OrlyTaitzEsq.com

TaitzReport.com

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation (DOFF)
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz


If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.





The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.

-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.
 -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.
 -- Mahatma Gandhi


Motion to dismiss FL challenge was based on the same argument that got the case dismissed in the Superior court of GA and the Supreme court of GA. Judge asked for proposed judgment to be submitted to him for signature

Posted on | June 18, 2012 | 6 Comments

Today Obama’s attorneys argued exactly the same point that got the case dismissed in the Superior court of GA and the Supreme court of GA.

 Obama’s attorneys stated that until the declaration of nominee is signed by the convention, Obama is not the party nominee. They stated that Hillary Clinton won the FL primary in 2008, but was not the Democratic nominee in 2008 general election. They also argued that on the Republican side Romney won some states and Santorum won some states and Gingrich won some states, but until the certificate of candidate is not signed, either one of them is not the nominee.

In GA Supreme court this argument was the reason for dismissal of Farrar et al v Obama et al. Of course, I am sure some other excuse will be used after the convention. Judge Lewis asked for proposed ruling to be submitted to him for signature within 1 week.

Comments

6 Responses to “Motion to dismiss FL challenge was based on the same argument that got the case dismissed in the Superior court of GA and the Supreme court of GA. Judge asked for proposed judgment to be submitted to him for signature”

  1. Bruriah Sarah
    June 18th, 2012 @ 4:03 pm

    Here is a site that might shed some light on the idea of the office of the president:

    https:// en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ President_of_the_United_States

    I am not a lawyer – so lawyers correct me – here goes:

    Perhaps by showing a definition that the President is slated to be the only Democratic nominee that he is the nominee, even if it has not been announced yet. And you can further argue that the original nomination of BHO – should hold – that he was improperly vetted and there are problems because of this. And then ask the court to protect the interests of the citizens of the state.

  2. Ed O.
    June 18th, 2012 @ 9:57 pm

    Isn’t there an attorney smart enough to argue that our voting process starts with supposedly qualified people at the primary elections. Should an unqualified person win the primary,as is the case with Obama,and the other candidates who ran in the primary then quit the race, then at the convention the unqualified person who won the primary is found to be disqualified as Obama should be,who then becomes the candidate? That would be a dysfunctional voting process. In other words stop the nonsense before it starts at the primary.

  3. scott
    June 19th, 2012 @ 3:12 am

    These motions to dismiss, just prove that Obama has nothing to show. Simply producing a certified sealed copy of his BC from HI would end all the court cases – yet he is unable to do so.

    Obama wants to stall all court challenges. Until after the elections. Then God forbid he should be re-elected, he will use the standing argument again saying the election is over balha blah blah and it’s groundhog day all over again.

    Perhaps the Court should order Obama to submit his documents now – to be opened only if he is the nominee and dismiss the case if he is not the nominee. Sort of like posting a bond

    The debate process for the Democratic nominee is OVER, there is no challenger.Both parties have their nominee and the conventions are just an out dated formality. It’s like saying we don’t know what time the sun is going to rise in the morning because it hasn’t happened yet.

    Time for Obama to step down !

  4. scott
    June 19th, 2012 @ 3:45 am

    April 04, 2012 USA TODAY ARTICLE :

    https://content.usatoday.com/communities/theoval/post/2012/04/this-just-in-obama-clinches-democratic-nomination/1

    IT’S OFFICIAL OBAMA CLINCHES DEMOCRATIC NOMINATION

    On April 4th Obama obtained the convention delegates needed to cinch the Democratic nomination. His lawyers can point to elections where one candidate won a particular states delegates and did not go on to receive the nomination……. But they can not point to any candidate that WON the needed delegates to be the nominee and was not nominated at the party convention. Once the majority of delegates is obtained, there is NO POSSIBILITY for anyone else to be the nominee other than the winner. In this case Obama

  5. Thomas
    June 19th, 2012 @ 5:05 am

    After my hearing against Obamas eligibility I talked with Sec. of State Gant and he said to me Quote ” we do not even know IF Obama will be the Democratic canidate…”
    I responded ” what Dumb Ass is going to go against him?”
    These people know Obama is Constitutionally Ineligible, yet they Play THIER Game.
    They think its funny. Well I have kids, and this Usurper in the White House is taking away THIER future. And I’m NOT laughing.
    According to the 2008 Democratic Certificate of Nomination, in MY State, Obama is NOT Constitutionally Eligible. THAT is my next Complaint to my SOS.

  6. Henry Tisdale
    June 20th, 2012 @ 10:34 am

    I agree with most of these, Orly, but we have already seen another prospective nominee – an intern in a West Virginia prison. But the main point is this, you are requesting that these few states should not allow him to become a nominee!! It makes no sense whatsoever to allow a man to continue spending millions of dollars when there are several courts who are hearing cases to have him removed from ANY POSITION WHICH COULD LEAD TO A CANDIDATE FOR THE PRESIDENCY. Also, Orly, it is not fair to the genuine democrats to limit them to such a small time to choose another candidate. Finally, let me say again, Your claim should read that he is not eligible to be a United States President, so allow the democrats sufficient time to locate a a nominee of their choice. As Sarah Palin says, “Anybody but Obama”, and that is my hope also. Obama is dangerous, and will certainly finish us off with another term.

    This criminal should not even be discussing his ideas and reviews for the proper president, and he may be putting the democrats so far behind, they may lose the election because of this greedy man.

    Other than the nomination causes, this criminal is spending U.S. dollars to have all those “small concentration camp homes” put into place. These are intended for those who make excessive trouble for the usurper. He is also spending tons of money to take control of all personal fire arms. Since the courts may rule in the favor of the plaintiffs, let’s shut down his excessive spending of taxpayer money – Please. Please make these points part of your opening causes to the court..

    Thanks.

Leave a Reply