Defend Our Freedoms Foundation (DOFF)
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz

If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.

The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.

-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.
 -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.
 -- Mahatma Gandhi

More evidence of racketeering in high positions of power: FedEx package with pleadings and evidence relating to Taitz v astrue (Obama’s use of a forged CT SSN) conveniently disappears from the Supreme Court of the US. That’s Pelican Brief on steroids

Posted on | December 8, 2012 | 42 Comments

Dr. Orly Taitz ESQ

29839 Santa Margarita ste 100

Rancho Santa Margarita CA 92688


via Federal Express

12. 08.2012

Attention Chief Clerk of the Supreme Court of the United States William Sutter and Mr.  Eric Fossum


Dear Mr. Sutter and Mr. Fossum,

I am in receipt of a December 3, 2012 letter from Chief Clerk William Sutter drafted and signed by Eric Fossum in regards to denial of Plaintiff’s First Amendment right for Redress of Grievances, which was exhibited twice by the clerk’s office’s wrongful denial of Plaintiff’s right to file a petition for Writ of Certiorari in Case Taitz v Astrue USCA District of Columbia Circuit no 11-5304.

In aforementioned letter from you Mr. Fossum provided incorrect information, specifically he stated that there was no order from the clerk’s office denying the “right by Petitioner to file a petition for a writ of certiorari” and that there was no attempt to file a writ of certiorari by the Plaintiff. Exhibit 1 December 3 letter from Clerk Sutter signed by Eric Fossum

1. Please, see attached two Federal Express receipts:

a. Exhibit 2. Federal Express Receipt showing a package delivered to SCOTUS on October 2, 2012 9:12 am signed by J Kouros.

b. Exhibit 3 Federal Express receipt showing a second package sent to  SCOTUS on October 7, 2012 and delivered to SCOTUS on October 9, 2012  9:52 am and signed by D. Gamble.

2. On December 6, 2012 around 10:45 am plaintiff Taitz called SCOTUS and demanded to talk to Chief Clerk Sutter in regards to her grievance of wrongful denial of her right for redress of grievances. Assistant for Chief Clerk Sutter stated that he is not available and advised Taitz to talk to a different case analyst, Mr. Traves. Mr. Traves reviewed the computer file of the case and stated that he can see on his internal docket  documents filed on October 1, received on October 2, 2012, he can see and can read a letter from Chief Clerk Sutter, which incorrectly stated that Plaintiff is out of time to file a Petition for Writ of Certiorari (Plaintiff was actually over a month early as the final decision was on August 8 and she had 90 days until November 7, 2012), however analyst Traves could not see on the electronic docket a  package  received by the court on October 9, 2012 and signed by D. Gamble.

It appears that there is nefarious activity in the court and someone threw the package away and either never docketed that package or deleted a docket entry made earlier.

This is only one of a number of suspicious activities in the Supreme Court of the United States. Previously a case Lightfoot v Bowen 08A524 was deleted from the docket of the Supreme court on inauguration day January 21, 2008, austencibly to give an impression that there are no more challenges to Obama’s legitimacy. Only after pressure from the public, media, state representatives and sworn affidavits from attorneys  the case was reentered. Clerk in charge for STAYs Danny Bickle repeatedly made incorrect or possibly statements  claiming that all files were deleted due to some type of computer malfunction, which was not the case.

In a different case  Rhodes v MacDonald 10A56 (entered by the Supreme Court as Taitz v MacDonald) a docket entry showing Justice Clarence Thomas denying an application for STAY was made retroactively on a weekend when Justice Thomas was thousands of miles away giving a seminar in Utah. When Taitz demanded to see an actual signature by Justice Thomas on the order to deny stay or on the cover page of the application, she was referred to Eric Fossum, the same employee, who signed the denial letter in the case at hand, who admitted to her on the phone that there is no signature of Justice Thomas either on the order or on the cover page of the petition. As such, there is no proof justice Thomas ever saw the petition or ever read a word written in the petition.

