Defend Our Freedoms Foundation (DOFF)
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz

If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.

The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.

-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.
 -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.
 -- Mahatma Gandhi

more on Siddarth Velamoor, Perkins Coie of Chicago and Seattle and Ropbert Bauer- Anita Dunn Obama connection

Posted on | October 17, 2009 | 12 Comments


robert bauer [perkins coie chicago] is obama personal lawyer and has funneled $1.7M approx to their firm from defending obama ineligibility. bauer’s wife is anita dunn, white house communication director who was seen on video recently expousing one of her hero’s, mao tse tung!


Approve | Spam | Delete | Edit | Quick Edit | Reply

Let’s hope this Siddarth Velamoor does not represent a problem
3 #


12 Responses to “more on Siddarth Velamoor, Perkins Coie of Chicago and Seattle and Ropbert Bauer- Anita Dunn Obama connection”

  1. Cion
    October 17th, 2009 @ 12:42 pm



    ILLEGAL ALIEN, mombassa kenya

  2. G. Fredrickson
    October 17th, 2009 @ 2:57 pm

    Please go to this fantastic site:
    theobamafile.com, latest news section.
    He has all the links to these important articles:

    What To Believe?

    The only thing we KNOW about Barack Hussein Obama II is we don’t KNOW a damned thing about him.

    Kenya Sunday Standard headline — “Kenyan-born Obama all set for US Senate”

    The Kenya Standard — “It seems Barack Hussein Obama, President of the United States of America (via a sleepy village in Kenya called Nyang’oma K’Ogelo) can do no wrong.”

    The Nigerian Observer — “Americans will today go to the polls to elect their next President with Democratic Party candidate, Senator Barack Obama largely favoured to win. The Kenyan-born Senator will…”

    AllAfrica.com — ” Little wonder then why Kenyan-born Barack Obama, America’s first Black President…”

    GraphicGhana.com — “For Ghana, Obama’s visit will be a celebration of another milestone in African history as it hosts the first-ever African-American President on this presidential visit to the continent of his birth.”

    The same article, with the same quote, appeared in ModernGhana.com.

    And The Ghana Times — “So far, the odds favour the once underdog in American politics, Obama, the African-American Senator from Illinois state. A Congressional Quarterly (CQ) politics monitored on BBC put the Kenyan born American ahead of his rivel, John McCain.”

    Then there’s Mama Sarah, Obama’s step-grandmother. She said Obama was born in Kenya, and she was there.

    Then there’s the recording of the Kenyan Ambassador saying Obama was born in Kenya on the “Mike In The Morning” show on WRIF radio, in Detroit.

    Then there’s the guy with the Kenyan birth certificate.

    Ok, ok, none of these are “official” sources — but this one is:

    The Kenyan National Assembly, Official Report, Wednesday, 5th November, 2008 — “Dr. Khalwale: On a point of order, Mr. Deputy Speaker, Sir. You have heard none other than the Leader of Government Business acknowledge that because of Obama’s win in the United States of America (USA), the House is crippled. Could we allow him to move a Motion for Adjournment so we could also continue the celebrations of having a Kenyan ruling the USA? I humbly request.”

    Don’t believe Kenya? How about Indonesia?

    HonoluluAdvertiser.com — “Duckworth is happy to point out that she and Hawai’i-raised Punahou graduate Obama have ‘a kama’aina connection.’ Both were born outside the country — Obama in Indonesia, Duckworth in Thailand.”

    The point here is that there are plenty of reasons to question who and what Barack Obama is.

    Obama admits he was, “at birth,” a Kenyan citizen and a subject of Great Britain. He has proffered a book, a phony birth document and some old newspaper clippings as documentation that he’s eligible to serve as POTUS.

    Obama continues to fight the release of his bona fides with millions of dollars and both federal and private attorneys, arrogantly assuming that the American People will just sit there with their mouths shut while he shreds the U. S. Constitution.

    To top it all off, the Democratic National Committee filed fraudulent “Official Certification of Nomination” papers for Barack Obama and Joe Biden in all 50 states.

    The legacy media has completely abandoned its responsibility as the government’s watchdog. It has become political, and is functioning as Obama’s propaganda machine. Don’t expect them to ask any embarrassing questions.

  3. Jack
    October 17th, 2009 @ 4:39 pm

    Orly, you’re probably aware that something else MAY be going on here, that is, by Judge Carter’s hiring of Siddharth Velamoor (from the law firm representing and closely connected to Obama) as his law clerk 4 days before the Oct 5 hearing.

    It’s simply too obvious. I’m assuming Judge Carter would surely know this would be relevant — and be grounds for your Motion for Recusal of Judge Carter.

  4. Jack
    October 17th, 2009 @ 5:06 pm

    Orly, you’re already likely aware of this (but just in case), since there conceivably can be an Evidentiary Hearing (which would entail discovery) in connection with a Motion for Recusal of Judge Carter for hiring an Obama-connected law clerk, perhaps this is an avenue for you to be granted discovery without Judge Carter having to deny Obama’s and the Government’s Motion to Dismiss, which would be appealed and tied up in the Fed. Appeals Ct.

    Just thinking — especially since Judge Land’s (obviously) gratuitous rulings and penalties against you would give ground for discovery there.

  5. Jack
    October 17th, 2009 @ 6:15 pm

    I posted this at Citizen Wells:

    IMHO, Judges, especially federal, simply don’t do such obvious over the top things, like with Judge Land bashing Orly, gratutiously, as he has done — giving grounds for Recusal, OR, Judge Carter, hiring an Obama Law Firm-connected attorney 4 days before the hearing on the Gov’s Motion to Dismiss.

