OrlyTaitzEsq.com

TaitzReport.com

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation (DOFF)
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz


If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.





The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.
-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.  -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.  -- Mahatma Gandhi

No decision yet from Judge Lamberth on a case of Obmaa using a fabricated selective service certificate with a fabricated 1980 cancellation postal stamp on it. I will advice the readers when any of the judges rule. I am waiting for 2 cases in the the 9th circuit, 1 in MD, 1 in DC and 1 in MS

Posted on | March 25, 2014 | 7 Comments

U.S. District Court
District of Columbia (Washington, DC)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:13-cv-01020-RCL

TAITZ v. DONAHUE et al
Assigned to: Chief Judge Royce C. Lamberth

 Case: 1:11-cv-00402-RCL

Cause: 05:552 Freedom of Information Act

 Date Filed: 07/05/2013
Jury Demand: None
Nature of Suit: 895 Freedom of Information Act
Jurisdiction: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff
ORLY TAITZ represented by ORLY TAITZ
29839 Santa Margarita Parkway
Suite 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688
(949) 683 – 5411
Fax: (949) 766 – 7603
Email: orly.taitz@gmail.com
PRO SE
V.
Defendant
PATRICK DONAHUE
Postmaster General		 represented by Eric J. Soskin 
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
20 Massachusetts Avenue, NW
Room 5134
Washington, DC 20530
(202) 353-0533
Email: eric.soskin@usdoj.gov
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Daniel Franklin Van Horn 
U.S. ATTORNEY’S OFFICE
Judiciary Center Building
555 Fourth Street NW
Room E4226
Washington, DC 20530
(202) 252-2506
Fax: (202) 514-8780
Email: daniel.vanhorn@usdoj.gov
TERMINATED: 10/28/2013
Defendant
DAVID C. WILLIAMS
Inspector General for the United States Postal Service		 represented by Eric J. Soskin 
(See above for address)
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Daniel Franklin Van Horn 
(See above for address)
TERMINATED: 10/28/2013

 

Date Filed # Docket Text
07/05/2013 1 COMPLAINT against PATRICK DONAHUE, DAVID C. WILLIAMS ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 4616057627) filed by ORLY TAITZ.(Note: Portions of these exhibits are illegible on ECF.) (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(rdj) (Entered: 07/08/2013)
07/05/2013 Summons (2) Issued as to PATRICK DONAHUE, DAVID C. WILLIAMS. (rdj) (Entered: 07/08/2013)
07/05/2013 2 NOTICE OF RELATED CASE. Case related to Case No. 11cv402. (rdj) (Entered: 07/08/2013)
07/16/2013 3 AFFIDAVIT of mailing by certified mail by ORLY TAITZ. (rdj) (Entered: 07/18/2013)
09/18/2013 4 MOTION for Summary Judgment, MOTION for Default Judgment by ORLY TAITZ (td, ) (Entered: 09/20/2013)
10/10/2013 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Daniel Franklin Van Horn on behalf of All Defendants (Van Horn, Daniel) (Entered: 10/10/2013)
10/10/2013 6 NOTICE REGARDING SERVICE OF COMPLAINT by PATRICK DONAHUE, DAVID C. WILLIAMS (Attachments: # 1 Declaration Declaration of Daniel F. Van Horn, # 2 Text of Proposed Order)(Van Horn, Daniel) (Entered: 10/10/2013)
10/21/2013 7 RESPONSE re 6 Notice filed by ORLY TAITZ. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibits (Note: Portions of these exhibits are illegible on ECF.), # 2 Text of Proposed Order)(rdj) (Entered: 10/22/2013)
10/24/2013 8 REPLY re 6 Notice filed by PATRICK DONAHUE, DAVID C. WILLIAMS. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration Second Declaration of Daniel F. Van Horn)(Van Horn, Daniel) Modified on 10/25/2013 to correct event and linkage (rdj). (Entered: 10/24/2013)
10/24/2013 9 NOTICE OF FILING REDACTED DOCUMENT to 7 Response to Document by ORLY TAITZ (The original PDF Document contained privacy information and was restricted pursuant to the E-Government Act.) (Note: Portions of these exhibits are illegible on ECF.)(rdj) (Entered: 10/25/2013)
10/25/2013 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Eric J. Soskin on behalf of All Defendants (Soskin, Eric) (Entered: 10/25/2013)
10/28/2013 11 NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF APPEARANCE as to PATRICK DONAHUE, DAVID C. WILLIAMS. Attorney Daniel Franklin Van Horn terminated. (Van Horn, Daniel) (Entered: 10/28/2013)
11/14/2013 12 ANSWER to 1 Complaint by PATRICK DONAHUE, DAVID C. WILLIAMS.(Soskin, Eric) (Entered: 11/14/2013)
11/14/2013 13 MOTION for Briefing Schedule by PATRICK DONAHUE, DAVID C. WILLIAMS (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Soskin, Eric) (Entered: 11/14/2013)
11/27/2013 14 ORDER denying 4 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 4 Motion for Default Judgment. Upon consideration of the defendant’s Notice 6 and Reply 8 Regarding Service of Complaint and the entire record herein, it is hereby ORDERED that the plaintiff’s Motion 4 for Summary Judgment and Default Judgment is DENIED, without prejudice; and it is further ORDERED that defendants shall answer or otherwise respond to plaintiff’s complaint within 30 days after appropriations for the Department of Justice have been restored, so that the Answer filed on November 14, 2013, shall be deemed timely filed. Signed by Judge Royce C. Lamberth on November 27, 2013. (lcrcl2) (Entered: 11/27/2013)
11/27/2013 15 ORDER granting 13 Motion for Briefing Schedule. Upon consideration of defendant’s Motion 13 to Set Briefing Schedule, it is hereby ORDERED that defendant’s motion is GRANTED; and it is further ORDERED that briefing in this matter shall proceed as follows: Defendants shall move for summary judgment no later than December 13, 2013; plaintiff shall file any response thereto no later than January 3, 2014; and defendants shall file a reply, if any, no later than January 24, 2014. Signed by Judge Royce C. Lamberth on November 27, 2013. (lcrcl2) (Entered: 11/27/2013)
12/05/2013 Set/Reset Deadlines: Summary Judgment motions due by 12/13/2013. Response to Motion for Summary Judgment due by 1/3/2014. Reply to Motion for Summary Judgment due by 1/24/2014. (mpt, ) (Entered: 12/05/2013)
12/11/2013 17 MOTION to Recuse under 28 USC 455 by ORLY TAITZ (rdj) (Entered: 12/12/2013)
12/12/2013 16 MOTION for Summary Judgment by PATRICK DONAHUE, DAVID C. WILLIAMS (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A – Poulsen Declaration, # 2 Exhibit B – Eyre Declaration, # 3 Text of Proposed Order)(Soskin, Eric) (Entered: 12/12/2013)
01/03/2014 18 Memorandum in opposition to re 16 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by ORLY TAITZ. (rdj) (Entered: 01/06/2014)
01/03/2014 20 MOTION for Summary Judgment by ORLY TAITZ. (See Docket Entry 18 to view document) (jf, ) (Entered: 01/26/2014)
01/24/2014 19 REPLY to opposition to motion re 16 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by PATRICK DONAHUE, DAVID C. WILLIAMS. (Soskin, Eric) (Entered: 01/24/2014)
01/24/2014 21 Memorandum in opposition to re 20 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by PATRICK DONAHUE, DAVID C. WILLIAMS. (See Docket Entry 19 to view document) (jf, ) (Entered: 01/26/2014)
01/31/2014 22 REPLY to opposition to motion re 20 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by ORLY TAITZ. (rdj) (Entered: 01/31/2014)
Category: Uncategorized