Current case deals with undeniable evidence showing Barack Obama using a stolen Connecticut Social Security number 042-68-4425, which was never assigned to him according to e-verify and SSNVS. Exhibits 4, 5, 6, showing Barack Obama using Social Security number 042-68-4425 on his 2009 tax returns and SSNVS and E-Verify reports showing that this number was never assigned to Barack Obama.

Conveniently a package with documents   relating to the case of the biggest fraud and forgery and treason in the U.S. history disappears from the Supreme Court of the United States.

Plaintiff Taitz demands reconsideration of her 60 (a) motion to correct an error by the Clerk of the Court and a 60 day extension to file a Petition for a Writ of Certiorari, which was wrongfully denied earlier.

If such extension is not received within three business days, Plaintiff will be filing not a 60 (a) motion, but a 60 (b) motion with the Court seeking a  reconsideration not due to error but due to fraud.



Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ


cc Congressman Darrell Issa


House Oversight Committee

2347 Rayburn House Building

Washington DC, 20515


cc Congressman Mike Rogers


House Intelligence Committee

133 Cannon House Office building

Washington DC 20515


cc Congressman Sam Johnson


House Subcommittee on Social Security

House Ways and Means Committee

2929 N Central Expy, 240

Richardson, TX 75080


cc Congressman Dana Rohrbacher


House Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations’

House Committee on Foreign Affairs

2300 Rayburn House Building

Washington DC 20515


US Commission

on Civil Rights

624 Ninth Street, NW

Washington, DC 20425 C



Public Integrity Section

Department of Justice

950 Pennsylvania Ave, NW

Washington DC 20530-0001


Inter -American Commission on Human Rights

1889 F Street, N.W.. Washington, D.C., 20006 U.S.A..

Tel.: 202-458-6002,     202-458-6002. Fax: 202-458-3992.


Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR)

Special Rapporteur on the Situation of Human Rights Defenders

The Honorable Mrs. Margaret Sekaggya

Palais des Nations

CH-1211 Geneva 10, Switzerland

International Criminal bar Hague


Head Office

Neuhuyskade 94

2596 XM The Hague

The Netherlands

Tel : 0031 (70) 3268070              0031 (70) 3268070

Fax : 0031 (70) 3353531

Email: info@bpi-icb.org

Website: www.bpi-icb.org

Regional Office – Americas / Bureau régional – Amériques / Oficina regional – Américas

137, rue St-Pierre

Montréal, Québec, Canada, H2Y 3T5

Tel : 001 (514) 289-8757              001 (514) 289-8757

Fax : 001 (514) 289-8590

Email: admin@bpi-icb.org

Website: www.bpi-icb.org


Laura Vericat Figarola


Secretaria Barcelona


Address: Avenida Diagonal 529 1º2ª

08029 Barcelona, España

tel/fax 0034 93 405 14 24


United Nations Commission for

Civil Rights Defenders

Orsolya Toth (Ms)

Human Rights Officer

Civil and Political Rights Section

Special Procedures Division

Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights

tel: + 41 22 917 91 51

email: ototh@ohchr.org



42 Responses to “More evidence of racketeering in high positions of power: FedEx package with pleadings and evidence relating to Taitz v astrue (Obama’s use of a forged CT SSN) conveniently disappears from the Supreme Court of the US. That’s Pelican Brief on steroids”

  1. Stu
    December 8th, 2012 @ 10:26 am

    Can Sutter be charged w/interference of an officer of the law in the discharge of her duty?

    Thank you Dr. Taitz for your continued fight of all this fraud. Your tenacity is to be commended.

  2. Patriot
    December 8th, 2012 @ 11:09 am

    Kagan and Sotomayer took the package !!!!
    Once it’s proved that Obummer is a fraud

    Kagan and Sotomayer will have to step down.

    Kagan did it – and told sotomayer she might as well be an acomplice – ’cause she already is.