    Having said that, were Judge Carter to deny the Gov’s Motion to Dismiss, there’s the very considerable possibility/probability the Gov could tie the case up in the Fed Ct. of Appeals — because they would instantly appeal — so we’d never get to discovery or trial for a very long time.

    On the other hand, if Judge Carter does something giving Orly grounds to seek Recusal of Judge Carter by reason of the appearances of, if not real, conflict of interest — which relief is afforded Orly under federal statute, there would be a hearing in connection with that Motion for Recusal, for which Orly could present evidence (and maybe there’d be discovery in connection therewith) to show the Obama-related conflict of interest which could embrace issues surrounding Obama which are in issue in the case. So, BINGO, Obama matters (birth, natural born citizen, etc.) including operations of the law firm on behalf of Obama and the DNC (which it apparently represents as well) are before the Court AND NOT ABLE TO BE APPEALED OR KEPT FROM THE COURT, AND EVEN IF THERE IS ATTEMPT TO HIDE THOSE MATTERS, IT WOULD PLACE TEAM OBAMA IN AN EXTREMELY UNTENABLE POSITION.

    Remember, the key to the whole case is Standing and Jurisdiction, not the merits of the case — which are SLAM DUNK AGAINST Obama, at least insofar as the meaning of “Natural Born Citizen” requiring two citizen parents. So, Standing and Juruisdiction ARE THE BALL GAME. If there ever is standing or jurisdiction, it’s then immediately all over for Obama; it will never even get so far as a trial — discovery would end it all (and a scenario could then very well be the Democrat Congress selects/votes Hillary Clinton as President — and I already think she knows this may be coming down the pike, hence her re-emergence on the national scene — obliquely challenging Obama).

    OK, all the above is IMHO, but seems to make sense.

  6. Frederick Puccetti
    October 17th, 2009 @ 8:25 pm

    Please be careful Dr. Taitz, Some of us thought that Kreep is an Obama Mole, maybe this lawyer is one also ?

    Reminds me of the Attorneys’ that Jim Garrison had working for him – one was a mole for the gov’t (JFK movie)

    Today I checked out “TheSteadyDrip/blogspot.com
    there are several international and african newspaper clips of “Kenyan Born Barack Obama”
    Even the Kenyan gov’t had to shut down for the “celebration” – in the minutes of the session.

    May God continue to BLess and Guide You


  7. Dean Brassfield
    October 17th, 2009 @ 10:09 pm

    Dr. Taitz: I have heard of witness tampering, and jury tampering, but I’m wondering, is there such a thing as judge tampering? Particularly if the defendant is almost omnipotent, as in The President of the United States?

    If the defendant (POTUS) arranges for an employee of his defense’s law firm to be hired as a clerk for a judge who is the judge in a case you are trying against him, influences the judge in the case by communicating offers (bribes) to the judge, his family, or worse, threats to all of the above, surely that would be judge tampering, would it not?

    What if the judge in your case, Carter, gets a big promotion next year or the year after, if he rules against you, could that be judge tamepering by POTUS? If that occurred, could you win an appeal due to that influence upon the judge?

    If the judge’s clerk, who worked for the defendant’s law firm, spies on your motions and relays them to the defense attorneys, is that judge tampering? Can you get the clerk fired for the appearance of tampering?

    I’m not an attorney, just a very interested observer who hopes you win your case against what I believe to be an ineligible president. And I’m a veteran who loves the United States, like you.

    Good luck!


  8. Thomas
    October 17th, 2009 @ 10:24 pm

    No other name has become more synonymous with the Illuminati than the Rothschilds. It is believed that the Rothschild family used the Illuminati as a means to achieving their goal of world-wide financial dominance. Mayer Amschel Rothschild (1743-1812) was born in Frankfurt-on-the-Main in Germany, the son of [ Moses Amschel Bauer ] ,,, [ robert bauer ] [perkins coie chicago] is obama personal lawyer and has funneled $1.7M approx to their firm from defending obama ineligibility
    Interesting Rothschilds name traces back to [ Moses Amschel Bauer ] ,,, [ robert bauer ] (Perkins Coie Chicago ) !!!!

  9. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    October 18th, 2009 @ 3:18 am

    I am not planning to file a motion to recuse judge Carter. It is way too early for it. Perkins Coie is a huge firm. It has about 17 offices around the world. Hiring smbd who worked in such a huge firm is not a sufficient ground to recuse judge Carter. We have to wait and see what his decisions will be in the future.
    PS Where do you see Hillary obliquely challenging Obama? I might be too busy with these cases, but I missed it

  10. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    October 18th, 2009 @ 3:25 am

    there is no absolute right to rule 11 discovery. I can appeal to the 11th circuit, but they will not order discovery. They can remand. I don’t know what will they decide on the motion to recuse Land. Let’s say he is recused. Another judge might decide the sanctions were not warranted. He can decide to remove sanctions without ordering any discovery. That’s what happened to John Hemenway in DC

  11. KBB
    October 18th, 2009 @ 4:15 am

    Orly, hasn’t “standing” already been achieved when Judge Land brought you all into his court and then threw the case out as being frivolous? Didn’t the fact that he allowed you to appear and present the case to him (even a short version) establish “standing”, that from then on can be referenced as no longer an issue?

  12. Jack
    October 18th, 2009 @ 2:11 pm

    Go to 32:50 into this radio program, sit back and listen, and you’ll understand why standing and jurisdiction IS THE BALL GAME against Obama (there’s no need ever to get to the merits):–