Defend Our Freedoms Foundation (DOFF)
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz

If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.

The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.

-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.
 -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.
 -- Mahatma Gandhi

Motion -request for verification of signature of Justice Thomas was submitted to Chief Justice Roberts

Posted on | July 20, 2010 | 30 Comments


In The

Supreme Court of the United States








APPLICATION FOR EMERGENCY STAY AND/OR INJUNCTION AS TO THE sanctions originally submitted to Justice Clarence Thomas



Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ

29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy

Rancho Santa Margarita, CA  92688










APPLICATION FOR EMERGENCY STAY AND/OR INJUNCTION AS TO THE sanctions originally submitted to Justice Clarence Thomas


Background of the request and statement of facts

1 On July 8 2010 Application for stay of sanctions 10A524 was docketed with the Supreme Court and addressed to Honorable Justice Clarence Thomas.

2. On July 16, Friday 2010, around 9PM EST Applicant Attorney Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq (hereinafter Taitz)  checked the electronic docket of the Supreme court, it showed no answer from Clarence Thomas.

3. On the same day Taitz has issued a press release, stating that there is no answer from Justice Thomas. Above press release was sent to some 28,000 media outlets and  some 300,000 individuals.

4. On Saturday July 17, 2010 Taitz started getting comments on her website from some Obama supporters  gloating about the fact that Justice Thomas dismissed her application. Originally, Taitz dismissed those as a dumb joke, but as those comments continued, she checked the electronic docket of the Supreme Court and to her amazement found, that somebody made a new entry on Saturday July 17, 2010, and backdated it for Thursday the 15th of July, stating that Justice Thomas dismissed her application.

5. On Saturday the court was closed, Justices and clerks were not there, therefore the applicant has reasonable belief and suspicion, that above entry was not authorized.

6. There appears to be a pattern of docket entries made or deletions of entries from the docket  done when the Supreme Court is closed.

7. On January 7, 2009 Your Honor reviewed another application for stay filed by Taitz on behalf of her clients: 08A524 Lightfoot v Bowen. Your Honor distributed above application  to be heard in the conference of the full court on January 23, 2010.

8. This case was followed by a number of citizens with great interest, as it dealt with Barack Hussein Obama’s illegitimacy to US presidency.

9. Some 360,000 US citizens have filed a petition by Net world Daily magazine, that was addressed to Justices, asking them to hear the case on the merits.

10. Before inauguration, on January 19, 2010 Aplication 08A524 was on  the docket of the Supreme Court.

11. On January 21, 2009, when Supreme Court was reopened for business after inauguration, and two days before the scheduled conference, application was not there, it was deleted by someone, as if it never existed.

12. Numerous outraged citizens, including members of the media and state representatives, called the Supreme Court and demanded to re-enter the application on the docket.

13. On January 22, 2009 Taitz received a phone call from a stays clerk, Danny Bickel, who asked Taitz to tell her supporters  not to contact the Supreme Court, he stated that application was never deleted. Taitz responded that she has affidavits and screen shots from her supporters, showing that the case disappeared. At that time Mr. Bickel stated that it was a computer problem, that affected all the cases. Taitz responded, that this statement is not true either, as she has an affidavit from Attorney Theresa Ward, ESq, member of the bar of the Supreme Court, who could see other cases on the docket, but Taitz case was not there. Ms. Ward called the Supreme Court and complained. At that point Mr. Bickel stated that the case will be re-entered within an hour and asked Taitz to contact her supporters and ask them not to contact the Supreme Court, as the problem was fixed. Above conversation happened on January 22, at the end of the day, while the conference of all nine justices was supposed to be the next morning.

14. On January 23, 2009 all nine justices supposedly discussed the case.

15. On January 26, 2009 it was announced that the justices decided not to proceed with oral argument.

16. On March 9, 2009 Justice Scalia was giving a lecture and signing his books in Los Angeles.

17. Taitz attended the lecture, asked Justice Scalia questions during Q and A and later at the book signing asked Justice Scalia, why the case was not heard in oral argument, why wasn’t it heard on the merits. To her amazement, Justice Scalia had no clue the case even existed, he could not remember one word, one thing about the case. When Taitz asked Justice Scalia about other similar cases, he could not remember a thing either, even though he was supposedly the Justice, who referred some of those cases to the conference in the first place, which means that he supposedly read those cases more than once.