  3. C. Retin
    December 8th, 2012 @ 11:38 am

    “If such extension is not received within three business days, Plaintiff will be filing not a 60 (a) motion, but a 60 (b) motion with the Court seeking a reconsideration not due to error but due to fraud.”

    I’m confused. How many people at the Supreme Court are involved in the fraud? Is it just the clerks or does it go higher than that?

  4. Elizabeth
    December 8th, 2012 @ 12:19 pm

    While reading up on Judge Kennedy, I came
    across the bio on his clerk, Lauren Willard,
    with a photo of her. She appears to
    be very wholesome and her words speak
    of some integrity and a sense of responsibility.

    I wondered if she would be instrumental in
    tracking down the disappearing evidence
    delivered by FedEx. It’s just a thought
    from reading about her and her philosophy.

    Since there are underground subversives
    now clerking at SCOTUS, she would be
    a valuable asset to making sure that when
    deliveries arrive, they are safely
    docketed and retained. It just remains
    being able to contact her for assistance.


  5. Falcon
    December 8th, 2012 @ 12:25 pm

    Please, just die.

  6. MichaelN
    December 8th, 2012 @ 1:32 pm


    An abstract from the article found at the link above….

    “Fossum, Erik
    Accused Party Type
    Accused Party Title
    Clerk of the Court Employee
    Court or Office
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Accused State
    District of Columbia
    City of Complaint
    State of Complaint
    District of Columbia
    Types of Misconduct

    Mail Fraud
    Violation of Constitution
    Violation of Rules

    Complainant Address
    PO Box 681236, Marietta, Georgia, 30068
    Complainant Business Phone
    Complainant Fax
    Complainant Email

  7. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    December 8th, 2012 @ 1:33 pm

    that what I want to know.

    are clerks acted on their own or they are told by the judges to do certain things to take responsibility and liability away from judges?

  8. MichaelN
    December 8th, 2012 @ 1:34 pm
  9. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    December 8th, 2012 @ 1:35 pm

    no, i am sure this was done by a lower level employee, judges will not get their hands dirty, at least not directly

  10. MichaelN
    December 8th, 2012 @ 1:56 pm

    More on clerks and staff of the SCOTUS


  11. MichaelN
    December 8th, 2012 @ 1:59 pm

    It seems it’s a culture, not just one “germ”.

    “no, i am sure this was done by a lower level employee, judges will not get their hands dirty, at least not directly”

  12. MichaelN
    December 8th, 2012 @ 2:10 pm

    There may be some useful material here, where someone in another matter has already done some investigative research.


  13. MichaelN
    December 8th, 2012 @ 2:28 pm

    When at the Google page above, go to the next page and see more hits where in most of the complaints it is Erik Fossum whose name keeps coming up as the court officer who handled the documents, etc

  14. C. Retin
    December 8th, 2012 @ 2:33 pm

    Is this lower level clerk Sutter involved? Since he’s the chief clerk, I’m sure he’s giving the marching orders to these low level civil servants whose salaries we taxpayers pay.

    Can you seek sanctions against these clerks for abusing your civil rights? Or report them to one of the more conservative Justices on the Supreme Court for further investigation? It seems like a strongly worded letter might be in order, unless you think it’s too dangerous for you in light of your reference to The Pelican Brief.

    Be safe my friend.

  15. cq
    December 8th, 2012 @ 3:14 pm

    The great California tax hoax: $577 billion in hidden assets never revealed to voters

    (NaturalNews) Is California really as bankrupt as its governor claims? Not if you believe in mathematics and accounting. As this story shows, California has hidden away $577 billion in assets, all revealed in CAFR documents (Comprehensive Annual Financial Report) that are becoming increasingly well-known.

    California’s government, you see, has two main funds in which money is kept. The first fund, which is bankrupt, covers all government activities and expenditures. But the second fund — the hidden “slush” fund with $577 billion in assets — holds all the money the government generates by conducting “nongovernmental” businesses and activities that aren’t officially part of the government. This money is hidden from California’s taxpayers who are repeatedly lied to and told they have to pay more in taxes to prevent the state from going broke.

