My latest vote count is 98,010, getting close to 100,000. More evidence of criminal activity, slander per se of my character on Google Please, join me for a protest against Obama’s visit and commencement speech on June 14, 11:30 in Anaheim, we will have a pizza party after we protest this anti-American usurper.
Posted on | June 6, 2014 | 10 Comments
This election I decided to run as an independent. In terms of the total number of votes, this might have been a mistake. In 2010 I ran as a Republican for SOS and got a total of 539,000. If I were to get the same number of votes or anything over 400,000, it would have been enough to make it into the general election.
This year so far I have about 100,000 votes, but the number will go up by the end of the count on July 4th. A lot of people do not vote for independent candidates even though they support their candidate statement, as they believe that only 2 major party candidates can win in a general election. I knew that I ran the risk of losing votes of people who do not believe that independents can win in the general election, however I believe that sometimes it is important to make a statement. I believe that the current GOP leadership was corrupt and did not represent the people. In my opinion the stance by the GOP, particularly in the senate in continues indebtedness, adherence to the WTO-Gatt and NAFTA and acceptance of amnesty- destroy the nation. I believe that one day we might have a strong third party, just as it happened in Great Britain, France and Holland, but it does not look like the time has arrived yet. It was important for me to make a statement, just as it was important to include in my candidate statement a paragraph regarding the need to prosecute government officials who are committing treason and aiding and abetting fraud committed by Obama. So, so far I have about a 100,000 votes, the number will go up till July 4, till the end of the count, however I know that these 100,000 voted for me not because of a party, but because they believe in me and in what I am doing.
Another snafu of this election, was an endorsement page. This year GOP did not endorse specific candidates, however a minor party, American Independent party, which did not have a candidate for AG, endorsed a Republican candidate, Ron Gold, so in the table of endorsed candidates they had Ron Gold -Republican listed. A lot of people called me and told me that there was a confusion and many believed that Ron Gold was the candidate endorsed by the Republican party, they did not realize that he was endorsed by the American Independent party, so they voted for him, even though he is quite liberal and advocated not only for medical marijuana, but also complete legalization of marijuana, for any purpose, just as it is legalized in CO, which is opposed by most GOP voters. Gold did not have a candidate statement in the voter guide, so people knew nothing about him, they just saw this endorsement by the American Independent party of Gold, with GOP designation next to his name, and voted for him. This was similar to Gore-Bush election when many liberals and Democrats in FL voted for far right Pat Buchanan due to a confusion on the ballot.
Also, I paid for Google ads, those ads were approved by Google, but Google never ran them, not one single ad. On the other hand Google ran at the top of the search page under my name a paid ad with an extremely defamatory statement claiming that I was disbarred. Of course I was never disbarred, my law license is in good standing and always was in good standing, but anyone who wanted to look me up saw this extremely defamatory statement at the very top of the page and of course would not vote for me for AG, as they thought that I was disbarred. this slander and defamation of my character was on Google and came from WAJAM, and ask.com and wow.com. This represents a defamation per se. I do not need to even prove any damages, particularly as I ran for a position of a law enforcement official, so the fact that these criminals posted such highly defamatory ads, was actionable, was a clear liability. At this point I am just waiting for an order from the court to start the discovery in order to ascertain the names of these RICO co-conspirators and go after them. When I ran for Sec of State in 2010, they paid a disturbed painter to paint pornographic nude paintings of me and posted those all over the Internet. This election this professional scum paid for highly defamatory ads, where they slandered my character and slandered me as a professional. The saddest thing, it that this scum is aiding a prson sitting in the position of the U.S. president and I am yet to find one honest judge, who would do anything about it. See a screen shot below with the link and a page
Defamation per se during the election
Well, the primary is over, but the fight continues.
Please, join me on June 14, 2014, 11:30-2:30, protesting Obama’s UCI commencement speech in Anaheim, corner of State College and Autry Way. We can have a pizza party after the protest. Please, bring your posters and fliers, call the media, let’s show Obama what we really think about him
Comments
10 Responses to “My latest vote count is 98,010, getting close to 100,000. More evidence of criminal activity, slander per se of my character on Google Please, join me for a protest against Obama’s visit and commencement speech on June 14, 11:30 in Anaheim, we will have a pizza party after we protest this anti-American usurper.”