Comments

7 Responses to “No decision yet from Judge Lamberth on a case of Obmaa using a fabricated selective service certificate with a fabricated 1980 cancellation postal stamp on it. I will advice the readers when any of the judges rule. I am waiting for 2 cases in the the 9th circuit, 1 in MD, 1 in DC and 1 in MS”

  1. Tom
    March 26th, 2014 @ 3:34 am

    Orly,

    This comment has nothing to do with this post, but I was wondering. From what I understand Obamacare had originated in the Senate and it was challenged in SCOTUS and SCOTUS declared Obamacare was a tax. Now according to the Constitution, the Senate cannot create a bill that generates revenue, since Obamacare is a tax, it creates revenue, so why has no one made this challenge against Obamacare?

  2. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    March 26th, 2014 @ 5:41 am

    they used a number from another bill which originated in the house

  3. Karl
    March 26th, 2014 @ 6:31 am

    “They used a number from another bill which originated in the house.”

    They ought not wonder why decent, law-abiding people utterly despise them. They have absolutely no personal honor or integrity.

  4. laminin
    March 26th, 2014 @ 6:40 am

    WHAT!
    You MUST be joking. So Law can be violated with impunity based on nomenclature. It is over. All forms of evil has won not a victory of engagement but of our pusillanimity.

  5. Scott
    March 26th, 2014 @ 10:36 am

    i have always wondered about this fake 1980 stamp. i was born in 1960. i registered for the draft on my 18th bday in 1978, which was the requirement then, not register anytime you decided too. guess 1979 stamp would have been totally impossible for them to fake, let alone the fake they came up with

  6. David
    March 27th, 2014 @ 3:38 am

    Oral arguments on this very subject are scheduled for May 8th, 2014 in Sissel v United States Department of Health and Human Services

    https://www.pacificlegal.org/cases/Tax-raising-Affordable-Care-Act-started-in-wrong-house-of-Congress

  7. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    March 27th, 2014 @ 12:03 pm

    no connection to Obama’s id

Leave a Reply