    Click here to see a complete listing of all the nongovernmental funds that Californians aren’t being told about.

    This list includes organizations and assets such as:

    • Independent System Operator: $876 million
    • The Economic Recovery Bond Sinking Fund: $484 million
    • Receipting and Disbursing Fund: $16.6 billion
    • State Water Pollution Control Revolving Fund: $3.1 billion
    • Financing for Local Governments and the Public Fund: $5.2 billion

    California’s criminal government hides hundreds of billions of dollars in these funds, then uses that money to hand out juicy contracts to their crony friends and political supporters while financially soaking all the businesses and taxpayers in the state who are trying to make ends meet.


  16. WILL
    December 8th, 2012 @ 3:17 pm

    this is getting sickening.. it time for people to stand up… a few hundred going there and dragging those idiots out and FIRING THEM .. daring them to return to our courts..


  17. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    December 8th, 2012 @ 3:28 pm

    I am sure you mean firing from the job. I do not want you to get in trouble with somebody accusing you of advocating violence

  18. Hunk
    December 8th, 2012 @ 4:11 pm

    Falcon….FOAD, MoFo! God bless you, Dr. Taitz!

  19. HARRY
    December 8th, 2012 @ 8:04 pm


  20. SCOTT
    December 8th, 2012 @ 8:18 pm

    Above the Law? Impeachment for HIGH CRIMES AND MISDEMEANORS. As demanded by all Americans yesterday.

  21. WILL
    December 8th, 2012 @ 8:34 pm

    I am sure you mean firing from the job. I do not want you to get in trouble with somebody accusing you of advocating violence

    IHV YES thats exactly what i meant.. let the citizens who pay them go in and litterally fire them.. pack up their belongings and walk them out the door and tell them to never return …

    at least it would send a message that we are sick of their illegal ways

  22. James Durwood Jophnson
    December 8th, 2012 @ 9:01 pm

    Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq.

    It appears that our Judicial System is corrupted at all levels.

  23. WALLYinWV
    December 8th, 2012 @ 9:42 pm

    When justice is finally served (and it will be), the rope will fit just as snug around these criminals necks as it does around the necks of all the criminals involved in these treasonous acts against this country.

  24. The Company
    December 8th, 2012 @ 10:11 pm

    Falcon: looks like you got a problem? We might say the same thing to you!

  25. AMJ
    December 8th, 2012 @ 10:33 pm

    What is your problem Falcon?

  26. AMJ
    December 9th, 2012 @ 12:05 am

    New treason from Obama. Arming the enemy. Breitbart.com Egypt’s Morsi and the Muslim Brotherhood set to receive a squadron of F-16 fighter jets and 200 battle tanks. No doubt to be used against it’s opposition and later against Isreal. This has got to end.

  27. AMJ
    December 9th, 2012 @ 1:58 am

    The report about Obama sending tanks and jets to Morsi is also at WND

  28. Bill
    December 9th, 2012 @ 6:10 am

    I certainly have no idea how this is happening,but it is crystal clear that many folks
    will do absolutely nothing to help this woman who only seeks the truth.These folks simply acquiesce to treason.

  29. Kerry
    December 9th, 2012 @ 7:48 am

    Theft is a crime. A crime against interstate commerce is a federal offense. Orly, you should file a criminal complaint with the FBI each time this happens. At the very least, it would be on the official record that high crimes of this type are taking place.

  30. ch
    December 9th, 2012 @ 9:49 am

    Perhaps you can hire a local security company in DC to deliver packages to the Supreme Court Judges in person, with a signature showing receipt. Bypassing the clerks, who need to be summoned by subpoena into court. And file a complaint with their boss and the Human Resource department. There may be an office that is to monitor employees, where people could call and file complaints about specific employees who sabotage you. A deluge of complaints and phone calls may put the clerks on alert that their jobs are precarious.