Leave a Reply
EVIDENCE AGAINST OBAMA — YouTube Indiana Trial of Obama !
Petition the White House to institute Edward Snowden, National Whistleblower – Patriots against Government Corruption Day
OrlyTaitzEsq.comTAITZ REPORT
Official Facebook
IMPORTANT NOTICES – PLEASE READ!
Historic DVD Now Available!
DVD of the historic trial in GA and DVD of a historic testimony in NH, where evidence was provided showing Obama using a forged birth certificate and a stolen social security number. The DVDs are in a beautiful commemorative case with personal autographs from attorney Dr. Orly Taitz $22.50 each +$2.50 for shipping and handling.
---------
To order these DVDs, donate $25.00 by credit card on the website RunOrlyRun.com and email orly.taitz@gmail.com with you name and address. Or send a $25.00 check with your name and address to: Orly Taitz for US Senate 2012, 29839 Santa Margarita ste 100, RSM, CA 92688.
Advertisement / Sponsors
29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy,
Ste 100
Rancho Sta Margarita, CA 92688
orly.taitz @gmail. com
(949) 766-7687
--------------------------------------
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld
--------------------------------------
Bumper Sticker
$9.99 thru PayPal--------------------------------------
--------------------------------------Orly Taitz Photo Collections
June 6th, 2014 @ 4:07 am
The Post & Email publishing a report that, according to a Congressional staffer, the following:
Congress Said to Be Drawing Up Articles of Impeachment against Barack Hussein Obama
June 6th, 2014 @ 4:09 am
Now HANNITY calling Obama a “MANCHURIAN CANDIDATE.”
June 6th, 2014 @ 8:02 am
MERCI A TOUS LES SOLDATS QUI A DECIDE’ SUR LES PLAGES DE NORMANDIE.
June 6th, 2014 @ 8:32 am
Thank you to the soldiers that gave their lives and whose names are inscribed on the memorial plaques in Normandy
June 6th, 2014 @ 8:56 am
I have a hunch that Antoinetta is not who she pretends to be. There are very basic mistakes in her grammar and spelling that no French person would ever make.
June 6th, 2014 @ 9:31 am
Plaques is what causes cavities isn’t it?
June 6th, 2014 @ 11:10 am
right, obots are a plaque
June 6th, 2014 @ 3:31 pm
Wow! Pizza? I’ll see if I can make it?? I’ll have mushroom and sausage! 🙂 3CCU
June 6th, 2014 @ 3:32 pm
Veritas: is that both sides of the isle that are preparing this?
And the 3CCU was a tech problem.
June 6th, 2014 @ 7:27 pm
If indeed Congress is having a light bulb experience, drawing up articles of impeachment, I went to Wikipedia to read about the way it may all go down. I cut out the pertinent sections, in case anyone wants to read what must transpire before it is all a done deal.
It isn’t over until it is over.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Impeachable offenses
In the United States, impeachment can occur both at the federal and state level. The Constitution defines impeachment at the federal level and limits impeachment to “The President, Vice President, and all civil officers of the United States” who may be impeached and removed only for “treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors”.[9] Several commentators have suggested that Congress alone may decide for itself what constitutes a “high crime or misdemeanor”, especially since Nixon v. United States stated that the Supreme Court did not have the authority to determine whether the Senate properly “tried” a defendant.[citation needed] In 1970, then-House Minority Leader Gerald R. Ford defined the criterion as he saw it: “An impeachable offense is whatever a majority of the House of Representatives considers it to be at a given moment in history.”[10] Four years later, Gerald Ford would become president when President Richard Nixon resigned under the threat of impeachment.
Officials subject to impeachment
The central question regarding the Constitutional dispute about the impeachment of members of the legislature is whether members of Congress are officers of the United States. The Constitution grants the House the power to impeach “The President, the Vice President, and all civil Officers of the United States.” [9] It has been suggested that members of Congress are not officers of the United States.[11] Others, however, believe that members are civil officers and are subject to impeachment.[citation needed]
The House of Representatives did impeach a senator once:[12] Senator William Blount, in 1798. The Senate expelled Senator Blount and, after initially hearing his impeachment, dismissed the charges for lack of jurisdiction.[13] Left unsettled was the question whether members of Congress were civil officers of the United States. The House has not impeached a Member of Congress since Blount. As each House has the authority to expel its own members without involving the other chamber, expulsion has been the method used for removing Members of Congress.