Currently, there is a clear pattern of entries being made on the docket of the Supreme Court, or entries or even cases deleted, when the court is closed and the Justices and the clerks are not there. While it is not uncommon for the clerks to make entries a day or two after the order was made, it is uncommon to do it when the court is closed. It is more unlikely for such entry to be made on an inauguration day, when all the Justices were not there and could be seen on TV attending the inauguration. Supreme Court is not a city bus, when one can go in and out any time he feels like. Supreme Court has tight security, and there were situations where cases were held for nearly a month, when it was told to the applicants, that the documents are undergoing Anthrax scan. It is highly imptobable, that someone would be working in the Supreme Court, when it is closed, particularly on inauguration day.

It is also of concern, that Justice Scalia could not remember any of the cases dealing with legitimacy of Barack Obama, particularly in light of the fact that at the lecture he gave on March 9, 2009 he stated that the Justices pick for oral argument cases not based on beauty of writing or legal argument, but based on importance to the country. What can be more important than legitimacy of a person sitting in the position of the president and Commander in Chief?

Of Additional concern is the fact that in both cases unexplained activity happened, when the cases were to the detriment of Mr. Obama, stating that he was not eligible to the presidency due to the fact that he had foreign allegiance and citizenship and due to the fact that he refused and still refuses  to unseal his original birth certificate, and the short version received does not show the name of the hospital or doctor or signatures. Taitz also provided information, that the social security number used by Mr. Obama, 042-68-4425, was issued in the state of CT, while he resided in Hi, and it was issued to an elderly individual, born in 1890.

Points and authorities

Taitz cannot provide any points and authorities, as nothing like that ever happened in the Supreme Court and Taitz is requesting your Honor to review the above Motion as the matter of first impression.

Relief requested

  1. Taitz is requesting an appointment to visit the Supreme Court with a forensic document expert (to be identified at a later date)  and view the orders pertaining to her cases and verify and clarify,  that there is a valid signature of Justice Thomas and his clerk on the denial of application 10A56, entered on the Docket on Saturday 17, 2010.
  2. Taitz is requesting an appointment to visit the Supreme Court with a forensic document expert and verify that there genuine signatures of all nine Justices on the denial of her case 08A524 discussed in conference on January 23, 2009.
  3. Taitz is requesting your Honor to grant her and her computer security expert  (to be identified at a later date) access to the electronic docket of the cases pertaining to her and her clients, in order to ascertain who made an entry in the docket 10A56 on Saturday, July 17, 2010 and who deleted the Application 08A 524 from the docket of the Supreme Court and whether such person was authorized to make such changes to the docket.

Respectfully submitted

/s/ Dr. Orly Taitz ESQ



I certify that true and correct copy of the above was served on

Kumar Neal Katyal

Acting Solicitor General of the United States

United States Department of Justice

950 Pennsylvania ave, N.W.

Washington DC 20530-0001


Hugh Randolph Aderhold, JR

Assistant US Attorney

P.O.Box 1702

Macon, GA 31202-1702

US Commission

on Civil Rights  
624 Ninth Street, NW
Washington, DC 20425



Public Integrity Section

Department of Justice

950 Pennsylvania Ave, NW

Washington DC 20530-0001



Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR)

Special Rapporteur on the Situation of Human Rights Defenders

The Honorable Mrs. Margaret Sekaggya

Palais des Nations

CH-1211 Geneva 10, Switzerland

International Criminal bar Hague


Head Office
Neuhuyskade 94
2596 XM The Hague
The Netherlands
Tel : 0031 (70) 3268070 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting              0031 (70) 3268070      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
Fax : 0031 (70) 3353531

Regional Office – Americas / Bureau régional – Amériques / Oficina regional – Américas
137, rue St-Pierre
Montréal, Québec, Canada, H2Y 3T5
Tel : 001 (514) 289-8757 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting              001 (514) 289-8757      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
Fax : 001 (514) 289-8590


Laura Vericat Figarola


Secretaria Barcelona


Address: Avenida Diagonal 529 1º2ª

08029 Barcelona, España

tel/fax 0034 93 405 14 24



United Nations Commission for

Civil Rights Defenders

Orsolya Toth (Ms)

Human Rights Officer

Civil and Political Rights Section

Special Procedures Division

Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights

tel: + 41 22 917 91 51

email: ototh@ohchr.org




/s/ Orly Taitz

Dr Orly Taitz, ESQ

29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, ste 100

Rancho Santa Margarita CA 92688


30 Responses to “Motion -request for verification of signature of Justice Thomas was submitted to Chief Justice Roberts”

  1. tina
    July 20th, 2010 @ 4:13 pm

    I am proud of you Orly. Wasn’t Justice Roberts the one earlier where your name mysteriously disappeared from the docket? Sorry but you are knee high in alligators! I don’t trust too many up there,so I am really happy you are doing this.

