the motion be dismissed as moot. No mandate has issued in this case. A petition for rehearing en banc remains pending before the court. The mandate issued July 24, 2012, in No. 11-5306, Taitz v. Ruemmler, where no petition for rehearing was received by the court. [1387271-2] [11-5304]
08/09/2012 Open Document PER CURIAM ORDER, En Banc, filed [1388336] denying petition for rehearing en banc [1377943-2] Before Judges: Sentelle, Henderson, Rogers, Tatel, Garland, Brown, Griffith and Kavanaugh. [11-5304]
08/29/2012   MANDATE ISSUED to Clerk, District Court [11-5304]
01/29/2013 Open Document MOTION filed [STYLED AS “MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION DUE TO NEW EVIDENCE AND NEW DECISIONS”] [1417882] by Orly Taitz to recall mandate (Response to Motion served by mail due on 02/11/2013) [Service Date: 01/28/2013 by US Mail] Pages: 11-15 with attachments. [11-5304]
02/19/2013 Open Document MOTION filed [STYLED AS “MOTION FOR JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF THE APPELLANT”] [1421271] by Orly Taitz. (Response to Motion served by mail due on 03/04/2013) [Service Date: 02/18/2013 by US Mail] Pages: 1-10. [11-
Category: Uncategorized

Comments

One Response to “Notice of contempt by the Appellee, Comissioner of Social Security of the court order to file an answer and request for judgment for the Appellant was docketted in the District of Columbia”

  1. Shani
    June 13th, 2018 @ 3:35 pm

    Howdy fantastic blog! Does running a blog like this require
    a great deal of work? I’ve virtually no understanding of coding but I was hoping to start my own blog in the near future.
    Anyway, if you have any recommendations or techniques for new blog owners please share.
    I understand this is off subject however I simply had to ask.

    Kudos!

Leave a Reply