Jefferson’s Manual, which is integral to the Rules of the House of Representatives,[14] states that impeachment is set in motion by charges made on the floor, charges preferred by a memorial, a member’s resolution referred to a committee, a message from the president, charges transmitted from the legislature of a state or territory or from a grand jury, or from facts developed and reported by an investigating committee of the House. It further states that a proposition to impeach is a question of high privilege in the House and at once supersedes business otherwise in order under the rules governing the order of business.
Process
At the federal level, the impeachment process is a two-step procedure. The House of Representatives must first pass, by a simple majority of those present and voting, articles of impeachment, which constitute the formal allegation or allegations. Upon passage, the defendant has been “impeached”. Next, the Senate tries the accused. In the case of the impeachment of a president, the Chief Justice of the United States presides over the proceedings. For the impeachment of any other official, the Constitution is silent on who shall preside, suggesting that this role falls to the Senate’s usual presiding officer. This may include the impeachment of the vice president, although legal theories suggest that allowing a defendant to be the judge in his own case would be a blatant conflict of interest. If the Vice President did not preside over an impeachment (of anyone besides the President), the duties would fall to the President pro tempore of the Senate.
To convict the accused, a two-thirds majority of the senators present is required. Conviction removes the defendant from office. Following conviction, the Senate may vote to further punish the individual by barring him from holding future federal office, elected or appointed. Conviction by the Senate does not bar criminal prosecution. Even after an accused has left office, it is possible to disqualify the person from future office or from certain emoluments of his prior office (such as a pension). If there is no charge for which a two-thirds majority of the senators present vote “guilty”, the defendant is acquitted and no punishment is imposed.
History of federal impeachment proceedings in the United States
Congress regards impeachment as a power to be used only in extreme cases; the House has initiated impeachment proceedings only 64 times since 1789 (most recently against Judge Thomas Porteous of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana) with only the following 19 of these proceedings actually resulting in the House passing Articles of Impeachment:
Two presidents:
Andrew Johnson, Democrat/National Union, was impeached in 1868 after violating the then-newly created Tenure of Office Act. President Johnson was acquitted by the Senate, falling one vote short of the necessary 2/3 needed to remove him from office, voting 35-19 to remove him. The Tenure of Office Act would later be found unconstitutional by the Supreme Court of the United States in dicta.
Bill Clinton, Democrat, was impeached on December 19, 1998, by the House of Representatives on articles charging perjury (specifically, lying to a federal grand jury) by a 228–206 vote, and obstruction of justice by a 221–212 vote. The House rejected other articles: One was a count of perjury in a civil deposition in Paula Jones’ sexual harassment lawsuit against Clinton (by a 205–229 vote). The second article was one that accused Clinton of abuse of power by a 48–285 vote. The Senate vote to remove him from office fell short of the necessary 2/3, voting 45-55 to remove him on obstruction of justice and 50-50 on perjury.
In 1876, cabinet officer William W. Belknap (former Secretary of War), resigned before his trial, and was later acquitted. Allegedly most of those who voted to acquit him believed that his resignation had removed their jurisdiction.
One Senator, William Blount, in 1797. He was expelled by the Senate, which declined to try the impeachment. This established the precedent that Members of Congress are not subject to impeachment, as they can be removed by action of the House of which they are members without impeachment or any other action being necessary.
One Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States, Samuel Chase in 1804. He was acquitted by the Senate.
Fourteen other federal judges. Seven of these have been convicted by the Senate and removed,[15] including Alcee Hastings, who was impeached and convicted for taking over $150,000 in bribe money in exchange for sentencing leniency. The Senate did not bar Hastings from holding future office, and Hastings won election to the House of Representatives from Florida. Hastings’ name was mentioned as a possible Chairman of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, but was passed over by House Speaker-designate Nancy Pelosi, presumably because of his previous impeachment and removal. Source U.S. Senate
Richard Nixon, Republican, was never impeached. While the House Judiciary Committee did approve articles of impeachment against him and did report those articles to the House of Representatives, Nixon resigned before the House could consider the impeachment resolutions and was subsequently pardoned by President Ford.