  2. William Zane
    July 20th, 2010 @ 4:23 pm

    Lady Liberty

    This is absolutely brilliant and totally unecpected. SCOTUS has been committing fraud and now they will have to admit it, too.

    The whole government is in on it. Except for those 40 brave Republican Senators and about 150 house members.

    Go get ’em, Dr. Taitz! Protect us from Communist tyranny and fraudulent courts.

    God bless Dr. Taitz.

  3. Penny Johnson
    July 20th, 2010 @ 5:34 pm

    Orly this is brilliant. Were you thinking of taking Sandra Lines to the SC to analyze the documents? I think she would be better than Polarik.

  4. Patriot
    July 20th, 2010 @ 8:20 pm

    Dear Lady Liberty, This is outstanding for Patriots everywhere to learn about! I think you have the Supreme Court right where you want them! Still not enough people know about your amazing fight. I have friends at ABC and talked with them about you for the TV show “Wife Swap.” It’s a very long running successful show and in the show, the wives swap lives for two weeks. You could teach a whole new family (and the Nation) about your brilliant ideas. Would you consider it? If you would I’ll ask them to come visit the site. Keep up the great work!

  5. Michael
    July 20th, 2010 @ 9:38 pm

    “The price good people pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men.”

    – Plato

  6. Ed
    July 21st, 2010 @ 3:20 am

    Doctor Taitz, it looks as though you may have them by the short hairs!! I think that as the OBUMMER in Chief continues his sillines( being polite here) that the Justices’ are now willing to go after this freak show and maybe just maybe hang Obummer by te shortest of the short hairs…OUCH!!!
    And know that that idiot Kagan amy soon be on the Court they bwant to do something soon, asin last year…GO GET LADY LIBERTY!!!
    As Admiral Perry once famously said “DAMN THE TORPEDO’S FULL SPEED AHEAD!!!

  7. chum lee
    July 21st, 2010 @ 3:28 am

    There are 5000 requests for cert a year. Less than 1 per cent are granted, and it is doubtful any justice remembers any given petition.

    My questions: why does not granting something that is completely discretionary indicative of a problem? Why is not remembering 1 out of 5000 requests indicative of something wrong?

    Lastly, I have personally run into problems with the electronic docket. Additionally, like many courts, it is likely that there is a lag between the time a Justice makes an order and when the clerk posts it. Why is this situation indicative of a pattern or problem?

    Personally, I hate that the Supremes don’t use their discretion in the way I want them to, but that does not make a problem.

  8. Cae
    July 21st, 2010 @ 4:00 am

    Democrat Barack Hussein Obama


  9. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    July 21st, 2010 @ 6:29 am

    you will not remember a minor issue, but illegitimacy of the President you would remember

  10. D. Oltieri
    July 21st, 2010 @ 8:18 am

    Lady Liberty, I see you have sent this to Chief Justice Roberts.

    Is there a reason you just sent it to just the Chief Justice? Wouldn’t it be *safer* to send it to the Associate Justices, too, given your concerns?

    This seeming Confederacy of Obot Court Clerks must be exposed!!!

    Patriots should post this far and wide.

    God Bless!

  11. Yephora
    July 21st, 2010 @ 8:58 am

    ‘Patriot’ – the pathetic anti-family TV show ‘Wife Swap’ you suggest Orly appear on is produced by low-lifes for low-lifes.

    Only Orly’s enemies would benefit from the ridicule she would subject herself to — damaging her credibility and hurting her *and America’s* cause.

  12. Flavio Pessoa
    July 21st, 2010 @ 10:12 am

    Dear Orly,

    You are absolutely awesome!!! Thank you for fightig our battles and for loving this republic with such passion. Your sacrifices will not be forgotten.
    I do think that on entries number 7 and 10 you meant 2009 instead of 2010.
    Keep up the great work. You are greatly loved. I’m proud to be your fellow citizen.

