More evidence of racketeering in high positions of power: FedEx package with pleadings and evidence relating to Taitz v astrue (Obama’s use of a forged CT SSN) conveniently disappears from the Supreme Court of the US. That’s Pelican Brief on steroids
Posted on | December 8, 2012 | 42 Comments
Dr. Orly Taitz ESQ
29839 Santa Margarita ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA 92688
via Federal Express
Attention Chief Clerk of the Supreme Court of the United States William Sutter and Mr. Eric Fossum
REGARDING MISSING FEDERAL EXPRESS PACKAGE DELIVERED TO THE SUPREME COURT ON 10.09.2012 9:52 AM AND SIGNED BY D. GAMBLE AND INCORRECT STATEMENTS/INCORRECT INFORMATION IN TWO LETTERS WRONGFULLY DENYING PLAINTIFF TAITZ HER FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHT FOR REDRESS OF GRIEVANCES AND SPECIFICALLY HER RIGHT TO FILE A PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI.
Dear Mr. Sutter and Mr. Fossum,
I am in receipt of a December 3, 2012 letter from Chief Clerk William Sutter drafted and signed by Eric Fossum in regards to denial of Plaintiff’s First Amendment right for Redress of Grievances, which was exhibited twice by the clerk’s office’s wrongful denial of Plaintiff’s right to file a petition for Writ of Certiorari in Case Taitz v Astrue USCA District of Columbia Circuit no 11-5304.
In aforementioned letter from you Mr. Fossum provided incorrect information, specifically he stated that there was no order from the clerk’s office denying the “right by Petitioner to file a petition for a writ of certiorari” and that there was no attempt to file a writ of certiorari by the Plaintiff. Exhibit 1 December 3 letter from Clerk Sutter signed by Eric Fossum
1. Please, see attached two Federal Express receipts:
a. Exhibit 2. Federal Express Receipt showing a package delivered to SCOTUS on October 2, 2012 9:12 am signed by J Kouros.
b. Exhibit 3 Federal Express receipt showing a second package sent to SCOTUS on October 7, 2012 and delivered to SCOTUS on October 9, 2012 9:52 am and signed by D. Gamble.
2. On December 6, 2012 around 10:45 am plaintiff Taitz called SCOTUS and demanded to talk to Chief Clerk Sutter in regards to her grievance of wrongful denial of her right for redress of grievances. Assistant for Chief Clerk Sutter stated that he is not available and advised Taitz to talk to a different case analyst, Mr. Traves. Mr. Traves reviewed the computer file of the case and stated that he can see on his internal docket documents filed on October 1, received on October 2, 2012, he can see and can read a letter from Chief Clerk Sutter, which incorrectly stated that Plaintiff is out of time to file a Petition for Writ of Certiorari (Plaintiff was actually over a month early as the final decision was on August 8 and she had 90 days until November 7, 2012), however analyst Traves could not see on the electronic docket a package received by the court on October 9, 2012 and signed by D. Gamble.
It appears that there is nefarious activity in the court and someone threw the package away and either never docketed that package or deleted a docket entry made earlier.
This is only one of a number of suspicious activities in the Supreme Court of the United States. Previously a case Lightfoot v Bowen 08A524 was deleted from the docket of the Supreme court on inauguration day January 21, 2008, austencibly to give an impression that there are no more challenges to Obama’s legitimacy. Only after pressure from the public, media, state representatives and sworn affidavits from attorneys the case was reentered. Clerk in charge for STAYs Danny Bickle repeatedly made incorrect or possibly statements claiming that all files were deleted due to some type of computer malfunction, which was not the case.
In a different case Rhodes v MacDonald 10A56 (entered by the Supreme Court as Taitz v MacDonald) a docket entry showing Justice Clarence Thomas denying an application for STAY was made retroactively on a weekend when Justice Thomas was thousands of miles away giving a seminar in Utah. When Taitz demanded to see an actual signature by Justice Thomas on the order to deny stay or on the cover page of the application, she was referred to Eric Fossum, the same employee, who signed the denial letter in the case at hand, who admitted to her on the phone that there is no signature of Justice Thomas either on the order or on the cover page of the petition. As such, there is no proof justice Thomas ever saw the petition or ever read a word written in the petition.
Current case deals with undeniable evidence showing Barack Obama using a stolen Connecticut Social Security number 042-68-4425, which was never assigned to him according to e-verify and SSNVS. Exhibits 4, 5, 6, showing Barack Obama using Social Security number 042-68-4425 on his 2009 tax returns and SSNVS and E-Verify reports showing that this number was never assigned to Barack Obama.
Conveniently a package with documents relating to the case of the biggest fraud and forgery and treason in the U.S. history disappears from the Supreme Court of the United States.
Plaintiff Taitz demands reconsideration of her 60 (a) motion to correct an error by the Clerk of the Court and a 60 day extension to file a Petition for a Writ of Certiorari, which was wrongfully denied earlier.
If such extension is not received within three business days, Plaintiff will be filing not a 60 (a) motion, but a 60 (b) motion with the Court seeking a reconsideration not due to error but due to fraud.
Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ
cc Congressman Darrell Issa
House Oversight Committee
2347 Rayburn House Building
Washington DC, 20515
cc Congressman Mike Rogers
House Intelligence Committee
133 Cannon House Office building
Washington DC 20515
cc Congressman Sam Johnson
House Subcommittee on Social Security
House Ways and Means Committee
2929 N Central Expy, 240
Richardson, TX 75080
cc Congressman Dana Rohrbacher
House Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations’
House Committee on Foreign Affairs
2300 Rayburn House Building
Washington DC 20515
on Civil Rights
624 Ninth Street, NW
Washington, DC 20425 C
Public Integrity Section
Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Ave, NW
Washington DC 20530-0001
Inter -American Commission on Human Rights
1889 F Street, N.W.. Washington, D.C., 20006 U.S.A..
Tel.: 202-458-6002, 202-458-6002. Fax: 202-458-3992.
Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR)
Special Rapporteur on the Situation of Human Rights Defenders
The Honorable Mrs. Margaret Sekaggya
Palais des Nations
CH-1211 Geneva 10, Switzerland
International Criminal bar Hague
2596 XM The Hague
Tel : 0031 (70) 3268070 0031 (70) 3268070
Fax : 0031 (70) 3353531
Regional Office – Americas / Bureau régional – Amériques / Oficina regional – Américas
137, rue St-Pierre
Montréal, Québec, Canada, H2Y 3T5
Tel : 001 (514) 289-8757 001 (514) 289-8757
Fax : 001 (514) 289-8590
Laura Vericat Figarola
Address: Avenida Diagonal 529 1º2ª
08029 Barcelona, España
tel/fax 0034 93 405 14 24
United Nations Commission for
Civil Rights Defenders
Orsolya Toth (Ms)
Human Rights Officer
Civil and Political Rights Section
Special Procedures Division
Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights
tel: + 41 22 917 91 51