  31. The Company
    December 9th, 2012 @ 5:39 pm

    And…what I’d like to know from someone on the “inside” is why don’t the SC Judges stop the clerks from screwing around with the cases that come in?
    I can’t believe that all of the judges are corrupt? Certainly, some of them would get tired of hearing how the (non)-justices are messing with the “future” of America?! If I were a judge, they’d DO IT or else!!!

  32. EqualjusticeI
    December 10th, 2012 @ 5:33 am

    If all judges, courts are corrupted what is next?

  33. WALLYinWV
    December 10th, 2012 @ 2:44 pm

    Isn’t it funny how these people that do not support Dr. Taitz’s effort, like to lurk around this sight to see what she is up to??? If they aren’t in agreement with her, why do they sneak around & peek to see what is going on here???

  34. Henry Tisdale
    December 10th, 2012 @ 6:42 pm

    Orly, you have no choice now, but to contact the CA representative in your district, either R or D, and demand that the evidence you have shown is sufficient to impeach the Chief Justice. His main infraction of his charter is his chat with obama in 1980, just after he was elected. Then of course, you have your own pile of complaints against the clerks. I would recommend strongly that you go for the impeachment.

  35. Joe Batters
    December 11th, 2012 @ 8:17 am

    FedEx, look for the union label


  36. Rod Riddle
    December 11th, 2012 @ 8:37 am

    Wally, it’s not that they disagree with Dr Taitz, in fact the majority of them have the intelligence level to know she’s right. It’s that they don’t want it to be true so they just want her to give up hence the constant attacks.

  37. Rod Riddle
    December 11th, 2012 @ 8:24 pm

    Kerry, the FBI is part of the cover up. Robert Mueller, Director of the FBI, received a brief on the entire scam known as Obama Forgery Gate. The FBI will not help us as they are aiding & abetting the Conspiracy just like tried to do during WaterGate.

  38. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    December 12th, 2012 @ 12:43 am

    do you have evidence that they tried to cover up Watergate

  39. Rod Riddle
    December 12th, 2012 @ 6:57 am

    Yes I do. Acting Director of the FBi at the time L. Patrick Gray later admitted that under pressure from the Nixon administration, he himself took part in covering up WaterGate. It was speculated that Mark Felt (later revealing himself to be the secret FBI informant known as “Deep Throat” ) leaked information to Woodward & Bernstein at The Washington Post who published their conversations with him to the American people via the Post. Those who were close to Felt later said he leaked the info due to animosity over being passed over as Director of the FBI. It should also be noted that Felt, Woodward & Bernstein were all staunch Democrats. Woodward has received my full briefing on Obama Forgery Gate and yet not a whisper from him. He still works at The Washington Post as an Editor.

  40. Henry Tisdale
    December 12th, 2012 @ 12:38 pm

    Does anyone friendly to you have a photo? I am a firm believer in that ol’ Chinese Proverb – “One picture is worth 10,000 words.” Most judges with whom I am familiar prefer the photos. If one cannot be found, if you know for whom he works, go the web site and you will likely find one.

  41. A Proud Patriot
    December 13th, 2012 @ 8:55 pm

    Orly: back during the Watergate Hearings, it was brought out by one of the witnesses, that he overheard a phone conversation that said… and I’m paraphraising here: “…We’re out to get the President…!”
    That means that Watergate was a “setup” to take Nixon down cause he balked at the idea of helping the NWO types, when they wanted him to do more to advance their cause! Nixon was only trying to protect his people!

  42. Axiomaticclerk286.Jigsy.Com
    June 26th, 2014 @ 11:05 pm

    I have learned, and decended into a more restful sleep.

    79 responded, 64 of whom can throw any light on psoriatic patients after applying different herbal la mortgage applications.
    The second question was Would you like as long as their first
    meeting, Rettmann had told her it would be real, scientific, basis.
    This is a profit reason behind the claim.

Leave a Reply