  13. marie
    July 21st, 2010 @ 11:35 am

    Everyone who has posted on this website are clearly bigots. Cant stand the fact that Obama is our president. Get over it, what will you come up with next. I voted for my Commander in Chief and will vote for him again in 2012.

  14. Penny Johnson
    July 21st, 2010 @ 12:01 pm

    Just a question. Shouldn’t this request first go to Justice Thomas since he has jurisdiction over the 11 Circuit? If he denies it then you can send it to another justice. I think you are in uncharted waters here. My guess is that the Supreme Court has never seen a motion like this.

  15. TJ Hunter
    July 21st, 2010 @ 12:30 pm

    Dr Taitz : Will this appear as a new docket, or will it go under one or both of your existing dockets?

    By the way … I see that somebody has been changing the dates on your dockets.

    2 items found for your search: taitz

    Search Results:
    Docket for 10A56
    Title: Orly Taitz, Applicant v. Thomas D. MacDonald, Colonel Garrison Commander, Fort Benning, et al.
    Orly Taitz, Applicant Orly Taitz Orly Taitz
    Last Modified: 7/19/2010 1:33:52 PM

    Docket for 08A524
    Title: Gail Lightfoot, et al., Applicants v. Debra Bowen, California Secretary of State
    Orly Taitz
    Last Modified: 7/17/2010 10:06:19 AM

    Does this mean that someone in the court is altering your docket files?

  16. Elizabeth
    July 21st, 2010 @ 1:53 pm

    Marie,please tell us what it is
    EXACTLY that you find admirable
    in Barack’s achievements?

    Somehow his integrity and his
    honesty, caring for the country
    and its citizens, has been lost on
    us. What is it that we don’t

    Please do inform us. I am serious.

    All we know is what we see.
    There must be something in the
    background of his daily activities
    and mandates that we are missing.

    Thank you, in advance, for the input.

  17. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    July 21st, 2010 @ 3:46 pm

    no, there were no recent modifications

  18. obimbowatch
    July 21st, 2010 @ 7:37 pm

    Orly, there have been over 70 so-called “eligibility” lawsuits. Not a single one has succeeded on a single motion.

    You are like Don Quixote tilting at windmills.

    There are better dragons to slay. Stop wasting your time.

  19. Veritas
    July 21st, 2010 @ 8:13 pm

    BARRY OBAMA sat on a WALL
    BARRY OBAMA had a great fall
    and all of the Court Clerk Men
    Couldn’t put Barry Obama together again.

  20. forex robot
    July 25th, 2010 @ 12:52 pm

    What a great resource!

  21. suplement
    November 22nd, 2011 @ 7:38 pm

    Some really nice and useful info on this website , also I think the design and style has excellent features.

  22. Aminokwasy
    November 23rd, 2011 @ 1:26 am

    I got what you intend, saved to my bookmarks , very decent site.

  23. gutter cleaning cost
    November 23rd, 2011 @ 4:18 am

    Good post we had been looking forit I can tell that you are a specialist at the field! I will be launching a web site soon & your details will be very ideal for me Thanks for all of your help & wish you all the success within your business.

  24. salons lancaster pa
    November 23rd, 2011 @ 5:19 am

    I am often blogging and i really appreciate your content. The article has really peaked my interest. I am going to bookmark your site and keep checking for new information.

  25. computer repair services houston
    February 10th, 2012 @ 7:49 pm

    Nice post!

  26. Hale Stalowe
    February 11th, 2012 @ 6:29 am

    You made several good points there. I did a search on the subject matter and found most persons will go along with with your blog.

  27. canada goose jacka barn
    February 11th, 2012 @ 6:43 am

    Spot on with this write-up, I actually think this website needs far more consideration. I’ll in all probability be again to learn far more, thanks for that info.

  28. pto shaft
    February 12th, 2012 @ 11:38 am

    Good day! I just would like to give a huge thumbs up for the good data you’ve right here on this post. I shall be coming back to your weblog soon.

  29. tiedowns
    February 12th, 2012 @ 5:01 pm

    This actually answered the drawback, thanks!

  30. Quale pu貌 essere il Presente Servizio Checklist
    April 10th, 2012 @ 12:25 am

    I was very pleased to seek out this web-site.I wished to thanks for your time for this glorious read!! I undoubtedly enjoying every little bit of it and I’ve you bookmarked to check out new stuff you blog post.

Leave a Reply